Comments On Lyndon Larouche Please

[PaulStott]

I wondered what 9/11 truth activists thought of the long term US political activist Larouche?

This is his website:

http://www.larouchepub.com/

Webster Griffin Tarpley is a former Larouchite, and Larouche published WGT's book on George Bush senior, on sale at WGT's London talk. It was clear to me at that talk that WGT still held to some of Larouche's theories:

http://paulstott.typepad.com/911cultwatch/2007/12/you-can-take-th.html

The most recent controversy over Larouche was the death of a young Briton in Germany, who had been involved in one of his front groups. This case is covered here:

http://justiceforjeremiah.com/

Anyway - comments please!

[TonyGosling]

He appears to have become largely an egotist Paul ever since he was put in prison for publishing research some people didn't want to hear.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyndon_LaRouche#Criminal_conviction_and_i mprisonment_.281988.E2.80.931994.29


Call him a fraudster if you want but it seems to me he was targeted for his beliefs and publication power rather than anything else. The US is run on fraud atb the highest levels.

[jahschild]

If what Eric Phelps says about air bourne Nuclear War being impossible, and a hoax, then you might be right.

Notice Webster Tarpley wears Black, for the London Talk. 'The men in Black' - see phelp's talks.

But it doesn't look good for Webster if Phelp's is correct.

Can anyone else verify phelps, or disprove him?

[conspiracy analyst]

Was a product of the Old Left and merged with the New Left in the 1960's.

Larouche was at one time associated with Gerry Healys followers in the USA I have been told. Hence he has allegedly been given a 'trotskyist' label at some stage in his political evolution.
http://wdennisking.org/fascism2.htm


As far as I can work out he is from a family which has elite connections but is educated. Some of his stuff is worth reading and I have been told many US politicians listen to what he has to say. To what extent it actually means anything is anyones guess.

The following part if true shows that EIR has big backers and this fact alone implies he became coopted in the mid-1970's like most of the 'far left' into the state machine...

http://wdennisking.org/fascism31.htm

[conspiracy analyst]

Theres an extract from this book from a one time collaborator Wohlforth regarding what Larouche stood for.

If you cant get the link go to google books search for On the Edge Political Cults Right and Left.

http://books.google.com/books?id=xXcsNRUuHEUC&pg=PA72&dq=lyndon+larouc he+third+stage+of+imperialism&ei=Sv9mR5OpLofCtAPYrZ2pAw&sig=XfNnhh3uoP Elo--UwhEpSYDpVAg#PPA73,M1

A lot of what is written now regarding Rockefeller, the CIA, the Jewish connection etc appear to have appeared in the early 1970's in the USA.

Does Larouche currently view 9/11 as inside job?

[paul wright]

It's absolute nonsense that this young Jewish activist was murdered by the LaRouche associated Schiller group. Schiller as I remember reading him at school, had some pretty good ideas
While strange, this antisemite jew-killing plot seems to have been dreamed up by the Observer newspaper and, to my mind is odd, to say the least
Larouche of course knows that 9/11 was an inside job. That doesn't mean I support him. His tactic of beating up commies in the distant past doesn't have much impact on his present views
Tarpley worked for him and then left
Webster's views on 9/11 are pretty cohesive backed over the past few centuries.
This is how it works
He's got it right for the most part, imo

[PaulStott]

[conspiracy analyst]