Here's where the £17.6tn figure comes from
Who Owns the World
“A land poor race on a land rich planet.”
Kevin Cahill’s new book Who Owns the World book examines land ownership in each one of the world’s 197 states or countries and 66 major territories, the first such survey ever attempted.
http://theeconomicrealms.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/who-owns-world.html
The value of her land holding. £17,600,000,000,000 (approx).
This makes her the richest individual on earth. However, there is no way easily to value her real estate. There is no current market in the land of entire countries. At a rough estimate of $5,000 an acre, and based on the sale of Alaska to the USA by the Tsar, and of Louisiana to the USA by France, the Queen’s land holding is worth a notional $33,000,000,000,000 (Thirty three trillion dollars or about £17,600,000,000,000). Her holding is based on the laws of the countries she owns and her land title is valid in all the countries she owns. Her main holdings are Canada, the 2nd largest country on earth, with 2,467 million acres, Australia, the 7th largest country on earth with 1,900 million acres, the Papua New Guinea with114 million acres, New Zealand with 66 million acres and the UK with 60 million acres.
She is the world’s largest landowner by a significant margin. The next largest landowner is the Russian state, with an overall ownership of 4,219 million acres, and a direct ownership comparable with the Queen’s land holding of 2,447 million acres. The 3rd largest landowner is the Chinese state, which claims all of Chinese land, about 2,365 million acres. The 4th largest landowner on earth is the Federal Government of the United States, which owns about one third of the land of the USA, 760 million acres... _________________ The queens real name is: Saxe Coburg Gotha. not Windsor. They were installed in 1915.
Government, Meaning/Translation;
Govern = To Control;
Ment, taken from Latin/Greek, Mente = Mind
Government = Control Mind.
Last edited by jahschild on Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:36 pm; edited 5 times in total
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 5:07 am Post subject: no it doesnt
"ment" does not mean "mind" at the end of english nouns based on latin ones. If it did, the word "fundament" would presumably imply that you have your head up your arse.
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:00 am Post subject: Re: no it doesnt
Rowan Berkeley wrote:
"ment" does not mean "mind" at the end of english nouns based on latin ones. If it did, the word "fundament" would presumably imply that you have your head up your arse.
Nicely put.
Putting all the other silliness aside, my very favourite bit of that film was that the Royal family allegedly claims to be of the same bloodline as Thor. I wonder if they also allegedly claim to be of the same bloodline as Zeus? _________________ It's a man's life in MOSSAD
"ment" does not mean "mind" at the end of english nouns based on latin ones. If it did, the word "fundament" would presumably imply that you have your head up your arse.
But poster Catfish wrote:
Quote:
Fundament means buttocks or from the latin literally means a base (or original) mind.
So to Rowan Berkly, you have been contradicted by another poster already. But Ment'e' with an 'e' at the end, is from the Greek or Latin, it cannot by pinned down yet as to cultural origin between the 2, at least i ain't seen it.
I got this from a world famous historian & I tend to believe him rather than your objection and display of ignorance.
The word Government is designed to be confusing and has more than one meaning depending on which rose tinted specticals you ware.
The translation is correct, just your view is singular.
The Masons use many smokescreens to confuse the simple minded.
But as any Arab will tell you, when you look at anything always use a dual perspective in evaluating.
Dogsmilk appears to be a deaf person following a blind man. _________________ The queens real name is: Saxe Coburg Gotha. not Windsor. They were installed in 1915.
Government, Meaning/Translation;
Govern = To Control;
Ment, taken from Latin/Greek, Mente = Mind
Government = Control Mind.
I thought the bit about the lion on the coat of arms having the body of a leopard and the feet of a bear was quite funny too. Satan had obviously gone to tremendous trouble to make this monstrous chimera look just like an everyday lion. The fiend. _________________ It's a man's life in MOSSAD
Prince Charles visited myth-steeped Transylvania - amid suggestions that the blood-drinking Dracula may be among his forebears.
The Prince - on a tour of eastern Europe - spent a day in the heart of the region in Romania, where the Dracula legend was born.
There he visited an old people's home in Sibiu, where he was presented with a book of poems written by one of the residents, and a school.
The Prince was then driven 40 miles through the Transylvanian countryside to visit a Saxon village at Mosna.
Prince Charles is apparently aware of the potential relationship between his family and Transylvania's most infamous son.
It is believed that Queen Mary, consort of George V was related to the 15th Century slayer prince Vlad the Impaler who inspired Bram Stoker's Dracula.
And it is known that porphyria, an iron deficiency, which is thought to lie behind the vampire myth, has run in the Royal Family.
Vlad Drac-ula, as he was known, is said to have dispatched with more than 100,000 Turkish warriors in battle.
The vampire legend was fed by Vlad's own predilection for eating bread dipped in his victim's blood.
But it wasn't until an author of the Victorian period, Bram Stoker, became interested in the myth of Vlad the Impaler, that Count Dracula was born.
Dracula means "son of the devil" in Romanian.
Now thousands of tourists visit the Transylvanian town every year where Vlad lived in Castle Bran.
Prince Charles arrived in Romania on Tuesday
On Thursday, he will visit several charities caring for the elderly and homeless in Bucharest, and he will watch a pantomime at the city's National Theatre.
He is due to leave for Sofia, in Bulgaria, on Friday. The tour also includes the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.
Dogsmilk wrote:
So do you think Charles thinks he's related to Thor then?
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 1:48 pm Post subject: Fayed: Philip a Nazi, Royals the 'Dracula Family'
Al Fayed brands Prince Philip a Nazi and the Royals the 'Dracula family'
Mohamed Al Fayed today claimed that Diana, Princess of Wales, had told him personally that she was pregnant before she and his son, Dodi, died.
The Harrods boss, in his first sensational evidence at the High Court inquest into their deaths, said Diana had told him alone she was expecting a baby.
He claimed the couple were planning to announce their engagement as soon as she had spoken to her two sons after her holiday in France.
Mr Al Fayed said: "Diana told me on the telephone that she was pregnant. I am the only person they told.
"They told me they were engaged and would announce their engagement on Monday morning. She would speak to her sons when she returned from Paris."
The tycoon tycoon also dubbed the Royal family "that Dracula family" and told the court that Diana and Dodi were not killed in a tragic accident but murdered.
And he launched an astonishing attack on the Duke of Edinburgh, calling him a "Nazi" and a "racist".
Arriving at the Royal Courts of Justice this morning, Mr Al Fayed, 75, had left no one in any doubt that he intended to speak his mind.
Surrounded by photographers, he gave a wry smile as he entered the building and announced: "I've been fighting for 10 years.
"This is the moment for me to say exactly what I feel happened to my son and Diana."
And true to his word, he cut almost immediately to the chase with the murder allegation being among his first words to the jury.
He began by stating that he would "make no allegations" and simply declare his beliefs about how the couple died.
But then he told the court: "Princess Diana also told me personally before and during the holiday we shared in July 1997 of her fears.
"She told me that she knew Prince Philip and Prince Charles were trying to get rid of her."
Of Philip, he said: "It's time to send him back to Germany from where he comes. You want to know his original name - it ends with Frankenstein."
Ian Burnett QC, for the coroner, commenting on Mr al Fayed's remarks, said: "This stems from your belief that Prince Philip is not only a racist but a Nazi as well."
At the beginning of his evidence, Mr al Fayed read out a statement in which he addressed his main concerns about the crash and the points he wanted the inquest to deal with.
The tycoon said Diana had told him she had kept a wooden box and if anything was to happen to her he must make sure the contents of the box were made public.
He said he spoke to Mr Burrell immediately after the crash and was assured by the butler that the box would be kept safe.
"I told him, if anybody tried to tamper with the contents, to tell me," he said.
"He did not keep his promise, the next I heard he had been arrested."
Mr Al Fayed said Diana's sister, Lady Sarah McCorquodale, had come to him two days after the crash.
"She told me that she thought the crash was suspicious, that she would find the box and keep its contents safe. She has not done so."
He added: "I am certain, also, that she was part of the cover-up."
The Harrods boss said he had been asked to provide proof of all of his claims, but told the jury: "You want me to get the proof but I am facing a steel wall from the security services.
"I have been fighting for 10 years to be where we are."
Mr al Fayed went into details about his belief that blood samples apparently taken from Mr Paul after his death were not actually his.
He said: "It's proved black and white that the blood being taken was not Henri Paul's blood.
"The blood had been taken from someone in the mortuary who had been breathing carbon monoxide by the pathologist who refused to appear because they know their arguments are false and it's baloney and its not facts."
Mr Al Fayed told the inquest he believed the murder was likely to have been carried out by photographer James Andanson, who has since died, on the orders on the security services.
He said: "There was one paparazzi member in the pay of the security services, this is likely to have been James Andanson, who exacted the murder in his own Fiat, pushed the car and a strobe light having been used to blind Henri Paul."
Mr Al Fayed also raised concerns about a message - dubbed the Mishcon note - written by Diana's divorce lawyer Lord Mishcon after an October 1995 meeting outlining her fears that there was a plot to kill her in a car crash.
In the strictest of confidence Lord Mishcon passed it on to police following a meeting with the then Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Paul Condon after the Princess's death.
It was only when Diana's former butler, Paul Burrell, produced a note from the Princess making very similar allegations in the Daily Mirror in October 2003, while Sir John Stevens was head of the Met, that the police agreed to hand over the Mishcon note.
It was sent to the coroner in December 2003.
Reading from a statement, Mr al Fayed said: "My belief that my son and Princess Diana were murdered was confirmed when I learned that the two leading Commissioners - Lord Condon and Lord Stevens - did not show the coroner the note made by a leading lawyer, Lord Mishcon, detailing the Princess' fears for her life."
He added: "I cannot believe that they sat upon such an important note and did not pass it on to the (examining French Magistrate) Judge Stephan in Paris and (the then coroner) Michael Burgess.
"I believe that they acted unprofessionally and they must have no conscience."
The Harrods boss described the note as "devastating" and said it explained Diana's fears in "black and white".
At one point this morning, Mr Al Fayed held up a copy of today's Sun newspaper, which alleges that Mr Burrell has admitted he did not tell the whole truth when he appeared at the inquest.
Ian Burnett, counsel to the inquest, asked the Harrods boss not to read out anything from the paper.
Mr Al Fayed said: "He's been sitting here in the witness box talking about baloney things... It's important to bring him back."
Lord Justice Scott Baker later addressed the issue, telling the court: "This is something that's certainly being investigated. I have called for the tape. We will certainly want to know the circumstances under which it was obtained."
Mr Al Fayed broke down in the witness box as he was asked about the moment he was told of his son's death.
Asked by Mr Burnett: "Can you remember who telephoned you with this dreadful news?"
Mr Al Fayed replied: "I think one of security, I think maybe Kes Wingfield, to the best of my recollection."
Mr Burnett asked the Harrods owner if he remembered a call from the Ritz hotel president Frank Klein. He replied: "It's difficult. I'd like to know why you are asking me things like that."
Mr Klein has previously told the inquest that he telephoned Mr al Fayed to break the news as soon as he was informed and recounted how his boss told him: "This is not an accident."
Mr al Fayed told the jury today: "Security called me; he called me after that. I told him exactly what collected in my mind, all what Diana told me, exactly what happened."
The Harrods boss insists the Paris car crash that killed Dodi, Diana and their driver, Henri Paul, on August 31, 1997 was the work of MI6 at the behest of the Duke of Edinburgh.
The tycoon also believes the Establishment could not accept an Egyptian Muslim as a stepfather to the future King of England.
He has been waiting more than a decade for an official chance to outline his belief that the Royal family were behind Diana's murder.
His testimony, however, is unlikely to be plain-sailing as many of his allegations surrounding the crash have already been disputed in court.
For the first time, his conspiracy theories will be put under the microscope and dissected by a team of top-flight QCs in cross-examination.
The inquest has already heard there is no medical evidence that she was pregnant, but Mr al Fayed is likely to say he was told so by Diana.
The jury has heard evidence that Dodi did buy Diana a ring - a diamond-crusted design from the Repossi jewellers - hours before their deaths.
But the suggestion that it was an engagement ring has been challenged and the court has heard that it was Mr Al Fayed who settled the bill for it only after the couple had died.
Mr Al Fayed also believes that driver Henri Paul - who was also killed in the crash - was not drink-driving as suggested by blood tests.
He believes the tests were faked, and that he was distracted by a blinding flash of light, possibly from a stun gun.
The inquest has been told that bar records from the Ritz suggest Mr Paul drank two double measures of Ricard liqueur.
Mr Al Fayed is also likely to be challenged to produce evidence backing up his allegation that MI6 were involved in the crash.
While i agree with most of what Al Fayed said i really think he has scored an own goal. His rant will not help in exposing the assasination of Diana.
We still dont know if it was MI6, Mossad, Jesuits or the CIA who dunnit.
Fayed live on tv calling a reporter a bl**dy idiot and a member of M16.
I really wish Michael Mansfield had gagged Al Fayed. _________________
While i agree with most of what Al Fayed said i really think he has scored an own goal. His rant will not help in exposing the assasination of Diana.
We still dont know if it was MI6, Mossad, Jesuits or the CIA who dunnit.
Fayed live on tv calling a reporter a bl**dy idiot and a member of M16.
I really wish Michael Mansfield had gagged Al Fayed.
Agreed. The footage of him calling a news reporter MI6 does make him look like a "conspiracy nut". That footage will be on a constant loop for the rest of the evening until most sheeple stop laughing.
However, it does lend him credibility in my eyes. If he was in it for any other reason than for the truth as he sees it, surely he would be briefed on what not to say.
I would suggest that Mohammed Al Fayed is actually one of the royal family lines, who doesn't actually give a toss for the lives of any of his family.
Pretty much similar to Charles and Philip though further down the pecking order.
Thus he can correctly state Philips familial tie-ins to prominent Nazis, whilst making himself sound like a maddened bereaved parent calling down crazed conspiracy theories. Perhaps his role is to undermine the real research within this final attempt to quash the proper examination of the evidence _________________ http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction
The more this drags on the more I see 'agents' whipping up yet another pretext for a Christian - Muslim conflict.
'Mohammed' v the head of the English Church? Where does that script come from?
Philip (mr. virus) is a bad egg from Rothschild/Donmeh country. The merry Windsors are IMO Rothschild family. Some are OK. I like Anne even Charlie who can't dance - Duchy ale is top rate just downed one tonight infact.
It's Kent the Mason I really suspect.
Younger Anne a dead ringer for Amy Winehouse BTW as Kent is for Rothschild. You can see the family in Rockenfelder 2 I think _________________ Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com
While i agree with most of what Al Fayed said i really think he has scored an own goal. His rant will not help in exposing the assasination of Diana.
We still dont know if it was MI6, Mossad, Jesuits or the CIA who dunnit.
Fayed live on tv calling a reporter a bl**dy idiot and a member of M16.
I really wish Michael Mansfield had gagged Al Fayed.
Royals are laughing at him. Fayed believes what he says, but he has been advised wrongly methinks
Methinks Di had to be wasted before 911 _________________ Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com
Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 290 Location: New Albion
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:44 am Post subject:
karlos wrote:
While i agree with most of what Al Fayed said i really think he has scored an own goal. His rant will not help in exposing the assasination of Diana.
We still dont know if it was MI6, Mossad, Jesuits or the CIA who dunnit.
Fayed live on tv calling a reporter a bl**dy idiot and a member of M16.
I really wish Michael Mansfield had gagged Al Fayed.
Where was Heinz? _________________ "When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty." ~ Thomas Jefferson
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." ~ Pennsylvania Historical Review (1759)
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 6060 Location: East London
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:55 pm Post subject:
He has a basic knowledge that the 'Establishment' killed Diana, which most of us would agree with. Like us with 911, there are different agencies in the frame according to our hunches and understandings.
He does go off on tangents which most of us believe are off target, but essentially he is right in his conviction that Diana, Dodi and Henri Paul were murdered.
Absolutely agree he does himself and his cause no good by his rants. _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Joined: 13 Jul 2006 Posts: 326 Location: All Power To The People, No More Power To The Pigs
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:13 pm Post subject:
outsider wrote:
He has a basic knowledge that the 'Establishment' killed Diana, which most of us would agree with.
If that is the case though, his chances of proving it are further away than ever before after this performance. _________________ http://paulstott.typepad.com/911cultwatch/
........Perhaps his role is to undermine the real research within this final attempt to quash the proper examination of the evidence
Am I just out of my depth or are you obsessively paranoid.
He owns Harrods, he's hugely rich. Do you in any way trust him?
I'm of the opinion that he lies every time he opens his mouth
He repeats the Richard Tomlinson assertion regarding mo, which is far too random . They couldn't guarantee that the car would hit anything with bright stroboscopic lights. The probability was that the car was under remote control and precisely pranged
He spouts a whole series of assertions, many of which contain a greater or lesser element of truth. While knowing full well what the reaction of the public and the media will be - wtf the guy's a mental Muslim millionaire
If he had wanted an honest result, he would have stuck to provable facts and evidence - the 25 CCTV cameras being turned away from the route, the nonsensical levels of CO in Henri Paul's blood. There's lots of evidence to go on, but he turned in a parody of a conspiracy theorist's rant.
A duplicitous declaration proving he doesn't give a monkey's about his own son's death. _________________ http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 2568 Location: One breath from Glory
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:35 pm Post subject:
Quote:
He said: "There was one paparazzi member in the pay of the security services, this is likely to have been James Andanson, who exacted the murder in his own Fiat, pushed the car and a strobe light having been used to blind Henri Paul."
Only problem with this is that the surviving bodyguard doesnt give testimony that thats what he saw. Then of course as "they" nearly killed him, of course hes in on it too. _________________ JO911B.
"for we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, against powers, against rulers of the darkness of this world, against wicked spirits in high places " Eph.6 v 12
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:37 am Post subject:
He dished the dirt on Neil Hamilton and doesn't go along with the unbelievably anal reticence of large parts of the British aristocracy.
They believe they keep their power by keeping schtum.
Answering your question.
Yes, more than I trust the Saxe-Coburg Gothas
paul wright wrote:
He owns Harrods, he's hugely rich. Do you in any way trust him?
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 6060 Location: East London
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 6:06 am Post subject:
paul wright wrote:
kbo234 wrote:
paul wright wrote:
........Perhaps his role is to undermine the real research within this final attempt to quash the proper examination of the evidence
Am I just out of my depth or are you obsessively paranoid.
He owns Harrods, he's hugely rich. Do you in any way trust him?
I'm of the opinion that he lies every time he opens his mouth
He repeats the Richard Tomlinson assertion regarding mo, which is far too random . They couldn't guarantee that the car would hit anything with bright stroboscopic lights. The probability was that the car was under remote control and precisely prangedHe spouts a whole series of assertions, many of which contain a greater or lesser element of truth. While knowing full well what the reaction of the public and the media will be - wtf the guy's a mental Muslim millionaire
If he had wanted an honest result, he would have stuck to provable facts and evidence - the 25 CCTV cameras being turned away from the route, the nonsensical levels of CO in Henri Paul's blood. There's lots of evidence to go on, but he turned in a parody of a conspiracy theorist's rant.
A duplicitous declaration proving he doesn't give a monkey's about his own son's death.
Richard Tomlinson wrote of the decapacitating light plan as one of the methods considered for assassinating Milosevic in his book 'The Big Breach' before Diana's murder, and of course there was an eyewitness report of an extremely bright flash which was like the special light decapacitators rather than a camera flash; this evidence was discounted by the French police (you believe the French police?). The brakes were probably fixed as well; combining a winding route through a forest of concrete pillars, with a car running interference, Henri Paul would have had to have been far luckier and a better 'pilot' than Hani Hanjour to have missed the pillars.
@ fish, the bodyguard didn't remember any of it? Leave off! Perhaps he didn't want to end up like David Kelly, Andanson, Milosevic, Pol Pot, John Smith, Pope John Paul I etc ad infinitum. _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
I'm sure in the end Burrell's a lying hound who will do all in his power to defend the British power structure.
If he's got the kind of information he puports to have, he'll no doubt end up neither imprisoned nor knighted in the future, but rather dead _________________ http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction
The aim behind Fayeds attacks is to discredit the monarchy.
This is one of the aims of the NWO.
No nation states, no history, no royals, no religion etc.
Taking into account he was Khashoggis right hand man having found out they bumped off his son, he blames all and sundry apart from the CIA.
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 6060 Location: East London
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 7:45 pm Post subject:
conspiracy analyst wrote:
The aim behind Fayeds attacks is to discredit the monarchy.
This is one of the aims of the NWO.
No nation states, no history, no royals, no religion etc.
Taking into account he was Khashoggis right hand man having found out they bumped off his son, he blames all and sundry apart from the CIA.
Is this a coincidence?
He is right but wrong as to the motive...
Read 'Jack the Ripper: the Final Solution' by Stephen Knight and I think it's plain that the Masons (and what else is the NWO? There are specialist branches, like Bilderburg etc but my reading of the situation is Masons are the NWO) will murder to protect the Monarchy, but only so long as the Monarchy plays ball; all is subservient to the Brotherhood. _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Muhammed Al Fayed has ever been resisted by the 'Establishment' (I wonder why?). He was in line for a take down.
Al Fayed is going on about talking to Diana 1 hour before the crash. During this conversation it appears Al Fayed was told of the couple's impending betrothal and Diana's pregnancy.
Pretty significant information imparted at a particularly interesting time.
Now Al Fayed is making himself look a bit unhinged as he blames Prince Charles, MI5, Prince Philip for murdering the pregnant princess.
Faking voice is easy.
Could Al Fayed have been set up in a 'sting' with multiple Cui Bono?
1) Eliminate Diana the pacifist pre Iraq
2) Stir up between Christians and Muslims
Fayed playing right into the hands of the BWOD** crowd
Quote:
Mr al Fayed told the court that Princess Diana told him personally that she knew Prince Charles and his father "were trying to get rid of her."
He then went on to call the Duke of Edinburgh a "Nazi" and a "racist", saying: "It's time to send him back to Germany from where he comes."
Quote:
Mr al Fayed told the inquest jury that Diana herself had told him she was pregnant in a phone call. He said: "Diana told me on the telephone that she was pregnant. I'm the only person they told.
"They told me they were engaged and would announce their engagement on Monday morning. She would speak to her sons when she returned from Paris."
Mr al Fayed said his belief in the murder theory stems from a note written by Diana's divorce lawyer Lord Mishcon after an October 1995 meeting outlining her fears that there was a plot to kill her in a car crash which was then "sat on".
1) Car crash arranged by Prince Philip was feared by Diana. So car crash it had to be to point the finger
2) Phone call sting loads the upcoming situation emotionally
3) Now Fayed is utterly convinced Philip has Diana mudered because she was pregnant. A time-bomb waiting to go off
4) At a time of their choosing Fayed's 'legal advisors' arrange for the current show trial. Meanwhile they collude with the authorities and even get Richard Dearlove to testify.
Quote:
I must say this is very convincing. In 40 years in MI6 this man is saying we have not killed anyone. No wonder we lost our whole empire. The security services are being run by pacifists.
**BWOD. Run with it. 'By Way Of Deception'
No wonder he still lives... _________________ Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
