Why destroy WTC7 in the first place?

[Eckyboy]

For me WTC7 is one of the key reasons I believe 911 was an inside job however there is something that has always puzzled me about it. If WTC7 had not been demolished would anyone be aware of it? That is if the building still stood to this day would it have been the centre of a massive investigation into the 911 attacks? Why demolish Building7 and draw possible attention to your scheme? What was so important in WTC7 that they would risk getting caught out in order to try and destroy it? SOMETHING IN THE BUILDING WAS IMPORTANT ENOUGH THAT IT HAD TO BE DESTROYED NO MATTER THE RISK OR CHANCE OF POSSIBLE DISCOVERY OF THE PLOT. I believe that WTC7 was used a command post for the controlled demolition of WTC2 & 1 contrary too what the OEM said about evacuating it after the second plane hit although it has been mentioned "Senior officials remained in the building." Any thoughts anyone?

[blackcat]

It contained a large CIA department and many of the records pertaining to investigations into corruption including Enron were kept there. I posted a list of who occupied WTC7 some weeks ago. There were a lot of records destroyed that day. The part of the Pentagon hit was where the bookkeepers and accountants were stationed. All records relating to the missing $2.3 thousand BILLION were kept there. Most of those doing the investigation were murdered that day. Connecting the dots yet? They could not rely on a 757 being accurate enough to do the job so something else was used to smash the Pentagon. It amazes me that some people still believe the ptb may yet come up with "proof" that a 757 hit the Pentagon! No way!

[DeFecToR]

Also there was the 'control centre' of the 911 attacks; Giulliani's emergency management bunker. Much easier to demolish the lot and be done with it.

There is also the small matter of a multi-million dollar insurance claim.

[Andrew Johnson]

See both Painful Deceptions and Loose Change 2.

With the "suicide" of the latest Enron Witness and the death of Ken Lay, my guess is that there is lots of ENron "fallout" which is still "radioactive".

[Eckyboy]

Thanks for responding Blackcat but I know about the occupants of WTC7. Files and important documents could be destroyed in a fire why go to all the trouble of destroying the building? It has to be something else in my opinion especially since it would draw attention to them. I would really like to know the specs for Mayor Rudys OEM Command Centre.

[dodgy]

Since they had explosives in the building with which to demolish it, would they:

a) Not demolish the building, and hope that no-one ever discovers the explosives (& whatever else the explosives were to be used for)
or
b) Demolish the building, destroying the evidence of explosives, and whatever other things that they were trying to conceal

Since firemen would be needed to extinguish the fires, then peeps would need to go in to investigate the fires and any structural damage to the building, which would most likely lead to discovery of explosives, a) isn't an option.

It is strange how they left it til 7 hours later to destroy WTC7 - but this could have been to avoid coverage by all those training their cameras on the towers when they were demolished earlier in the morning.

I've also heard a hypothesis that Flight 93 may have been intending to have WTC7 as it's target, so that WTC7 could be felled in the same way as WTC1 & 2 - but it's just speculation.

[Eckyboy]

You talk sense dodgy unlike your name thats a valid point. I just have a feeling that there is something we are missing though. The explosives could as has already been pointed out have been used as a safety precaution although I will admit that it clutching at straws. There were fires in the building but no firemen went anywhere near them. The building was left to burn. Maybe they realised the fires were not enough to destroy the evidence and files and went too their back-up plan to destroy the building. Just a thought. As for building 7 being a target of Flight93 I do not believe that. Most people never knew anything about WTC7 before 911 and many still don't know about it now. The targets for me were either Capitol Hill or the White House but something went wrong.

[dodgy]

[Jane]

Could it be because something in the heart of stone knows how sick it is and still hopes to be "healed"? Thus, maybe without even planning it, "it" somehow conspires to create a series of "clues" by which people like us can can act as "the doctor" who can see the symptons of the illness and trace it back to the sick body that needs help big time?

Don't know if I am explaining this very well, but maybe however sick you are, you still basically want to live and be "made whole" and thus you inadvertertendly "leave clues" as you committ your "crimes" - crimes both against yourself and against humanity?

[paul wright]

Of course they eventually wanna be found out
The responsibility for sorting the mess out always passes on to the next tier of management upwards - presumably the UN and the real globalists
Their moves in the Lebanon look like an act of triggering a nuclear holocaust in Iran and according to Bush the bombing of Syria, in the open mike conversation,and perhaps the other way round, which is the downward slope to the endgame

[Jane]