FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

WTC7 Study

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> 9/11 & 7/7 Truth Controversies
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jfk
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 19 Aug 2007
Posts: 246

PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:43 am    Post subject: WTC7 Study Reply with quote

the various footage showing the WTC7 collapse betrays irreconcilable discrepancies. While some early TV shots may have been simply retouched (to blur & conceal the explosiveness of the WTC7's demise), other subsequently released clips appear to be entirely fabricated imagery (digital video composites).

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=w4Vrsjs_cLg


Last edited by jfk on Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:29 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
John White
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 3187
Location: Here to help!

PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 1:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looks like Shack is targeting the next credible body of 9/11 Truth then
_________________
Free your Self and Free the World
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jfk
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 19 Aug 2007
Posts: 246

PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 11:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looks like John White is targeting the next credible body of 9/11 Truth then
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chek
Mega Poster
Mega Poster


Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland

PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 11:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

John White wrote:
Looks like Shack is targeting the next credible body of 9/11 Truth then


..and bringing his usual panoply of techniques to bear.

It's difficult to believe that his flock still can't get their heads around the fact that events will always look different from different perspectives - which is what he's playing on yet again.

Well, that and his usual lack of insight into how electronic imaging actually works. I don't suppose Simon Socialdisease has a clue how light to dark transitions are handled by camera CCD's, let alone artificial enhancement processing in the interests of picture sharpening.

And I don't suppose his fans care too much either when they can instead go off on another wild goose chase into the wilds of paranoia.

But spot on John about the reasons behind his new interest.
The guy's a plague and a disinfo peddling shyster of the worst kind.
As are those who unquestioningly promote his nonsense.

_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.

It's them or us.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jfk
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 19 Aug 2007
Posts: 246

PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
It's difficult to believe that his flock still can't get their heads around the fact that events will always look different from different perspectives - which is what he's playing on yet again.


i think it is up to people to make up their own minds, shack just points out possible signs of tampering. This kind of study is important to find out if there was or was not any video trickery.
or maybe we just shouldn't bother, like chek, who has an unwavering belief that the MIComplex would never do such a thing.

Chek & co want to decide what research is allowed and what is not.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chek
Mega Poster
Mega Poster


Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland

PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jfk wrote:
Quote:
It's difficult to believe that his flock still can't get their heads around the fact that events will always look different from different perspectives - which is what he's playing on yet again.


i think it is up to people to make up their own minds, shack just points out possible signs of tampering. This kind of study is important to find out if there was or was not any video trickery.
or maybe we just shouldn't bother, like chek, who has an unwavering belief that the MIComplex would never do such a thing.

Chek & co want to decide what research is allowed and what is not.


Why have you not commented on the outline issue?
Never mind, I think it's obvious ... Simon Says, 'believe this'.
Simon says 'believe that'.
Best believe what Simon says, eh?

Given that the rest of your response comprises a sad little badly done to martyr complex gratuitously thrown in, allow me to correct you.

Chek thinks it's better for people to make informed, educated choices, not false ignorant ones foisted on them by those with an agenda.

That includes that promoted by proven conmen like your hero Simon "falsename" Shack, that you never tire of being a shill for, no matter how many times his shoddy techniques are exposed.

_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.

It's them or us.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jfk
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 19 Aug 2007
Posts: 246

PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 8:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Simon "falsename" Shack,


so what 'chek'?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chek
Mega Poster
Mega Poster


Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland

PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jfk wrote:
Quote:
Simon "falsename" Shack,


so what 'chek'?


Just pointing out another of his dishonest affectations, jfk.

A bit like the way you trade on JFK from LTW's handle

_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.

It's them or us.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
John White
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 3187
Location: Here to help!

PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

John White wrote:
Looks like Shack is targeting the next credible body of 9/11 Truth then


I stand by my statement

In my view Shack is a proven fraudster, and with these truly nonsensical claims of fake footage regarding WTC7, demonstrates once and for all that his actions are utterly against the needs of 9/11 Truth

This is a reasonable view given all the facts about Shack's activities and the dishonour and deceit in his films

_________________
Free your Self and Free the World
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chek
Mega Poster
Mega Poster


Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland

PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

John White wrote:
John White wrote:
Looks like Shack is targeting the next credible body of 9/11 Truth then


I stand by my statement

In my view Shack is a proven fraudster, and with these truly nonsensical claims of fake footage regarding WTC7, demonstrates once and for all that his actions are utterly against the needs of 9/11 Truth

This is a reasonable view given all the facts about Shack's activities and the dishonour and deceit in his films


There's only one side of the fence from which such blatant cointelpro is seen as a "socialservice".

And it ain't ours.

_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.

It's them or us.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redadare
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 19 Apr 2008
Posts: 204
Location: France

PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 8:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

John White wrote:
I stand by my statement


John, I know you have said it all before, but thread is so old, many of us can't actually find it. How about summarising it again?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> 9/11 & 7/7 Truth Controversies All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group