View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
TimmyG Validated Poster
Joined: 04 Apr 2006 Posts: 489 Location: Manchester
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:15 am Post subject: Barry Jennings and wtc7 |
|
|
I don't post often on 911 forums anymore.. simply because i don't have much time and have been generally disheartened by whats happening in the world. but the recent testimony from Barry Jennings and the BBCs carefully constructed wtc7 propaganda work has got me quite excited..
this is pretty big.
i think we have a chance of seeing something real happen here.
What are the ptb gonna do next?!
http://911blogger.com/node/16573
we have the full video of Barry. They can't pretend the explosions didn't happen in wtc7... and pre twin towers collapsing..
they're either going to have to kill Jennings, or try and persuade him to change his mind. _________________ "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
xmasdale Angel - now passed away
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 1959 Location: South London
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is a particularly powerful smoking gun.
Have I got it right that Barry Jennings, subsequent to Dylan Avery's interview of him, denied that he had ever said he had to step over bodies? If that is so, that means he has now been threatened to keep his mouth shut.
You are in most danger when you have a piece of information damaging to the powerful which no one else knows. If that information later becomes widely known you are no longer in danger as threats to shut you up become pointless and expose the powers that be as bullies.
Therefore the best way to protect Barry Jennings is to get this interview as widely distributed as possible and also to distribute his subsequent denial that he ever said he had to step over bodies. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TimmyG Validated Poster
Joined: 04 Apr 2006 Posts: 489 Location: Manchester
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yeah .. according to the loose change crew he's already had threats in the past. hence why his testimony wasn't included in final cut.
The main portrayal of jennings being 'against' the truth movement seems to be largely sneaky editing by the bbc though..
in the third tower doc the editing team have cleverly placed his interview into the timeline of the piece so that it looks like the twin towers went down, and then explosions started in wtc7.. where as in the original interview with LC, Barry clearly says he heard and felt loud explosions before either tower collapsed. _________________ "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Stefan Banned
Joined: 29 Aug 2006 Posts: 1219
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The key question for the BBC here is -
Given the glaring difference in time lines between Barry Jennings account in your production, and the full length Louder Than Words interview currently posted on the internet, my question is this:
Did Barry Jennings specify in relation to the collapse of the towers when the events he experienced occurred, or did you fit them to the time line yourselves?
If the former, I would like confirmation that the time line you suggested matched that that Mr Jennings specified to you and was not manipulated by editing. If the latter, do you consider the practice of providing your own timeline to someone elses story to be objective and responsible reporting, befiting of the BBC's reputation? _________________
Peace and Truth |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fish5133 Site Admin
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 2568 Location: One breath from Glory
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Its not just Barry Jennings but also the other guy who was with him. Lets hope he finds the courage to speak the truth out also. His silence may be telling. _________________ JO911B.
"for we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, against powers, against rulers of the darkness of this world, against wicked spirits in high places " Eph.6 v 12 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|