40ft hole found under Ground Zero at WTC

[Micpsi]

Pictured: The 40ft 'pothole' that shows Ground Zero was once the site of an Ice Age glacier
MailOnline
By Mail Foreign Service
Last updated at 12:03 PM on 23rd September 2008

Proof that Manhattan was once buried underneath an Ice Age glacier has been uncovered at Ground Zero.

Crews excavating the site of the destroyed World Trade Centre this summer have uncovered a spectacular underground landscape carved into the bedrock by glaciers about 20,000 years ago.
(snip)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1060043/Pictured-The -40ft-pothole-shows-Ground-Zero-site-Ice-Age-glacier.html
Also:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26844329/

Are we supposed to accept that this hole was never detected during the excavation of the foundations of the WTC complex, known as the Bathtub? Nothing about this was mentioned by this engineer who oversaw the construction of the slurry walls in 1967:
http://www.caets.org/nae/bridgecom.nsf/weblinks/CGOZ-58NLJ9?OpenDocume nt
No doubt the WTC site has glacial rock. But is the hole just a 20,000 year-old Ice Age pothole? If not, perhaps it could be the 'smoking gun' hole created by the explosion heard by William Rodriguez?

[Lee]

Interesting.

It does appear as though an old, rusted post is embedded in the rock in the featured picture.

I suppose one would need to know if that post is from the previous site and which building it was originally underneath.

It would seem suspicious to be claiming the 'pothole' wasn't discovered during the sites original excavation, but I suppose it depends if it was considered noteworthy or spotted by those involved originally as having archeological significance.

[fish5133]

Perhaps NIST will come out with a report telling us that the hole may have been a factor in the WTC collapse.

[Disco_Destroyer]

I doubt 'perhaps' will come into it, it wasn't the planes after all

[Disco_Destroyer]

Revised Edition:- It was the melting ice that caused it!!

[Marigold]

Interesting ...I also believe they would have discovered this formation when they prepared the foundations for the building of WTCs 1 & 2 in the sixties.
Over at the forum of Godlike Productions.com http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message613795/pg1 there's some v.interesting arguments on the debate of ice and creationism in regard to the revelation:

[Disco_Destroyer]

[chek]

[Disco_Destroyer]

On another note though I've never heard of Glaciation or Ice drilling holes in rock, only moving water and debris does this (whirl Pools and Eddies) or water dissolving porous rock. Glaciation would scour the surface to next to smooth as huge boulders and debris grind slowly across the rocks surface, scratching is always evident.

[truthseeker john]

[Micpsi]

The New York Times said the hole was found in the site for the new Tower 4
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/22/nyregion/22rocks.html
This is in the south-east corner of WTC, not where WTC 1 and WTC 2 were:
http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2008/09/22/nyregion/22rocks_map.read y.html
So I guess that now demolishes the possibility that the hole was 'man-made'
I wish I had seen the NY article earlier.

[dewstru]

Have they explained the multiple 24ft(and other diameter)vertical 8 to 10 storey deep cylindrical holes found in in the WTC complex after the towers collapsed? See the youtube '9/11 the New Hiroshima'.The damage to building six looks strangely like the Oklahoma building after "Tim McVie's truck bombed".

[chek]

[dewstru]

I think you'll find they are incongruously cylindrical and uniform, did the rubble fall in 24ft balls...then disappear perhaps? I am agnostic about 'tv fakery and directed energy but Dr.Wood asks some very pertinant questions in my humble opinion. That WTC1 central core 'spire' vapourised, I have never seen a felled tree topple vertically, have you?

[chek]

[dewstru]

Yes how the WTC1 'spire' fell vertically remains a mystery, as I understand it the towers went down 6 basement storeys to the bedrock so if the 'spire' was to fall through some lateral movement of the rubble pile this lateral movement would have to leave a vertical chasm at least sixty storeys (the height of the 'spire') deep into bedrock, this would take a cataclysmic seismic shift and is very unlikely to have been the case.

The theory is that the straight edges in the WTC6 mystery 8 storey deep hole were caused by the directed energy beam moving in a straight line, you can clearly see the circular 24ft diameter shapes at the corners.

What caused these vertically cut holes in the WTC complex remain another unanswered 9/11 question.

I ,like the general concensus , thought Dr.Wood was either deranged or in the pay of the 9/11 guilty out to divide and rule the truthers, but after seeing '9/11 the new Hiroshima'...I don't know what I think!?!