Sifting evidence on the Tavistock Square Bus Bomb

[astro3]

I just read all of the J7 Tavistock section, 96 pages.
http://z13.invisionfree.com/julyseventh/index.php?showtopic=23&st=406
Phew, I’m a bit wiped out. Intense, or what? How long before they pass 100 pages? Awestruck, I humbly offer the following comments:

They accept (or did not dispute) Staraker’s sequence of images of the 30 bus.
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=10691&postdays=0&post order=asc&start=120
That has all the crowd up the top deck really there to start with (as Daniel O once assured me that they were) and they then come down and the empty-top bus pics are taken much later.

For three years this has been the ‘unwritable’ section on the J7 site http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/7-7-30-bus-tavistock-square.html and all they have put up is a sequence of 7 sky-pictures of an empty, deserted bus with the time written as 10.54 and the Kingstar van next to it. I had always assumed that this van would not have stayed long in that position and that therefore those pictures had to have been taken on July 7th. That sets up the paradox of a bus empty a few minutes after the explosion. However, Ant also found an image of the Kingstar van being carted off on Sunday, wrapped up and on a lorry. So, could it be that the blast somehow immobilised the Kingstar van, and those air- pictures were taken the next morning?

There is a silver car next to the bus, with windows shattered (unlike the Kingstar van) and they identify it as belonging to a Martin Bailey. It was showered with debris from the bus and photos show a large chunk of debris across the roof. I always found it hard to believe that this chunk of debris would be left lying there, completely blocking the road, until the next day. Do you want to believe that? Mr Bailey saw a body lying between his car and the bus, absent from these sky-photos. No-one has written the J7 section on Tavistock Square all this time, I guess because this time sequence seems not resolvable, and whether or not the load of top-deck passengers were genuine.

[Frazzel]

[astro3]

Ok, I deleted other comments as Frazzell didn't like them, only left query over photo sequence.

[astro3]

Two bodies?

I’d like to suggest that two corpses are detectable in all of the web-available images of the Tavistock Square blast. The US professional photographer Matthew Rosenberg who conveniently happened to be on the scene and took the best photos has 3 photos of the event: www.matthewrosenberg.com/news/ and they are visible in two of them. One of these is best seen in the excellent enlarged format www.officialconfusion.com/77/images/bus/bus_large.jpg and the corpse is visible behind the driver. The other image can also be seen in Staraker’s sequence:
www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=10691&postdays=0&postorder=a sc&start=90 image (F)

Please do contradict me, if you can see more. A group gathers round a figure lying on the pavement near the zebra crossing, and that figure might be Tony Cancellera, with his girlfriend Tania Calabrese beside him: he’s still very much alive. The owner of the silver car behind the Kingstar van (all its windows shattered), Martin Bailey, said he saw a corpse lying in between his car and the bus. I’m not at all denying that, just suggesting that we may not see this in any pictures.

In Obachike’s book ‘The 4th Bomb’ he has two dead as initially reported (p.199). That is compatible with the number of dead we actually see in pictures. Who knows, Reva Cope might have died on the lower deck (her partner heard her voice suddenly stop on the phone at the instant of blast) and likewise Anthony Fatayi-Williams might have been lying on the lower deck floor, as witnessed by Regina Friel, and might have died there: but we have no authentication of such deaths by any witnesses, nor pictures of them ... do we?

Let’s quote from Obachike: