View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
spiv Validated Poster
Joined: 01 Jul 2006 Posts: 483
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:21 am Post subject: Blair joins JP Morgan Chase |
|
|
Rueters today informs us that war monger (criminal) Tony Blair has joined up with his Bilderberg mates. They state:
"Former prime minister Tony Blair on Thursday joined U.S. bank JPMorgan Chase & Co as a senior advisor, a role in which he is expected to give advice to senior executives on global politics.
JPMorgan, the third largest U.S. bank, said Blair will advise JPMorgan Chase's CEO and senior management team on a part-time basis, and participate in the company's events with key clients.
"I look forward to advising them on how they approach the huge political and economic changes that globalisation brings," Blair said in a statement.
Blair, a key ally of U.S. President George W. Bush, was replaced last year by Gordon Brown as prime minister."
While much of the world burns with their wars, and much is harnessed in abject poverty, these Bildebergers really look after themselves, don't they?!
See http://uk.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idUKN0963534220080110 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zennon Moderate Poster
Joined: 28 Nov 2006 Posts: 161
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:03 pm Post subject: Re: Blair joins JP Morgan Chase |
|
|
spiv wrote: | Rueters today informs us that war monger (criminal) Tony Blair has joined up with his Bilderberg mates. They state:
"Former prime minister Tony Blair on Thursday joined U.S. bank JPMorgan Chase & Co as a senior advisor, a role in which he is expected to give advice to senior executives on global politics.
JPMorgan, the third largest U.S. bank, said Blair will advise JPMorgan Chase's CEO and senior management team on a part-time basis, and participate in the company's events with key clients.
"I look forward to advising them on how they approach the huge political and economic changes that globalisation brings," Blair said in a statement.
Blair, a key ally of U.S. President George W. Bush, was replaced last year by Gordon Brown as prime minister."
While much of the world burns with their wars, and much is harnessed in abject poverty, these Bildebergers really look after themselves, don't they?!
See http://uk.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idUKN0963534220080110 |
He did his masters' bidding and now he's being rewarded. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ian neal Angel - now passed away
Joined: 26 Jul 2005 Posts: 3140 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Talking of revolving doors between government and business, a well informed but anonymous bird informed me that Sir David King ex-HMG's chief scientific advisor and of late, vocal supporter of nuclear power is strongly tipped to take up a prominent role for US major FLUOR who have interests in PFI nuclear projects. Today sees the announcement that the government supports a massive PFI-led nuclear project and Sir David is all over the media providing his 'impartial' advice on the wisdom of this
More jobs for the boys and trebles all round. It's a lucrative job being an expert just so long as your expertese leads you to agree with the government. Of course Gordon Brown's brother working for the nuclear lobby is a wholly unconnected coincidence |
|
Back to top |
|
|
acrobat74 Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 03 Jun 2007 Posts: 836
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
scubadiver Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Apr 2006 Posts: 1850 Location: Currently Andover
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Reported on the 10th January (11) _________________ Currently working on a new website |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mark_e Moderate Poster
Joined: 29 Oct 2006 Posts: 155 Location: Ipswich
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This got buried quickly! it was on the radio 4 news this morning, now deep in the business section of the bbc website
Northern Rock has agreed to sell £2.2bn, or 2%, of its mortgage assets to US investment bank JP Morgan.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7182569.stm
I guess Tony knows a deal when he sees one! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scubadiver Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Apr 2006 Posts: 1850 Location: Currently Andover
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For those who are "aware" it is so blatantly obvious. _________________ Currently working on a new website |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
acrobat74 wrote: | lol it's not too hard to figure out who *really* run things and why...
Guys like that sad soul Tony are just employees of the real owners. |
I think it was Frank Zappa who said that politics is the PR front for Power available to ugly people. Showbizz being the one for beaut .... er ... less ugly (on the surface) people.
They're just a top>down direction channel. _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rodin Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 2224 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:11 am Post subject: Blair joins JP Morgan Chase |
|
|
Why are we chasing JP Morgan?...
Seriously though folks. Nice little thank you from Lord levy's protege. I wonder who lord Levy works for?
Quote: | JEKYLL ISLAND and Fed Res act of 1913
The Illuminati interests wanted to create a Central Bank in America. They wanted to build the Federal Reserve. First, they needed a bunch of banking crisis’ that would push public opinion towards a Federal Reserve system. These were provided by the Illuminati, including J.P. Morgan’s Knickerbocker Panic of 190?. Second, they needed a favorable U.S. president in office. Rothschild agent Colonel House provided this by getting Woodrow Wilson elected. The American people were being couditioned. To provide the ‘reform of the American banking system" a congressional National Monetary Commission was created and a man related to the Rockefellers, Nelson Aldrich, was put in charge.
For two years this Commission travel around Europe hob-nobbing with the IllumInati and getting directions as to how the central bank should be set up. Then the Commission returned in 1910, and Nelson Aldrich went to a secret meeting at the Jekyll Island Hunt Club in Georgia to write the legislation for an American central bank to be run by the IllumInati. Others at the Jekyll island meeting were these Illuminati men - A. Platt Andrew, Frank Vanderiip (of a Kuhn-Loeb & Company bank), Henry Davidson (of J.P. Morgan), Charies Norton (of a Morgan bank), Paul Warburg (of Kuhn-Loeb & Company and brother-in-law of Schiff), Benjamin Strong (of another Morgan company). Most of these men were connected to Jacob Schiff or J.P. Morgan, who in turn were agents for the House of Rothschild. The Jekyll Island Hunt Club was even owned by J.P. Morgan. |
_________________ Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ravenmoon Validated Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 410 Location: Sheffield
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
fish5133 Site Admin
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 2568 Location: One breath from Glory
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Tony Blair and his 'greedy' wife are laughing all the way to the bank |
Yes, but no matter how much they laugh old Popey isnt able to remit Bliar,s sin. That will knock the smile off his face.
As a matter of interest I wonder what penance old Popey would ask of Bliar over his illegal war?
Dont think 3 hail mary's , 6 our fathers and a bottle of vodka will quite atone.
Any other suggestions? _________________ JO911B.
"for we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, against powers, against rulers of the darkness of this world, against wicked spirits in high places " Eph.6 v 12 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marky 54 Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 3293
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Yes, but no matter how much they laugh old Popey isnt able to remit Bliar,s sin. |
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=4339200993563581344
what sin? it seems to me people like blair and the ptb just follow the bible, and are justified in their actions of killing, enslaving and whatever else.
infact i'd go as far as to say the bible was proberbly made to justify our future and is one of the reasons behind everything ie: designed to justify controlling and enslaving people.
if you believe in the bible then for example you believe everyone who works on a sunday should die.
if you believe the bible then everyone who dos'nt believe in god should be killed? does that include those who believe in a different god? if so i don't see the sin according to the bible. did blair swear an oath on the bible before taking office? or does that only happen in america?
just to save confusion ill add this: i said IF you believe in the BIBLE, not IF you believe in a GOD.
it seems to me the bible gives lots of justifications for a holocaust. how many people work on a sunday? how many do not believe in god? or even a differnet god?
anyone who believes in the bible but dos'nt agree with these parts are not following gods word. if god is good and all loving then surely it is obvious the bible was not the word of god, but rather a code of law that those who wrote it believe, the many should be ruled but in the guise of faith and via using gods name.
thats why your told anyone trying to tell you it is'nt true are trying to decieve you. its a full proof belief to those who believe it and preech it, there are always answers to rationalize it and it will never go away, and its words could be enforced or used as justifaction.
or does the video take it out of context? it seemed pretty clear to me.
there is wisdom in it, but also rationlizsations for great evil.
if the bible says its fine to enslave other people in other countries then by believing the bible your supporting that belief. plus what ever other nasty's are in the bible and justified by it.
it may be against the law at present but is it really a sin if the bible says its ok?
"thou shalt have no OTHER gods before me" the first commandment.
DEUTERONOMY
17:2 If there be found among you, within any of thy gates which the LORD thy God giveth thee, man or woman, that hath wrought wickedness in the sight of the LORD thy God, in transgressing his covenant,
17:3 And hath gone and served other gods, and worshipped them, either the sun, or moon, or any of the host of heaven, which I have not commanded;
17:4 And it be told thee, and thou hast heard of it, and enquired diligently, and, behold, it be true, and the thing certain, that such abomination is wrought in Israel:
17:5 Then shalt thou bring forth that man or that woman, which have committed that wicked thing, unto thy gates, even that man or that woman, and shalt stone them with stones, till they die.
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/dt/17.html
so the bible justifys killing those who do not believe in god or a different god. therefore no sin. and those who believe the bible justify this thinking.
Quote: | As a matter of interest I wonder what penance old Popey would ask of Bliar over his illegal war?
Dont think 3 hail mary's , 6 our fathers and a bottle of vodka will quite atone.
|
i think your getting modern day law and what the bible say's is a sin or not a sin or what the bible justifys mixed up. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rodin Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 2224 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marky 54 wrote: | what sin? it seems to me people like blair and the ptb just follow the bible, and are justified in their actions of killing, enslaving and whatever else. |
Would that be the Old Testament
New Testament is where Christ came in.
Read about the Babylonian Talmud before getting too tough on Christians _________________ Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marky 54 Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 3293
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rodin wrote: | marky 54 wrote: | what sin? it seems to me people like blair and the ptb just follow the bible, and are justified in their actions of killing, enslaving and whatever else. |
Would that be the Old Testament
New Testament is where Christ came in.
Read about the Babylonian Talmud before getting too tough on Christians |
is the old testament not a part of the christan faith? which bible do they swear oaths on?
either the bible justifys this stuff or it dos'nt. if it does then theres no sin in the example mentioned above, against the law yes, a sin no if what it says is what it means.
already someone is trying to rationalize/pretend the words do not exsist in their faith.
i reckon most christians try to ignore these parts, but that dos'nt mean strict christians will or believers in a postion of power. if they follow it word for word they can justify just about anything via using faith. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rodin Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 2224 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marky 54 wrote: | rodin wrote: | marky 54 wrote: | what sin? it seems to me people like blair and the ptb just follow the bible, and are justified in their actions of killing, enslaving and whatever else. |
Would that be the Old Testament
New Testament is where Christ came in.
Read about the Babylonian Talmud before getting too tough on Christians |
is the old testament not a part of the christan faith? which bible do they swear oaths on?
either the bible justifys this stuff or it dos'nt. if it does then theres no sin in the example mentioned above, against the law yes, a sin no if what it says is what it means.
already someone is trying to rationalize/pretend the words do not exsist in their faith.
i reckon most christians try to ignore these parts, but that dos'nt mean strict christians will or believers in a postion of power. if they follow it word for word they can justify just about anything via using faith. |
Old testament = Judaism. New Testament = Christianity
Christianity supercedes Judaism for Christians
At least that's what they believe. Hence a true Christian cannot kill etc. As I understand it. _________________ Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rodin Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 2224 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Cesare Borgia was greatly admired by Niccolò Machiavelli, who met the Duke on a diplomatic mission in his function as Secretary of the Florentine Chancellery. Machiavelli was at Borgia's court from October 7, 1502 through January 18, 1503. During this time he wrote regular dispatches to his superiors in Florence, many of which have survived and are published in Machiavelli's Collected Works. Machiavelli used many of Borgia's exploits and tactics as examples in The Prince and advised politicians to imitate Borgia. Two episodes were particularly impressive to Machiavelli: the method by which Borgia pacified the Romagna, which Machiavelli describes in chapter VII of The Prince, and Borgia's assassination of his captains on New Year's Eve of 1503 in Senigallia. [6]
Machiavelli's praise for Borgia is subject to controversy. Some scholars see in Machiavelli's Borgia the precursor of state crimes in the 20th Century.[7] Others, including Macaulay and Lord Acton have historicized Machiavelli's Borgia, explaining the admiration for such violence as an effect of the general criminality and corruption of the time.[8]
In Volume One of Celebrated Crimes, Alexandre Dumas, père states that some pictures of Jesus Christ produced around Borgia's lifetime were based on Cesare Borgia, and that this in turn has influenced images of Jesus produced since that time.
Cesare Borgia briefly employed Leonardo da Vinci as military architect and engineer between 1502 and 1503. Cesare and Leonardo become intimate instantaneously - Cesare provided Leonardo with a unlimited pass to inspect and direct all planned and undergoing construction in his domain. Before meeting Cesare, Leonardo had worked at the Milanese court of Ludovico Sforza for many years, until Charles VIII of France drove Sforza out of Italy. After Cesare, Leonardo was unsuccessful in finding another patron and eventually moved to France, where he died. |
Pictures of Christ based on him? King of the Jews?
Of course Machiavelli comes up again when Rothschild comes up with his Protocols via Joly _________________ Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rodin Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 2224 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Also interesting that the elite are always in cahoots with technology - Da Vinci. _________________ Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marky 54 Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 3293
|
Posted: Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rodin wrote: | marky 54 wrote: | rodin wrote: | marky 54 wrote: | what sin? it seems to me people like blair and the ptb just follow the bible, and are justified in their actions of killing, enslaving and whatever else. |
Would that be the Old Testament
New Testament is where Christ came in.
Read about the Babylonian Talmud before getting too tough on Christians |
is the old testament not a part of the christan faith? which bible do they swear oaths on?
either the bible justifys this stuff or it dos'nt. if it does then theres no sin in the example mentioned above, against the law yes, a sin no if what it says is what it means.
already someone is trying to rationalize/pretend the words do not exsist in their faith.
i reckon most christians try to ignore these parts, but that dos'nt mean strict christians will or believers in a postion of power. if they follow it word for word they can justify just about anything via using faith. |
Old testament = Judaism. New Testament = Christianity
Christianity supercedes Judaism for Christians
At least that's what they believe. Hence a true Christian cannot kill etc. As I understand it. |
ah ok, did'nt know that. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|