FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Why be a critic?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Critics' Corner
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Busker
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 374
Location: North East

PostPosted: Thu May 01, 2008 5:51 pm    Post subject: Why be a critic? Reply with quote

I'd be interested to know why critics hang around and spend their time of 9/11 forums.

It would be a bit like me arguing how nonsense football is and spending hours trying to convince football fans they were wasting their lives.

So genuinely, why are critics here? What's your motivation?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alex_V
Wrecker
Wrecker


Joined: 24 Sep 2007
Posts: 515
Location: London, England

PostPosted: Thu May 01, 2008 6:17 pm    Post subject: Re: Why be a critic? Reply with quote

That's a question I regularly ask myself - I'm currently 'considering my position'. Smile

Motivations...

- I have a good friend who is a truther, and I don't think it would be morally right for me to just wash my hands of a topic which he passionately believes in. I see it as a duty to him to engage him and show an interest, even if it means vehemently disagreeing with him.

- I am genuinely concerned that truthers may turn into violent extremists. I believe to some small extent that I am doing a good turn in trying to expose flaws in their reasoning.

- I think the other reason I retain an interest, is that I have a genuine interest in finding a conspiracy. I'm waiting for the conspiracy theorists to get something right, and they only have to be right once for a whole can of worms to be opened. (I must admit I'm losing faith in this happening)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SHERITON HOTEL
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 988

PostPosted: Thu May 01, 2008 6:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No-one knows the definitive 9/11 truth, except the 9/11 guilty, and the US authorities won't have a proper enquiry, so how do these truth critics pontificate from a position of (it appears) 'the official narrative is gospel' certainty? Like the threads' author says, they expend sooo much energy on people they consider loons!! what did the bard say?...me thinks she/they (i'm paraphrasing) doth protest too much!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
paul wright
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 2650
Location: Sunny Bradford, Northern Lights

PostPosted: Thu May 01, 2008 6:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
- I am genuinely concerned that truthers may turn into violent extremists. I believe to some small extent that I am doing a good turn in trying to expose flaws in their reasoning.


You what????? Sounds like a good excuse for a round-up.

_________________
http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
SHERITON HOTEL
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 988

PostPosted: Thu May 01, 2008 6:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

'Critics' seem to be proportionately far too large a percentage on internet forums than opinion polls on 9/11 suggest they should be, if any were proven to be in the pay of the government, what would this say?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alex_V
Wrecker
Wrecker


Joined: 24 Sep 2007
Posts: 515
Location: London, England

PostPosted: Thu May 01, 2008 7:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SHERITON HOTEL wrote:
No-one knows the definitive 9/11 truth, except the 9/11 guilty, and the US authorities won't have a proper enquiry, so how do these truth critics pontificate from a position of (it appears) 'the official narrative is gospel' certainty? Like the threads' author says, they expend sooo much energy on people they consider loons!! what did the bard say?...me thinks she/they (i'm paraphrasing) doth protest too much!


You basically seem to be saying that the more wrong critics think you are, the more likely that you are right Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alex_V
Wrecker
Wrecker


Joined: 24 Sep 2007
Posts: 515
Location: London, England

PostPosted: Thu May 01, 2008 7:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

paul wright wrote:
You what????? Sounds like a good excuse for a round-up.


I suppose it does - another damn good reason for a debate to happen within forums like this.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pepik
Banned
Banned


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 591
Location: The Square Mile

PostPosted: Thu May 01, 2008 8:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I debunk because truthers are apologists for mass murdering terrorists, and their truther views are often the tip of a very big and ugly iceberg.
_________________
"could it be that ww2 and the extermination of jewish people was planned as a way of creating a race of people who it would be difficult to blame for anything, a cover race for the illuminati?" - a quote NOT from the 'controversial theories' section.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
paul wright
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 2650
Location: Sunny Bradford, Northern Lights

PostPosted: Thu May 01, 2008 11:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh yes. We are the guilty ones. Apologists for mass killings. We ought to out these critics from here. This is another time I've seen it. We've been accused of being future violent extremists. These critics are really getting in the mode They're trying to accuse us of future crimes
Seriously. They've revealed the mode of thought to condemn us on the part of authority
Get them out of here, Tony, or I will
They've transgressed

_________________
http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Alex_V
Wrecker
Wrecker


Joined: 24 Sep 2007
Posts: 515
Location: London, England

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 12:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

paul wright wrote:
Oh yes. We are the guilty ones. Apologists for mass killings. We ought to out these critics from here. This is another time I've seen it. We've been accused of being future violent extremists. These critics are really getting in the mode They're trying to accuse us of future crimes
Seriously. They've revealed the mode of thought to condemn us on the part of authority
Get them out of here, Tony, or I will
They've transgressed


Pepik has a totally fair point - whatever spin you put on debunkers as apologists for a crime could apply perfectly well in the opposite direction. Your indignation at the suggestion could be seen as hypocrisy.

I also didn't accuse anyone of any crime in the future - I don't appreciate my words being spun like this. Please don't play the victim here - surely we can aspire to a higher level of debate than this mock indignation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Busker
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 374
Location: North East

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 3:11 am    Post subject: Re: Why be a critic? Reply with quote

Alex_V wrote:
That's a question I regularly ask myself - I'm currently 'considering my position'. Smile

Motivations...

- I have a good friend who is a truther, and I don't think it would be morally right for me to just wash my hands of a topic which he passionately believes in. I see it as a duty to him to engage him and show an interest, even if it means vehemently disagreeing with him.

- I am genuinely concerned that truthers may turn into violent extremists. I believe to some small extent that I am doing a good turn in trying to expose flaws in their reasoning.

- I think the other reason I retain an interest, is that I have a genuine interest in finding a conspiracy. I'm waiting for the conspiracy theorists to get something right, and they only have to be right once for a whole can of worms to be opened. (I must admit I'm losing faith in this happening)


Alex
Thanks for your frank response to the question posed.

I have to take exception at your "may turn into violent extremists" comment though. I think that shows a flaw in your thinking rather than those who doubt the "official line of 9/11".

As you remain to be convinced by those who doubt the official line, I yet to remain convinced by the official line. I dont understand how WTC7 was brought down without controlled demolishion. I don't understand how the entire plane folded into a 16 feet wide hole at the pentagon and didn't leave bodies, seats or baggage at the scene or physical damage from the tail or engines. So if you could help me out on that I'd appreciate it.

Do you believe all people capable of critical thinking are potential violent extremists?

Thanks once again for your polite response.


Last edited by Busker on Fri May 02, 2008 8:46 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pepik
Banned
Banned


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 591
Location: The Square Mile

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 8:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Oh yes. We are the guilty ones. Apologists for mass killings. We ought to out these critics from here. This is another time I've seen it. We've been accused of being future violent extremists. These critics are really getting in the mode They're trying to accuse us of future crimes
Seriously. They've revealed the mode of thought to condemn us on the part of authority
I regularly get accused of covering up mass murder for believing Al Queda did it, yet I don't go home in tears. In fact I have been told that I will be hung as a traitor some day (not here, mind you). One of us is right, the other is either deliberately or accidentally aiding the cover up of a mass murder. Why can't I say it?
Quote:
Get them out of here, Tony, or I will
They've transgressed
Oh yeah, that reminds me of the other reason I come here. The laughs.

But as for future crimes, well, why not wonder? Conspiracy theories can be perfectly legitimate and even true. They can also be popular with the insane and extremists. Timothy McVeigh believed conspiracy theories, so did Adolf Hitler, so did David Copeland. Hamas has conspiracy theories written into their constitution. Paranoid schizophrenics by definition all believe in conspiracy theories.

And if you genuinely believed the governments and the media were controlled by a secret cabal which was plotting tyranny and murder on a colossal scale (standard stuff for the likes of Alex Jones), well, you've pretty much written yourself a solid justification for violent resistance haven't you?

_________________
"could it be that ww2 and the extermination of jewish people was planned as a way of creating a race of people who it would be difficult to blame for anything, a cover race for the illuminati?" - a quote NOT from the 'controversial theories' section.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alex_V
Wrecker
Wrecker


Joined: 24 Sep 2007
Posts: 515
Location: London, England

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 12:22 pm    Post subject: Re: Why be a critic? Reply with quote

Busker wrote:
As you remain to be convinced by those who doubt the official line, I yet to remain convinced by the official line. I dont understand how WTC7 was brought down without controlled demolishion. I don't understand how the entire plane folded into a 16 feet wide hole at the pentagon and didn't leave bodies, seats or baggage at the scene or physical damage from the tail or engines. So if you could help me out on that I'd appreciate it.


NIST are preparing a report to explain how WTC7 collapsed. What is your evidence that the hole in the pentagon was 16 feet wide? The victims were identified from the scene. There is plenty of evidence of wreckage.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SHERITON HOTEL
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 988

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 12:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are the critics not concerned that with so many 9/11 questions unanswered,they may have been propping up treasonous mass murderers of the worst kind and keeping them from justice? How do they sleep at night?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dogsmilk
Mighty Poster
Mighty Poster


Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1616

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 12:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Alex_V wrote:
paul wright wrote:
Oh yes. We are the guilty ones. Apologists for mass killings. We ought to out these critics from here. This is another time I've seen it. We've been accused of being future violent extremists. These critics are really getting in the mode They're trying to accuse us of future crimes
Seriously. They've revealed the mode of thought to condemn us on the part of authority
Get them out of here, Tony, or I will
They've transgressed


Pepik has a totally fair point - whatever spin you put on debunkers as apologists for a crime could apply perfectly well in the opposite direction. Your indignation at the suggestion could be seen as hypocrisy.

I also didn't accuse anyone of any crime in the future - I don't appreciate my words being spun like this. Please don't play the victim here - surely we can aspire to a higher level of debate than this mock indignation.


Yes, but it doesn't do much good if everyone just accuses the other side of being apologists. I doubt many truthers sincerely want to act as an apologist to mass murder just as I don't think many critics do. I think all sides can agree on the awfulness of the crime while perhaps disagreeing on the exact perpetrator.
This thread is just going to turn into "you're the apologist" "No! you are!" as appears is already happening.^

I am genuinely intrigued at your suggestion truthers may become "violent extremists". In what way do you foresee this potentially occurring?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
A Sharp Major
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 19 Feb 2006
Posts: 237
Location: In the van with the blacked out windows, parked outside your home.

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 1:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Most if not all the answers from officialdom, fire department professionals, the majority of witnesses and more distant professional observers (those with peer reviewed technical papers on the subjects) are not acceptable to the truthiness movement. The truthiness movement has shown that it isn't qualified to critique NIST et.al. In an adjacent thread one truther has shown that he or she doesn't understand how a gas cutting torch works (ask a welder)* but rabbits on elsewhere about heat transfer as if he/she is Lord Kelvin. * Par for the course.

Even the odd truther claiming an engineering degree posts evidence that they may have passed exams but don't understand the application. Jones and Wood included. Six years plus of truthiness and no alternative theories supported by peer reviewed calculations of what should have happened in truther world. If truthers really believe that 'nine eleven was an inside job' they haven't been very successful in putting their alternative 'theory' across. Do they even go to NIST's public progress meetings to view the engineering science for themselves and challenge the in house and contracted experts' theories and calculations? No, they wait for publication and get some non technical professors to 'demand' amendments in 'open letters'. Rolling Eyes

* Cue google frenzy by truthers 'educating' themselves.

_________________
"It's been my policy to view the Internet not as an 'information highway,' but as an electronic asylum filled with babbling loonies.” Mike Royko

http://www.screwloosechange.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Dogsmilk
Mighty Poster
Mighty Poster


Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1616

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 1:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am sorry but your failure to appreciate Stockhausen undermines everything you write.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
SHERITON HOTEL
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 988

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wait a minute, didn't I see a film of a NIST official (sweating profusely)in denial about molten metal below WTC 1, 2 AND 7 months post 9/11 and requesting the person who suggested it send him the satellite thermal images for WTC hotspots...then refuse to give contact details? have the critics had a suspicion by-pass?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pepik
Banned
Banned


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 591
Location: The Square Mile

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 1:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dogsmilk wrote:
Yes, but it doesn't do much good if everyone just accuses the other side of being apologists.
I was asked why I debunk, so I gave the honest truth.
Dogsmilk wrote:
I am genuinely intrigued at your suggestion truthers may become "violent extremists". In what way do you foresee this potentially occurring?
I tried explaining:
pepik wrote:
But as for future crimes, well, why not wonder? Conspiracy theories can be perfectly legitimate and even true. They can also be popular with the insane and extremists. Timothy McVeigh believed conspiracy theories, so did Adolf Hitler, so did David Copeland. Hamas has conspiracy theories written into their constitution. Paranoid schizophrenics by definition all believe in conspiracy theories.

And if you genuinely believed the governments and the media were controlled by a secret cabal which was plotting tyranny and murder on a colossal scale (standard stuff for the likes of Alex Jones), well, you've pretty much written yourself a solid justification for violent resistance haven't you?

_________________
"could it be that ww2 and the extermination of jewish people was planned as a way of creating a race of people who it would be difficult to blame for anything, a cover race for the illuminati?" - a quote NOT from the 'controversial theories' section.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SHERITON HOTEL
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 988

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 1:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Apologist for mass murder and treason is pretty consistent with working in the square mile.

"bet, you'd sell your mother, you could buy another!" ref.10cc Wall Street Shuffle.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
A Sharp Major
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 19 Feb 2006
Posts: 237
Location: In the van with the blacked out windows, parked outside your home.

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 1:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Wait a minute, didn't I see a film of a NIST official (sweating profusely)in denial about molten metal below WTC 1, 2 AND 7 months post 9/11 and requesting the person who suggested it send him the satellite thermal images for WTC hotspots...then refuse to give contact details? have the critics had a suspicion by-pass?


I'm sure if you did you will post a link.

The NIST staff directory is on the NIST web page. Invitations to public progress meetings are also therein. They even have a 'work for us' link. What an opportunity for the emerging truthiness movement engineers and scientists. So what excuse do truthers have for dragging their heels? Is it really more fruitful and fun to shout at ground zero and rant at cyberspace?

_________________
"It's been my policy to view the Internet not as an 'information highway,' but as an electronic asylum filled with babbling loonies.” Mike Royko

http://www.screwloosechange.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Alex_V
Wrecker
Wrecker


Joined: 24 Sep 2007
Posts: 515
Location: London, England

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 1:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I doubt many truthers sincerely want to act as an apologist to mass murder just as I don't think many critics do. I think all sides can agree on the awfulness of the crime while perhaps disagreeing on the exact perpetrator.


Agreed. But this thread was started with the question of why critics 'criticise'. Should Pepik lie in his answer or be honest?

Quote:
I am genuinely intrigued at your suggestion truthers may become "violent extremists". In what way do you foresee this potentially occurring?


I'm certainly not expecting Paul Wright or any other specific truther to start mounting an armed resistance movement, if that's what you mean. My concern is more theoretical - as Pepik points out, the upshot of many of these conspiracy theorists is that governments, banks, corporations, individuals etc are inherently evil, and the world would be a better place without them.

Is it really that much of a leap to be concerned that some may consider direct action against those they accuse of unspeakable evil? Compare it with the OT - how many have died because the 9/11 attacks were blamed on Al Qaeda terrorists?

I speak as someone who faintly considered direct action for animal rights causes (it was a bit of an idle threat, I was living in St John's Wood at the time Smile ). I now shudder at the thought.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dogsmilk
Mighty Poster
Mighty Poster


Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1616

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 1:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pepik wrote:
Dogsmilk wrote:
Yes, but it doesn't do much good if everyone just accuses the other side of being apologists.
I was asked why I debunk, so I gave the honest truth.
Dogsmilk wrote:
I am genuinely intrigued at your suggestion truthers may become "violent extremists". In what way do you foresee this potentially occurring?
I tried explaining:
pepik wrote:
But as for future crimes, well, why not wonder? Conspiracy theories can be perfectly legitimate and even true. They can also be popular with the insane and extremists. Timothy McVeigh believed conspiracy theories, so did Adolf Hitler, so did David Copeland. Hamas has conspiracy theories written into their constitution. Paranoid schizophrenics by definition all believe in conspiracy theories.

And if you genuinely believed the governments and the media were controlled by a secret cabal which was plotting tyranny and murder on a colossal scale (standard stuff for the likes of Alex Jones), well, you've pretty much written yourself a solid justification for violent resistance haven't you?


Well if it is your opinion I think it is inaccurate - but we may have to agree to disagree there.

I was asking Alex_V - cunningly indicated by quoting him - why he thought truthers might go on the rampage.

I thought your explanation was silly. There is no inherent reason why conspiracy theorists should be more prone to becoming violent. Any more than Christians are more likely to be violent because some people kill in the name of God.
I have met a very large number of schizophrenics and I can assure you that belief in conspiracy theories - in the general sense - is not common. At least not on my patch. Paranoid schizophrenics will believe in highly personalised delusional narratives. Reaching the conclusion that 911 was inside job based on consideration of what you would regard as specious evidence is very different indeed to the immediate personal experience that the television newsreader is talking specifically about you in a negative fashion or you are just sure your wife is poisoning you or the like. Indeed, the perception that conspiracy theorists are in some way either mad or more likely to become mad is a common fallacy frequently expounded by critics and your invocation of paranoid schizophrenics as being in some way relevant to anything is just meaningless. No matter what the voices in your head are telling you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
SHERITON HOTEL
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 988

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 1:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcqf5tL887o

This youtube doesn't include the perspiring NIST engineer refusing contact details, I'll have to do a search.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stefan
Banned
Banned


Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 1219

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 1:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="Alex_V"]
Quote:
How many have died because the 9/11 attacks were blamed on Al Qaeda terrorists?


How many what?

Civil liberties? Rights? A whole lot.

Innocent people? Hundreds of thousands if not over a million in Afghanistan and Iraq. How many more to follow? Incalculable.

From DU radiation? Millions of unborn babies.

The argument that going along with the official story is harmless and questioning it dangerous is quite simply insane, ignorant, or both...

_________________


Peace and Truth
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dogsmilk
Mighty Poster
Mighty Poster


Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1616

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 2:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Alex_V wrote:
Quote:
I doubt many truthers sincerely want to act as an apologist to mass murder just as I don't think many critics do. I think all sides can agree on the awfulness of the crime while perhaps disagreeing on the exact perpetrator.


Agreed. But this thread was started with the question of why critics 'criticise'. Should Pepik lie in his answer or be honest?

Quote:
I am genuinely intrigued at your suggestion truthers may become "violent extremists". In what way do you foresee this potentially occurring?


I'm certainly not expecting Paul Wright or any other specific truther to start mounting an armed resistance movement, if that's what you mean. My concern is more theoretical - as Pepik points out, the upshot of many of these conspiracy theorists is that governments, banks, corporations, individuals etc are inherently evil, and the world would be a better place without them.

Is it really that much of a leap to be concerned that some may consider direct action against those they accuse of unspeakable evil? Compare it with the OT - how many have died because the 9/11 attacks were blamed on Al Qaeda terrorists?

I speak as someone who faintly considered direct action for animal rights causes (it was a bit of an idle threat, I was living in St John's Wood at the time Smile ). I now shudder at the thought.


Well I admire Pepik's honesty. Though a part of me thinks he was just baiting. Call it a conspiracy theory.

I personally don't see any reason why truthers are any more included to do crazy stuff than anyone else. Plenty of people who think governments, banks, corporations, individuals etc are inherently evil descend on London every Mayday without mass killing. I don't preclude, say, Nico Haupt losing his nonsense and going on the rampage with an uzi, but I don't think it's intrinsically any more likely than with, well, an animal rights activist.
I used to do hunt sabs years ago. All the violence was directed at us!

Now I've said all that, there'll probably be a UK truth riot or something.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dogsmilk
Mighty Poster
Mighty Poster


Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1616

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 2:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Is it really that much of a leap to be concerned that some may consider direct action against those they accuse of unspeakable evil? Compare it with the OT - how many have died because the 9/11 attacks were blamed on Al Qaeda terrorists?


Just to add. Stefan's obviously right about the deaths that followed the attacks, but I'm not sure exactly what you really mean here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
pepik
Banned
Banned


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 591
Location: The Square Mile

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 2:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Masked man enters, attacks Bohemian Grove
'Phantom' expected armed resistance

Peter Fimrite, Chronicle Staff Writer

A bumbling, hooded commando calling himself the "Phantom Patriot" invaded the fabled grounds of the Bohemian Grove during the weekend hoping for a shootout.

What he got was a good night's sleep in a cot reserved for one of the club's captains of industry and a date with a prison psychologist.

Richard McCaslin, 37, of Carson City, Nev., pleaded not guilty in Sonoma County Superior Court yesterday to five felony counts including arson, burglary and brandishing a weapon at a peace officer after he allegedly sneaked into the exclusive Russian River encampment carrying an arsenal of weapons.

He told The Chronicle during a jailhouse interview that he went to the Monte Rio retreat Saturday night intent on exposing child abuse and human sacrifice and punishing the perpetrators.

"I was expecting armed resistance and I would have fired back if I was fired upon," he said.

The bizarre episode is the latest brouhaha involving San Francisco's Bohemian Club, which for years has provided fodder for conspiracy theorists and been attacked by women's groups.

Club representatives insist that the nonprofit organization -- founded in 1872 by five newspapermen, a Shakespearean actor, a vintner and a local merchant -- is dedicated to the simple enjoyment of music, literature and drama.

"We're very concerned and disturbed by the fact that this individual would trespass on our property armed as he was with the intent of doing harm," said Matt Oggero, general manager of the Bohemian Club. "His allegations . . . are totally irresponsible, highly offensive and grossly false."

But the well-spoken and seemingly lucid McCaslin is convinced that there are hidden torture chambers and other horrors at the club. He told how he was inspired by Austin, Texas, radio personality Alex Jones. Jones says he has seen "bizarre, Luciferian ceremonies" at the idyllic 2,000-acre redwood grove during the club's annual two-week summer encampment, which draws U.S. presidents and other luminaries.

Jones' Web site has dark, spooky-looking but completely indistinct pictures of the club's "Cremation of Care Ceremony."


Horrified by the images, McCaslin said he spent a year collecting weapons, staking out the grove and planning the commando-style operation.

"I was acting on reports that inside the Bohemian Club were incidents of child abuse and human sacrifice," McCaslin said. "I felt if physical damage was inflicted upon them and it got enough attention, the American people would rise up."

McCaslin was wearing a bulletproof vest, blue fatigues with "Phantom Patriot" spelled out in red letters across the chest and a rubber skeleton mask when he crept into the grove.

He quickly found himself hopelessly lost and bouncing off the trees in the pitch dark after his flashlight went out. Feeling "almost silly," he said he felt his way into a cabin, flopped down on a cot and went to sleep.

The next morning, McCaslin said, he discovered the club's giant owl "idol" and would have blown it up if he had explosives. Instead he placed an Old Testament verse from Leviticus at the base of the statue. Alone, with no enemy or anybody else in sight, McCaslin decided to set fire to the camp's mess hall, but sprinklers extinguished the flames.

He was soon confronted by Sonoma County sheriff's deputies. He said he was expecting resistance but gave up quietly when he realized the deputies were "legitimate officers of the law."

Sheriff's Lt. Bruce Rochester said that besides the outlandish costume, McCaslin was armed with a double-barreled shotgun/assault rifle hybrid, a 2- foot-long sword, a .45-caliber pistol, a crossbow, a knife and a hand-made bomb launcher.

"We've had protesters and stuff at the Bohemian Grove, but I've been here 24 years and I've never seen -- and I don't think any of us will ever again see -- a guy come here dressed like that in our careers," Rochester said. "Nobody's laughing. The deputies were scared and we're all still scratching our heads."

McCaslin is being held on $500,000 bail in the Sonoma County Jail mental health ward and is being evaluated by psychologists. A preliminary hearing is scheduled on Feb. 5.

_________________
"could it be that ww2 and the extermination of jewish people was planned as a way of creating a race of people who it would be difficult to blame for anything, a cover race for the illuminati?" - a quote NOT from the 'controversial theories' section.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dogsmilk
Mighty Poster
Mighty Poster


Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1616

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 2:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And the relevance of this is?

Are you attempting to assert truthers are notably more likely to lose it by citing a newspaper article regarding a single individual whose ultimate diagnostic status is not noted? And yet you criticise the way truthers evidence their claims...?

Kevin Barrett killed someone because he had voices in his head telling him to do it. There is no evidence he believed in conspiracy theories. There is no evidence he was a truther.

Though if he firmly believed he believed in the OT, this must be clear evidence OT believers are potentially dangerous.

Heh - come to think of it, now I think I remember a guy storming out of an appointment with an Asian psychiatrist shouting that the psych was in Al Qaeda. Maybe the OT is dangerous!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
pepik
Banned
Banned


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 591
Location: The Square Mile

PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 3:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmmm... what is the relevance of someone incited to go on a killing spree by conspiracy theories? You can't think of any?

Its clear some truthers are turning into stalkers. Ask the woman who photographed the Pennsylvania crash. And a recently a 7/7 victim has spoken out against harassment. Even former astronauts get harassed by moon landing hoax conspiracy theorists.

Its also clear that only firm rules keep the holocaust deniers out of this site - they are clearly attracted to it - although other conspiracy theories about jews are allowed (see my tag). You can't see how that could go wrong?

_________________
"could it be that ww2 and the extermination of jewish people was planned as a way of creating a race of people who it would be difficult to blame for anything, a cover race for the illuminati?" - a quote NOT from the 'controversial theories' section.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Critics' Corner All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group