| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Pikey
Banned
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1491
Location: North Lancashire
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:48 am Post subject: 911 - Finding the truth: book launched |
 |
|
Top quality UK truth researcher Andrew Johnson produces a book and unlike others (David Ray Griffin, Ian Henshall etc) its also downloaded for free.
The text of the press release is below. Here is the link.
http://www.prlog.org/10320921.html
Here is a 1-minute long video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjUgiOuALtc
The WMV file can be downloaded from
http://www.checktheevidence.com/video/
(911 ftt - book trailer.wmv). If you have a youtube channel, perhaps you will consider reposting this video.
| Quote: | Press Release – New Book Documents 9/11 Evidence and Research Cover Up
Derbyshire, UK – A new self-published book has been released which documents the importance of 9/11 research completed by Dr. Judy Wood, who has discovered that the WTC was destroyed with an undisclosed type of directed energy weapon.
Andrew Johnson, who has a background in Software Engineering, Tutoring and Assessing has self-published a book called “9/11 – Finding the Truth”. The book is a compilation of over 2 years of writing and research - related primarily to the studies published by Dr. Judy Wood.
Johnson states, “This book has been compiled from a set of articles I have posted over the last two and a half years at http://www.checktheevidence.com/ (people in the UK can also obtain a copy of the book through the website). The articles have attempted to point out the most compelling evidence gathered by Dr. Judy Wood in relation to the destruction of the World Trade Centre Complex on 9/11. When I first came across Dr. Wood’s research in late 2006, I did not imagine the ongoing efforts to cover up and discredit her research would be so strong and so persistent. I realised that what she was revealing was of great importance. I therefore took it upon myself to try and document the actions of those who were interacting with Dr. Wood, and how those interactions changed over time. This book presents that documentation.”
He continues, “Dr. Wood’s research links the 9/11 cover up to the energy cover up – inasmuch as the evidence she compiled reveals that a very unusual type of energy weaponry was used to destroy the WTC complex. Chapters in the book document how certain individuals who had been supportive of Dr. Wood’s research began to behave when she revealed the connection between the WTC evidence and something called ‘The Hutchison Effect’. I tried to document the attacks on Dr. Wood’s research and that of Canadian Experimental Scientist John Hutchison. This book attempts to give the reader an ‘inside view’ of these events.”
In the book, Johnson also covers aspects of Dr. Wood’s legal case, “The cover up has also meant that only a very small number of people have heard about Dr. Wood’s legal case against ARA, SAIC and other companies, who were contracted by NIST to contribute to the various WTC reports. Dr. Wood sued them for fraud – something that no other 9/11 researcher has done. This again shows the strength and importance of the evidence Dr. Wood has uncovered and compiled.”
Johnson has made the book available at cost price, or as a free PDF download at this link http://tinyurl.com/911book . “Obviously I hope as many people as possible will read the book and understand the important matters it covers. I think it is unlike any other book about 9/11.”
A few readers and reviewers have already commented on the work.
“Now we are discovering that there is a highly-sophisticated black-ops weaponization of free energy technology and it was responsible for the bizarre, low-temperature pulverization of the Twin Towers. Dr. Judy Wood has pieced together the physical evidence and Andrew Johnson has highlighted who is working to silence or smear whom, as the powers that be rush to impede or at least contain the dissemination of these startling findings."
-- Conrado Salas Cano, M.S. in Physics
“Like most people I kept watching the Towers “come down” at free fall speed & it did not sit right. Then I discovered www.drjudywood.com & my eyes where opened. Andrew Johnson certainly achieves his objectives - which are to expose another level of intrigue beyond the official explanations of 9/11.”
-- Peter Taylor Wood
“Johnson presents his evidence in a carefully-reasoned, dispassionate manner, inviting us to reassess everything we thought we knew about this world-changing event.” |
_________________
Pikey
Peace, truth, respect and a Mason free society
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaH-lGafwtE#
www.wholetruthcoalition.org
www.truthforum.co.uk
www.checktheevidence.com
www.newhorizonsstannes.com
www.tpuc.org
www.cpexposed.com
www.thebcgroup.org.uk
www.fmotl.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TonyGosling
Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 18335
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pikey
Banned
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1491
Location: North Lancashire
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
scienceplease 2
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 06 Apr 2009
Posts: 1702
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is all science fantasy and drags down the rest of the efforts at getting to the real mass murderers.
Proof of scalar waves: um none.
Proof of HAARP as a weapon: er nothing
Use of truly exotic technology to destroy WTC buildings: the risk would be enormous!!! This is the Star Wars Defence Program mentality: it would never work!
Why use space beams when you can use (proven) explosives?
Why use holograms when you can use (proven) remote controlled aircraft?
Etc?
It just doesn't pass the credibility test.
I'd suggest to Tony that this topic should be moved off the front page and into another section. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling
Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 18335
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
scubadiver
Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 1850
Location: Currently Andover
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TonyGosling wrote: | Yes, I will move it soon.
What do others think? |
Controversies (sorry!)
When it comes to Joe and Josephine Bloggs on the street, we need to be more down to earth.
_________________
Currently working on a new website |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pikey
Banned
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1491
Location: North Lancashire
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Scubadiver and Scienceplease2 I bet you were flat earthers in your past lifes? 
Have you actually thoroughly checked out the evidence based research Andrew Johnson presents? The energy input to produce the devastation/dustification effect on WTC 1 and 2 was far in excess of what Controlled demoltion can achieve imo.
| Quote: | | Yes, I will move it soon. |
If that occurs its sad and inevitably will bring this site further into disrepute from a truthseeker POV. Its further evidence of gatekeeping journalism/editorial action Tony. Its doing exactly what the 911 Keane Commission report did - ignoring the evidence and being selective.
| Quote: | | What do others think? |
Now thats the reaction I'd expect from a professional open minded independent journalist.
Hope that prompts a reaction from the silent majority rather than the usual dominating contributors here.
_________________
Pikey
Peace, truth, respect and a Mason free society
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaH-lGafwtE#
www.wholetruthcoalition.org
www.truthforum.co.uk
www.checktheevidence.com
www.newhorizonsstannes.com
www.tpuc.org
www.cpexposed.com
www.thebcgroup.org.uk
www.fmotl.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 6060
Location: East London
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 4:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dr. Hieronymous Disney, Emeritus Prof. of Disinfo for the Beano, has favourably peer-reviewed Wood's fantasies.
Haven't come across anyone else, though. Needless to say, her 'work' will be trumpeted by the MSM to attempt to smear and ridicule the Truth Movement, 'a la Nick K'.
_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
scienceplease 2
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 06 Apr 2009
Posts: 1702
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Pikey wrote: |
Have you actually thoroughly checked out the evidence based research Andrew Johnson presents? The energy input to produce the devastation/dustification effect on WTC 1 and 2 was far in excess of what Controlled demoltion can achieve imo.
|
Actually if you have the info to hand then that would be useful. I'm discussing energy budgets elsewhere...
The OCT claims the collisions and fire generated 1 Gigawatt of power - I don't know how that was calaculated.
Another OCTopus calculated there were hundreds of tons of HE needed to blow up the towers
I've recently read CD Inc used 82lb of explosive to blow up a 15 story building. That equates to 656lb per tower - even trebled that's only 2000lb per tower - which doesn't seem very much!
How much energy does this supposed "space weapon" generate?
Why would they use such risky technology? Where was it tested? The towers blow up from the middle (just above a/c impact point) - so how did a space ray do that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pikey
Banned
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1491
Location: North Lancashire
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Outsider wrote:-
| Quote: | | Needless to say, her 'work' will be trumpeted by the MSM to attempt to smear and ridicule the Truth Movement |
"WILL" being the operative and key word. I'd be very surprised if the MSM covered the subject properly. But if it does or has send us the evidence here.
| Quote: | | Actually if you have the info to hand then that would be useful. |
All links provided above. It took me about 3 months of reseraching the subject and checking out the evidence (and yes Hurricane Erin passed close to NY at the time of the collapse) before coming to an informed opinion.
You be the judge but your'll have to check out the evidence and research first. Andrew has done alot of the hard work for us.
_________________
Pikey
Peace, truth, respect and a Mason free society
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaH-lGafwtE#
www.wholetruthcoalition.org
www.truthforum.co.uk
www.checktheevidence.com
www.newhorizonsstannes.com
www.tpuc.org
www.cpexposed.com
www.thebcgroup.org.uk
www.fmotl.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andrew Johnson
Mighty Poster
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1919
Location: Derbyshire
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 4:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
An interesting thread - which again backs up much of the evidence presented in "9/11 - Finding the Truth" - because it catalogues wilfully ignoring evidence, insults, ridicule and at the same time, not providing a suitable alternative explanation which explains the available evidence.
This activity is not limited to anonymous posters either, it seems.
It is so very interesting that Pikey is the only one willing to talk about evidence in relation to establishing what happened on 9/11.
_________________
Andrew
Ask the Tough Questions, Folks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andrew.
Validated Poster
Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Posts: 1518
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 5:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Andrew Johnson wrote: | An interesting thread - which again backs up much of the evidence presented in "9/11 - Finding the Truth" - because it catalogues wilfully ignoring evidence, insults, ridicule and at the same time, not providing a suitable alternative explanation which explains the available evidence.
This activity is not limited to anonymous posters either, it seems.
It is so very interesting that Pikey is the only one willing to talk about evidence in relation to establishing what happened on 9/11. |
Dear Andrew J,
What is the strongest evidence for the hutchison effect being used on 9/11 to bring the towers down. I have looked through the above links and can find no proof or proof of evidence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 6060
Location: East London
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Proof of a 'Hutchison Effect' would be extremely interesting, period. Never mind proof of it bringing down the Towers, in a 'cool' reaction (molten steel not withstanding).
Even more interesting would be a 'Peer Reviewed' (or even presented) Woods 'paper'.
Glad the thread has been relegated to 'contoversies'. I wouldn't even give it that level of 'oxygen'.
_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andrew.
Validated Poster
Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Posts: 1518
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| outsider wrote: | Proof of a 'Hutchison Effect' would be extremely interesting, period. Never mind proof of it bringing down the Towers, in a 'cool' reaction (molten steel not withstanding).
Even more interesting would be a 'Peer Reviewed' (or even presented) Woods 'paper'.
Glad the thread has been relegated to 'contoversies'. I wouldn't even give it that level of 'oxygen'. |
As for the Hutchison effect and Energy, we know that E = mc2 so then E must also = dtc2. (Where delta t is change in time)(Time dilation which is a proven concept)
But there is no proof of evidence that it was used and at what level it can be *used as per the Hutchison Effect and its collection of
Phenomena’s (edit)*by man.
2 Peter
3:8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day [is] with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering toward us, not wanting that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Surah 70. The Ascending Stairways, The Ways of Ascent, Sceptic
70:4. The angels and the Spirit ascend unto Him in a Day the measure whereof is (as) fifty thousand years:
70:5. Therefore do thou hold Patience,- a Patience of beautiful (contentment).
70:6. They see the (Day) indeed as a far-off (event):
70:7. But We see it (quite) near. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 6060
Location: East London
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@ Andrew:
'As for the Hutchison effect and Energy, we know that E = mc2 so then E must also = dtc2. (Where delta t is change in time)(Time dilation which is a proven concept)'
Like most posters on these Forums, I am not a physicist.
What I have seen is a Svengali-like character in a junk-filled area, flicking switches, and objects 'elevating' and moving off in different directions; also, an apparent model warship, tossing (the warship, not 'Svengali'!) around on water in a small tank, with flashes of light.
Like Woods, it would be interesting to see a peer-reviewd paper by Hutchison (or even a paper, rather than idiotic 'special effects').
_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Last edited by outsider on Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:29 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andrew.
Validated Poster
Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Posts: 1518
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| outsider wrote: | @ Andrew:
'As for the Hutchison effect and Energy, we know that E = mc2 so then E must also = dtc2. (Where delta t is change in time)(Time dilation which is a proven concept)'
Like most posters on these Forums, I am not a physicist.
What I have seen is a Svengali-like character in a junk-filled area, blasted switches, and objects 'elevating' and moving off in different directions; also, an apparent model warship, tossing (the warship, not 'Svengali'!) around on water in a small tank, with flashes of light.
Like Woods, it would be interesting to see a peer-reviewd paper by Hutchison (or even a paper, rather than idiotic 'special effects'). |
Well most people likely know that electrons spin around seemingly perpetually; they must get that energy from somewhere. That microwaves heat up things so why not parts of the atmosphere. Dangerous things microwaves really, similar to HAARP? That is not to say that this Hutchison effect can be used as per Dr. Wood. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 6060
Location: East London
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| outsider wrote: | @ Andrew:
'As for the Hutchison effect and Energy, we know that E = mc2 so then E must also = dtc2. (Where delta t is change in time)(Time dilation which is a proven concept)'
Like most posters on these Forums, I am not a physicist.
What I have seen is a Svengali-like character in a junk-filled area, blasted switches, and objects 'elevating' and moving off in different directions; also, an apparent model warship, tossing (the warship, not 'Svengali'!) around on water in a small tank, with flashes of light.
Like Woods, it would be interesting to see a peer-reviewd paper by Hutchison (or even a paper, rather than idiotic 'special effects'). |
I cannot understand this. I clearly typed 'flipping switches', yet it came up 'blasted switches'. I tried to correct, but it reverted to 'flipping switches' when it came up for correction. Yet when I pressed 'submit', again it had switched to 'blasted'.
_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andrew.
Validated Poster
Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Posts: 1518
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
“an apparent model warship, tossing (the warship, not 'Svengali'!) around on water in a small tank, with flashes of light.”
Power from radio waves -- hooking up a meter to measure the voltage and current
http://sci-toys.com/scitoys/scitoys/radio/homemade_radio.html
Power is needed to vibrate the earpiece to make sound vibrations.
Again this is not to say that this Hutchison effect can be used as per Dr. Wood. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gruts
Major Poster
Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 1050
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Andrew Johnson wrote: | | wilfully ignoring evidence |
as has been pointed out many times on this forum - in order for judy wood's "theory" about the WTC steel being "dustified" to be plausible, the WTC dust would have to contain unusually high levels of iron. However, none of the many analyses of the WTC dust show this.
for example, in the USGS study the iron content of the dust samples varied from less than 1% to 4.13%.
http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/
http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/chem1/WTCchemistrytable.html
it's funny how judy wood's gullible fanboys accuse others of wilfully ignoring evidence while wilfully ignoring the most obvious and pertinent evidence available - for the simple reason that it shows her "theory" is a complete load of boll0cks.
_________________
Nyetu pravdy v Isvyestyakh i nyetu isvyestyi v Pravde |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Micpsi
Moderate Poster
Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 505
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gruts wrote: | | Andrew Johnson wrote: | | wilfully ignoring evidence |
as has been pointed out many times on this forum - in order for judy wood's "theory" about the WTC steel being "dustified" to be plausible, the WTC dust would have to contain unusually high levels of iron. However, none of the many analyses of the WTC dust show this.
for example, in the USGS study the iron content of the dust samples varied from less than 1% to 4.13%.
http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/
http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/chem1/WTCchemistrytable.html
it's funny how judy wood's gullible fanboys accuse others of wilfully ignoring evidence while wilfully ignoring the most obvious and pertinent evidence available - for the simple reason that it shows her "theory" is a complete load of boll0cks. |
Yes, it is, but your analysis does not prove it. Each tower was 450 million Kg in mass. It contained about 90 million Kg of steel:
http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2004/EricChen.shtml
So 20% by weight of the tower was steel (over 19% iron). If iron and concrete were turned into dust by the same percentage, then the resulting dust samples should have contained 19% of iron, disproving Wood's theory. But, if some hypothetical DEW dustified a much smaller percentage of the iron than it did the concrete, then the 19% figure might have been reduced to the measured few percent. Therefore, your claim that the data disproves her theory is not necessarily correct, for it is based upon the quite possibly wrong assumption that the dustification of iron and concrete was equally efficient. Furthermore, Wood does not claim that all the steel went "poof", and so her theory does allow the possibility (whether one believes it or not is another matter) that the concentration of iron in the dust sample was as low as it was measured to be.
That said, I don't believe that her data and analysis need the hypothesis of DEW. There is no conclusive evidence that most of the steel disappeared into thin air, as she claims, nor does the observed damage require such an exotic weapon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gruts
Major Poster
Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 1050
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hi micpsi
you're assuming that there was no iron in the non-steel portion of the building, which is clearly not the case.
don't forget that iron makes up about 5% of the earth's crust - so you'd expect to find some in dust that came from the pulverised concrete and other materials that made up the buildings - in roughly the amounts that actually were found.
"dustified steel"? gimme a break.... 
Incidentally - for anyone too busy to read through the 300 pages of turgid waffle in andrew johnson's book, I posted a condensed version of it here a while ago....
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=15767
_________________
Nyetu pravdy v Isvyestyakh i nyetu isvyestyi v Pravde |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pikey
Banned
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1491
Location: North Lancashire
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Stephen
Moderate Poster
Joined: 03 Jul 2006
Posts: 819
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ive got the book
Keep up the truthseeking Pikey mate.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
IanFantom
Validated Poster
Joined: 31 Jan 2007
Posts: 296
Location: Halifax, West Yorkshire
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| TonyGosling wrote: | Yes, I will move it soon.
What do others think? |
I'm just catching up, having been disconnected from the Internet for a little while, so I haven't yet examined the book.
However, I have in the past from time to time sought a seminal paper on the Hutchison Effect, and not found it. Until such a paper is produced, I can't really see how anyone can take it seriously.
However, I do have one question on it. Could the Hutchison Effect be put into reverse? Could the towers of the World Trade Center have been constructed in the first place by an inverse Hutchison Effect of Molecular Integration? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Stephen
Moderate Poster
Joined: 03 Jul 2006
Posts: 819
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gruts
Major Poster
Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 1050
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wonder where the Andrew/Johnson/Judy/Wood/don't/ask/how/many/North Atlantic/hurricanes/there/are/per/year/wannabee's fan club is meeting this year?
I hear nanotech structures these days are coming on in leaps and bounds and whatever else creatures at that scale do.
Oh berlawx, was there a not-so-subliminal zionist LIHOP Steve "molten" Jones reference in there? Whoops, there goes my confirmation bias, with a heavy emphasis on the confirmation part.
_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
