My summary of holes in official 7/7 story

[TonyGosling]

I don't pretend that this is 100% accurate or entirely comprehensive but it's my attempt - following the Press TV 'London Bombings Enquiry Debate' to sum up the most cogent holes in the official 7/7 story.

What are your general thoughts about what I might have missed and/or overegged. Any peer reviewing by your good selves the users and readers which will help me hone it down.

UK Indymedia version:- Summary of gaping holes in UK government's official 7/7 narrative

Just to add at this point that I have submitted much material related to this summary over the last 12 months to both Private Eye and to the Evening Standard. I have talked to the Evening Standard deputy editor at the Standard newsdesk on several occasions as well as a news producer at the radio station where I used to work GLR which has now been rebranded as 'BBC for London'. None of them have used any of this material.



London Bombings - appeal for testimony and further investigation

Tony Gosling. 10-12 Picton Street, BRISTOL. BS6 5QA. 0117 944 6219
http://www.public-interest.co.uk

British broadcasters have not made any documentaries which either seriously examine flaws in the official 7/7 story or look at suggested alternative scenarios. However there are at least five films circulating on the internet: BT Final Version; Mind The Gap; Ludicrous Diversions; The Homefront and 7/7 The Ripple Effect which make a case that the four bombers accused by Sir Ian Blair may not be responsible for the attacks.

There are four horrifying holes in the British government’s official ‘narrative’ of 7/7. Any one of these should prompt a public enquiry into the attacks but, as part of an apparent cover up, the government has been extraordinarily resistant to one.

1. Peter Power says his company Visor Consultants' exercise at the same three tube stations on the same day as the attacks was a coincidence. There is a 7,600 million to one chance that he is telling the truth about his exercise having no link to the attack.

2. A warning 15 minutes prior to the explosions relayed to Associated Press (AP) and subsequently published under the title 'Netanyahu Changed Plans Due To Warning' by several English language newspapers. AP's Jerusalem desk were told by the Israeli Embassy that the warning had come from Scotland Yard and that as a result Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu didn't leave his hotel to head for Liverpool Street that morning. Scotland Yard have denied making the call.

3. The cancelled Luton to Kings Cross train implies the four alleged bombers could not make it in time to where they were supposed to have blown up the bombs.

4. Despite the number of cameras there is no CCTV evidence in the public domain that the four alleged bombers were anywhere on the tube network that day - CCTV snaps released to the press being from a 'dummy run' nine days before.

There are at least twenty more minor questions which also throw serious doubt on the government's 2006 'narrative' including evidence the famous Luton CCTV picture was 'Photoshopped', that the alleged bombers may have been terrorist exercise 'actors' and survivors' reports that the bombs exploded underneath the trains. There is also the fact that tube privatisation in October 2004 allowed an extremely secretive private Israeli business, Verint Systems, 24hr. access to London's entire Underground System. There have been no inquests for the alleged bombers as the law demands. Nobody will put their name to the government 'narrative' which is supposed to explain the attacks.

There is also the overall modus operandi in which the targeting of ordinary people, two-and-a-half million of whom turned out two years previously to protest against the attack on Iraq, contradicts the bombers supposed motives. With recent revelations that David Cameron's think tank 'Policy Exchange' has been caught fabricating evidence of Muslim extremism there is an alternative hypothesis developing: that God fearing Muslims have replaced the Soviet Union as establishment's 'bogey-men' and are being 'set-up' for far right interests, much like the Jews were demonised by the Nazis.

I am concerned about the racist overtones of the Government/Metropolitan Police's version of events which hasn't been properly tested in court amounting to a extra-judicial 'trial by media' of the four bombing suspects.


London Bombing Inquiry Debate part 1 of 5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBO6dWCtu8w

[spiv]

Tony, there was also the very mysterious reports of three men being shot by police in the Canary Wharf area that afternoon. I find this quite a coincidence, if it is indeed true.

Scroll down to "Unconfirmed Reports" at the bottom of http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/july-7-mind-the-gaps-part-2.html

[guzman]

[numeral]

An update on the Home Office narrative seems timely. The Home offoice have changed the Luton train from the 7.40 to the 7.25. They have also made some changes to the period before the four allegedly entered Luton station. With this correction in place, the amended section of the official Home Office narrative now reads:

[rodin]

[onion3000]

"There is a 7,600 million to one chance that he is telling the truth about his exercise having no link to the attack. "

This suggests that Power is lying, whereas the fact that he gave the information so freely points to a probability that he and his company were not complicit in the attacks - but innocently following instructions. Whoever employed Visor that day though...

I would word it as: "There is a 7,600 million to one chance that this exercise had no link to the attack."

[Wokeman]

The source of the New Zealand newspaper story was a reporter from that country working for Reuters at Canary Wharf, who heard what happened and phoned his family in Christchurch. Presumably they took it to their paper, and a London source picked up on it.

[astro3]

How about bringing in a woman’s view?

[xmasdale]

[TonyGosling]

I agree Xmas,

This is the most comon point people come back to me with - 'what about the Kahn video' but people normally concede the point if it's been explained to them early on that the 4 lads were most likely duped into being terrorist 'actors' in Peter Power's exercise.
The video would be a natural part of the act.
When I was working for the Fire Brigade we did several of these 'exercises' whith various of us taking on roles such as the headmaster of a simulated school which was burning down, actually some firemen got really into the roles and were occasionally shouting even though they were'nt supposed to be. The whole thing was recorded for debriefing and playback afterwards.

The software was called Hydra and Minerva.

[PaulStott]

[xmasdale]

[numeral]

[TonyGosling]

thanks for this JB

12Jul05 The London Bombings, Part One: The Footprints of State Terror download - play

19Jul05 The London Bombings, Part Two: Inventing the Scapegoats download - play

16Aug05 The London Bombings, Part Three: Unravelling the Official Fiction download - play

23Aug05 The London Bombings, Part Four: The De Menezes Execution - Prelude to the Death-Squad State - download - play


13Jul05 Ralph Schoenman: The London Bombings download - play

26Jul05 Pattern of State Terror: From 9/11 to the London Bombings download - play

[Micpsi]

Whether the four men could have caught the 7.24am train (which left at 7.25am)
http://www.nogw.com/download/2005_conclusions7-7.pdf
and have arrived at 8.23am in time to be filmed on CCTV at Kings Cross at 8.26am remains a controversial issue. FinancialOutrage.org.uk is adamant that they could not, even if they had pre-purchased tickets, have got onto the platform within the available three minutes because walking took those investigating the issue 3m35s:

[Stefan]

[alwun]

Stefan
the 7.40 train cancellation was uncovered(never announced) by persistent application of FOI requests to the Luton station management, and were discovered by Xmas 05, I believe. Prole over at J7 is the one to ask.

cheers Al..

[numeral]

[alwun]

numeral

I stand corrected.

cheers Al..

[scubadiver]

[Stefan]

To make my point clearer -

I wasn't asking when it became uncovered by Nick that the train had been cancelled.

I was asking whether it is known when on the day of 7/7 was the train announced as cancelled.

[Bushwacker]

It is hardly relevant whether they knew the 7.40 had been cancelled or not. It would be natural to run to a train seen standing on a London-bound platform.

[rodin]

[Stefan]

[A.L.EX-N.E.TA]

We need a killer 7/7 documentry and enough cash to send a copy to everry household in the Greater London Area - though with over a million homes we'd be talking £2 million for DVD pressing and postage

[KP50]

[Bushwacker]

[kbo234]

[Bushwacker]

[kbo234]