Obama to be Shot?

[conspiracy analyst]

Obama Seeks Red Cross Help On War Crime Charges Against Bush, Cheney,
Rumsfeld

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers (Traducción
al Español abajo)

Russian Foreign Ministry reports to President Medvedev are stating today
that US Presidential candidate Barack Obama has sent one of his top
aides named Valerie Jarrett to meet with officials from the
International Committee of the Red Cross, in Geneva, Switzerland, to
what is being described in these reports as the ‘preliminary stage’ to
begin actions in the International Court of Justice charging the present
United States President, Vice President and former US Defense Secretary
with war crimes.

As we had previously written about in our October 15, 2005 report, the
International Committee of the Red Cross opened in that year a War
Crimes Portfolio alleging that President Bush, Vice President Cheney and
Defense Secretary Rumsfeld, and other US Officials, were in violation of
Articles 3 and 4 of the Geneva Convention and could be tried for Crimes
Against Humanity.

These two Articles of the Geneva Convention state:

“Article 3

In the case of armed conflict not of an international character
occurring in the territory of one of the High Contracting Parties, each
party to the conflict shall be bound to apply, as a minimum, the
following provisions:

1. Persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including members
of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed hors de
combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause, shall in all
circumstances be treated humanely, without any adverse distinction
founded on race, colour, religion or faith, sex, birth or wealth, or any
other similar criteria.

To this end the following acts are and shall remain prohibited at any
time and in any place whatsoever with respect to the above-mentioned
persons:

(a) Violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds,
mutilation, cruel treatment and torture;

(b) Taking of hostages;

(c) Outrages upon personal dignity, in particular, humiliating and
degrading treatment;

(d) The passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without
previous judgment pronounced by a regularly constituted court affording
all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by
civilized peoples.



2. The wounded and sick shall be collected and cared for.

An impartial humanitarian body, such as the International Committee of
the Red Cross, may offer its services to the Parties to the conflict.

The Parties to the conflict should further endeavour to bring into
force, by means of special agreements, all or part of the other
provisions of the present Convention.

The application of the preceding provisions shall not affect the legal
status of the Parties to the conflict.

Article 4

A. Prisoners of war, in the sense of the present Convention, are persons
belonging to one of the following categories, who have fallen into the
power of the enemy:

1. Members of the armed forces of a Party to the conflict as well as
members of militias or volunteer corps forming part of such armed
forces.

2. Members of other militias and members of other volunteer corps,
including those of organized resistance movements, belonging to a Party
to the conflict and operating in or outside their own territory, even if
this territory is occupied, provided that such militias or volunteer
corps, including such organized resistance movements, fulfil the
following conditions:

(a) That of being commanded by a person responsible for his
subordinates;

(b) That of having a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a distance;

(c) That of carrying arms openly;

(d) That of conducting their operations in accordance with the laws and
customs of war.

3. Members of regular armed forces who profess allegiance to a
government or an authority not recognized by the Detaining Power.

4. Persons who accompany the armed forces without actually being members
thereof, such as civilian members of military aircraft crews, war
correspondents, supply contractors, members of labour units or of
services responsible for the welfare of the armed forces, provided that
they have received authorization from the armed forces which they
accompany, who shall provide them for that purpose with an identity card
similar to the annexed model.

5. Members of crews, including masters, pilots and apprentices, of the
merchant marine and the crews of civil aircraft of the Parties to the
conflict, who do not benefit by more favourable treatment under any
other provisions of international law.

6. Inhabitants of a non-occupied territory, who on the approach of the
enemy spontaneously take up arms to resist the invading forces, without
having had time to form themselves into regular armed units, provided
they carry arms openly and respect the laws and customs of war.

B. The following shall likewise be treated as prisoners of war under the
present Convention:

1. Persons belonging, or having belonged, to the armed forces of the
occupied country, if the occupying Power considers it necessary by
reason of such allegiance to intern them, even though it has originally
liberated them while hostilities were going on outside the territory it
occupies, in particular where such persons have made an unsuccessful
attempt to rejoin the armed forces to which they belong and which are
engaged in combat, or where they fail to comply with a summons made to
them with a view to internment.

2. The persons belonging to one of the categories enumerated in the
present Article, who have been received by neutral or non-belligerent
Powers on their territory and whom these Powers are required to intern
under international law, without prejudice to any more favourable
treatment which these Powers may choose to give and with the exception
of Articles 8, 10, 15, 30, fifth paragraph, 58-67, 92, 126 and, where
diplomatic relations exist between the Parties to the conflict and the
neutral or non-belligerent Power concerned, those Articles concerning
the Protecting Power. Where such diplomatic relations exist, the Parties
to a conflict on whom these persons depend shall be allowed to perform
towards them the functions of a Protecting Power as provided in the
present Convention, without prejudice to the functions which these
Parties normally exercise in conformity with diplomatic and consular
usage and treaties.

C. This Article shall in no way affect the status of medical personnel
and chaplains as provided for in Article 33 of the present Convention.”

Russian diplomats are speculating that Senator Obama’s actions against
the present US War Leaders in his country are due to the horrific
testimony heard this past week in Washington where American soldiers
detailed the war atrocities they have been ordered to commit, and as we
can read as reported by the AntiWar News Service:

“Antiwar veterans of the U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan took their
case to Capitol Hill Thursday, baring their souls with stories of
killings of innocent civilians, torture and wrongful detentions.

"On several occasions our convoys came upon bodies that had been lying
on the road, sometimes for weeks," said Marine Corps veteran Vincent
Emanuele, who served in al-Qaim near the Syrian border in 2004 and 2005.

"When encountering these bodies standard procedure was to run over the
corpses, sometimes even stopping and taking pictures, which was also
standard practice when encountering the dead in Iraq," he told the
Congressional Progressive Caucus, which organized the hearing.

Emanuele also said that U.S. military personnel often took "pot shots"
at cars passing by.

"Our rules of engagement stated that we should first fire warning shots
into the ground in front of the car, then the engine block, and the
windshield. That is if the car was even moving in the first place," he
said. "Many times cars that actually had pulled off to the side of the
road were also shot at."

Nine veterans of the Iraq war told their stories before members of
Congress and a packed gallery. One of the veterans had also served in
Afghanistan. About 40 veterans were in the audience.

The veterans spoke about extremely lax rules of engagement handed down
by commanding officers, which they said virtually guaranteed atrocities
would be committed, and which in turn created a violent backlash among
Iraqi people and a continued cycle of violence.”

Russian experts in International Law further state in these reports that
with this latest testimony by US war veterans of these atrocities, and
when combined with the US torture of POW’s in their dreaded secret
prisons spread around the Globe, there is ‘little doubt’ that the
American War Leaders would be convicted of the War Crime charges leveled
against them.

It should be noted that the United States refuses to call their captured
enemies prisoners of war (POW’s) and instead designates them as
‘detainees’ and does not afford them their rights as granted under the
Geneva Convention. Russian experts, however, noted that both Nazi
Germany and the Japanese Empire had, likewise, used these terms for
their POW’s, but when defeated by the Allied Forces in World War II they
were brought to justice.

Further to be noted, and as we had previously reported on October 15,
2006, President Bush and his family have purchased nearly 100,000 acres
of land in Paraguay for them to flee should War Crime Charges be filed
against them.

Russian legal experts further state that Senator Obama, and should he,
as expected, become the next President of the United States, he ‘almost
certainly’ would have to file War Crime charges against these US War
Leaders to keep himself from being brought up on these charges should he
ignore them.

Benjamin Ferencz, the former chief prosecutor of the Nuremberg Trials
against the Nazis, and who is the founding father of the basis behind
International law regarding war crimes, has also stated that "There is a
case for trying Bush for the supreme crime against humanity, and an
illegal war of aggression against a sovereign nation."

To the success of a new President Obama being able to successfully
prosecute America’s present War Leaders for their war crimes it is not
too our knowing, but what is to our knowing is that the US Republican
Party Leadership is now openly joking about his assassination, and as we
can read as reported by the New York Daily News Service:

"Even a friendly National Rifle Association audience seemed stunned
Friday after the former presidential candidate cracked a tasteless joke
about a gun aimed at Barack Obama. Huckabee, a Republican and former
Arkansas governor, was addressing the gun group's convention in
Louisville, Ky., when a loud crash was heard off stage.

"That was Barack Obama," Huckabee ad-libbed. "He just tripped off a
chair.... He's getting ready to speak, and somebody aimed a gun at him
and he, he dove for the floor."

[paul wright]

Should Obama be selected for power, that would be to enable his fate as the next big mass consciousness changer - ie by being shot dead
I almost wish for McCain's (s)election. It would prove much more difficult for them to proceed

[scienceplease]

Clinton's last gaff, EXPECTING Obama to be assassinated in June... hence why she keeps on running...

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/26/us/politics/26campaign.html?ref=us

If Obama does get killed, they better not replace him with Clinton!!

[outsider]

Whilst the best of the likely contenders in with a chance, Obama is a creature of the 'Secret Government', the manipulators behind the scenes.
Here is a response from Fidel Castro to Obama's 'playing to Miami':

http://www.cuba-solidarity.org.uk/news.asp?ItemID=1334

[iro]

[conspiracy analyst]

A good reason to stay in the race is that Kennedy was shot in June according to Ms Clinton...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdSlDmZH0TQ

[conspiracy analyst]

Lynne Cheney: VP, Obama are eighth cousins
Obama camp responds to revelation: ‘Every family has a black sheep’

MSNBC video
Lynne Cheney on new book, husband
Oct. 16: MSNBC's Norah O'Donnell talks to Lynne Cheney about her new book and her husband Vice President Dick Cheney.

MSNBC

Interactive

Decision ’08 leaderboard
See who’s leading in the delegate count in the race for the presidency.

NBC News
Cartoons

The week in political cartoons


Obama 11 away
The flood: Obama 14 away
Hillary expresses interest as Obama veep
updated 7:27 a.m. ET Oct. 17, 2007

WASHINGTON - Though they may spar across the political aisle, Vice President Dick Cheney is close enough to Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama to call him “cousin.”

Eighth cousin, that is.

Lynne Cheney, the vice president’s wife, revealed this tantalizing bit of political trivia during a television interview Tuesday.
Story continues below ↓advertisement

She said she uncovered the long-ago ties between the two while researching her ancestry for her latest book, “Blue Skies, No Fences,” a memoir about growing up in Wyoming.

“This is such an amazing American story that one ancestor ... could be responsible down the family lines for lives that have taken such different and varied paths as Dick’s and Barack Obama,” Lynne Cheney told MSNBC.

According to her spokeswoman, Sen. Obama, D-Ill., is a descendent of Mareen Duvall. This French Huguenot’s son married the granddaughter of a Richard Cheney, who arrived in Maryland in the late 1650s from England, said Ginny Justice, a spokeswoman for Lynne Cheney.

The vice president’s full name is Richard B. Cheney.

A spokesman for Obama, who wants to be the first black U.S. president, offered a tongue-in-cheek response. “Every family has a black sheep,” said spokesman Bill Burton.

Lynne Cheney did not reference the ancestral ties between her husband and Obama in the book.

[fenchurch]

Sorcha Faal is full of sh*t. He writes misinformation articles.

Google him if you don't believe me. His real name is David Booth.

Beware of anything he writes. It's pure fiction.

[conspiracy analyst]

[karlos]

Link

He says Hilary is only staying in so long waiting for Obama to be assasinated


Link

[iro]

[Linda]

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/june2008/060408_obama_scandal.htm

Republicans To Save Hillary With Obama Scandal?
Rumors of racist Michelle Obama tape could be reason why Clinton stayed in losing race

Republicans are preparing to save Hillary Clinton's doomed bid for the Democratic nomination and answer the question of why she has refused to concede a losing race, with the release today of a shocking video tape featuring Michelle Obama going off on a racist rant, but others maintain the rumor is nothing more than a hoax.

The tape allegedly shows Obama's wife, sitting on a panel with Louis Farrakhan, making racist remarks about white Americans and using the term "whitey" during a speech at the then Jeremiah Wright-helmed Trinity United Church of Christ.

The rumor originated from Larry Johnson's No Quarter blog, which claims to have been under hack attack since it first reported the existence of the tape. Johnson says he has five separate reliable sources who have confirmed that the video exists.

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/june2008/060408_obama_scandal.htm

[scienceplease]

Perhaps the republicans decided to keep the tape for the election rather than to help out Clinton.

[kbo234]

What about this...?

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fbd_1201056512

[scienceplease]

[TonyGosling]

No,

Not to be shot.

To be crowned King!

Tarpley's book 'Obama The Postmodern Coup' suddenly becomes a bestseller I hope.....

[karlos]

personally i am worried that this was the plan all along to bump him off
Obama was a total unknown, a crack smoker and suddenly he materialised as the main speaker at the Democrat conference and ever since has been touted as the top man
it turned out he was always destined because he is George Bush and Dick Cheney's cousin and a relative of Winston Churchill.

But now that he has been nominated, the powers will have been seen to be open to a black president he is now ripe for assasination, because they would always rather have Hilary. All the tv networks support Hilary especially CNN. China sponsored Hilary's campaign and dont forget the Clintons killed Vince Foster and anyone else who might have been trouble. Bill Clinton also was a warmonger bombing Somalia and Sudan.

Obama on the face of it with a Muslim father and living grandparents in Kenya will never be as bad as Hilary or McBush.
So AIPAC can never allow him to win.