Charlie Brooker=idiot debunker, or possibly disinfo agent

[Bugs_23]

Not sure if this is in the right section. Sorry if not. Anyway, once again, debunkers prove they're running seriously low on counter-arguments. Now they're no longer even trying to argue logically against conspiracy theories; they're just going to suppress them instead because they've run out of ideas on how to try to prove us wrong. This is what the halfwit Charlie Brooker wrote about Edge Media TV:

"Conspiracy theorists need to believe their viewpoints are being suppressed, rather than, say, assessed and dismissed as ropey and ludicrous. Which makes a channel devoted to spreading these viewpoints a bit of a paradox. If “the system” was even 1% as efficient and sinister as they believe, their station wouldn’t exist."

That's his argument? So, according to this douchebag, once something is labelled a conspiracy theory, it shouldn't even be assessed; just dismissed straight away. And debunkers aren't even a bit ashamed to be associated with someone who thinks like that? Unsurprisingly I found this extract on counterknowledge.com, a website set up in yet another pathetic attempt at debunking pretty much every conspiracy theory known to man. And of course, in the 9/11 section, their favourite source to quote from seems to be Popular Mechanics. I would recommend anyone who still believes the * those idiots who call themselves mechanics wrote read Debunking 9/11 Debunking by David Ray Griffin (my hero!), which rips the Popular Mechanics debunking attempts to shreds.
Websites like this are a bit worrying though, especially when reading the comments by gullible people who just obediently lap up everything they read without any kind of critical thought. Seeing how many people out there are stupid enough to believe the authorities are on our side and there are no conspiracies is kind of depressing. What will the future be like?