FT calls for World Government

[QuitTheirClogs]

And now for a world government

By Gideon Rachman -- Published: December 8 2008
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7a03e5b6-c541-11dd-b516-000077b07658.html

could the European model go global?

it is increasingly clear that the most difficult issues facing national governments are international in nature: there is global warming, a global financial crisis and a “global war on terror”.

A taste of the ideas doing the rounds in Obama circles is offered by a recent report from the Managing Global Insecurity project, whose small US advisory group includes John Podesta, the man heading Mr Obama’s transition team and Strobe Talbott, the president of the Brookings Institution, from which Ms Rice has just emerged.

The MGI report argues for the creation of a UN high commissioner for counter-terrorist activity, a legally binding climate-change agreement negotiated under the auspices of the UN and the creation of a 50,000-strong UN peacekeeping force. Once countries had pledged troops to this reserve army, the UN would have first call upon them.

the MGI report opts for soothing language. It emphasises the need for American leadership and uses the term, “responsible sovereignty” – when calling for international co-operation – rather than the more radical-sounding phrase favoured in Europe, “shared sovereignty”. It also talks about “global governance” rather than world government.

But some European thinkers think that they recognise what is going on. Jacques Attali, an adviser to President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, argues that: “Global governance is just a euphemism for global government.” As far as he is concerned, some form of global government cannot come too soon. Mr Attali believes that the “core of the international financial crisis is that we have global financial markets and no global rule of law”.

[insidejob]

Secrecy used to be their stock in trade, but are the NWO becoming more public? And if so, is this because they are getting ready to implement their plans?

IS one sign of this the publicity given to the Rothschilds. We've had them being interviewed in financial magazines, they have publicly rebuked the Tories, they have appeared on BBC radio and TV supporting the UK bank bail out and they've been on C4's The Assent of Money with a whitewashed history of how Nathan Rothschild made his fortune. This all can't be a mistake or happenstance.

[fish5133]

[acrobat74]

Yep, just saw this. Ah these 'solutions'. Testing the waters?

Rachman appears to be well connected (former Brussels correspondent for the Economist, allegedly also a Bilderberger).

[acrobat74]

http://blogs.ft.com/rachmanblog/2008/12/covered-in-internet-slime

[Disco_Destroyer]

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7a03e5b6-c541-11dd-b516-000077b07658.html?nc lick_check=1

[Disco_Destroyer]

Haha

Corporate Newspaper Columnist Backpedals on World Government Story


http://www.infowars.com/?p=6481

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, December 11, 2008

Financial Times columnist Gideon Rachman complains that he has been "covered in internet slime" after receiving hundreds of hostile e-mails in response to his article in which he all but called for a dictatorial global government to be installed to fight terrorism, climate change and solve the financial crisis.



Self-satisfied with his perch on the wannabe-elitist media peanut gallery, puking verbal diarrhea from the gravy train of sophistic phony intellectualism, Rachman's was aghast that the rabble-rousers and "gun-toting bible bashers" as he disdainfully referred to them dared challenge his globalist world view.

"These people can read, but they cannot think.," sneers Rachman, as he registers his contempt for those "Who believe not only that global warming is a hoax - but that it is actually a conspiracy."

No matter that the IPCC's chief source for its scientific data was recently caught faking temperature data in claiming that data records from the naturally warmer month of September represented those from October.

No matter that 2008 is the coldest year of the decade, that the Arctic ice sheet has expanded by an area the size of Germany since summer 2007, and that record low temperatures have hit areas all over America.

No matter that over 650 scientists have put their names to a US Senate Minority report that challenges the contention of the UN's International Panel on Climate Change that there is a scientific "consensus" on the causes of global warming.

Forget about all that, to even question the religious orthodoxy of global warming makes one intellectually inferior, Rachman implies.

Despite calling his article, 'And now for world government,' Rachman then has the temerity to argue that he was not promoting the idea of a one world government, but merely "debating" the topic.

Throughout Rachman's article he employs the intellectual tactic of making it seem that global government is inevitable as a means of advocating its necessity.

Rachman writes that there is, "An opportunity and a means to make serious steps towards a world government," that the idea is "plausible," makes an argument that the financial crisis, terrorism and global warming create a pretext for it, and he quotes others who have passionately called for it. Near the end of the article he bemoans that fact that the push for a world government will be a slow process due to massive opposition against it.

How can this represent anything other than advocacy for the implementation of global government? If this article was a "debate" surrounding the question of whether or not global government should be set up, as Rachman claims, then he would have included at least some of the many arguments against global government, but how many did he cite? Zero. That's not a "debate", that's coming down on one side of an issue. For Rachman to claim that his article was "a dispassionate discussion of the possibility" of global government is completely dishonest.

This smacks of the classic hand-in-the-cookie jar moment. Far from being covered in slime as he protests, the spotlight has been turned on Rachman and to everyone's horror, he is already a slimeball of the highest order. Rachman's retort is a desperate effort to turn the light off again before more people take a look - he obviously doesn't like the fact that his distasteful and abhorrent opinions are being shown for what they are.

Rachman's article is all about the merits and necessity of global government and then at the end he brazenly adds the caveat that it will only be a success if it is anti-democratic in nature, ie dictatorial.

Rachman's attempt to backtrack and protest his innocence in claiming the article was anything but a PR piece for global government may fool the naive, but when we have dozens and dozens of highly influential figures throughout the decades calling for the same thing, the seriousness of the issue becomes clear.

Global government is by no means a new phenomenon proposed as a "solution" to current problems, it is the ultimate goal for a long-standing agenda that seeks to crush national sovereignty and freedom and replace it with a tyrannical new world order. That is not some kind of hare-brained conspiracy theory as Rachman would have it, it is a privately and publicly stated mission of the global elite.

Strobe Talbot, current Obama advisor and President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, wasn't loosely "debating" the subject of one world government when in 1992 he told Time Magazine, "In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all."

Neither was Dr. Henry Kissinger absently chit-chatting when he told a Bilderberg conference in 1991, "Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government."

Likewise, international financier James Warburg was deadly serious when he told a Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1950, "We shall have a world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest."

The march towards a centralized global government is not a contemporary idea, it is a coordinated movement firmly entrenched in history.

At the end of his riposte, Rachman cracks a lame joke about pretending to be a member of the "Bilderberg/Illuminati/Council on Foreign Relations/UN/Zionist establishment" to make millions from tell-all books.

Deliciously ironic it is therefore that as a matter of routine, Rachman's colleague Martin Wolf, the Financial Times' associate editor and chief economics commentator, attends the Bilderberg Group meeting every year and hob-knobs with hundreds of the world's power elite, and then routinely fails to report on it in the knowledge that if he did he'd be shunned by the very establishment that Rachman makes light of.

After all, 200+ global powerbrokers meeting in secret to discuss the future course of the planet doesn't seem like a very interesting story now does it?

Perhaps Rachman should ask Wolf for an invite to Bilderberg 2009, and then he could stop hoping to be a member of the global elite and actually become one. With disgusting, anti-democratic and elitist opinions like his, I'm sure Bilderberg will welcome Rachman with open arms.

[TonyGosling]

Why am I not suprised to see this engineered financial crisis being used to make a media blitz push for a one world government.
They may force various sovreign states into it but it will and can never work.

What a colossal waste of money, time and effort.

[acrobat74]

Same thread here:
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=16333&highlight=

[TonyGosling]

ta acrobat, merged.

[Disco_Destroyer]

33º Freemason admits sworn ambition of elite to unite the world



http://www.masonicforum.ro/en/nr16/iancu.html

Excerpt:

"The fraternal love must work indeed and win. I think this is our message, especially that we are now on the verge of unifying—in the profane field of world union—, at the point of restoring and installing the new order of the Temple of Solomon. For this we all swore, this is our ambition . . . . Masonry should be what it was before, the promoter of this union on the world plane. We are convinced that Masonry, the Scottish Rite, represents the elite that leads and will lead the mankind towards harmony and peace and towards love, which is above all.

. . . [P]lease consider seriously the fact that from now on a new stage begins, a stage in which we have to dedicate ourselves to work and prove that we are indeed an elite and we deserve the sacred mission we were called at."

—CONSTANTIN IANCU, 33º

Sovereign Grand Commander,
Supreme Council of AASR [Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite] from Romania

[TonyGosling]

Wonderfully ironic that this blatantly RIIA/CFR agenda setting piece should be penned by a man with a surname synonymous with one of London's worst ever parasitic Landlords.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Rachman

[QuitTheirClogs]

WEF -- Alcoa, Shell Want Climate Plan, Global Carbon Limits

June 20 (Bloomberg) -- Alcoa Inc., Royal Dutch Shell Plc and 97 other companies are urging world leaders to devise a plan for fighting global warming by setting greenhouse-gas targets for all nations and creating an international carbon market.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aSGm18AJaMkk

A new climate-change treaty is needed with incentives to capture and store carbon dioxide and protect forests, the 99 companies said in a statement prepared by the World Economic Forum, a Geneva-based business coalition.

...an extra $45 trillion must be invested in clean-air technologies, the Paris-based International Energy Agency said this month. The business group said it wants government guidance on how new climate policies may affect investment decisions.

...Willie Walsh, chief executive officer of London- based British Airways Plc ... is one of 16 corporate leaders who developed the proposals.

The group, representing 10 percent of the market value of the world's listed companies ...

“We see enormous opportunity here for the global financial industry,” Caio Koch-Weser, vice chairman of Frankfurt-based Deutsche Bank AG, Germany's biggest bank, said on the conference call. An emissions treaty enforced beyond 2012 might produce “the makings of the global carbon market, with carbon almost as a currency 10 years from now.'”

[Thermate911]

[QuitTheirClogs]

[QuitTheirClogs]

Adrian Salbuchi discusses the New World Order -- Will It Be World Government?


Part 1: Private Power


Link



Part 2: Orchestration


Link



http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13099

http://www.asalbuchi.com.ar/

[Pugwash]

Obam'a - the mask slips further..

http://phibetacons.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NzQ3NGUwODY4NTUzNWEyNjBm MTNlNzM5ZmI0ZDRiNWI=

http://www.chander.com/2009/04/dean-harold-kohs-nomination-to-the-stat e-department-.html

[Disco_Destroyer]

Beelderberg G. set to meet in Greece, save a riot =D

http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/meet_in_greece_173.html

[outsider]

Why on earth isn't the FT calling for the return of capital punishment? After all, a financial 'collapse' should be a dire threat to their readers? Or not, as the case may (and would apear) to be.

[QuitTheirClogs]

The Complete Idiot's Guide to the New World Order


Link



I just clicked on google video and this was the number one hot video. Is that encouraging or not? I can’t quite decide.

[paul wright]

[TonyGosling]

Adrian Salbuchi talks about the 2000 think tanks headed by CFR, Bilderberg, Chatham House, Trilateral Commission.
Most erudite presentation of the subject:

Link


Salbuchi - Will It Be World Government? - Part 1: Private Power
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEp1D5hAGO8

Salbuchi - Will It Be World Government? - Part 2: Orchestration
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4pDIwMukA8

Summarizes how the Global System REALLY works. "New World Order" as a generic description of periodic global systemic overhauls. Now, the Power Elite want to go for World Government.



(Two parts)

[satya]

^^double post lol