| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
kbo234
Validated Poster
Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 2017
Location: Croydon, Surrey
|
 Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 7:47 pm Post subject: SHILLS ON 5-DAY WEEK |
 |
|
| All the 'shills' that have been bombing this site for the last 5 days have suddenly disappeared. They must be working a 5-day week. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Snowygrouch
Validated Poster
Joined: 02 Apr 2006
Posts: 628
Location: Oxford
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 8:42 pm Post subject: 5 day week |
|
|
I believe its due to the fact that liars need the other 2 days to fabricate
stories and the other 5 to dish them out.
Telling the truth avoids this eventuality as the truth HAPPENS to us all 365 days a year. 
_________________
The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist
President Eisenhower 1961 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Newspeak International
Validated Poster
Joined: 18 Apr 2006
Posts: 1158
Location: South Essex
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 8:56 pm Post subject: Re: SHILLS ON 5-DAY WEEK |
|
|
| kbo234 wrote: | | All the 'shills' that have been bombing this site for the last 5 days have suddenly disappeared. They must be working a 5-day week. |
Is that right ,I did wonder!
9 to 5 plus overtime!
What government building do they reside in, The Ministry of Information?
Edited: overuse of the word wonder  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ian neal
Angel - now passed away
Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 3140
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Let's hope it is a more permanent withdrawl.
I'm all for informed debate between different 9/11 researchers including with those misguided souls who struggle to accept what to me appears overwhelming evidence of an inside job. But discussion boards doesn't seem to be the best place to conduct this debate. It is too easy for either 'side' to derail the argument with personal abuse etc.
So my preferred solution is the creation of a separate area for our 'critics' and then keep them off the remainder of the forums |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jane
Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Aug 2005
Posts: 312
Location: Otley, West Yorks, England
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 6:56 pm Post subject: "Informed debate" |
|
|
| Quote: | | I'm all for informed debate between different 9/11 researchers including with those misguided souls who struggle to accept what to me appears overwhelming evidence of an inside job. But discussion boards doesn't seem to be the best place to conduct this debate. It is too easy for either 'side' to derail the argument with personal abuse etc. |
I don't think they are looking for an "informed debate" I think they just want to cause disruption and conflict between us and maybe try to influence some people (who may innocently be taken in by them) in a negative way. I think they also play games and there are I think some of them that pretend to disagree with one of their mates in order to appear to have more credibility.
I think if members of this board want to enter into an informed debate with genuine people who do not agree with what we say, then they would be better to join other discussion boards as well as ours and try to open up a discussion about 9/11 and put their view accross openly and calmly. I know Graham does this. I've tried to a bit but I wasn't very good at it. I might try again. There is nothing wrong or dishonest in doing this and it may have some positive results. I can't see the point of having endless "arguments" with people who will never change their opinions and don't seem very "real" to me anyway on this board.
_________________
Romans 12:2 Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will.
http://www.wytruth.org.uk/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
