FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Release of secret child punishment manual ordered

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> The War On Children, Marriage and the Family
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
non-sheep
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Posts: 176

PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 11:26 pm    Post subject: Release of secret child punishment manual ordered Reply with quote

Kent Child Jail

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/jan/10/secret-child-punishment- manual-released

Release of secret child punishment manual ordered
Restraint techniques including 'hair grab' detailed in manual for privately run secure training centres

The information commissioner has said that a secret prison service punishment manual used in privately run child jails should be made public after a three-year freedom of information battle. The 114-page Physical Control in Care training manual details restraint techniques authorised for use on children in secure training centres.

They include detailed descriptions of "distraction" techniques, which deliberately inflict pain and were found by the court of appeal to have been routinely unlawfully used in secure training centres.
The information commissioner's Youth Justice Board was told to publish secret parts of the manual after a complaint from the Children's Rights Alliance for England in 2007 which was endorsed by parliament's human rights committee.

MPs and peers said their were alarmed when they saw the headings of some of the redacted sections of the manual covered issues including "hair grab", "strangle on the ground", "strangle against the wall", "strangle on the ground", "kicks standing" and "kicks on the floor".
The MPs and peers also concluded in their report that it was impossible to tell whether physical restraint techniques complied with human rights when they remained secret.

The Youth Justice Board refused to publish pages 60 to 114 of the manual, which detail the restraint techniques, and argued that publication could undermine security in child prisons by allowing the children to learn how they work and develop ways to counteract them.
But in an unusual ruling the information commissioner has now said that the security considerations for keeping it secret were outweighed by the public interest in disclosure.

The commissioner said he had taken into account the serious concerns surrounding the use of restraint on children in custody.
This included the 2004 deaths of two young teenage boys in restraint-related incidents in secure training centres, the appeal court ruling and the "significant body of opinion ... who argue against the use of distraction techniques on moral and ethical grounds".
The information commission has told the Youth Justice Board that it has until Thursday to disclose the secret parts of the manual or appeal its decision.

A YJB spokeswoman said due consideration was being given to the commissioner's decision: "We will notify him of our position in due course."

Katy Swain, the legal director of the Children's Rights Alliance, which brought the case, expressed delight at the ruling: "A year after the government published its plans to reform the use of restraint in custody, inspection reports continue to reveal shocking conditions in many child prisons. However, information remains patchy and there is a lack of strong leadership from the government to ensure that institutions are held to account for abusive practices."
The ruling comes as the Howard League for Penal Reform has formally complained to Ofsted that its latest inspection report on Medway secure training is "blithely uncritical" of the use of physical violence on children and is "so superficial as to be almost meaningless". The report on the Kent child jail says that the use of restraint by individual staff is carefully monitored to ensure it remains appropriate but fails to detail the number of times that it has been used.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fish5133
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 2568
Location: One breath from Glory

PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 11:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Institutional child abuse ? Some of the techniques described might just be forms of self defence against kids who have "lost it" . Obviously better if troubled kids can be won round by love and reason but unfortunately not that easy.
_________________
JO911B.
"for we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, against powers, against rulers of the darkness of this world, against wicked spirits in high places " Eph.6 v 12
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
non-sheep
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Posts: 176

PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 12:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

fish5133

We will have to wait and see; I hope you are right, but why would they be so reluctant to declare ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
non-sheep
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Posts: 176

PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 11:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bill Maloney – Award Winning Film Producer


St Peter's Child Abuse Advert
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9cgmS0eHsg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> The War On Children, Marriage and the Family All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group