Search found 34 matches

http://gordonssite.com/id4.html

I've just added this new page to my site.
Hope you enjoy it.

Gordon Ross.

There are still several other pieces of evidence which I yet to see successfully explained:

3) Inflated aircraft tyre under scaffolding with no apparent crater damage

An inflated tyre c ...

I'm having difficulty getting onto the NIST site so have not been able to download the article to read again. The Scholars will be releasing a detailed response to the NIST factsheet but this conce ...

Over here soggy. Better to stay here rather than fill the rest of the board with your nothingness.
I've submitted it to the world - how much more do you want.

I'm told that when you stick your h ...

Take the challenge soggy.

http://gordonssite.tripod.com/index.html

Are you big enough? Or are you just going to repeat someone else's flannel for the rest of your puff?

Gordon

Low rise buildings are sturdier than high rise, because they don't have the same weight above them.

A fact that is unlikely to have escaped the designers, who would then presumably specify that th ...

You have come in useful after all, soggy. You have supplied a link to my site which gives a detailed analysis of the controlled demolition of the collapse. Exactly what your buddy, aggle, was asking ...

If you stand for election you have the right to have your election address delivered to every household in the constituency, usually by the Post. Might be worth checking this out for by-elections and ...

I don't know of a single qualified structural engineer that finds any of this evidence inconsistent with......

How many structural engineers do you know?
What did they say in particular regardin ...

Does Ockham mention anything about evidence? Like maybe, "of those possibilities which match the evidence, the simpler is the more likely."
Unfortunately your theory does not match the evi ...

Look at the top of the remaining core. Where is the bit that used to be above this?
So now we examine the options. I've identified only one. There was a complete and total horizontal disassociat ...

How did you determine the condition of the remaining core?

That is not in question. The relevant part is the condition of the unremaining section, and it was unremaining. Not there. Gone.
In or ...

Sorry how did the explosives survive again?
Being as how they they were not in the impact area, they were unaffected by impact.

And how did you determine the core was cut horizontally again?
Th ...

Well done Gordon you have done more to demolition your own theory than I ever could.

Being as how your ability to demolish my theory is non existent, that would not be difficult.
You should also ...

It was “A core failure did not start the collapse”
Over the last couple of days you have led this tortuous attempt to get me to change this statement for you. It has not, it still stands.

No ...

So getting back to the point of this thread. You now acknowledge that only part of the core remained, and must therefore accept that there was indeed a core failure involving total and complete disas ...

It's not going to come as a complete surprise to the people on here to learn that the actions of the authorities sometimes betrays their impartiality.
Take the Poll Tax. Thatcher needed to break t ...

No Gordon this is not true. How can you possibly say we saw the core move? The external perimeter simply sagged under the extra weight.
Because we saw the antennae move before the perimeter. If th ...

Not according to NIST, the movement was the external supports sagging under the massive weight above.
If the external supports - the perimeter structure - failed before the core then we would see mo ...

you are starting to contradict yourself.
You said
Quote:
You are correct, however, when you say that the core failure did not initiate the collapse.
After you said.
Quote:
There is no way ...

NIST’s theory may not be perfect but it far more credible that cutting the cores at the precise point and in the precise direction the plane hit.

You are not really paying attention are you?
I h ...

If Nist say the core did not fail then how do they account for it not being in its original position after collapse initiation. Aman Zafar's photograph shows quite clearly that the upper section of t ...

I think what you are saying is that I have explained these phenomenon of the collapse but have not explained how the charges were placed? Correct me if I am wrong.

I must be clear on one very sign ...

Surely any controlled demolition of the internal core would have brought the 30 odd floors above straight down, not tilted it.

If the core columns were cut, this would allow some downward moveme ...

On this site you will find his photograph, WTC18.
This removes any doubt that there was a core failure involving complete horizontal disassociation of all of the core structure, and furthermore sho ...

Now could you please answer the questions I asked as to why this core did not fail if it was prerigged with explosives?

This is where you make your error. There was a core failure and this is evi ...

You are being a little simplistic in your ideas of how the collapse could be caused. Note that I said a portion of the core.
There is no doubt that there was a failure in the core since this alone w ...

Aman Zafars photographs don't show the core, this video does.

Sorry to rain on your parade, but his photograph's WTC17 - 19, show quite clearly that the core was upright after the collapse front ha ...

How about you explaining why one of the cores was still standing as the building collapsed.

I think you will find that a portion of both core structures remained upright after the collapse front ha ...

1/2 X mass X velocity^2 = a huge amount of energy

Sounds simple.
But,
1/2 X mass1 X velocity1^2 = a huge amount1 of available energy

1/2 X mass2 X velocity2^2 = a huge amount2 of unexpended ...

Author	Message
Topic: Sorry Dr. Greening et al
gordon Replies: 5 Views: 1485	Forum: Stratehy Of Tension, Fake Terror, 9/11 & 7/7 Truth News Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 10:01 pm Subject: Sorry Dr. Greening et al
gordon Replies: 5 Views: 1485	http://gordonssite.com/id4.html I've just added this new page to my site. Hope you enjoy it. Gordon Ross.
Topic: Video Overlay Lies. NPT Research exposed.
gordon Replies: 50 Views: 21051	Forum: 9/11 & 7/7 Truth Controversies Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:38 am Subject: Video Overlay Lies. NPT Research exposed.
gordon Replies: 50 Views: 21051	There are still several other pieces of evidence which I yet to see successfully explained: 3) Inflated aircraft tyre under scaffolding with no apparent crater damage An inflated tyre c ...
Topic: NIST release rebuttal of CD theories
gordon Replies: 23 Views: 5940	Forum: Stratehy Of Tension, Fake Terror, 9/11 & 7/7 Truth News Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 2:57 am Subject: NIST release rebuttal of CD theories
gordon Replies: 23 Views: 5940	I'm having difficulty getting onto the NIST site so have not been able to download the article to read again. The Scholars will be releasing a detailed response to the NIST factsheet but this conce ...
Topic: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 3:50 am Subject: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Over here soggy. Better to stay here rather than fill the rest of the board with your nothingness. I've submitted it to the world - how much more do you want. I'm told that when you stick your h ...
Topic: Were explosives used to bring down the towers?
gordon Replies: 8 Views: 3793	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 3:13 am Subject: Were explosives used to bring down the towers?
gordon Replies: 8 Views: 3793	Take the challenge soggy. http://gordonssite.tripod.com/index.html Are you big enough? Or are you just going to repeat someone else's flannel for the rest of your puff? Gordon
Topic: New WTC Complex Photos Highlight Bizarre Building 7 Collapse
gordon Replies: 25 Views: 8083	Forum: Stratehy Of Tension, Fake Terror, 9/11 & 7/7 Truth News Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 1:18 am Subject: New WTC Complex Photos Highlight Bizarre Building 7 Collapse
gordon Replies: 25 Views: 8083	Low rise buildings are sturdier than high rise, because they don't have the same weight above them. A fact that is unlikely to have escaped the designers, who would then presumably specify that th ...
Topic: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 11:51 pm Subject: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	You have come in useful after all, soggy. You have supplied a link to my site which gives a detailed analysis of the controlled demolition of the collapse. Exactly what your buddy, aggle, was asking ...
Topic: IT'S TIME FOR COLLECTIVE ACTION - AND THAT TIME IS NOW
gordon Replies: 77 Views: 28191	Forum: Campaigning Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 2:38 pm Subject: IT'S TIME FOR COLLECTIVE ACTION - AND THAT TIME IS NOW
gordon Replies: 77 Views: 28191	If you stand for election you have the right to have your election address delivered to every household in the constituency, usually by the Post. Might be worth checking this out for by-elections and ...
Topic: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 2:28 pm Subject: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	I don't know of a single qualified structural engineer that finds any of this evidence inconsistent with...... How many structural engineers do you know? What did they say in particular regardin ...
Topic: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:45 pm Subject: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Does Ockham mention anything about evidence? Like maybe, "of those possibilities which match the evidence, the simpler is the more likely." Unfortunately your theory does not match the evi ...
Topic: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:02 pm Subject: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Look at the top of the remaining core. Where is the bit that used to be above this? So now we examine the options. I've identified only one. There was a complete and total horizontal disassociat ...
Topic: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 11:25 am Subject: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	How did you determine the condition of the remaining core? That is not in question. The relevant part is the condition of the unremaining section, and it was unremaining. Not there. Gone. In or ...
Topic: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 10:43 am Subject: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Sorry how did the explosives survive again? Being as how they they were not in the impact area, they were unaffected by impact. And how did you determine the core was cut horizontally again? Th ...
Topic: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 10:15 am Subject: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Well done Gordon you have done more to demolition your own theory than I ever could. Being as how your ability to demolish my theory is non existent, that would not be difficult. You should also ...
Topic: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:11 am Subject: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	It was “A core failure did not start the collapse” Over the last couple of days you have led this tortuous attempt to get me to change this statement for you. It has not, it still stands. No ...
Topic: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:31 am Subject: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	So getting back to the point of this thread. You now acknowledge that only part of the core remained, and must therefore accept that there was indeed a core failure involving total and complete disas ...
Topic: IT'S TIME FOR COLLECTIVE ACTION - AND THAT TIME IS NOW
gordon Replies: 77 Views: 28191	Forum: Campaigning Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:16 am Subject: IT'S TIME FOR COLLECTIVE ACTION - AND THAT TIME IS NOW
gordon Replies: 77 Views: 28191	It's not going to come as a complete surprise to the people on here to learn that the actions of the authorities sometimes betrays their impartiality. Take the Poll Tax. Thatcher needed to break t ...
Topic: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 11:37 pm Subject: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	No Gordon this is not true. How can you possibly say we saw the core move? The external perimeter simply sagged under the extra weight. Because we saw the antennae move before the perimeter. If th ...
Topic: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 9:34 pm Subject: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Not according to NIST, the movement was the external supports sagging under the massive weight above. If the external supports - the perimeter structure - failed before the core then we would see mo ...
Topic: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 4:32 pm Subject: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	you are starting to contradict yourself. You said Quote: You are correct, however, when you say that the core failure did not initiate the collapse. After you said. Quote: There is no way ...
Topic: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 3:38 pm Subject: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	NIST’s theory may not be perfect but it far more credible that cutting the cores at the precise point and in the precise direction the plane hit. You are not really paying attention are you? I h ...
Topic: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 2:47 pm Subject: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	If Nist say the core did not fail then how do they account for it not being in its original position after collapse initiation. Aman Zafar's photograph shows quite clearly that the upper section of t ...
Topic: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 2:19 pm Subject: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	I think what you are saying is that I have explained these phenomenon of the collapse but have not explained how the charges were placed? Correct me if I am wrong. I must be clear on one very sign ...
Topic: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:35 pm Subject: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Surely any controlled demolition of the internal core would have brought the 30 odd floors above straight down, not tilted it. If the core columns were cut, this would allow some downward moveme ...
Topic: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 11:17 am Subject: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	On this site you will find his photograph, WTC18. This removes any doubt that there was a core failure involving complete horizontal disassociation of all of the core structure, and furthermore sho ...
Topic: Lets speculate on the towers not having explosives II
gordon Replies: 21 Views: 8596	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 11:09 am Subject: Lets speculate on the towers not having explosives II
gordon Replies: 21 Views: 8596	Now could you please answer the questions I asked as to why this core did not fail if it was prerigged with explosives? This is where you make your error. There was a core failure and this is evi ...
Topic: Lets speculate on the towers not having explosives II
gordon Replies: 21 Views: 8596	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 1:10 am Subject: Lets speculate on the towers not having explosives II
gordon Replies: 21 Views: 8596	You are being a little simplistic in your ideas of how the collapse could be caused. Note that I said a portion of the core. There is no doubt that there was a failure in the core since this alone w ...
Topic: New Video proves FEMA and NIST are correct.
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:58 am Subject: What's new?
gordon Replies: 79 Views: 38001	Aman Zafars photographs don't show the core, this video does. Sorry to rain on your parade, but his photograph's WTC17 - 19, show quite clearly that the core was upright after the collapse front ha ...
Topic: Lets speculate on the towers not having explosives II
gordon Replies: 21 Views: 8596	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:28 pm Subject: Lets speculate on the towers not having explosives II
gordon Replies: 21 Views: 8596	How about you explaining why one of the cores was still standing as the building collapsed. I think you will find that a portion of both core structures remained upright after the collapse front ha ...
Topic: Lets speculate on the towers not having explosives
gordon Replies: 35 Views: 15245	Forum: Critics' Corner Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:21 pm Subject: Lets speculate on the towers not having explosives
gordon Replies: 35 Views: 15245	1/2 X mass X velocity^2 = a huge amount of energy Sounds simple. But, 1/2 X mass1 X velocity1^2 = a huge amount1 of available energy 1/2 X mass2 X velocity2^2 = a huge amount2 of unexpended ...