Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 1:20 pm Post subject: US prepares to attack Iran - 2010
Story from The Herald - Scotland, 14th March, 2010
Quote:
Final destination Iran?
Exclusive: Rob Edwards
Published on 14 Mar 2010
Hundreds of powerful US “bunker-buster” bombs are being shipped from California to the British island of Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean in preparation for a possible attack on Iran.
The Sunday Herald can reveal that the US government signed a contract in January to transport 10 ammunition containers to the island. According to a cargo manifest from the US navy, this included 387 “Blu” bombs used for blasting hardened or underground structures.
Experts say that they are being put in place for an assault on Iran’s controversial nuclear facilities. There has long been speculation that the US military is preparing for such an attack, should diplomacy fail to persuade Iran not to make nuclear weapons.
Although Diego Garcia is part of the British Indian Ocean Territory, it is used by the US as a military base under an agreement made in 1971. The agreement led to 2,000 native islanders being forcibly evicted to the Seychelles and Mauritius.
The Sunday Herald reported in 2007 that stealth bomber hangers on the island were being equipped to take bunker-buster bombs.
"They are gearing up totally for the destruction of Iran" - Dan Plesch, director, Centre for International Studies and Diplomacy, University of London
Although the story was not confirmed at the time, the new evidence suggests that it was accurate.
Contract details for the shipment to Diego Garcia were posted on an international tenders’ website by the US navy.
A shipping company based in Florida, Superior Maritime Services, will be paid $699,500 to carry many thousands of military items from Concord, California, to Diego Garcia.
Crucially, the cargo includes 195 smart, guided, Blu-110 bombs and 192 massive 2000lb Blu-117 bombs.
“They are gearing up totally for the destruction of Iran,” said Dan Plesch, director of the Centre for International Studies and Diplomacy at the University of London, co-author of a recent study on US preparations for an attack on Iran. “US bombers are ready today to destroy 10,000 targets in Iran in a few hours,” he added.
The preparations were being made by the US military, but it would be up to President Obama to make the final decision. He may decide that it would be better for the US to act instead of Israel, Plesch argued.
“The US is not publicising the scale of these preparations to deter Iran, tending to make confrontation more likely,” he added. “The US ... is using its forces as part of an overall strategy of shaping Iran’s actions.”
According to Ian Davis, director of the new independent thinktank, Nato Watch, the shipment to Diego Garcia is a major concern. “We would urge the US to clarify its intentions for these weapons, and the Foreign Office to clarify its attitude to the use of Diego Garcia for an attack on Iran,” he said.
For Alan Mackinnon, chair of Scottish CND, the revelation was “extremely worrying”. He stated: “It is clear that the US government continues to beat the drums of war over Iran, most recently in the statements of Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton.
“It is depressingly similar to the rhetoric we heard prior to the war in Iraq in 2003.”
The British Ministry of Defence has said in the past that the US government would need permission to use Diego Garcia for offensive action. It has already been used for strikes against Iraq during the 1991 and 2003 Gulf wars.
About 50 British military staff are stationed on the island, with more than 3,200 US personnel. Part of the Chagos Archipelago, it lies about 1,000 miles from the southern coasts of India and Sri Lanka, well placed for missions to Iran.
The US Department of Defence did not respond to a request for a comment.
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 6:15 am Post subject: for Netanyahu?
Tony - I don't think it's "for Netanyahu", that's simply a misreading of current geo-political events.
As has been pointed out by many people, and as seems fairly obvious, the current game in the Middle East is part of an Imperial strategy whose main thrust right now is the sequestration of energy reserves. It’s an insane and outright Fascist exercise and it is the work, mainly, of the Anglo/American Empire; again this should be fairly obvious. As well as being pretty much bog-standard Imperial behaviour it is also exacerbated by the harsh and unavoidable realities of Peak Oil. This is a mobilised Empire and that Empire is a huge entity with long historical roots and populations on two continents. To apportion blame for any attack on Iran, as a part of all that, mainly to Netanyahu/Israel is ridiculous and buys into the shrill and hysterical “it’s the Jews (and/or Israel)!!!” line favoured by the likes of Alex James.
For the umpteenth time on the pages of this forum I will point out that the “it’s the Jews (and/or Israel)!!!” line is wholly inaccurate and a huge red herring. Israel plays its role as supporter and part of the Imperial entity but to say it’s behind everything is just plain silly. Some even say that the U.S. attacked Iraq for Israel – no; the U.S. attacked Iraq for oil – this is SO in the realm of the-bleedin-obvious that it should go without saying.
I would have thought you’d know better and would have had a much more accurate understanding of geo-political realities.
PS - One of the factors contributing to the U.S. attack on Iraq was that Saddam Hussein had switched from pricing Iraqi oil in US Dollars to pricing it in Euros. The first thing Uncle Sam did in Iraq was to revert Iraqi oil pricing back into Dollars. The Iranians have also switched to pricing their oil in Euros - read this article - http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CLA410A.html
PPS – and finally; for you and anyone else who would like to be reminded of the bigger picture here’s an excellent appraisal of Zbigniew Brzezinski's Imperial manifesto “The Grand Chessboard” –
I feel horrified to the outcome of this. Cant stop feeling empty on how such a * up race can kill each other. bleed each other dry and ultimately
destroy this planet. We could of been so much more than this selfish, corrupt bs that WILL drive us into the dirt and the sheep who back these illegal governments will suddenly realise "what the * are we going to do now"
So wrong in so many different angles its untrue. This whole situation came around due to overspending and limited resources from within america.
They KNEW even in 1980 the oil was running out. They have been put in a situation will we either bleed everyone else dry or watch ourselves bleed dry.
What a * up world and i believe america is top of the pops for most
bad deeds. _________________ Think for yourself....Question Authority
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 1:56 pm Post subject:
It's deliberate
Just like world wars 1 and 2 were
satya wrote:
I feel horrified to the outcome of this. Cant stop feeling empty on how such a * up race can kill each other. bleed each other dry and ultimately
destroy this planet. We could of been so much more than this selfish, corrupt bs that WILL drive us into the dirt and the sheep who back these illegal governments will suddenly realise "what the * are we going to do now"
So wrong in so many different angles its untrue. This whole situation came around due to overspending and limited resources from within america.
They KNEW even in 1980 the oil was running out. They have been put in a situation will we either bleed everyone else dry or watch ourselves bleed dry.
What a * up world and i believe america is top of the pops for most
bad deeds.
your right. i can see this race gorging itself to extinction. This continous battle against who can get enough resources to protect their own interests wont ever stop. What hope do we have tony? I cant see any in this moment.
It may come to the us bleeding us dry because of the new oilwell found in the faulklands. If that ever happened we would really suffer because of the number of us bases in the uk. That alone would be a real worry _________________ Think for yourself....Question Authority
The U.S had greater control over the oil of Iraq prior to the Gulf Wars than it does now.
Wakeymedia....states..
"It’s an insane and outright Fascist exercise and it is the work, mainly, of the Anglo/American Empire; ... . To apportion blame for any attack on Iran, as a part of all that, mainly to Netanyahu/Israel is ridiculous and buys into the shrill and hysterical “it’s the Jews (and/or Israel)!!!” line favoured by the likes of Alex James.
Who controls the American/Anglo empire......doh......Zionism.
Alex Jones wouldn't dare say ...it’s the Jews . Source please.
"Some even say that the U.S. attacked Iraq for Israel – no; the U.S. attacked Iraq for oil – this is SO in the realm of the-bleedin-obvious that it should go without saying."
Wakeymedia..........why do you peddle this garbage.?
Do a Cost Benefit Analysis on the Iraq War for America/Anglo empire.
Have fun.!
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:03 pm Post subject: blackbear - can you think for yourself?
blackbear - you said "why do you peddle this garbage.?" in response to my assertion that the U.S. attacked Iraq for oil - are you serious? I ask that question because if you think the invasion of Iraq was not about geo-strategy and energy sequestration (for that read Oil) then I do not know which planet you inhabit; certainly not this one.
Also you seem to confuse "Alex Jones", who I did not mention, with "Alex James" who I did mention. The difference is the surname. It's different. Alex James posts on this forum and sends out mass emails to some in its name. He is also a lazy minded deluded buffoon who has taken the "it's the Jews!!!" line to new heights.
If you think that the mobilisation of an entire empire by outright Fascists in a panic response to Peak Oil is all about Israel then you understand nothing and are probably incapable of understanding anything. Silly boy.
Here's a clue - watch the videos of Ruppert's commentary on Brzezinski's book "The Grand Chessboard" - they're a few posts above.
The U.S had greater control over the oil of Iraq prior to the Gulf Wars than it does now.
Wakeymedia....states..
"It’s an insane and outright Fascist exercise and it is the work, mainly, of the Anglo/American Empire; ... . To apportion blame for any attack on Iran, as a part of all that, mainly to Netanyahu/Israel is ridiculous and buys into the shrill and hysterical “it’s the Jews (and/or Israel)!!!” line favoured by the likes of Alex James.
Who controls the American/Anglo empire......doh......Zionism.
Alex Jones wouldn't dare say ...it’s the Jews . Source please.
"Some even say that the U.S. attacked Iraq for Israel – no; the U.S. attacked Iraq for oil – this is SO in the realm of the-bleedin-obvious that it should go without saying."
Wakeymedia..........why do you peddle this garbage.?
Do a Cost Benefit Analysis on the Iraq War for America/Anglo empire.
Have fun.!
you obviously have no knowledge of the rockefellers and this is nothing more than disinformation. I happen to have EVIDENCE against the us/bilderberg group that (in their own words) saying their oil supplies were limited and this was in 1980. Why are your spreading such lies? _________________ Think for yourself....Question Authority
EXTRACT FROM BILDERBERG 1980 FULL MEETING I OBTAINED
"What was fundamentally involved in the concept of our "willingness to fight in the Persian Gulf" was ourprotection of the status quo. If we ever really got engaged in a successful military venture there, the most likely
result would be the complete destruction of, not only the oil fields, but the sociál and political structure of Iran and many other countries, companíed by an irrational Muslim uprising against the infidels.
Our strategy stockpile of oil was extremely limited, and the Saudis had refused to add to it. But the Soviets could very well do for a number of years without oil from that region, and without Ihe disorganized situation there.
Local governments had refused to be associated with any major effort by the U.S. to build up the strategie stockpile, andAmerica's European allies were reluctant to come along. Was the Carter Doctrine not really just a reiteration of the Dulles Doctrine: that wc would retaliate at the places
and times, and with the means, of our choosing?
Did that not make sense in the circumstances? Many other proposals
on the subject seemed to emanate from a "never-never land." The beginning of all wisdom was to know one's weaknesses.
Another American observed thai any military build-up in the Middle East was first and foremost the responsibilityof ihe U.S. It would have to be sufficient to make clear that any further Soviet aggression entailed a risk of direct confrontation with the U.S. Until the Palestinian problém was solved, Arab cooperation in any security measures would be limited. Indeed such cooperation would be dangerous to the intcrnal stability of the Arab states."
------------------------
I believe this to be a concession of america backing iraq and further proof that peak oil is a reality. If you look closely at their report i think they fear direct confrontation of russia. _________________ Think for yourself....Question Authority
The U.S had greater control over the oil of Iraq prior to the Gulf Wars than it does now.
Wakeymedia....states..
"It’s an insane and outright Fascist exercise and it is the work, mainly, of the Anglo/American Empire; ... . To apportion blame for any attack on Iran, as a part of all that, mainly to Netanyahu/Israel is ridiculous and buys into the shrill and hysterical “it’s the Jews (and/or Israel)!!!” line favoured by the likes of Alex James.
Who controls the American/Anglo empire......doh......Zionism.
Alex Jones wouldn't dare say ...it’s the Jews . Source please.
"Some even say that the U.S. attacked Iraq for Israel – no; the U.S. attacked Iraq for oil – this is SO in the realm of the-bleedin-obvious that it should go without saying."
Wakeymedia..........why do you peddle this garbage.?
Do a Cost Benefit Analysis on the Iraq War for America/Anglo empire.
Have fun.!
Who are the Zionists? Who runs the Anglo-American Empire? (when I see it written the other way I'll let you know) Now for the biggest clue, who penned the King James edition of the book so many lay their lives for?
Edit* Who prevented the Palestinian State? _________________ 'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
Who are the Zionists? Who runs the Anglo-American Empire? (when I see it written the other way I'll let you know) Now for the biggest clue, who penned the King James edition of the book so many lay their lives for?
Well Disco_Destroyer there's a few questions.
Why don't you just answer them? Give us your opinion on them.
Who are the Zionists? Who runs the Anglo-American Empire? (when I see it written the other way I'll let you know) Now for the biggest clue, who penned the King James edition of the book so many lay their lives for?
Well Disco_Destroyer there's a few questions.
Why don't you just answer them? Give us your opinion on them.
Enlighten us. Don't tease.
I'm not sure but I suspect we (UK & Euro Royalty) have more say than that what we're led to believe. That is strictly an opinion No real hard proof, just a few pointers here and there.
Edit* I'll list some of my pointers
1. Elizabeths intervention in Canadian Politics recently.
2. Her Intervention and overturning of the highest court in the lands decision re. Diago Garcia
3. Her head on Canadian and Australian coinage etc. and royal crowns/coats of arms still used to this day in both.
4. She stole the Throne so we are led to believe? Now that is some decieving alone.
5. The Royal Bloodlines are still intact and can be traced many years?
In short a Great Deceiver? or The Grand Deceiver?
Edit Again*
Anyone remember the public opinion smear campaign that Blair Government started when they took office? What was that about? Maybe he already knew War was being planned and didn't like the idea? I'll add I was duped at the time and thought well thats out of line Bliar, whats the Royal Family done.
Edit lol*
Also imo it is normal for those groups or countries that fight for independance not to rush back to dealings with their previous oppressors.
Also we have the case of Zimbabwe, imo either the guy is doing what he is told or he is trying to shake outside influence in his countries affairs? Either way he can't be pissing the wrong people off _________________ 'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
The Scots have Independence from UK governance but not the Crown!
surely you folks can think of more examples _________________ 'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
Haha gotta love the 'ole Red White and Blue, I wonder if there was any funding of this little revolution
Quote:
History of the France flag
The 17th July 1789 Louis 16th of France travelled to the Paris Town Hall where he received a rosette containing three colours of ribbon - red, white and blue. This rosette was the symbol of the French Revolution and subsequently became the symbol of the First Rebublic in France. Blue and red were the colours of Paris, and white was the Royal colour.
The presentation was very symbolic, and represented the 'point of no turning back', since the ceremony gave complete control to the republicans / revolutionaries. The white had been added by La Fayette, new head of the National Guard, out of respect to the King.
Tricolor is a generic name for any flag having three colours. The Dutch flag, considered to be the oldest tricolor in existence, is the same colours as the French flag, but with the stripes running horizontally, red at the top and blue at the bottom. It is sometimes said that the colours for the France flag were inspired by this earlier flag (perhaps it encouraged LaFayette to include the Royal white?).
See a detailed description of the history of the French flag
_________________ 'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
People here were predicting a US false-flag attack on Iran 2 years ago.
Didn't happen.
If this one doesn't happen either, will you stfu ???
Or do you want to sound like those 'end of times' loonies who climb to the top of the mountain to witness The Rapture, but then climb quietly down again and just choose another date? _________________ Cryin' won't help you, prayin' won't do you no good.
Glad your world must be all sown up Sam, care to spread some of that joy and happiness? _________________ 'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
WMD was the rationale for invading Iraq. But what was really driving the US were fears over oil and the future of the dollar....! AlicetheKurious
"One can choose to artificially view the 2003 invasion and occupation of Iraq in isolation, as though the previous American invasion and the subsequent 12 years of crippling sanctions are a completely separate subject, and that's the only way the "it's the DOLLAR!" argument makes sense.
Or, as I do, one can choose to view the entire sordid tale as one continuum, beginning with the Iran-Iraq war, followed by the deliberate provocations against Iraq by America's puppet Kuwaiti government, followed by Saddam Hussein asking for and being granted permission to invade Kuwait, followed by America's fake outrage and massive bombing of Iraq, followed by 12 years of hellish sanctions that killed at least 1.5 million Iraqis (a third of them children), followed by Iraq's decision to switch from US dollars to Euros in 1999, followed by the 2003 invasion and systematic destruction of Iraq as a nation.
Saddam Hussein's decision to switch currencies in 1999 does not explain why Kuwait was permitted to steal Iraqi oil and flood the market in the late 1980s, lowering oil prices just as Iraq was trying to rebuild its shattered economy after 10 years of a war with Iran supposedly on behalf of Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and the UAE, but in reality a war instigated and prolonged by the United States and Israel, who supplied weapons to both sides including chemical and biological weapons. It doesn't explain why America totally ignored Iraq's increasingly desperate complaints but gave Iraq the "green light" to invade Kuwait. It doesn't explain why, even after Iraq fully withdrew from Kuwait and cooperated with the UN weapons inspectors, the sadistic sanctions were not lifted.
In order to be valid, a hypothesis must make sense with regard to all the known facts, not just some artificially selected facts while those that don't fit are simply ignored.
Iraq was a client state of the U.S. Saddam Hussein was one of its most loyal and longstanding agents, a CIA "asset" since his student days who had a long history of doing exactly what his American handlers asked of him, even launching a very costly war of aggression against Iran that effectively neutralized that country for a decade after the Islamic revolution. Israel was very delighted with that war, and therefore found
Saddam Hussein useful as long as it continued. Once the war was over in
1989, the zionists' longstanding plans to eradicate Iraq were activated.
Israel got exactly what it wanted, at a debilitating cost to the United States and even greater cost to Iraq."
People here were predicting a US false-flag attack on Iran 2 years ago.
Didn't happen.
If this one doesn't happen either, will you stfu ???
Or do you want to sound like those 'end of times' loonies who climb to the top of the mountain to witness The Rapture, but then climb quietly down again and just choose another date?
FACT - america has made an aggresive stance towards iran
FACT - They have Transported a large amount of death bombs to
diego garcia. Why supply such disinformation when the facts are there?
your basing your so called "opinion" without seeing the actions.
Guess who opposes american direct action? Russia, china and india. MORE FACTS. Alot better than your opinionated spin bs _________________ Think for yourself....Question Authority
Glad your world must be all sown up Sam, care to spread some of that joy and happiness?
Well, tsk tsk and pshaw to you and all your strawmen.
No, the world is a nasty dangerous place where countries get invaded for devious reasons, regimes get subverted for political gain, and all manner of shennanigans go under the radar.
But predicting and pontificating on an internet forum is all very well as long as the p+p'ers are willing to 'fess up and say ' "Hmmm. It's 2011. I was wrong. It didn't happen"
It's a scene rarely seen. Never seen it here, for sure.
So, here's the deal. If Iran gets zapped in 2010 I'll put £100 into a popular neutral charity. Oxfam, or Donkey Rescue ... your call.
If it doesn't, anyone supporting the o/p does the same. _________________ Cryin' won't help you, prayin' won't do you no good.
Well, tsk tsk and pshaw to you and all your strawmen.
No, the world is a nasty dangerous place where countries get invaded for devious reasons, regimes get subverted for political gain, and all manner of shennanigans go under the radar.
But predicting and pontificating on an internet forum is all very well as long as the p+p'ers are willing to 'fess up and say ' "Hmmm. It's 2011. I was wrong. It didn't happen"
It's a scene rarely seen. Never seen it here, for sure.
So, here's the deal. If Iran gets zapped in 2010 I'll put £100 into a popular neutral charity. Oxfam, or Donkey Rescue ... your call.
If it doesn't, anyone supporting the o/p does the same.
More opinions with no factual content. Why are your putting a spin on this event without debate? none of this dribble actually relates to the present context of america having a severe dislike to iran and its current operation of transporting weapons of mass destruction to key strategic areas _________________ Think for yourself....Question Authority
More opinions with no factual content. Why are your putting a spin on this event without debate? none of this dribble actually relates to the present context of america having a severe dislike to iran and its current operation of transporting weapons of mass destruction to key strategic areas
Facts? Previous confident predictions here of false-flag ops in the Persian Gulf as a prelude to attack on Iran came to naught. That's a fact.
Debate? We're having one.
Dislike? I think you underestimate the USA's attitude to Iran.
WMD? Bunker-busting bombs are not WMD. That would be nukes, bio and chemo weapons. That kind of stuff.
Not very good at this, are you? _________________ Cryin' won't help you, prayin' won't do you no good.
Joined: 04 Dec 2007 Posts: 226 Location: Buckinghamshire
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 11:47 pm Post subject:
Hi Sam welcome to the main stream.
Quote:
U.S. Prepares To Attack Iran for Netanyahu - 2010
Yes of course your right, albeit somewhat pedantic. Nobody should claim to be Nostradamus. It would nevertheless be remiss of this forum to ignore the warning signs and informed opinion for the next move on the Grand Chessboard. (The increasing political and military US incursions into Pakistan [as a friendly ally], The bellicous sound emminating from Washington accompanied by the baying of Britian and Israel politicians, this with the loyal media not missing any oppertunity to cast Ahmadinejad as the devil incarnate in charge of an evil empire.) All this points to an attack (unless any other reason can be supplied?) However future events are by their nature speculative but in my opinion, more so as to when than if. _________________ Truth Movement Clips: www.truthtotell.co.uk
Tell me why america is transporting these weapons to diego garcia.
Tell me why amierca has stated we can bomb iran in a 70 day period?
Can you categorically state the bombs will result in zero human death?
Why are they attempting to bomb iran when india, russia and china oppose this? I think you will find obama's talks on iran display their dislike.
Still not looked at the aaron russo video? That video explains their imperialastic ideals and further explains the bilderberg group and mainly the rockefellers control the ideals of the american government because of their debt levels and the money owed to the banks.
David rockefeller does state he wants complete control of the middle east pipeline. This is what is going to happen next. America cant say no because of the threat of their markets being crashed due to the control that bilderberg has. Its a shame you dont know the bigger picture _________________ Think for yourself....Question Authority
Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 4:05 pm Post subject: Some people!
Sam - if you believe the official account of what happened on 9/11 then you could be made to believe anything -
- If you like cheese and have a big enough stepladder there is a big ball of it floating in the sky most nights. Gorgonzola apparently.
PS - just because an empire does not decide to implement a part of its strategy (the attack on Iran) at a certain time does not mean to say that the strategy has been abandoned.
PPS - if you think that this empire does not have plans drawn up for an attack on Iran you then you are not just gullible you are an actual living, breathing, walking, talking idiot. A proper one.
Sam - if you believe the official account of what happened on 9/11 then you could be made to believe anything -
- If you like cheese and have a big enough stepladder there is a big ball of it floating in the sky most nights. Gorgonzola apparently.
PS - just because an empire does not decide to implement a part of its strategy (the attack on Iran) at a certain time does not mean to say that the strategy has been abandoned.
PPS - if you think that this empire does not have plans drawn up for an attack on Iran you then you are not just gullible you are an actual living, breathing, walking, talking idiot. A proper one.
Why is Iran mentioned virtually every other day on the news? Why Iran? It is almost like the US and UK are angling for something.
And then fabricating "fake" confrontations to stir up trouble...
The processes and checks on the handling of nuclear weapons are such that it is impossible to imagine that these bombs were mistakenly flown across the US. The 70 or so people "disciplined" for this mistake were basically given a few months (paid) holiday. While there are many rumors that several of the whistleblowers had mysterious accidents.
Not that I'm paranoid or anything but knowing what we know about 9/11 (ie the actual facts) then we should be very worried about such stories of military build up and the constant wars of words against Iran.
WMD? Bunker-busting bombs are not WMD. That would be nukes, bio and chemo weapons. That kind of stuff.
Not very good at this, are you?
Sam, not quite sure if you were saying bunker busting bombs are or are not WMD's. In case you were saying they are not ...
Anyone who knows even a little about bunker busting bombs, knows that they are in fact 'depleted' uranium tipped, and hence WMD's.
These bombs contain 'depleted' uranium - a carcinogenic substance that spreads in the form of a toxic and radioactive dust. The pyrophoric nature of uranium metal causes it to burn (oxidize rapidly) when heated by impact (as in, dropped on some poor unsuspecting Iraqi, Afghani, or in the future Iranian) or in fires to form invisible aerosol particles that become airborne. These particles enter the lungs and bones and are especially harmful to babies and young children. The 'half-life' of 'depleted' uranium is 500 million years. _________________ In the end, it's not the words of your enemies you will remember, but the silence of your friends. Martin Luther King
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
No real hard proof, just a few pointers here and there.
