The Coroner ensured a cover up and a whitewash the moment he declared that "unlawful killing by persons unknown" was not an allowable outcome.
So the lies from this multi-million pound charade are just repeated
Steven's inquiry was perhaps a little more honest
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/apr/07/diana.monarchy
No wonder Al Fayed remains furious
There's a whole heap of evidence that remains that this was assassination and sacrifice _________________ http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction
I like how they say there's absolute zero evidence of a 'conspiracy' to 'murder' Diana. Going off their logic there's zero evidence of an accident either! Why don't they just deny the crash ever happened, order all images and news footage to be erased and repeat over and over again 'Diana and Dodi's Mercedes simply disappeared' You can guarantee there are people out there who would buy that explanation, even now!!!
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 1:09 am Post subject: Princess Diana - The Witnesses In The Tunnel
It's now all there on the record. Unfortunately for the British Royal family this execution is not going away.
Paparazzi were not to blame, exonerated in the Channel 4 documentary which Charles and Philip tried to pull their tatty strings to ban. And it proved beyond reasonable doubt premeditation to FRAME the photographers.
The 25 CCTV cameras along the route were turned away from the road
The exit preceding the tunnel was blocked by a motorcycle
The Mercedes involved was stolen at gunpoint a few days before and recovered by police with no problem other than its engine management microchip had been taken
Henri Paul's blood sample had a vast amount of CO, carbon monoxide, origins unknown
The ambulance carrying Diana to hospital took between 1hr 15 mins and 1 hr 40mins to do a 10 min journey
It parked in the car park of a museum within sight of the hospital for a number of minutes for reasons unknown
Contrary to French law her body was embalmed immediately
At the same time the crash scene had the wreckage removed and the crime scene was jet-washed and traffic moving again within a couple of hours
Henri Paul had many cash deposits in his bank account of some 2 - 4 thousand Euros
On the night of the crash he had a couple of thousand Euros in an envelope
Diana's seatbelt was obstructed and couldnt be worn
A papparazo who boasted he was in the tunnel on the night of the crash was later murdered in the south of France in a car that was locked from the outside. Verdict suicide
A few weeks before the Diana crash, Camilla Parker-Bowles was involved in a car crash from which she fled into the neighbouring woods
Was she fearful of assassination?
Need I go on?
There's much much more _________________ http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction
Daily Express ran article 06/04/2006: "Diana seatbelt sabotage probe"
I dont recall Mercedes providing evidence to the inquest?
From what i remember they had not been allowed access to the wrecked vehicle. _________________
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:05 pm Post subject: The man who killed Princess Diana?
James Andansan, a Frenchman by the name of Jean Paul Gonin, a millionaire paparrazi and rumoured freelance photographer for several intelligence agencies, photographed Diana and spent several days on her yacht in the month of her death, taking photos of her to sell to newspapers. He boasted to the widow of one of his friends that he had been in the Alma Tunnel the night she died and had taken photos there. Ex-MI6 agent Richard Tomlinson claimed that MI6 did employ a photographer in Paris as one of their agents (see interview in video below for confirmation of both these statements).
Andansan was found dead in a burnt-out car in June, 2000.
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/12839/Diana:-Fiat-driver
A French fireman called to the scene of the burning car said that he saw TWO bullet holes in Andansan's head. The police decided to call his death a suicide, but his widow, his friends and the funeral director remained sceptical that he killed himself. For one thing, his car was locked from the outside, and no car keys were found in it, suggesting that his killer made the error of taking the keys away with him after shooting Andansan and setting fire to his car in order to hide any forensic evidence and to make it appear that Andanson had committed suicide. Shooting him twice was another blunder - in fact, a dead giveaway that someone else had shot him - because it is virtually impossible for someone to pull a trigger a second time having just shot himself in the head! Was Andanson killed because he had started to boast to his friends that he had been at the scene of Diana's car crash and might have given the game away if he blabbed his mouth any more?
I'm surprised Tony didn't tell us the jury 's majority verdit was 9/11 for the unlawful killing! Isn't there talk of AlFayed being sued as his employe was drunk?
The driver was not drunk.
How many people get drunk after two single measures?
In this inquest.: the judge said Paul Burrell lied.
The French did not provide the cctv from the cameras.
Alot has gone undiscovered.
Dont forget "OSWALD LE WINTER"
He is the former agent with connections to Mossad who offered to sell Al Fayad an aparantly authentic M16 file detailing the whole Diana assaination plot for £10,000,000.
You may recall thet Annie Machon was hired by Al Fayad to verify these documents and told them that the documents were fake.
Princess Diana was probably killed for political reasons. Foremostly because she was certainly Muslim friendly which would have made the wars against Islam much harder to conduct and also because she was planning to start campaigning for the Palestinian cause. _________________
Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 1107 Location: Free Scotland!
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:26 pm Post subject:
My God, what does it take to shake the Establishment of this country?!
The outcome was predictable. It was always going to be a whitewash. And notice how criminals like Gordon Brown are saying, it's time to move on and draw a line in the sand blah, blah?
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:52 pm Post subject:
Absolutely ALL of the coverage appears to have been put together by shrinks.
Crude attempts to guilt trip the nation into dropping what they know to be true - by telling us William and Harry want us to 'let it go'. Yes, crude psycology.
Royals, aided and abbetted by the taxpayer funded occultists at MI6 dark forces central - were out to get this lady who knew what mean-hearted shysters they are and ran rings round them in the press.
The royal reptiles were losing the battle against her despite their infinite financial resources to bribe their way to influence. In life she drove these control freaks mad and in death she will continue to do so. For ever. They have only two choices, stop being control freaks or else plunging the nation into Chinese style totalitarianism.
Doomed: Henri Paul at the wheel of the Mercedes on the fateful last journey with bodyguard Trevor Rees in the passenger seat and Diana, in the back, turning to look out of the rear window
'I know he was NOT drunk': Henri Paul's mother insists he was damned by flawed evidence
By REBECCA ENGLISH - 8th April 2008
Henri Paul's elderly mother was "deeply saddened" last night as she insisted her son was not a drunk and branded the inquest's verdict "not the truth". Gisele Paul, who is in her mid-70s, said: "I had hoped that the jury would see reason but I am really not surprised that they have condemned Henri as the other two inquiries did. "They should have taken into consideration the statements and the evidence that showed the tests carried out on Henri's blood were flawed and should have been dismissed as evidence. "My son was not an alcoholic and he was not drunk at the wheel of the Mercedes. The verdict of the jury is not the truth." At her home in Lorient, Brittany, Mrs Paul demanded: "How could my son have driven the Mercedes with 1.8grammes of alcohol and 20 per cent carbon monoxide in his blood? It's ridiculous. "The jury saw footage of him at the Ritz on the night of the accident. He bent down to tie his shoelace and spoke to the princess and his boss's son. He was doing his job competently and he was not drunk. Anyone could see that." Gisele Paul and her husband Jean have always maintained that the blood sample which showed Henri to be three times over the limit and contained a massive level of carbon monoxide did not come from their son. Mr Paul said the inquest was "sewn up" by the time he and his wife gave their evidence. He said: "The general impression we got when we went to Paris to give evidence to the inquest by video link was that somehow the whole affair had already been sewn up." The jury verdict came as a crushing blow to the Pauls' hopes that their son's name would be finally cleared of what they and their lawyer have called "an atrocious slur". The question of whether Henri Paul's ability to drive was impaired by drink or drugs may never be fully answered. His parents claim they were told by Lord Stevens, who conducted the British police inquiry into the crash, that their son was not drunk on the night he died. The former Metropolitan Police Commissioner told the inquest that he meant the driver was not - as had been reported earlier - "as drunk as a pig" but more correctly "under the influence of alcohol". Toxicologist Professor Robert Forrest said he thought Mr Paul had drunk up to eight double measures of his favourite aniseed spirit, Ricard, before the crash, telling the jury: "I would not get in a car with someone who had had two Ricards." Blood tests showed he was twice the British legal drink-drive limit and more than three times the French limit. The jury was told there was "no doubt" the Ritz security chief had been prescribed a variety of medications shortly before his death, including Acamprosate because he was 'worried' about his drinking, and the antidepressant Prozac. But Mohamed Al Fayed insists Mr Paul's blood tests were flawed, and Professor Forrest said that the Paris laboratory that did the tests committed such serious errors - including storing blood in an ice cream tub - that it would not have been allowed to operate in the UK. Mystery over the toxin levels found in the Frenchman's body also remains. Blood samples showed such high levels of carbon monoxide that Mr Paul should have had severe headaches and nausea. Tests carried out hours after the crash showed the levels of carbon monoxide in Mr Paul's blood ranged between 12 and 21 per cent - a normal reading is around two and four per cent. Yet hours before his death Mr Paul was seen on CCTV at the Ritz parking his car and walking around in apparent good health. Richard Keen QC, the barrister representing his parents, suggested the samples had been "spiked" in an attempt to "posthumously murder" the Frenchman's reputation and portray him as a drunk. The jury heard several possibilities to explain the high readings, including that the driver inhaled gas from the Mercedes airbag after impact or that the levels may have been connected to Mr Paul's heavy smoking. Professor Forrest admitted he could not find a logical explanation for the findings. "One is left with either analytical error or a mystery," he said. "It's either conspiracy or c***-up."
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_artic le_id=557965&in_page_id=1770 _________________ www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org www.rethink911.org www.patriotsquestion911.com www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org www.mediafor911truth.org www.pilotsfor911truth.org www.mp911truth.org www.ae911truth.org www.rl911truth.org www.stj911.org www.v911t.org www.thisweek.org.uk www.abolishwar.org.uk www.elementary.org.uk www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149 http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:10 pm Post subject:
I don't know where Paul got that from but Diana was well known to have obsessively worn a seat belt - always made a point of it - it appears that night she wasn't for some reason.
IanFantom wrote:
paul wright wrote:
Quote:
Diana's seatbelt was obstructed and couldnt be worn
I hadn't heard that one. Where does it come from?
Ian.
ah, here it is - the investigator isn't named
Quote:
Analysis of the wreckage of the car by the Transport Research Laboratory in 2005 was undertaken by a forensic accident investigator who had 35 years experience. He found that all the seatbelts were in good working order, with the exception of the right rear one which was where Diana was seated
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/apr/07/diana.monarchy1
And the other one was the 'Boston Brakes' manouevre, developed by the SAS in their HQ in Boston where the management of the brakes, steering and engine is taken over by remote control as described by ex-SAS operative Sir Ranulph Fiennes This only applies to cars which have sophisticated management chips in use. other modifications may have been made to the car, which is why Mercedes engineers have never been allowed to examine the wreckage
The Mercedes was another remote-control jobee, in line with the masonic importance of the Thirteenth Pillar and Diana's own nightmares _________________ http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction
You have to read 'DIANA:THE HIDDEN EVIDENCE'
which is a book by by two investigative journalists called Jon KIng and John Beveridge, and was published in 2002.
The evidence of a staged accident and a conspiracy is very convincing.
Some of the allegations were looked at during the inquest. For example Henri Paul's blood sample being switched. It is my understanding there indeed is doubt over the sample and this was exposed at the inquest.
However there are allegations in this book that were NOT put to the test.
For example that the mercedes car they were killed in, was stolen at gunpoint by 'thieves' sometime before the crash, and had its original microchip removed. This microchip controls the ABS brakes and the power steering. The car was returned, or 'found' later.
In this book Sir Ranulph Fiennes who was in the SAS, said a device called the 'BOSTON BRAKES' was a device designed by the SAS to remotely control cars to crash. There is nothing the driver could do about it.
So was the car stolen in order to fit this device...?"
Have a look at this clip of this video as it shows
one of the authors talking about
Air Marshall Peter Horsley,who on one occasion was driving his car when he lost control of the steering.
The steering was being controlled remotely and the car swerved violently from left to right.
click on this link or copy and paste it into your browser to watch:
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 6:29 pm Post subject:
From: Chris Everard at Enigma Motion Pictures
I have had thousands of emails from people who have watched my ILLUMINATI series of films (http://www.illuminatiDVD.com), asking questions about the recent enquiry into the crash which killed Princess Diana just over 10 years ago. Many of the questions are from the David Icke forum visitors, and people who have read David’s books.
I have presented my research into the death of Princess Diana in a FOUR hour film called LADY DIE, and I have created a website for people to read reviews and comments about my film at http://www.LadyDieDVD.com
The most common questions which many of you have emailed to me are these:
Q: Do I Agree With David Icke’s Research in THE BIGGEST SECRET?
Answer: Not Only Do I Agree With it, I Have Presented Some New Video Evidence Which Suggests Occult Rituals Are Happening at Hampton Court Palace.
Q: Do I think Diana was murdered?
Answer: Yes
Q: Who Killed Diana?
Answer: Operatives of British Military Intelligence (most probably MI6).
Q: Who Ordered the Killing?
Answer: According to Diana’s own Hand Written Notes, She Suspected Prince Charles of Planning An Accident to Kill Her. I do not Disagree.
Q: Did Diana Die Due Entirely to Injuries Suffered in the Crashed Mercedes?
Answer: No, She Was ‘Finished Off’ in the Back of an Ambulance Which Deliberately Parked Up and Took Nearly 90 minutes to Make a Journey of 11 Minutes.
Q: Why Was Lord Stevens’ Computer Stolen?
Answer: So That The Investigation Could be Monitored by Spies Reporting Back to Buckingham Palace.
Q: Do I Think The Royal Family Are Involved With The Occult?
Answer: Most Definitely, Yes.
Q: Are There Black Magic Rituals or Occult Activities Going On at Royal Palaces?
Answer: Yes, I present Video CCTV Footage Which Proves It.
Q: Why Was Diana Murdered?
Answer: She Knew Too Much About The Perverted Lives of the Royals and How They Have Stabbed & Slashed Their Way Through History.
LADY DIE is not a film for the feint hearted. My film encompasses many facets of Diana’s life, and presents a timeline leading up to the assassination.
I present new evidence and new motives.
The links between Prince Philip and the Profumo Scandal, Princess Grace of Monaco and the Order of the Solar Temple, Exorcisms on Aristocratic Estates, Eerie Figures Dressed as Medieval Black Magicians Caught on CCTV at Royal Palaces, The Double Murder of Two Young Princes by the Royals, The Forced Murder by Lethal Injection of King George, The ‘Box of Secrets’ Diana Kept and many other items of evidence are explored in this film, produced by Queen of Compassion Films in Australia.
LADY DIE is now in stock and you do NOT need a paypal account to order the film – just click through through the paypal payment options until you see the familiar credit card logos. I promise your DVD will be dispatched within 48 hours of your order.
Proceeds will be used to offer training courses in film making and media studies, encouraging people to make films about Landmines, AIDS and other subjects which Princess Diana was interested in.
I would like to thank DAVID ICKE and the Australian team of producers, plus extra special thanks to the subscribers of THE ENIGMA CHANNEL – a new season of shows will be launched soon featuring extra bonus footage and interviews.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
