| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
gruts
Major Poster
Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 1050
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:38 pm Post subject: Get your twin towers out for the lads |
 |
|
first the tv fakery crowd turned repetitive images of the wtc plane crashes into a new genre of music video....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3myMuF7RLzE
next, they started remixing each other's vids (and making them more fun and sexy)....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PmVJuPgJx0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ek3wmlGB_yY
but what I hadn't realised until I checked out genghis6199's toob channel (I was looking for another link to his "I hate judy wood" vid) - is that they're also uploading porn clips to youtube and using the "About This Video" section to advertise their channels and slander whoever they don't like in the truth movement. for example....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hdQNetaXO0
| Quote: | VERY SEXY BIG BOOBS BATTLE
About This Video
Perky and firm or supple and soft, one thing they won't be doing is believing in the wq2rx lies put out by the planehugging truthlings!
What are planehugging truthlings? They're people who don't know that Alex Jones is fighting FOR the NWO in the infowars! They really did show fake video on september 11, 2001. Just watch ozzybinoswald2, genghis6199, lisa17g, 911news, or http://livevideo.com/socialservice |
all very amusing - and it's easy to imagine the likes of sidgullible and prole art threat sitting in their bedrooms beating their meat to these vids - but I have to wonder what exactly this is meant to achieve.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
telecasterisation
Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:51 pm Post subject: Re: get your twin towers out for the lads |
|
|
| gruts wrote: | | it's easy to imagine the likes of sidgullible and prole art threat sitting in their bedrooms beating their meat to these vids - but I have to wonder what exactly this is meant to achieve.... |
Easy to imagine? I wouldn't know where to begin to create mental images of other members in such scenarios.
I am able to picture you now though gruts in a distinctly different light. Fortunately you remain fully clothed.
_________________
I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gruts
Major Poster
Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 1050
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
now now - don't lower the tone (even further).... 
what on earth did you do to get saddled with the "9/11 critic" thing? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation
Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gruts wrote: | now now - don't lower the tone (even further)....
what on earth did you do to get saddled with the "9/11 critic" thing? |
I am not really the person to be asking, but the official line is we are apparently being 'experimented on' so certain individuals can be easily identified, but no-one decided to tell us before it was implemented.
We can talk about it later in the dustbin when your thread gets slung in there.
_________________
I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:57 pm Post subject: Re: get your twin towers out for the lads |
|
|
| gruts wrote: | first the tv fakery crowd turned repetitive images of the wtc plane crashes into a new genre of music video....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3myMuF7RLzE
next, they started remixing each other's vids (and making them more fun and sexy)....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PmVJuPgJx0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ek3wmlGB_yY
but what I hadn't realised until I checked out genghis6199's toob channel (I was looking for another link to his "I hate judy wood" vid) - is that they're also uploading porn clips to youtube and using the "About This Video" section to advertise their channels and slander whoever they don't like in the truth movement. for example....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hdQNetaXO0
| Quote: | VERY SEXY BIG BOOBS BATTLE
About This Video
Perky and firm or supple and soft, one thing they won't be doing is believing in the wq2rx lies put out by the planehugging truthlings!
What are planehugging truthlings? They're people who don't know that Alex Jones is fighting FOR the NWO in the infowars! They really did show fake video on september 11, 2001. Just watch ozzybinoswald2, genghis6199, lisa17g, 911news, or http://livevideo.com/socialservice |
all very amusing - and it's easy to imagine the likes of sidgullible and prole art threat sitting in their bedrooms beating their meat to these vids - but I have to wonder what exactly this is meant to achieve.... |
And to think they're all NicointelproHaupt and his aliases.
I saw somwhere recently he and his partner had 200 youtube accounts between them.
He's a busy, busy lad.
_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| telecasterisation wrote: | | gruts wrote: | now now - don't lower the tone (even further)....
what on earth did you do to get saddled with the "9/11 critic" thing? |
I am not really the person to be asking, but the official line is we are apparently being 'experimented on' so certain individuals can be easily identified, but no-one decided to tell us before it was implemented.
We can talk about it later in the dustbin when your thread gets slung in there. |
I never took you for a Truth Critic Tele.
I sort of assumed it meant your avatar, Bob Monkhouse.
_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gruts
Major Poster
Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 1050
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| telecasterisation wrote: | | gruts wrote: | | it's easy to imagine the likes of sidgullible and prole art threat sitting in their bedrooms beating their meat to these vids - but I have to wonder what exactly this is meant to achieve.... |
Easy to imagine? I wouldn't know where to begin to create mental images of other members in such scenarios. |
no such mental images ever entered my mind, so I wish you hadn't mentioned that....
| telecasterisation wrote: | | We can talk about it later in the dustbin when your thread gets slung in there. |
that's a bit harsh - I don't think it belongs in the dustbin.
and I do think that the question of why various NPTards have chosen to promote their "research" by uploading porn to youtube deserves an answer....
I mean - if you were a genuine researcher who wanted to be taken seriously - is that the knid of thing you'd do? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dogsmilk
Mighty Poster
Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1616
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I mean - if you were a genuine researcher who wanted to be taken seriously - is that the knid of thing you'd do? |
Certainly not. They should be producing their own original porn and make it far more interesting.
Let's face it, the way they're going on, the porn industry represents a far more viable prospect for respect and recognition.
_________________
It's a man's life in MOSSAD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mr nice
Validated Poster
Joined: 05 Sep 2007
Posts: 103
Location: In a camper
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Dogsmilk"] | Quote: |
They should be producing their own original porn and make it far more interesting.
. |
I have already got visions of "Dr wood does Dallas" and similarly titled iffy porn ditties......... 
_________________
Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut, that held its ground.
David Icke |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation
Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
chek made the point;
| Quote: | I never took you for a Truth Critic Tele.
I sort of assumed it meant your avatar, Bob Monkhouse. |
Poor old Bob shuffled off in 2003 which was really long before either movement really sprouted wings. Having said that, he may well have been a critic or equally championed the 'towers were brought down by large crossbow bolts' theory.
The critic handle is most definitely aimed at me and shoehorned around a thousand corners to fit. I have had an official explanation which is fabulously convoluted in principle and has nothing whatsoever to do with my views about 9/11;
| Quote: | you have been viewed at the moment as a "critic" because of the Norman wisdom persona and general irrelevant comments in your posting of say the last three or four months:
The critic label is an experiment being tried so that posters who are generally critical of the campaign or who are here to post against 9/11 Truth can be identified easily by other members when they read their posts on threads outside of critic corner |
I am most positively not against 9/11 Truth or the campaign in any shape or form and have never once intimated such.
I also asked why this labelling system has not been made common knowledge?;
| Quote: | | With regard to public announcments about the "critic" label, the fine detail of a draft is still being deliberated upon by the mods but is being worked upon and no doubt will be made soon. Regretably it can sometimes take time to get full consensus |
Unusual to roll something out an unfinished conceptual experiment without the recipients being informed.
Apologies to the supplier of this information if it was not for public consumption.
_________________
I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
John White
Site Admin
Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 3187
Location: Here to help!
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Apologies to the supplier of this information if it was not for public consumption. |
It was not. Strictly speaking it comes under "publication of a pm" but I'll give you public interest on that one
Still, have you done what was advised and contacted TG to discuss removal of the "critic" label in return for less flippant/irrelevant posting on popular threads? Your quoted segments omit that part of the private message
_________________
Free your Self and Free the World |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation
Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| John White wrote: | | Quote: | | Apologies to the supplier of this information if it was not for public consumption. |
It was not. Strictly speaking it comes under "publication of a pm" but I'll give you public interest on that one
Still, have you done what was advised and contacted TG to discuss removal of the "critic" label in return for less flippant/irrelevant posting on popular threads? Your quoted segments omit that part of the private message |
I only considered the more salient aspects of 'why' I acquired the label to be pertinent and not the potential removal, for unless everyone who has been dealt the same name calling card has identical circumstances, then it has no bearing on them whatsoever.
To answer your question, no I haven't contacted Mr G. You said you had appraised him of our interchange and so I trust he is in possession of all the details. I am actually quite content to play along with his bizarre whims, it adds a very daft slant to what is otherwise a solid forum.
I hope those 'chemtrailing' us don't take a leaf out of our book and offer up 'With regard to public announcments about you lot being sprayed, the fine detail of a draft is still being deliberated upon by the government and no doubt will be made soon, but we thought we'd go ahead with it anyway'.
To openly label someone with a completely inappropriate label and get them to chase having it removed is beyond comprehension. The longer the whole badge thing continues - especially with no official public explanation - the crazier and more playground the whole concept is.
I remember how everyone aspired to the gold prefect's badge at my school - when a wearer entered the dormitory, we had to cover our eyes with our hands on could only speak when spoken to. Happy days are indeed here once again.
_________________
I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TmcMistress
Mind Gamer
Joined: 15 Jun 2007
Posts: 392
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | you have been viewed at the moment as a "critic" because of the Norman wisdom persona and general irrelevant comments in your posting of say the last three or four months:
The critic label is an experiment being tried so that posters who are generally critical of the campaign or who are here to post against 9/11 Truth can be identified easily by other members when they read their posts on threads outside of critic corner |
Hello groupthink, my old friend, good to see you once again... because of labels slowly creeping... division, it is slowly seeping...
(Yes, before anyone says it, I am neither Simon, nor Garfunkel. I realize this. )
This is entirely stupid. There is no way to implement this system without it being entirely subjective.
_________________
"What about a dance club that only let in deaf people? It would really only need flashing lights, so they'd save a lot of money on music." - Dresden Codak |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gruts
Major Poster
Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 1050
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| what do we need these labels for anyway? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gruts
Major Poster
Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 1050
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
anyway - just to get this thread back on track....
| Dogsmilk wrote: | They should be producing their own original porn and make it far more interesting.
Let's face it, the way they're going on, the porn industry represents a far more viable prospect for respect and recognition. |
according to webfairy (over at the champ's forum) it's really important to get the NPT message out to the "porn surfers and pretty girl appreciator demographic". 
| webfairy wrote: | 9/11 Revealed: "Planehuggers are Pedophiles" (GG Allin Tribute Bite it You Sc*m `07 Mix)
http://www.uvouch.com/video-911-Revealed-P...m-07-MIx-513471
No Planer video with pretty girls jiggling as the main attraction are pulling legitimate no planer information to the porn surfers and pretty girl appreciator demographic.
KVØRI!!! Sexy Lisa17g XXX Schoolgirl Bubblegum Free Masons
http://youtube.com/watch?v=G_WPnONOjMo
And if that doesnt fry your gizzard crispy enough, there is also an entire Bollywood genre, featuring rest-of-the-world friendly Bollywood characters no planes and millions of Meena fans.
Sexy MEENA Drops FCS Saree (Future Combat Nipple Slip Mix)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=G_WPnONOjMo |
so in summary - it's now official....
NPT is for w@nkers.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sherlock Holmes
Validated Poster
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 205
Location: Sunny Southampton
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| telecasterisation wrote: |
I remember how everyone aspired to the gold prefect's badge at my school - when a wearer entered the dormitory, we had to cover our eyes with our hands on could only speak when spoken to. Happy days are indeed here once again. |
Really? Interesting school, and days spent at school no doubt. Not the kind of school I went to (dormitories and gold prefect badges). I take it your old school is listed on this site: http://www.ukprivateschools.com/ ??
Somewhere like this:
http://www.wellingtoncollege.org.uk/page.aspx?id=0
This publicity photograph should read "international" Academic - (international - but don't panic - we're white).
Well imho anyone who did go to that kind of school definitely needs to be labelled a 9/11 truth critic regardless |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation
Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Sherlock Holmes wrote: | Really? Interesting school, and days spent at school no doubt. Not the kind of school I went to (dormitories and gold prefect badges). I take it your old school is listed on this site: http://www.ukprivateschools.com/ ??
This publicity photograph should read "international" Academic - (international - but don't panic - we're white).
Well imho anyone who did go to that kind of school definitely needs to be labelled a 9/11 truth critic regardless |
My school days were over thirty years ago and I remember one herbert who stitched a bit of tartan to the bottom of his trousers because of an affiliation to The Bay City Rollers. He was expelled the instant it made a public appearance (no, it wasn't me blackcat).
Although I haven't been anywhere near the place since I walked out of the gates, I understand it was closed as an educational establishment and converted to swish apartments during the eighties.
In retrospect, I can only recall one pupil who was even slightly off-white and he was only there for a year. He got the most awful taunting because of it. His dad was something big in Sri Lanka and a cultural attache or the like.
_________________
I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gruts
Major Poster
Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 1050
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
oi!!!!! could you keep your public school reminiscences to yourself? 
meanwhile over at killtown's komedy korner....
it looks like they're having a "heated debate" about the pros and cons of the npt/porn crossover:
http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?showtopic=3386 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gruts wrote: | oi!!!!! could you keep your public school reminiscences to yourself?
meanwhile over at killtown's komedy korner....
it looks like they're having a "heated debate" about the pros and cons of the npt/porn crossover:
http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?showtopic=3386 |
I never really understood the term "stiff opposition", until now.
_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sam
Wrecker
Joined: 29 Dec 2007
Posts: 343
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | you have been viewed at the moment as a "critic" because of the Norman wisdom persona and general irrelevant comments in your posting of say the last three or four months:
The critic label is an experiment being tried so that posters who are generally critical of the campaign or who are here to post against 9/11 Truth can be identified easily by other members when they read their posts on threads outside of critic corner |
Being fairly new here (and having failed to read the 'terms and conditions' properly) I find this bizarre.
As a out-and-out "9/11 Truth Critic", does this mean I am only supposed to post in Critics Corner?
If so, what kind of sense can this make? For example, I might be vehemently opposed to the addition of fluoride to our drinking water. If a debate on this subject were running in "Other Controversies", would I be banned from contributing? Would I have to create a parallel thread in "Critics Corner" to express my views on fluoridation, even though "Critics Corner" is specifically designated as (and I quote) "For those who wish to criticise the 9/11 truth movement & key peace campaigners", when this would automatically mean I am posting off-topic.
My current understanding of the forum rules would mean that 9/11 Truth Critics are being consigned to a ghetto and denied the opportunity to engage in other areas of discussion. Perhaps I have misunderstood the rules? It all seems very strange indeed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blackcat
Validated Poster
Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 2376
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | My current understanding of the forum rules would mean that 9/11 Truth Critics are being consigned to a ghetto |
Correct. You shouldn't even be allowed that. Go and join a golf club and argue with all the members that golf is rubbish. See how long they would tolerate you. The world is full of tv stations, newspapers, radio stations and web sites which espouse the official conspiracy theory and they outgun sites like this like an atomic bomb outguns a peashooter. Why do you need to come here and spout the official line which is hammered ad nauseum everywhere? As someone who has become aware of the fairy tale that the official version is, I am tired of the deceit and the last thing I want is to read someone like you telling the same dreadful blatant lies we have been fed for years.
_________________
"The conflict between corporations and activists is that of narcolepsy versus remembrance. The corporations have money, power and influence. Our sole influence is public outrage. Extract from "Cloud Atlas (page 125) by David Mitchell. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sam
Wrecker
Joined: 29 Dec 2007
Posts: 343
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| blackcat wrote: | | Quote: | | My current understanding of the forum rules would mean that 9/11 Truth Critics are being consigned to a ghetto |
Correct. You shouldn't even be allowed that. Go and join a golf club and argue with all the members that golf is rubbish. See how long they would tolerate you. The world is full of tv stations, newspapers, radio stations and web sites which espouse the official conspiracy theory and they outgun sites like this like an atomic bomb outguns a peashooter. Why do you need to come here and spout the official line which is hammered ad nauseum everywhere? As someone who has become aware of the fairy tale that the official version is, I am tired of the deceit and the last thing I want is to read someone like you telling the same dreadful blatant lies we have been fed for years. |
So you're no admirer of Voltaire's philosphy then? Ah well.
But in the meantime, what if I agree with you on the evil of fluoride in water? Where can I express my deep admiration for your devastatingly lucid analysis? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blackcat
Validated Poster
Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 2376
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | So you're no admirer of Voltaire's philosphy then? Ah well. |
I do not dispute your right to an opinion nor to be able to express it. I object to you doing so here. I doubt Voltaire would have supported the right to be deliberately provocative.
| Quote: | | But in the meantime, what if I agree with you on the evil of fluoride in water? Where can I express my deep admiration for your devastatingly lucid analysis? |
Keep it to yourself. I'll get by without your admiration - or your corruscating wit.
_________________
"The conflict between corporations and activists is that of narcolepsy versus remembrance. The corporations have money, power and influence. Our sole influence is public outrage. Extract from "Cloud Atlas (page 125) by David Mitchell. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ian neal
Angel - now passed away
Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 3140
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| sam wrote: |
Being fairly new here (and having failed to read the 'terms and conditions' properly) I find this bizarre.
As a out-and-out "9/11 Truth Critic", does this mean I am only supposed to post in Critics Corner?
|
Yes
If you want to discuss flouride or other exciting issues you are of course free to start such a thread in critics corner
Here you are
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=2990
Always happy to help |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Larry O'Hara
Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 96
Location: depends
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| John White wrote: | | Quote: | | Apologies to the supplier of this information if it was not for public consumption. |
It was not. Strictly speaking it comes under "publication of a pm" but I'll give you public interest on that one
Still, have you done what was advised and contacted TG to discuss removal of the "critic" label in return for less flippant/irrelevant posting on popular threads? Your quoted segments omit that part of the private message |
of course, the term 'critic' is meant to inform the faithful those labelled so, against their will (such as myself), are in fact 'heretics'. How very...medieval. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation
Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There are also a number of so-called 'critics' who simply 'aren't' - so labelled because erroneous comments could not be found a suitable category for.
I completely challenge the official version of events and do not believe a word of it, yet proudly display the totally misleading and incorrect '9/11 Truth Critic' label.
But when has the truth been something to aspire to?
_________________
I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sam
Wrecker
Joined: 29 Dec 2007
Posts: 343
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ian neal wrote: | | sam wrote: |
Being fairly new here (and having failed to read the 'terms and conditions' properly) I find this bizarre.
As a out-and-out "9/11 Truth Critic", does this mean I am only supposed to post in Critics Corner?
|
Yes
If you want to discuss flouride or other exciting issues you are of course free to start such a thread in critics corner
Here you are
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=2990
Always happy to help |
You're totally missing the two points I set out in my original comments a few posts above.
1. Why would being a "9/11 Truth Critic" disqualify anyone from commenting on non-9/11 issues in the "Other Controversies" section?
2. Posting non-9/11 subjects in "Critics Corner" is automatically off-topic given the description of that sub-forum. I'm surprised that the Site Founder would encourage people to do this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
slimpickins
Validated Poster
Joined: 29 Feb 2008
Posts: 17
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's interesting that the no-planners are promoting their videos by linking it with pornography to entice people who otherwise wouldn't be interested.
Ever since I first came across the no-plane phenomena, I've been intrigued by the motivations of those propagating it. It seem unlikely that people with the ability to manipulate the videos so they match their argument are incapable of understanding why the argument doesn't stand up and sometimes they seem to be actually planting clues in the videos that it's all a hoax.
So I find it hard to believe that the main drivers of no-planes are sincere but the effort involved suggest it's more than just joke. The obvious answer is that it's disinformation, designed to discredit the truth movement but honestly, does the truth movement really think that's necessary? In the eyes of the press and public, and not just in the US, hologram theory did that sometime ago (I'm not commenting on the validity of that idea).
So I'm wondering if it's a sociological study of some sort run by students to study how an idea can spread through society and the pornography marketing ploy fits that to some extent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gruts
Major Poster
Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 1050
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| another thing that's fishy about the whole no-planes thing is how certain individuals (ace baker is a good example) have appeared seemingly from nowhere and then rapidly become very influential in the NPT club - by spewing out a huge quantity of videos, articles, blogs, forum posts etc all over the internet - and then disappeared again, usually after throwing all their toys out of the pram.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
