scienceplease 2
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 06 Apr 2009
Posts: 1702
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:57 pm Post subject: Debunk of "Bush too inept" in USA paper |
 |
|
Article from USA, New Hampshire, newspaper
http://sentinelsource.com/articles/2009/10/03/opinion/letters_editor/f ree/id_373381.txt
| Quote: | Questions on 9/11 aren’t answered
Published: Saturday, October 03, 2009
This is a response to a few questions raised by Fred Slavic in his Saturday, Sept. 19, letter to the editor.
1. “Who in the Bush administration, known for its ineptness, would have had the expertise to plan and initiate such a flawlessly executed operation?”
The Bush administration achieved its aim of passing Patriot Acts one and two, creating Homeland Security, and invading two countries while constructing permanent military bases in those same countries. How is it possible to classify these extraordinary political gains as “inept”?
The Project For A New American Century (PNAC), in a policy document “Rebuilding America’s Defenses,” written in September 2000, openly advocates for total global military domination.
Its members include Jeb Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfowitz and Kristol, to name a few.
In it, PNAC realizes its aims would be difficult and that “the process of transformation is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor.”
Fast forward to 9/11/01 and they have their “New Pearl Harbor.”
Yet consider what the official conspiracy theory asks us to accept — that a bearded man in an Afghan cave is capable of taking over four planes, convincing the U.S. air defense to stand down, while leveraging two of these planes to cause three skyscrapers to collapse in free fall, mimicking every characteristic of controlled demolition.
Al Qaida’s advanced technological expertise is certainly not considered “inept” here.
2. “How did they manage to smuggle hundreds of pounds of explosives plus wiring and electronic gear into the buildings, one of which had been bombed some years before, without anyone noticing, or getting curious about the unusual activity?”
I will provide an answer that merely scratches the surface, by quoting Kevin Ryan, who previously worked for Underwriters Laboratory, which certified the steel used to build the Twin Towers.
“Throughout the life of the WTC buildings, modifications were made to each structure. The modifications included upgrades to electrical, fire protection, and elevator systems, as well as general construction activities. As a rule, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ) was responsible for initiating the modifications in the public access areas, and the tenants were responsible for completing the modifications throughout the leased spaces. For this reason, the tenant companies would have been capable of coordinating the installation of explosive materials and other devices with reasonable certainty that those materials would not be detected by others. For a demolition plan to work, however, such tenants would need to be managed as a group, and explosives would need to be placed on enough floors to ensure the fall of each building through what would otherwise have been the path of most resistance.”
Kevin Ryan, during his visit to Keene State College this past Sept. 12, demonstrated that both exploded and unexploded nano-thermite particles are consistently present within WTC dust samples. The unique signature of highly engineered nano-thermite is well documented and peer reviewed. This is hard evidence of premeditated mass murder, that cannot be refuted.
Interestingly, a sol gel was developed in the 1990s that allows for an easy application of nano-thermite while keeping this volatile substance chemically stable, including the capacity for wireless remote detonation.
More interestingly, each handpicked member of NIST’s scientific team studying the WTC collapses has direct and intimate links to this highly specialized field of nano-thermite research and development.
Is it me? Or is just a little odd?
For those curious enough to dig deeper, go to www.911review.com/articles/ryan for the complete studies. They are lengthy and numerous.
MIKE CASNER
50 Grove St.
Peterborough |
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
