View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Rory Winter Major Poster
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 1107 Location: Free Scotland!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
marky 54 Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 3293
|
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
what exactly is being discussed? just europe in general?
my stance is that if europe stands for freedom and democracy, why is it they are not being open about it and allowing the vote of the people?
it seems more like a case of 'your having it wether you like or not wether you stand for it or not' and given the bigbrother state being put in place at the same time it is very worrying IMO about what exactly the motives are for it. i don't like the idea of being ruled by somebody who was'nt voted in by the people.
how can it be called democratic when nobody has a say? i though democracy was the ability to vote for a leader, not having one enforced upon you without any say. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rory Winter Major Poster
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 1107 Location: Free Scotland!
|
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Welcome Marky54, so you found it! Problem with threads in Controversies it's like being sent to the Gulag Archipelago. Nobody hears from you again because --unlike the Dustbin-- posts to this thread don't get publicity in Latest Topics. So it's a pretty lonely sin bin.
Anyway I thought I might as well move before Tony relegated the thread there. The idea of starting a thread here was that there might be a place where anyone could publish without being threatened in the way I have been. This, however, is a temporary arrangement for now with other developments in the offing.
My intention all along was to try and reach a point where all sides could engage in a discussion freely with no coercion, harrassment or threats or fear of saying the wrong thing and offending a particular interest group. My main interest is to establish a forum where all sides can meet to engage in dialogue with each other rather than a slanging match.
The European issue concerns us all on this island and the sub-continent. It's an issue which cuts across all political views and concerns the future of our societies. Hence the need to discuss it intelligently without becoming overly emotional or reducing it to a point-scoring exercise.
Quote: | how can it be called democratic when nobody has a say? i though democracy was the ability to vote for a leader, not having one enforced upon you without any say. |
You make a very good point. Elsewhere I have tried to deal with this issue but so far it appears to have fallen on deaf ears. The problem of the present undemocratic nature of EU institutions is primarily because the Europarliament has been given next to no power. That is a totally unacceptable situation which has to be changed.
With widespread calls for a Referendum on the Lisbon Treaty (and not withdrawal as some would like us to believe) I believe that now is 'the moment of crisis' during we should look anew at what to do after the Irish referendum.
There are calls for a similar Referendum in the UK. That may yet happen. But whether it does or not there is a crying need to conduct an investigation into the question of who and what is threatening our, where the threats are coming from freedom and what we the people can do to defend our freedoms in the face of those threats.
Clearly, it is in no way the simplistic thing it has been made to look, ie a threat from an EU 'fascist state'. Most of the real threats to our human rights in Britain come from the power structure of our own rulers. We should be investigating those and the history of its development in greater detail, ie the threat from within, trying to put them into an historical context vis-a-vis the more recently perceived threat from without from an EU 'super-state'.
These are the kind of analyses I hope we can make here as well as to find a common ground, a consensus, between sides in an issue which has become dangerously polarised. In order to do this we have to try and listen to each other instead of continuing to behave like a dysfunctional family that's rowing and fighting continually.
So, a good starting point might be to ask the question: what is it that we, both the pro-EUers and anti-EUers have in common? We know all too well what divides us (and that too requires proper examination) but what common interests do we all share concerning the European issue?
These are some of the things I hope we can discuss here in as constructive a manner as possible.
Some of this is still being discussed on another thread which it would be worth keeping an eye on for now http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=114043#114043 _________________ One Planet - One People - One Destiny
http://chimesofreedom.blogspot.com
http://eurodemocrats.blogspot.com/
http://x09.eu/splash/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GAIALINK/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GAIALINK_FREE_UNIVERSITY/
Last edited by Rory Winter on Thu Apr 03, 2008 12:51 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zimboy69 Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 108
|
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 11:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the problem with the EU is were getting it without a choice
they should give us all a referendum
if it really is good for the country then they will have no worries
they could tell us all the amazing things that we will get and how it will help us all
but i suspect that its mostly big bussiness that will have the major benifits
and here is the problem
for 99% of the population they will get nothing or less than they have now
so for what reason should they vote for the EU |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rory Winter Major Poster
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 1107 Location: Free Scotland!
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 5:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | the problem with the EU is were getting it without a choice |
I suspect you mean the Lisbon Treaty, not the EU. The EU is simply a different name for what was previously called the European Community and before that the European Economic Community (EEC) which Britain voted twice about (1) to join and (2) to stay in.
Eire is having a Referendum to approve the Lisbon Treaty as it is the only EU country that is obliged to do so by its own laws. The French and the Danes had referendums on the proposed Constitution which was then scrapped and some say 90% of which has been re-presented as a Treaty.
But if it had remained as the Constitution only two EU countries voted against it. Eire would still have been required to ratify it with a referendum by law. No other country, including Britain, has a legal obligation such as this and it is up to the government of the day to decide whether or not to have a referendum.
So Quote: | they should give us all a referendum |
is an opinion of which the Government would have to be persuaded.
Quote: | if it really is good for the country then they will have no worries
they could tell us all the amazing things that we will get and how it will help us all |
And here's the problem. All the good bits like stronger Human Rights and Protection of Civil Liberties and Protected Labour Union Rights are being denied us the British people by a New Labour Government which doesn't want us to have such protected rights. So they blackmailed the other EU countries and got what are called Opt-Out Clauses which means that certain rights that other EU citizens enjoy we don't! For a detailed list see the list below.
Quote: | here is the problem
for 99% of the population they will get nothing or less than they have now
so for what reason should they vote for the EU |
If you look at the list below you will see that if the Government had simply accepted the entire Lisbon Treaty there would have been things to improve the quality of our lives. But it was the UK Government that blocked these, not the EU! That is the big irony that the anti-EU folk and the Europhobes choose to ignore!
These are the Fundamental Rights, some of which the Brown government opted out of by threatening to block the entire Charter if they didn't get this 'concession'. This amounted to an all-out attack by Brown & Co on the fundamental rights of the people of Britain.
Brown then had the nerve to present these Opt-Outs (which effectively deny us certain rights) as an "achievement" on behalf of the British people! It was a lie. The 'achievement' was secured to enable him to strengthen his Police State and benefit big business at the expense of British workers.
You, Europe, and your rights
The Government is blocking an EU charter which would protect these fundamental rights for British people. Why?
The Independent, 22 June 2007
http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article2692471.ece
Eugenics
Prohibition of eugenic practices, particularly those aiming at the selection of person. Article 3
What's at stake: Science is seeking to eradicate disabilities by genetic manipulation. It might be possible for parents to order a "designer" baby.
Expert opinion: "I would be totally opposed to any attempt to socially engineer people."
Ian Gibson, vice-president, Royal Society for Public Understanding of Science
Torture
No one should be subjected to torture. Article 4
What's at stake: Since the invasion of Iraq, British soldiers have found themselves in the dock over the abuse of civilian detainees
Expert opinion: "It is all the more deplorable when some of the most powerful men on earth seek to justify the use of torture."
Moazzam Begg, a torture victim and former prisoner in Guantanamo Bay
Human trafficking
Trafficking in human beings is prohibited. Article 5
What's at stake: This year the UN said that human trafficking had reached epidemic proportions. The Home Office said that in 2003, 4,000 women were trafficked into the UK for sexual exploitation
Expert opinion: "It is shameful that this country is trying to duck out of a charter that specifically prohibits child trafficking."
Louise Christian, human rights lawyer
Data protection
Everyone has the right to the protection of personal data concerning him or her. Article 8
What's at stake: A vast amount of data is stored on each of us already. From 2010, ID cards will be compulsory for anyone applying for a passport in the UK.
Expert opinion: "It's... a safeguard to protect the right of the individual in relation to the state."
Maurice Frankel, director, Campaign for Freedom of Information
Right to protest
Everyone has the right to freedom of assembly and of association. Article 12
What's at stake: Anti-war protests prompted the Government to bring in legislation to prevent unlicensed demos within quarter of a mile of Parliament
Expert opinion: "Allowing dissent in the form of peaceful protest is the hallmark of a country that understands respect for human rights."
Kate Allen, Amnesty International UK director
Working rights
Every citizen of the Union has the freedom to seek employment... in any Member state. Article 15
What's at stake: The Conservatives' fear is that Poles and other east Europeans have taken up jobs and housing at British workers' expense
Expert opinion: "People who come to work in the UK are providing vital services which would collapse without them."
Brendan Barber, TUC general secretary
Deportation
No one can be removed to a state where there is a serious risk of torture. Article 19
What's at stake: The Government's determination to deport terror suspects to countries with questionable human rights records
Expert opinion: "In an effort to circumvent its obligations, the Government has secured 'memoranda of understanding' with Jordan, Libya and Lebanon."
Shami Chakrabarti, Liberty director
Industrial action
Workers have the right to take collective action to defend their interests, including strike action. Article 28
What's at stake: The right to strike has been restricted in the UK since the 1980s. There are rules about ballots andpicketing. None of these restrictions is mentioned in the charter
Expert opinion: "We back the right to strike, to negotiate, to fight against unfair dismissal."
John Monks, European TUC leader
Child exploitation
The employment of children is prohibited... except for limited derogations. Article 32
What's at stake: Could be a threat to family-run corner shops where children help out, or to the pocket money others earn from babysitting or paper rounds
Expert opinion: "To keep children safe, we must ensure parents and employers are clear about how and when children and young people can be employed."
NSPCC statement
Health care
Everyone has the right to preventative health care. Article 35
What's at stake: Earlier this month, The Independent highlighted a new pill that could help hay fever sufferers, which the NHS will not prescribe because of cost. Critics say this clause could open the NHS to litigation
Expert opinion: "This article would not give much backing to any patient who took on the NHS."
Dr Evan Harris, member Medical Ethics Committee _________________ One Planet - One People - One Destiny
http://chimesofreedom.blogspot.com
http://eurodemocrats.blogspot.com/
http://x09.eu/splash/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GAIALINK/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GAIALINK_FREE_UNIVERSITY/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rory Winter Major Poster
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 1107 Location: Free Scotland!
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 5:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
... And so the point has to be made and loudly: it is not 'Europe' or a European Constitution which threatens the fundamental rights of the British. It is the fascist attitude of our own governments (both Nu Labour and Tory) which are creating the police state!
It is Britain that is the odd-man-out when it comes to the European Charter of Fundamental Rights. That is the reality. Yet what we read in most of the Murdoch media (utter lies of course) makes out 'Europe' to be the threat! These lies must be challenged by folk like you and me. The fascist policies of British governments must be challenged, by civil disobedience if necessary, and we must appeal to the European Union for help. It is our only, last chance!
This goes for all of us but especially for minority groups who are at the sharp end of the British government's fascist persecution.
The people of Britain are the victims of the treason of their own political leaders. In the name of God, how long will it be before they wake up to see the truth. The truth, not the nonsense that is being shoved down our throats by a Right wing, fascist establishment?
There is still time to fight these fascist chickenhawks. To give up the struggle before the battle is over is to be a coward and a defeatist. Worse still, to do so is to betray ourselves, our families and our most precious beliefs.
We must not surrender to them! _________________ One Planet - One People - One Destiny
http://chimesofreedom.blogspot.com
http://eurodemocrats.blogspot.com/
http://x09.eu/splash/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GAIALINK/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GAIALINK_FREE_UNIVERSITY/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rory Winter Major Poster
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 1107 Location: Free Scotland!
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 5:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Why are Tony Blair and Gordon Brown trying to deny us the Charter of Fundamental Rights?
Spy.blog, 23 June 2007
http://tinyurl.com/27uooz
What with all the media spin by the UK Government and the European Union and the shallow analysis and reporting by the mainstream media, we are puzzled as to what exactly has been agreed at the European Union summit in Brussels this weekend.
We are still especially worried about what exactly Tony Blair and Gordon Brown have agreed to with regard to the European Union Reform Treaty and especially, the legally binding Charter of Fundamental Rights (.pdf) These sort of follow the European Convention on Human Rights and the UK's Human Rights Act 2000:
Article 7 Respect for private and family life
Everyone has the right to respect for his or her private and family life, home and communications.
Article 8 Protection of personal data
1. Everyone has the right to the protection of personal data concerning him or her.
2. Such data must be processed fairly for specified purposes and on the basis of the consent of the person concerned or some other legitimate basis laid down by law. Everyone has the right of access to data which has been collected concerning him or her, and the right to have it rectified.
3. Compliance with these rules shall be subject to control by an independent authority.
However, there are significant differences i,e, there are no explicit exemptions for the Government using vague weasel words like "national security" or "the prevention or detection of crime" or "public health" or "the economic interests of the UK" etc. which so much UK legislation has embedded into it.
Nothing seems to have changed since we commented on this back in 2004: Have the pundits actually bothered to read the EU Constitution ?
See also this confusing BBC background article on Charter of Fundamental Rights
Is there really a workable United Kingdom "opt out" from these clauses ?
If so, then why should we tolerate authoritarian Labour politicians who seek to deny us these human rights, which are enjoyed and legally enforced by the rest of the European Union ?
We demand that these existing human rights are upheld now and ratified by this UK Government and all future ones.
__________
Rory's Comments:
Although this article was published last June the points being made are still highly relevant. The Blair/Brown regime has cunningly cashed in on the innate Europhobia of the British (and in particular the English) by using a wholly unfounded disaffection among Brits for the European Union to exert pressure on other member nations and the Commission in order to extract 'concessions' from the Union, not in the interests of the common people but on behalf of the vested interests of British capital and the ruling classes.
The high level of ignorance and Europhobic prejudice amongst Brits was deliberately nurtured by British politicians and their attendant media in order to use it as a weapon against progressive European social and civil rights.
At the recent meeting at Lisbon, not only did the Brits insist on their right to opt put of the new Charter but went out of their way to water-down the Charter nevertheless. Proof indeed of the mischievous intent of the Brits to act as a reactionary force within the EU working, no doubt, in the interests of Washington's neocons.
The British, along with others on the Right in countries like Poland, are now seen by other Europeans to be a trojan horse for Washington. They play an entirely destructive role as an adversary of the EU. While doing so they ensure that their own people are kept ignorant of the deceptive game they are playing.
Ultimately, it is the British people who will pay the price and that they have now begun to do with Britain's inexorable slide into becoming a full-blown police state. The time has already come when those of us in Britain who consider ourselves to be rightfully citizens of Europe to mobilize ourselves against these tinpot dictators. All is not yet lost and I believe the time has come, as European citizens, to make a direct appeal to the European Union to help us protect our fundamental civil rights against an oppressive, domestic government.
http://tinyurl.com/3dyefr _________________ One Planet - One People - One Destiny
http://chimesofreedom.blogspot.com
http://eurodemocrats.blogspot.com/
http://x09.eu/splash/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GAIALINK/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GAIALINK_FREE_UNIVERSITY/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rory Winter Major Poster
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 1107 Location: Free Scotland!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|