Pentagon attack - web pages blocked

[truthmonger]

Tried to access the "Missing Pentagon Attack Jet FLT AA 77 Found At Last" page on the Joe Vialls site.
The page pops up for a second and then disappears, leaving the message "Server not found. Error 404".
I tried this several times, always with the same result.

Then checked a number of other pages listed on his site:
"Let's Roll! on United Flight 93 - The Saddest Lie"
"Cleveland Tape Proves FL 93 'hijack' calls faked"

Exactly the same happens with these. Haven't checked all the (very many) pages listed, but some others I checked are still working.

Anyone know who is blocking the pages and how they can do it?

[Mark Gobell]

The page you mentioned on Vialls site has this URL

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/steveseymour/pentagon/pentagon2.htm

The root of which:

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/steveseymour/

appears not to exist any longer


Seems a bit weird that the page begins to load and then can't complete.

Anyway, the pages you require are available at the web archive so grab em while you can.

For example:

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://homepage.ntlworld.com/steveseymour  /pentagon/pentagon.htm

and

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://homepage.ntlworld.com/steveseymour  /pentagon/pentagon2.htm

were the only two HTM pages that were originally referenced by

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/steveseymour/pentagon

[fish5133]

I found if you hit your stop icon as the page loads it stays there

Full text below

Also have flight 93 text


"Missing" Pentagon Attack Jet Found At Last!
Flight 77 shown in death dive as Ehud Barak demands attack on Iraq

Joe Vialls, 30 September 2002





Note the light color of the lower fuselage on American Flight 77 in frames 1 & 2 as it dives very quickly towards the Pentagon. This is a totally different color from the dark grey belly of United 175 [shown in picture at bottom of page] as it flies into the South Tower of the World Trade Center.

For many months now, certain Frenchmen have been growing very rich by publishing books based on a giant conspiracy which claims that the Pentagon was not hit by American Airlines Flight 77 on September 11th 2001. Instead, the French allege the building was hit either by a much smaller aircraft, or perhaps by a bomb planted inside the Pentagon by its own ”evil” occupants, the United States Military. As I wrote at that time:
"Though I am not surprised by such extraordinary suggestions from a bunch of wine swilling Parisians at the time, I am certainly surprised by the immediate and rampant American response. Within days, hundreds of US bulletin boards and web sites were awash with similar claims. It was an incredibly successful “divide and rule” exercise that pitted American against American, and civilian against soldier. Needless to say, the French were delighted.
"The apparent problem was quite simple. American Airlines Flight 77 was a Boeing 757 twin-jet with a wingspan of 124 feet, but the hole in the Pentagon was less than 124 feet across. Conspiracy heaven! Obviously then, according to those determined to undermine American national security, the attack aircraft was a remotely-controlled F-16 fighter or Martell missile, 'almost certainly' guided to its American military target by a crazed four-star American general buried deep inside Cheyenne Mountain at NORAD headquarters."
The main problem was that the US Administration had confiscated the CCTV cameras from a local Washington hotel and service station, leaving only eyewitnesses to report on actual events as they unfolded, and we all know how eyewitness testimony alone can be gradually undermined and destroyed, if such destruction serves a particular geopolitical agenda. But were the CCTV cameras the only source of pictures?
Logic dictated that there would be other pictures of the attack aircraft somewhere else, because the Pentagon was attacked a considerable time after the first strike on the World Trade Center, resulting in just about every media network camera in America nervously scanning the skies for other likely "missiles" by the time American Flight 77 arrived overhead Washington, DC.
This was indeed the case, but actually finding the photographs proved to be a giant task. As all readers are aware, live television footage on the day was shown in a completely random fashion by a number of different networks, most of whom intermittently used footage drawn from third-party sources. None of this footage carried a date or time clock on the screen, with most being cobbled together on the run. By late on September 12th I had about eight hours of mixed "live" VHS tape from three different Australian networks, which I threw into a cupboard for safe keeping on the off-chance it might be needed later.
Last week I reluctantly dragged the tapes out of the cupboard for review, because over the last year a number of puzzling events have surfaced, and I was looking for clues. I was particularly interested in the sudden "implosion" of Building 7, World Trade Center, late on September 11th, which will hopefully be covered in a later report. But then my eye was suddenly attracted by a few "frames-within-frames" of American Airlines Flight 77 diving towards the Pentagon, and I grabbed two of them for this report.
As you can see from the pictures at the top of this page, they were shown as inset frames by BBC World News, while former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak was being interviewed about the attacks. Because there are no timing clocks on-screen I cannot give you an exact time of transmission, though the voice-over indicates that Barak was interviewed "three hours" after the first strike on the WTC. This indicates that the BBC footage was broadcast at roughly 11 a.m. American Eastern Time, with the inset frames simultaneously giving viewers a dramatic record of events as they have recently unfolded.
This approximate timing is confirmed by the legends under each BBC inset screen, which read respectively, "BREAKING NEWS - Four hijacked planes crash. Two in New York, one into the Pentagon and one in Pennsylvania". And, "Reports say another hijacked plane is heading towards Washington." The poor quality of the frames is due to my rickety old VCR which lacks a sophisticated "freeze" facility, coupled to my antique computer video board, which can only grab frames measuring about two by one and one-half inches.
Before anyone bothers to ask, these frames of Flight 77 are not repeated anywhere else in my eight hours of footage, so it seems likely that regardless of which source provided its inset frames, the BBC either did not realize what it had in its possession, or though it unimportant, or the video clip simply got lost in the flurry of frantic activity that day. Any suggestions that this footage might be United Flight 175 flying into the World Trade Center can be confidently discounted.
Quite apart from the belly of the aircraft lacking the grey color of United 175 shown at the foot of this page, the BBC footage was shot in Washington, and the dramatic footage of Flight 175 flying into the WTC did not become available until the morning of September 12, one day after this BBC footage went to air. In addition and by a process of elimination, we have no approach footage of Flight 11 or Flight 93, so what remains is Flight 77.
Sacre bleu! Could the aircraft be an F-16 fighter, perhaps? Non monsieur. Well, what about a remotely piloted Air Launched Cruise Missile? Non monsieur. Well, er, there was a white executive jet with two engines in the tail reported over the White House by CNN, and you know how fantastically reliable they are? Non monsieur, this plane has no jets in the tail. Well then, it must be a helicopter taking American special forces to the Pentagon to blow up their own colleagues? Non monsieur, it 'as ['ow you say?] no rotor blades.
This trip down memory lane became more useful than I anticipated, because in order to grab the right frames with my amateur gear I had to play this section of the tape forwards and rewind it several times. While doing so I gradually became aware of the extraordinary things Barak was actually saying live, only three hours after the first strike on the WTC. Put bluntly Barak was outlining a game plan for the American President. A game plan that George Dubya has demonstrably adhered to ever since. Barak included the following “observations”:
“If it is a kind of Bin Laden organization, and even if it’s something else, I believe this is the time to deploy globally a concerted effort led by the United States, UK, Europe and Russia against all sources of terror, the same kind of struggle that our forefathers launched against piracy on the high seas…”
“What is also needed is [going] after rogue states should also be deployed, not only on a national level or tri regional level as cover exactly to counter threats from rogue states like Iran, Iraq and Libya” … “we have no way but to stand firm facing terror, otherwise all our way of life will be threatened. To stand firm means to isolate from the world every nation that is hosting them [terrorists] and calling every terror cell with accurate names. And be ready with all the pain that comes with it, to act upon our observations…”
“There are no more than five or six countries in the world which are directly or indirectly hosting terror. There are now no more than ten or fifteen terrorist sites in the world. All the organizations are well known…”It’s time to launch an operational concrete war against terror”.
You all know what happened after that. George Dubya obeyed his Jewish orders exactly, standing in the White House Rose Garden trotting out terms like “Crusade” and “Axis of Evil”, before starting the “War on Terror” ball rolling down the hill by bombing Afghan weddings, though not the incredibly lucrative Afghan/CIA Opium poppy fields. Barak also suggested “pre-emptive” strikes during his interview with the BBC, which brings us nicely up to date with Dubya’s “War on Saddam”, intended solely to transfer Iraqi oil reserves to Wall Street ownership.



Pentagon Story Flight 77 Flight 93 War On Terror Vialls Home

Vialls Investigations

Is a public-interest organization
operating entirely without funds.
Please help me to maintain this
free service by making a small
donation to the cause of truth.