Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 1:22 pm Post subject: Einstein was a fraud. Media are complicit
Quote:
Einstein's act of stealing almost the entire body of literature by Lorentz and Poincaré to write his document raised the bar for plagiarism. In the information age, this kind of plagiarism could never be perpetrated indefinitely, yet the physics community has still not set the record straight.
Quote:
It cannot be emphasised enough that the Eclipse of 1919 made Einstein, Einstein. It propelled him to international fame overnight, despite the fact that the data were fabricated and there was no support for general relativity whatsoever. This perversion of history has been known about for over 80 years and is still supported by people like Stephen Hawking and David Levy.
(Article Good on history of the science - ends with nonsensical conclusions about stools )
Here's more BS you are meant to swallow
According to Red Shift furthest celestial objects are receding from us multiples speed of light. Like global warming occurring simultaneously throughout the solar system, you would think this would be sufficient warning that Big Bang is BS, as is man-man Global Warming.
But no. We are supposed to believe that space itself is expanding at much faster than lightspeed.
I mean, does no one read the King's New Clothes story these days? _________________ Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com
I read quite a lot of this while in Scotland over New Year (party animal eh?)
Most researchers find out that Zionists backed Hitler to get Jews into Israel, to make a load of money, and to kill millions of Christians. However I wish these interesting and well researched revisionist would agree on
1) Whether there was any Nazi holocaust at all
2) Whether there was some kind of Holocaust Lite for publicity & travel brochure purposes
3) Whether they believe in the 6 mil.
Option 3 just does not stack up with stats. Either Global or Euro for Jewish numbers pre and post WW2
I also see that Mr Bjernkes (sp) is concerned with proving Einstein was a plagarist, which he does conclusively and brilliantly, while ignoring the possibility of a fundamental error in Relativity. I had been thinkng that xtreme Red Shift could be accounted for not by space 'expanding' at multiples lightspeed (current OST) but by a sort of gravitational magnetism created by moving mass. I found an echo of these thoughts in the works of Henry Wallace and his device for measuring inertial gravity. He postulates that this comes from the alignment of fast-moving unpaired neutrons, as magnetism can be created by very fast moving electrons in e.g. a wire. Very interesting stuff I intend to research further.
This 'error' in relativity may be a deliberate corruption of science to hide the existence and applications of a 3rd order inertial gravitational force. If it existed flying saucers might be viable interplanetary transport. You would need to spin mass at high speed to generate a 3rd order field. You would also need to be able to vector it, that's another story. But the spinning part demands a disc. _________________ Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com
Found it by checking out Huygens’ (1690) wave structure of light. Kind of important if that was the reason why Einstein invented the relativity thing. Doubting the Big Bang, seriously. Won't tell you what I now think about evolution either. That got me parents ruffled over the xmas table, he he.
Interested as with everyone else at the moment trying out our luck here in Bristol with free energy, namely the Bedini Motor and the Newman motor. We'll post the results I'm sure on YouTube.
scott.
P.s. Our little venture's called Zero Point Engineering Ltd in case you're interested.
Bedini motor works you've got to be patient conditioning the batteries. At the point now where it's obvious that the wheel doesn't need to spin.
The tubes of force from the magnets are actually moving...
These tubes can oscillate the coil much faster than the rotation of the wheel although user plengo on youtube has some amazing speeds out of his ssg/cole/newman machine.
Also instead of hooking the output to a charge battery connect it to a stainless electrolysiser, concentric tubes like Meyer/Joe cell and look at the free gas....
E=MC2 cannot be true. Energy in H2 is much less than energy in H despite having more mass. Speed of light is not the fastest speed, it changes in different pressures... different tensions.... different voltages.
Speed of light is just the fastest speed we can see. Energy is seen as mass moving, nothing stands still, everything moves very fast, everything IS energy. The absolute quickest way to travel would be to stand still and wait for where your going to arrive!
Found it by checking out Huygens’ (1690) wave structure of light. Kind of important if that was the reason why Einstein invented the relativity thing. Doubting the Big Bang, seriously. Won't tell you what I now think about evolution either. That got me parents ruffled over the xmas table, he he.
Interested as with everyone else at the moment trying out our luck here in Bristol with free energy, namely the Bedini Motor and the Newman motor. We'll post the results I'm sure on YouTube.
scott.
P.s. Our little venture's called Zero Point Engineering Ltd in case you're interested.
Have you read up the kinemassic force field?
I did some joined up science thinking and went looking for something and the KFF was it.
Take electrostatic charges. Inverse square law
Take mass. Inverse square law.
Magnetism (aligned magentic moments - electric dipoles) inverse cube law
Take mass. Align nucleon - a 3rd order gravity field of incredible strength but rapid decay with distance. This happens with spin pairing (which I suspect delocalises in similar manner to pi orbital in aromatic compounds.)
Consider toy gyroscope
Why precession?
Why when you try to move a gyroscope does it react like a current in an magnetic field with orthogonal movement?
Consider inertial component of nucleon = 3rd order gravity = strong force
Consider collapsed matter at the centre of supermassive collapsed centres some call black holes, despite the fact they eject beams from the poles (go figure). The entire mass is like a big nucleus..
All high red shift objects have supermassive collapsed cores
I suggest 3rd order gravity supplies the Red Shift unacccountable by standard gravity
My 3rd order gravity model explains nucleus and Red Shift. But will it fly?
I am sceptical of over-unity. I do suspect an 'aether' capable of transmission. It acts like a solid and yet we cannot touch it, nor does it impede our movement. I do not know it's nature, save that it apparently
allows instantaneous communication (ie no light speed limit) if experiments on paired particles are to be believed.
Another possibility is that gravity waves are somehow coherent. Perhaps 3rd order gravity is polarised? Perhaps it forms a quantum grid? Perhaps 3rd order gravity has lines of flux like magetism? Perhaps the aether is really a gravity field?
And here's a very interesting thought. Perhaps there is a repulsive element to the force which keeps galaxies spaced out (pardon the pun). Perhaps this repulsion element is what the Judao-masonic military industrial complex seeks to control?
Perhaps the Big Bang is a hoax to stymie research into what could cause a relatively even distribution of galaxies?
I would be interested in examples of 'virtual solid' transmission behaviour in nature.
I also suspect 3rd order gravity may be generated under conditions of extremely rapid motion. This would make the 'flying saucer' shape logical for propulsionless flight not limited to atmospheric.
Here is an experiment I have designed but not tried. Perhaps you can do it.
Take Bismuth (spin 1/2)
Drop in an evacuated chamber. Carefully measure freefall speed in a vacuum speed. Is it different from 'normal'
Also is it possible to alter weight by rotating mass? _________________ Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com
We must view the major works of all Jewish scientists of the 20th c, particularly those with Zionist militant tendencies, with suspicion, since they were done in the context of the plan for world domination envisaged by Rothschild and co.
To be credible, some truth must be in their works. Einstein’s ‘truth’ was merely hijacked. Then he grafts on bent space to hide inertial gravity, which may well be the propulsion behind flying saucers if they exist.
Einstein and Freud are easy to spot as elite shills, spewing corrupting nonsense eagerly amplified by the controlled press. Plagarism is rife in Einstein’s work, and Freud was downright dirty. He is legacy is the psychiatrists couch where imaginary illness are used to extort money and confessions in a trawl for likely candidates for political office. That and Sex with Everything.
(Note how among Western nations sex is rife but the existence of the indigenous population under threat from declining birth rates and assimilation.)
You already suspect Charles Darwin was a similar placeman. I am actually still an evolutionist waiting to be convinced otherwise.
But Velikovsy? Surely he was a rebel against the prevailing scientific wisdom? Yes, but unlike Tesla, he was a controlled rebel.
The Protocols clearly state that the elite will supply us with oppositional leadership.
(How do you think Alex Jones was so prescient on 911?)
The idea that planets came close to Earth within a biblical timescale is ludicrous. No more so than the Big Bang, but still so. Pure Zionist nonsense. Earth is 5 billion years old, and all this planetary shuffling takes place in the past 5000 years??? Selling and bridges spring to mind.
As for electrical energy coming into the Sun from space causing its mass to heat. That’s another matter. I will have to look into further. This is a new idea to me and interesting.
IMO the sun's magnetic field like that of the Earth comes from within. We have poles that correspond to the axes, Occams razor and all that. Nebulae are plasma being driven from massive star clusters each with its own field. The resultant shapes are derivative of spatial distribution and motion of stellar objects and 'space dust' - particles.
The Earth has cooled over time. If it got its heat energy from space this would not happen.
My guess is that the interdisciplinary science movement has some good honest innovative contrarian researchers, and some gatekeepers and disinfo syringes in its midst. I think I can see which is which here
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
)
