| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
SHERITON HOTEL
Moderate Poster
Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 988
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 2:54 pm Post subject: A generation with discoloured teeth |
 |
|
| Many late 1950's and early '60's born UK people have discoloured teeth because of an anti-biotic prescribed to their expectant mothers I'm reliably informed. This is anecdotal, but I personally note that this must have impacted genetically as it seems to have passed to subsequent generations. Should these damaged people be compensated like those who suffered terrible disfigurment from Thalidomide? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
uselesseater
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Posts: 629
Location: Leeds
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have discoloured teeth from steroids when I was much younger. I think my liver is a bit knacked from it too - need to get around to doing a liver flush as soon as i have a weekend free.
_________________
www.wytruth.org.uk
www.myspace.com/truthleeds |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Newspeak International
Validated Poster
Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 1158
Location: South Essex
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm in that age bracket and have had problems.
I remember at senior school around 70-72 there was an experiment which involved some pink tablet one had to dissolve in the mouth,then an x-ray was taken!
I don't know any more than that,but recently I did remember it what with all the genetics talk on the news etc.
Makes you wonder eh!
_________________
http://www.myspace.com/glassasylum2
Dave Sherlock's:
http://www.myspace.com/GlassAsylum
http://www.myspace.com/chemtrailsuk |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rodin
Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Dec 2006
Posts: 2224
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fluoride causes fluorosis of teeth and bones.
| Quote: | | Fluoridation: A Horror Story |
http://www.ahealedplanet.net/fluoride.htm
| Quote: | International reports of fluoride damage mushroomed in 1933 when the world's first major air pollution disaster struck Belgium's Meuse Valley: several thousand people became violently ill and 60 died. The cause was disputed, but investigations by prominent scientists, including Kaj Roholm, the world's leading authority on fluoride hazards, placed the blame on fluoride. (21)
Here and abroad, health scientists were beginning to regard fluoride as a poison, pure and simple. The trend toward its removal from the environment was potentially disastrous from industry's point of view. "Only recently, that is, within the last ten years, has the serious nature of fluoride toxicity been realized," wrote Lloyd DeEds, senior toxicologist with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) in 1933. "It is a well-established fact that chronic intoxication [poisoning] may manifest itself in man as recognized abnormalities only after constant, or at least frequent, exposure over many years.... |
| Quote: | in 1946, despite the fact that the official 15-year experiment in Michigan had barely begun, six more U.S. cities were allowed to fluoridate their water. The fluoridation bandwagon had begun to roll.
At this juncture, Oscar R. Ewing, a long-time ALCOA lawyer who had recently been named the company's chief counsel with fees in the then-astronomical range of $750,000 a year (35) -- arrived in Washington. Ewing was presumably well aware of ALCOA's fluoride litigation problem. He had handled the company's negotiations with the government for the building of its wartime plants. (36)
In 1947, Ewing was appointed head of the Federal Security Agency (later HEW), a position that placed him in charge of the Public Health Service (PHS). Under him, a national water fluoridation campaign rapidly materialized, .... |
http://www.healthy-communications.com/fluorideproject_for_poisoning_wa te.html
Money Master & Monopoly
| Quote: | | Noted economist and former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan criticized the judgment of monopoly against Alcoa (Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal; see[5]) quotes Learned Hand, the judge in U.S. v Alcoa, who remarked, "It was not inevitable that it should always anticipate increases in the demand for ingot and be prepared to supply them. Nothing compelled it to keep doubling and redoubling its capacity before others entered the field. It insists that it never excluded competitors; but we can think of no more effective exclusion than progressively to embrace each new opportunity as it opened, and to face every newcomer with new capacity already geared into a great organization, having the advantage of experience, trade connections and the elite of personnel." Greenspan believes that the characterization of Alcoa as a threat to competition is erroneous, as "ALCOA is being condemned for being too successful, too efficient, and too good a competitor. Whatever damage the antitrust laws may have done to our economy, whatever distortions of the structure of the nation's capital they may have created, these are less disastrous than the fact that the effective purpose, the hidden intent, and the actual practice of the antitrust laws in the United States have led to the condemnation of the productive and efficient members of our society because they are productive and efficient." Greenspan grants that Alcoa was a monopoly, but maintains that it was not a coercive monopoly and, hence, should not have been subject to anti-trust action. |
| Quote: | | Based on year 2000 data,[6] the University of Massachusetts' Political Economy Research Institute determined that Alcoa was is one of the top ten most toxic companies in the country, producing 9,884,267 pounds of toxic chemicals in that year. [7] |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcoa
| Quote: | ... do you realize that flouridation is the most monsterously conceived communist plot to sap and impurify our precious bodily fluids?
never thought that that could be real, but you learn something new an a rate of x+1/t, where t is time and x is a comfortable rate. |
http://forums.randi.org/archive/index.php/t-1732.html
_________________
Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
catfish
Validated Poster
Joined: 24 Apr 2006
Posts: 430
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Get yourself one of these. No more toothpaste and my teeth are gleeming!
Japanese have had them since 1980s
http://www.soladey.com/
Peace and clean teeth
David
_________________
Govern : To control
Ment : The mind |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pebe
Minor Poster
Joined: 23 Oct 2007
Posts: 18
Location: NW LONDON
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fluoride is highly toxic and should never be used in toothpaste, water; in fact anywhere near any God's living creature.
I use baking soda on my toothbrush instead of toothpaste. It works a treat!
Toothpaste, even the fluoride/sodium laureth sulfate poison (also used as industrial degreasant and garage floor cleaner)-free variety, prevents remineralisation of your teeth because of its glycerine content that sticks to your teeth and forms a barrier. Soda is also highly alkalizing and gently whitens your teeth.
Try it out and see for yourself. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SHERITON HOTEL
Moderate Poster
Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 988
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm not talking about tooth staining from poor oral hygiene or fluoride or bionic tooth brushes even, this anti-biotic taken by pregnant women permenantly discoloured the teeth of a generation and, of course, side effects rarely come in ones. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Reflecter
Validated Poster
Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 486
Location: Manchester
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Are you meaning this antibiotic; Tetracycline?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetracycline
It does indeed stain developing teeth and thus now is avoided during pregnancy, so that's reliable info. It also uptakes into bone but is regarded as very safe (as was fluoride though, see Dr P Mullenix).
I highly doubt any lawsuits would get anywhere and if they could it will have already occurred. (seems some companies have paid out compensation afterall)
Tetragenex
Compensation expenses: over various recent years = 183,094 256,636 419,338 450,743 (this probably isn't purely for tetracycline though)
See here: http://www.secinfo.com/dScj2.u6Hq.htm
The only hint of conspiracy otherwise that I can find thus far is PATENT issues and price fixing with Pfizer and others,
see this Time Magazine article from 1958
Dissent on Wonder Drugs
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,825466,00.html
Whilst here Ralph Nader gets a mention for a paper to the Federal Trade Commission over price fixing
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0026-2234(196911)68%3A1%3C151%3ATCATF T%3E2.0.CO%3B2-M
The X-ray business mentioned is somewhat baffling but I'm no expert despite some radiographic experience.
I can find a few papers on X ray Powder Diffraction tests of antibiotics but that was lab based and not on patients. http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/analsci/21/7/833/_pdf
The pink tablet sounds more like a disclosing agent and the X ray perhaps just routine. I'd be interested if you find anything it about though.
An Evil Squirrel Conspiracy of patients taking animal grade Tetracycline floats this bloggers boat aswell http://www.theindychannel.com/entertainment/1702824/detail.html
but that's probably just nutty ramblings resulting from chasing up the wrong trees 
_________________
The Peoples United Collective TPUC.ORG
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
utopiated
Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Jun 2006
Posts: 645
Location: UK Midlands
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
catfish
Validated Poster
Joined: 24 Apr 2006
Posts: 430
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
utopiated
Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Jun 2006
Posts: 645
Location: UK Midlands
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Newspeak International
Validated Poster
Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 1158
Location: South Essex
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
