| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
arthur two sheds jackson
Minor Poster
Joined: 16 Dec 2007
Posts: 30
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 12:30 am Post subject: |
 |
|
The non-committal, disconnected semi-theorising I was expecting, but there was only one actual new item (the freon recovery) after which I'm seriously doubting that woman's claim to be a 'scientist'.
Does "Dr." Wood seriously equate non-toxic with 'safe'?
Sure, why not allow 200,000lbs of freon loose and see how much oxygen it displaces in the subways. Or how much ozone damage it does as the chlorine leaches out into the upper atmosphere.
I've viewed her up until now as half-baked, but it seems I may have been over-estimating her.
_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
paul wright
Moderator
Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 2650
Location: Sunny Bradford, Northern Lights
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| chek wrote: | The non-committal, disconnected semi-theorising I was expecting, but there was only one actual new item (the freon recovery) after which I'm seriously doubting that woman's claim to be a 'scientist'.
Does "Dr." Wood seriously equate non-toxic with 'safe'?
Sure, why not allow 200,000lbs of freon loose and see how much oxygen it displaces in the subways. Or how much ozone damage it does as the chlorine leaches out into the upper atmosphere.
I've viewed her up until now as half-baked, but it seems I may have been over-estimating her. |
Yours is fake science isn't it?
Fails to recognise the self-regulatory mechanism and the real disruption that's going on
_________________
http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| paul wright wrote: | | chek wrote: | The non-committal, disconnected semi-theorising I was expecting, but there was only one actual new item (the freon recovery) after which I'm seriously doubting that woman's claim to be a 'scientist'.
Does "Dr." Wood seriously equate non-toxic with 'safe'?
Sure, why not allow 200,000lbs of freon loose and see how much oxygen it displaces in the subways. Or how much ozone damage it does as the chlorine leaches out into the upper atmosphere.
I've viewed her up until now as half-baked, but it seems I may have been over-estimating her. |
Yours is fake science isn't it?
Fails to recognise the self-regulatory mechanism and the real disruption that's going on |
Fake how exactly?
Is heavier than air freon - the 'silent killer' not a possible danger near subway systems?
Is almost a hundred tons of any chemical material to be considered insignificant?
Does Ms Wood have anything - anything at all - to pin a theory on?
Oh wait, it's not even a theory so much as idle non-falsifiable speculation isn't it?
From another perpective, maybe I see the unregulated quacks and their unchallenged quackery as the main disruption.
_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
