noise
New Poster
Joined: 28 Nov 2006
Posts: 4
Location: United States
|
 Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:34 am Post subject: Transparent conspiracy or the failure to conceal complicity |
 |
|
| Quote: | I want to elaborate somewhat on the idea of transparent conspiracy (see part 3), lest the idea seem too big to chew. It is chewable, but it takes a little work. Even though I have been chewing on it for some time, I am only now arriving at the conclusion, as I pointed out in part 4, that the theory is correct.
First of all, let's give it a name that will itself be more transpaent: MITOP. We are familiar with LIHOP (Let It Happen On Purpose) and MIHOP (Made It Happen On Purpose). Now we have "Made It Transparent On Purpose."
What do so many people now think 9/11 was an inside job? Because there are so many reasons to think so? Yes--for all of those reasons, and for one more that not so many people may have thought of: we are supposed to think so. The perpetrators, the people on the inside (Orwell's "Inner Party") want us to think so.
(snip)
The simplest and most logical answer to this is that they were not that stupid. On the contrary, they wanted us to know. They have always wanted us--at least those of us who are not yet fully lobotomized by the mainstream propaganda--to know that they can do whatever they * well want to with us, which includes not only 9/11 but also jamming a ridiculous and totally incredible fairy tale down our throats. They want us to know, very clearly but without having to come out and say it explicitly (this may come if martial law is imposed), as I have put it more bluntly earlier, that they've got us by the balls (short hairs for the politically correct).
http://www.geocities.com/mdmorrissey/logical6 |
I like his theory because IMO it does fit the MO of some false sponsorship attacks. That said, there are aspects that seem contradictory:
1. If a key goal of false sponsorship attacks is to convince the public that the false sponsor was responsible, then why detract from that goal by way of "showing their cards?"
2. How could they (the real perps) know that MITOP wouldn't get out of hand? Wouldn't the lower level operatives be worried that if things (for example the coverup afterwards) didn't go as planned that they would be sacrificed? |
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
