| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Caz
Last Chance Saloon
Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 836
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 1:05 am Post subject: Rockefeller and Bilderberg in Academy Schools |
 |
|
Rockefeller and Bilderberg in academy schools
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 9:32 am
| Quote: | (Although I have posted this elsewhere I consider it sufficiently disturbing to post it again in a more readable format.)
It was reported in the Times www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/article681786.ece
| Quote: | | Such is the explosion of what has been dubbed “venture philanthropy” and “philanthrocapitalism” among the nouveaux riches that Britain’s first philanthropy school opened its doors recently to multi-millionaires intent on learning how best to give to charity…The courses are run in London by the recently created Institute for Philanthropy, an offshoot of the fabulously wealthy Rockefeller Foundation |
But in some cases these people are not merely donating to charities; they are the charities. The chairman of the charity ARK is also chairman of the hugely wealthy EIM Group. (His children have a godfather, Giovanni Agnelli, who has been associated with his family for decades; Agnelli was one of the top four men at Bilderberg, according to www.bilderberg.org ) And Bilderberg do exist, they have been mentioned a number of times in Parliament: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmhansrd/vo021107/te xt/21107105.htm
| Quote: | Mr. Rosindell: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many arrests were made in connection with security arrangements for the Turnberry Bilderberg meeting; if the status of one arrested individual as special constable was consequently revoked; what the costs of policing this event were; what arrangements were made for the use of military transport for security of attendees; how many Bilderberg events have taken place in the UK requiring notification of his Department; when the next such is planned; and if he will make a statement. [78119]
Mr. Blunkett: This is a matter for the Scottish Executive. |
At this point in time ARK sponsors one school in London, Burlington Danes Academy, in Hammersmith and Fulham. They are looking at having at least 6 more.
We know what the Rockefeller Foundation is capable of: http://www.eugenics-watch.com/roots/chap12.html
| Quote: | The Rockefellers funded the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Germany, when eugenicists were preparing the way ideologically for what eventually became the world's most infamous slaughter, the Nazi holocaust. The Rockefeller Institute supported Alexis Carrel, who advocated the use of gas to get rid of the unwanted. John D. Rockefeller III founded the Population Council. Rockefeller money made Alfred Kinsey's sex research possible. In the fall of 1993, the Rockefeller Archive Center Newsletter published "The Rockefeller Foundation, the Population Council and the Groundwork for New Population Policies" by John B. Sharpless of the University of Wisconsin, Madison. Sharpless had been studying the files of the Rockefeller Foundation (RF), the records of the Population Council, and the personal papers of John D. Rockefeller III. He concluded that "Foundations and individual philanthropists are important in understanding the impressively quick and nearly unanimous change in attitudes and ideas about population that occurred during the 1960s."
Sharpless wrote, "The power to accomplish this task was based on their relationship with the philanthropic community.
|
They have an interest in global mind control. They have also had a long involvement with education and health. http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/brainwashing/rockefeller-mind-control.h tm
| Quote: | 1973. After a trip to China, David Rockefeller praised Mao Tse-tung who had slaughtered over 40 million people. His report, "From a China Traveler," highlights the goals presented in UN reports such as "The Commission on Global Governance" and UNESCO's Our Creative Diversity. Both focus on lofty ideals such as peace, harmony and unity in the communitarian "global" village -- a vision that demands absolute control and universal participation in facilitated small groups (modeled by the hierarchy of "soviets" or councils in Communist lands):
"One is impressed immediately by the sense of national harmony.... Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution it has obviously succeeded... in fostering high morale and community purpose. General social and economic progress is no less impressive....The enormous social advances of China have benefited greatly form the singleness of ideology and purpose.... The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in history." New York Times, 8-10-1973.
1979. Supported by the Rockefeller Foundation, the National Institute of Education and the U.S. Department of Education, Schooling for A Global Age is published. In the Preface, John Goodlad wrote: "Enlightened social engineering is required to face situations that demand global action now. Education is a long-term solution.
1987. Among the notable members of the Study Commission on Global Education were (then) Governor Bill Clinton, AFT president Albert Shanker, Professor John Goodlad, CFAT (Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching) president Ernest Boyer, and Frank Newman, president of the Education Commission of the States. Together, they prepared a report titled The United States Prepares for Its Future: Global Perspectives in Education. The Rockefeller, Ford and Exxon Foundations helped fund this report. |
The Institute for Philanthropy in London is an offshoot of the Rockefeller Foundation, training the hedge-fund managers, who are sponsoring our schools. We should all be on red alert. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Caz
Last Chance Saloon
Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 836
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Originally posted by Caz Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 9:41 am
| Quote: | I find the following from Beckett's book 'The Great City Academy Fraud' highly disturbing, and note that the teacher who passed this on to Beckett preferred to remain anonymous:
| Quote: | | Students are never allowed a break outside of the school. They must stay in the building all day. Students are given two half-hour ‘brunch’ breaks. These are not at the same time as other students. These breaks are staggered throughout the day, from 9.30 a.m. to 2 p.m., so that different groups are together. Brunch takes place in a large room without windows. Students have no opportunity to let off steam and are constantly monitored. |
Why on earth are these students being acclimatised to being in a room without windows? And why are they being constantly monitored? The students have no opportunity to chat amongst themselves. It seems that neither do the staff. And that is very handy. (Teachers work all the hours that god gives anyway). There is a small staff-room at one of these schools, only built because the staff absolutely insisted. It is more like a meeting room. Another new-build academy (as they are all new build buildings) which is currently being built will have no staff-room, and I know of one comprehensive (not academy) where there is talk of removing the staff-room. Also, a refurbishment at another place (not an academy) shrunk the staff-room to half its original size. No-one uses that staff-room now either. So the staff don’t get to see the big picture by cross-referencing information. Someone told me that there is no attempt at all to retain staff at one particular academy school. In a year only a handful of the original staff from the old school were still there.
Quoting Beckett again:
| Quote: | | One of the minor sins to be laid at the door of academies is the stupid waste of talented, experienced, dedicated teachers. |
Not at all. There are a lot of TeachFirst teachers at one school, apparently about 40%. These are teachers who have a good degree, they are ‘head-hunted’ while studying, spend 4-6 weeks doing teacher training over summer and go into the schools in September. (This is most certainly not a qualified teacher.) However, having a teacher like this in the school may be beneficial, but I do think the number I heard, about 40%, seems somewhat ridiculous. They are contracted for 2 years, and as they are inexperienced are given easier classes and lighter time-tables. The rest of the staff pick up the difficult classes and have heavier time-tables. The TeachFirst staff are then given the opportunity to be fast-tracked into senior posts in the school, presumably only if they are suitably compliant. One TeachFirst teacher at a school in London must have been suitably compliant as she is now the recruitment officer for ARK, and some of these recruitment officers certainly have interesting jobs. The young TeachFirst teachers who stay will be moulded into the shape the managers want. Interestingly, the TeachFirst programme arrived in this country from the US at about the same time that the academy schools programme arrived.
What’s more, the number of senior management in some of these schools is staggering.
In ‘The Great City Academy Fraud’ Beckett states: | Quote: | | ‘ Coulby Newham had a senior management team of four and was told it was overstaffed. King’s Academy had a senior management team of 14. This is, of course, entirely taxpayer-funded – Sir Peter pays not a penny towards their salaries.’ |
What on earth do these people do all day? But then, if you have the difficult job of making sure the staff bend to your will (and I suspect their will is rather difficult to bend to) this probably keeps them very busy indeed. What I am hearing from teachers in London who are not teaching in academy schools is that no-one really knows much about what is going on in the academy schools and they find that odd. Because people talk and people chat. In academy schools there isn’t much of that going on, because they get rid of the staffrooms. It is written into their contract (once a school becomes an academy school the staff sign a new contract and it is only for 6 months) that they are not to make any negative comments about the school. Now, what could someone possibly say about an academy school which is negative?
Disturbing, again, (this is all disturbing) is who is actually running these so called ‘good’ academy schools. Many are now being farmed out to third parties. At least one of them, 3E’s (http://www.3es.com), is a subsidiary of a global construction giant. 3E’s is part of Faber Maunsell, and if you look at the Faber Maunsell website (http://www.fabermaunsell.com) you will see that they are attached to Aecom, and if you look at Aecom’s website (http://www.aecom.com), you will see that they are military, they subcontract to the Pentagon, and they work in Iraq.
Private Sector Has Firm Role at the Pentagon
By Robert O'Harrow Jr. and Ellen McCarthy
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, June 9, 2004; Page E01
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A26316-2004Jun8?language=prin ter
| Quote: | The Defense Department is paying a firm called AECOM Technology Corp. to do work in Iraq once reserved mostly for military managers and other public employees, an arrangement that shows how far the government has gone in its decade-long effort to turn over much of its work to private contractors.
Under the $22 million contract, awarded in March, the Los Angeles-based engineering firm's subsidiaries will help the Pentagon buy goods and services, plan projects and administer contracts in Iraq related to reconstruction work. The firm will also monitor other contractors who are overseeing billions of dollars worth of electrical, water and communications projects. And the firm will assist on audits of projects, according to company documents.
The AECOM contract is the latest example of a transformation of the military acquisition system that started more than a decade ago and has contractors making decisions once made by government staffers. From 1990 to 2000, the Defense Department cut its procurement and acquisition staff from about 461,000 to 231,000, according to a 2000 report by the Defense Department's inspector general. Many duties that had been handled by the government were gradually shifted to the private sector. |
And 3E’s, way down the bottom of this pile, has become the third party in running a rather large number of schools. And Tony Blair has been completely complicit in this as, again in my favourite book ‘The Great City Academy Fraud’, it says:
| Quote: | | Sir David, having no experience of education, asked one of the mushrooming educational consultancy’s to run the school. He chose 3E’s, the firm set up by the first head of the first city technology college, Valerie Bragg, and the late Stanley Goodchild, a former chief education officer for Berkshire. Tony Blair, opening the academy, made a point of crediting them: ‘Stanley Goodchild and Valerie Bragg, for their educational leadership of the academy project through their path-breaking company 3Es.' 3E’s apparently stands for ‘education, education, education’. I’ve heard that phrase somewhere before, and am wondering whether they should be paying royalties. The Prime Minister’s endorsement will have helped 3E’s win the contracts they now have for four more academies in Chelsea, Lewisham, Croydon and Liverpool; but this is hardly a surprise, since Valerie Bragg is also an advisor to the Prime Minister’s office on regeneration of schools. |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Caz
Last Chance Saloon
Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 836
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 1:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 9:47 am
| Quote: | A friend in Australia told me by email very recently a story about what had happened in her daughter’s school.
| Quote: |
Towards the end of last term, they had their annual school
concert (musical). My daughter kept telling me about other children's roles
and how poorly they learned all the dialogues etc.
On the day of the concert, I got the picture.
All the teachers were in it (playing) and playing main roles.
Children (about 50) were divided into two groups,
One was with a horrible school (my daughter was among them, Group
A), the other at good school (B).
A appeared on stage ONLY at the beginning and at the end of the show
which lasted like two hours, singing one song each.
The rest was for B and the teachers.
It was absolutely unfair and unacceptable from my point of view --
that's even if my daughter was in B, I would have thought so.
I would like to complain, but it seems they've been doing (teacher
performing) all the time, I can see the majority (the family=Mr, Mrs
and daughter of the principal plus another, out of 7 total) really
enjoy it, but IMHO they should go to some local theater group!
But I know they won't like it, so I think I'll keep my mouth shut.
So far, they've been all nice to us, but it's like they've got my daughter as
a hostage, so to speak... |
So this is the new baddie, ‘the bad schools’ It’s been the ‘bad jews’ and the ‘bad Muslims’ and the ‘bad immigrants’ and the ‘bad black people’ and now we’ve got the ‘bad schools’. (In my day there was one sort of school, the local school, but the League tables certainly got rid of that.) Since this is all about the twisted use of language I would actually say that what they are meaning is really the ‘naughty schools’ because you only get to go to the ‘good’ school if you are very very good indeed. You had really better want to go there and you had really better behave, and do exactly as you are told. And this is exactly what was said of Bexley Academy: Any students who have complained have basically been told that they are lucky to be in the academy and should shut up. The building is not the school, the people are the school. Children can learn in a shed with a piece of chalk and a chalk board. The third world knows this. And what’s more, their kids are vastly better educated. We’re being told that the ‘good school’ is the academy school. What utter garbage. The Academy is not the ‘good’ school it is the ‘new’ school. And what is new about it? The building. As far as I am aware every single academy is either a complete rebuild or a partial rebuild; they just cannot seem to leave these buildings alone. Langely Academy looks like it is going to be one of the ‘good’ schools. www.langleyacademy.org. How sanitised. In fact, on looking closely at the graphics, it reminds of the Great Western Shopping Outlet. Welcome to the shopping Stepford Children. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Caz
Last Chance Saloon
Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 836
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Originally Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 3:59 am (slightly modified below for evidence, links to Aecom website rather than attachment brochure)
Aecom is involved in schools in the UK, the public largely unaware (see below). However, they are also involved in the 're-generation' of parks and gardens (and particularly playgrounds - children) as well, evidence from Australia.
| Quote: | Disturbing, again, (this is all disturbing) is who is actually running these so called ‘good’ academy schools. Many are now being farmed out to third parties. At least one of them, 3E’s (http://www.3es.com), is a subsidiary of a global construction giant. 3E’s is part of Faber Maunsell, and if you look at the Faber Maunsell website (http://www.fabermaunsell.com) you will see that they are attached to Aecom, and if you look at Aecom’s website (http://www.aecom.com), you will see that they are military, they subcontract to the Pentagon, and they work in Iraq.
Private Sector Has Firm Role at the Pentagon
By Robert O'Harrow Jr. and Ellen McCarthy
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, June 9, 2004; Page E01
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A26316-2004Jun8?language=prin ter
Quote:
The Defense Department is paying a firm called AECOM Technology Corp. to do work in Iraq once reserved mostly for military managers and other public employees, an arrangement that shows how far the government has gone in its decade-long effort to turn over much of its work to private contractors.
Under the $22 million contract, awarded in March, the Los Angeles-based engineering firm's subsidiaries will help the Pentagon buy goods and services, plan projects and administer contracts in Iraq related to reconstruction work. The firm will also monitor other contractors who are overseeing billions of dollars worth of electrical, water and communications projects. And the firm will assist on audits of projects, according to company documents.
The AECOM contract is the latest example of a transformation of the military acquisition system that started more than a decade ago and has contractors making decisions once made by government staffers. From 1990 to 2000, the Defense Department cut its procurement and acquisition staff from about 461,000 to 231,000, according to a 2000 report by the Defense Department's inspector general. Many duties that had been handled by the government were gradually shifted to the private sector.
And 3E’s, way down the bottom of this pile, has become the third party in running a rather large number of schools. And Tony Blair has been completely complicit in this as, again in my favourite book ‘The Great City Academy Fraud’, it says:
Quote:
Sir David, having no experience of education, asked one of the mushrooming educational consultancy’s to run the school. He chose 3E’s, the firm set up by the first head of the first city technology college, Valerie Bragg, and the late Stanley Goodchild, a former chief education officer for Berkshire. Tony Blair, opening the academy, made a point of crediting them: ‘Stanley Goodchild and Valerie Bragg, for their educational leadership of the academy project through their path-breaking company 3Es.' 3E’s apparently stands for ‘education, education, education’. I’ve heard that phrase somewhere before, and am wondering whether they should be paying royalties. The Prime Minister’s endorsement will have helped 3E’s win the contracts they now have for four more academies in Chelsea, Lewisham, Croydon and Liverpool; but this is hardly a surprise, since Valerie Bragg is also an advisor to the Prime Minister’s office on regeneration of schools. |
Aecom is involved in at least one local council in Australia, in the regeneration of parks and gardens, against community wishes.
Check their website. http://www.aecom.com/MarketsAndServices/49/93/index.html
So, a military company which subcontracts to the pentagon, involves itself in schools and local communities. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Caz
Last Chance Saloon
Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 836
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 1:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Originally posted by suraci
Sat Feb 09, 2008 8:46 am
| Quote: | The most well funded "club" in my son's state school is the joint services cadet force. When I was initially shown round, our group was herded towards their meeting place where we were paused to listen to the teacher telling us how the school has a very active cadet force which the children really enjoy. It seemed to escaped her that this might be seen as conditioning tomorrow's fresh meat for illegal wars.
UK schools are at the vanguard of the criminal elite's plan's for us all. Get 'em young and you have 'em for life. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Caz
Last Chance Saloon
Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 836
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 1:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 1:45 pm
| Quote: | | I can't see how a company which subcontracts to the pentagon has anything to gain by rebuilding playgrounds....or running schools which do not have cadets, and where parents and children don't even know that the parent company is military (hey, they think its 3es!) .... maybe I'm missing something, again. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
