The WTC2 Stream of Molten Metal

[Alulim]

This is a work in progress discussing the visual evidence of molten metal flowing from WTC2:

http://baldur.globalsymmetry.com/fact911/wtc2-corner/wtc-metal.html

[fish5133]

Is it possible to tell from your studies where the "molten metal" is coming from. e.g. ceiling level, floor level or mid room height. This may determine what materials were available in those locations. Similary if from the ceiling void could it not be a liquid burning from a ruptured service pipe? or a ruptured high voltage cable shorting out (this would probably have switched a circuit breaker so an unlikely scenario)

Do we know who occupied the office from where the material appears to be coming from?

Also could it be anything burning from the remains of the plane or what the plane was carrying (assuming NPT is a non starter)

[Alulim]

I agree with the NIST analysis of the location of the source. It appears to have spilled from a sagging floor slab at the top of the window, and had probably pooled on the floor before it spilled out. You can find a discussion of this in the section of the NIST document referenced in the paper. Somewhere there is a stabilized slow motion video of this molten material which shows clearly that it was not some burning. That is also a fairly obvious conclusion from the other stills and videos.

Since the ceiling void had only weak ceiling tiles suspended by flimsy wires, anything flowing from that location can be ruled out. The idea the phenomenon was a result of some kind of high voltage arching, or similar, has, to my knowledge, no precedences nor theoretical support.

[Keith Mothersson]

Dear friends,
I happen to find this highly improbable.

I agree with Jones and Reynold's Paper here:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/why/why_indeed.html#Thermite

For mentioning these dreaded names will this thread get relegated to Controversial theories?

Even though I find the thread highly controversial = I don't see how such a thing could have happened and suspect videofakery , I personally don't wish for it to be relegated to some Controversial section of this website. Let mistakes, if error this flowing aluminium sequence be, be tackled with reason and evidence, not administrative shuffling.

But this and other articles here prove my point that Tony is operating an unconscious or conscious bias against th work of Woods on weird phenomana of the Hutchison-effect/DEW variety (perhaps) while not shunting off other weird phenomena such as at metal pouring out of a window, then the neighbouring one!?

Please contact me if you agree that Tony's policy should change on this. And/or let Tony know too by pm or some other way.

[Pikey]

[Alulim]

Why don't you specifically address the scientific merits of the paper I posted a link to, rather than changing the subject?

The evidence for the use of thermite in the destruction of the WTC is conclusive.

[Micpsi]

The molten metal was lead from batteries stored by Fuji Bank on the very floor hit by 'Flight 175.
http://iamthewitness.com/Bollyn/Bollyn-Fuji-WTC.html
Dr Jones' hypothesis of thermate is therefore redundant.
Professor Fetzer thoroughly discredits Jones' interpretation in this argument between them at:
http://67.15.255.19/~c911sch1/images/proofofthermatequestioned.pdf
The evidence of thermate/thermite put forward by Jones and his acolytes is thoroughly debunked here:
http://www.debunking911.com/thermite.htm

[Alulim]