First plane strike footage NOT Naudet brothers?

[fish5133]

Sorry if i am behind the times with this one.

http://cleveland.indymedia.org/uploads/2007/01/wtc1-strike-2.avi

[Newspeak International]

Good find fish,conclusive proof of an explosion.

[insidejob]

Not sure about this.

This could be evidence that there was no plane but an explosion, but…

But, we don’t know whether the camera, due to its angle, would have captured the plane entering the building.

Also, the explosion doesn’t look that big. The first plane explosion we all saw was a lot bigger.

And the TV news commentator gives no impression that this film contradicts the official explanation. And if it did, would they be showing it?

I don’t agree with the abuse of the no plane theory. Firstly, there is evidence of no planes, although clearly not conclusive. Eyewitnesses on the day insisted they saw the first explosion and insisted there was no plane.

There is, though, the argument that the no plane theory is deliberate misinformation by the perpetrators to make the 911 Truth Movement look silly. Yet, supporters of this idea must believe that the perpetrators would promote the no plane theory when the perpetrators’ own plans involved no planes on two of the four attacks. Why promote the no plane theory when 50% of your own plans used no planes? It’s a bit risky.

[numeral]

My take on this is that the camera is to the south of Manhattan (Brooklyn Battery Tunnel)
http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=Brooklyn&ie=UTF8&ll =40.701333,-74.007683&spn=0.028436,0.058365&z=14

The North Tower is obscured by the South Tower. Consequently the explosion looks small.

At 8:46:27 a shape can be seen moving towards the Tower.

[rodin]

Open to big screen. Run the thing backwards frame by frame using mouse. You can see a fuselage 'coming out' of the building looks like quite a steep angle. Running backwards the camera is panning out so resolution drops before you can see the plane in the sky, but you can see it 'emerge' from the building clearly. You could calculate speed and angle of approach and compare with Naudet's film for corroboration.

[insidejob]

Rodin,

I took your advice and slowly played it forwards rather than backwards. I still see no plane.

Something appears from nowhere and strikes the building before the larger blast. But it could be a missile rather than a plane. The plane makes no approach whatsoever. And it can't be because it's going so fast because we see the plane strike the building in other footage.

This film is v strange.

[numeral]

Rodin

Can you capture a still and post it here?

[gareth]

[rodin]

[numeral]

I should have twigged this before. The explosion is the one on the east face of the Tower. We cannot see the actual impact of the shape against the north face.

[rodin]