Globalists argue about indoctrinating our children

[simplesimon]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/7896751.stm

Primary education 'too narrow'

Children in England are getting a primary education that is too narrow, because schools focus too much on maths and English, claims a major report.

There it is in a nutshell. Deliberate dumbing down.

The author of the Cambridge University report warns that too much emphasis on testing the basics could "impoverish" learning in areas such as the arts.

Professor Robin Alexander says this could mean a "deficient" education.

He means he wants to ratchet up indoctrination for world government.

The government has rejected the claim as "insulting" and says it "flies in the face of international evidence".

The government say their bankster masters are satisfied with progress so far.

The Cambridge Primary Review's interim report is part of the biggest independent inquiry into primary education in England for 40 years.

Independent? LMFAO.

It calls for an urgent debate about the purpose of primary education.
?????
Some of these kids can still think for themselves, we have to address that "urgently".

The report says inadequacies in the primary curriculum stem from a mistaken belief that breadth in the curriculum is incompatible with improved standards in the "basics" of maths, literacy and numeracy.

The the more time spent on globalist indoctrination, the less is available for such "old-fashioned" things as maths and English. Any child can see that. Well, not if these mind benders get their way...

...

The review suggests the primary curriculum should be "re-conceived" with 12 specific aims, which it arranges in three groups:

We don't want to just tinker, we want a wholesale routing of real education, to be replaced my such s**t as:

* The needs and capacities of the individual: wellbeing; engagement; empowerment; autonomy

How complete must your slavery be before you recognise it as such, how hard will you work for your bankster overlords, how can we make you love your slavery, how can we make you think you are free, how can we fool you into thinking you have any say about anything at all, how can we make you think you matter in the slightest to us.


* The individual in relation to others and the wider world: encouraging respect and reciprocity; promoting interdependence and sustainability; empowering local, national and global citizenship; celebrating culture and community

How can we further destroy values related to family, religion, race, nation and sovereignty, and make you love your enslavement to the international bankers.


* Learning, knowing and doing: knowing, understanding, exploring and making sense; fostering skill; exciting the imagination; enacting dialogue.

Indoctrination, deception, think what we tell you. Believing you thought of it yourself. Encourage meaningless discussion that you will imagine your mind is free.



Nick Seaton, of the Campaign for Real Education, said children needed to be taught the basics at primary school, as well as a range of subjects.

"But if literacy and numeracy are taught well there should be enough time in the curriculum to teach the other subjects," he said.

The gatekeeper on the other side speaks.

==========================


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/7488417.stm


Call for better 'global literacy'


http://www.prisonplanet.com/unesco_strangle_this_monster_in_its_crib.h tml

Consider this gem from UNESCO revealed by William F. Jasper in The New American magazine:

"A 10-part series for teachers, published in 1949 under the title Toward World Understanding, asserted that 'one of the chief aims of education today should be to prepare boys and girls to take an active part in the creation of a world society. ...' But government schools must stamp out love of country and the family must be viewed as the enemy: 'As long as the child breathes the poisoned air of nationalism, education in world-mindedness can produce only rather precarious results. As we have pointed out, it is frequently the family that infects the child with extreme nationalism. The school should therefore use the means described earlier to combat family attitudes that favor jingoism.'"
========================================
http://www.unesco.org/education/educprog/50y/brochure/unintwo/106.htm

During the summer of 1947 UNESCO organized its first Summer Seminar in Sèvres (France). This seminar focused attention on two main areas of interest:

1. Ways and means of improving the curriculum, within the educational systems of the Member States, as a means of developing world-mindedness;
2. The influence of differences in cultural environment on the growth and adjustment of adolescents of various countries.
========================================
http://theunjustmedia.com/Media/Mass%20Media%20Mind%20Manipulations%20 and%20the%20world%20Illusion.htm

The wealthiest men of our nation are in control of our education system. Our schools teach curriculums created by the Ford Foundation, Carnegie Endowment, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Guggenheim Foundation. While President of the Ford Foundation in 1954, Rowan Gaither explained the Foundation's mandate: "… we operate in response to directives, the substance of which is that we shall use our grant making power to alter life in the United States so that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union." Openly admitted, for the record, the tax-exempt foundations which determine what and how American children learn have tried to manipulate attitudes toward a socialist model - specifically the Soviet Union. What are some alterations which would favor this change in attitude? In the Soviet Union there were no guaranteed
rights, freedom of political expression was outlawed, the government regimented all aspects of life, and religion was systematically abolished in favor of the belief in atheism.