Guests to 9/11 Truth please read

[blackcat]

http://septembereleventh.org/documents/rodgwtcpdf.pdf

To any guest who visits this forum I urge you to please read the above pdf document to gain an insight into the "half-baked farce" which was the official "investigation" into the collapse of the WTC towers.

In a misguided attempt at fair play the moderators of this site allow disinformation agents to post here to spread the lies of the 9/11 report. These people would have you believe that thousands of structural engineers support the official explanation when in fact that is yet another lie. The document is full of references to engineering experts, and quotes from newspaper articles from the time of the "enquiry" questioning the obstructions placed in the way of the investigators. It shows the collapse to be impossible as explained by the government report, as well as referring to many of the deliberate lies they told.

[Jay Ref]

[blackcat]

This is an example of the bilge I am talking about. Just not even bothering to read the article I posted and asking for names when there are names in the article. Note that I am required to provide a name of an engineer who is on record as saying he believes explosives were used. This in a climate when a University lecturer is threatened with losing his means of earning a living for saying the same. When senior members of the US government call for his sacking for daring to express his opinion. The article clearly gives names of experts who describe the official explanation of the collapse of the towers as a "half-baked farce" and even worse. What is wrong with asking for a proper and full enquiry? What do they have to hide? Why do people who speak out get slammed?

The response of Jayref to this article is typical of the way he avoids the issue and pretends to want debate. His request is nonsense and he knows it. There is a massive amount of disquiet about what made the buildings collapse and this has been voiced by many experts. He knows this but seeks to obfuscate and detract from the truth.

[Jay Ref]

[blackcat]

[paul wright]

Jay Ref is averaging about 12 posts a day, which is pretty good going.I see Chipmunk is moving at roughly the same rate. Perhaps the tasking includes a quota thing.

[ian neal]

Jay Ref

Last warning, your posts outside the critics corner will be deleted

That does not mean you can not comment or challenge material posted outside critics corner. All you have to do is cut and paste the material or link to the original thread and start your own thread in critics corner then post a link to your new thread in the original post inviting others to join you in the critics corner.

Those that wish to will do so and those that don't, won't.

Cheers

[blackcat]

http://www.chiefengineer.org/article.cfm?seqnum1=1029

Interesting article from "Chief Engineer" Magazine where people within the WTC describe the explosions that went off in the basement. Explosions which could not possibly be associated with the plane crash.

[blackcat]

http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F40A11FB3E550C768EDDAB 0994D9404482

From the New York Times Dec 25 2001

[Fenix]

If that that occurs it is necessary to search for that to whom it favourably. Whether to Islamites explosions of the world towers were favourable?
Christopher Bollina's researches, Lyndon LaRouche, Andreas fon Bulow, etc. - have proved a full inconsistency of the official version of destruction of buildings-skyscrapers on September, 11th. How semiliterate arabs with knives could for papers are sharp have grasped the plane?
Background Bulow marks, that all large terrorist operations are constructed by a principle of a nested doll. On a kind for a deceit, there are terrorists of an operating level. The highest level - a level of architects - develops acts of terrorism for change of public opinion.