Senior BBC Mideast Correspondent: "Here's what may have REALLY happened on 9/11"!
Kevin Barrett
Truthjihad.com
Wed, 26 May 2010 12:49 EDT
Breaking his self-imposed rule against talking about 9/11, former Senior BBC Mideast Correspondent and author Alan Hart described what he thinks may have really happened on that fateful day on yesterday's Kevin Barrett show.
[Listen to the interview here]
Hart, who got to know Yasser Arafat and Golda Meir while serving as a Security Council-briefed Mideast peace negotiator, said that he has been assured by a top-level demolitions/engineering expert who wishes to remain anonymous that the three World Trade Center skyscrapers were destroyed by controlled demolitions, not plane crashes and fires. (For the names of more than 1000 experts willing to go on the record with the same opinion, see here).
During the hour-long interview, Hart discussed Israel's record of engaging in outrageous attacks on friend and foe alike, and spreading even more outrageous lies to cover them up. (Around the midpoint of the show he explained the real reason Israel attacked the U.S.S. Liberty in 1967.)
Regarding 9/11, Hart suggested that while there may have been some original terrorist plot conceived by fellow-travelers of Osama Bin Laden, the Israeli Mossad, with its near-total penetration of Middle Eastern governments and terrorist groups alike, would have quickly detected and hijacked the operation to its own ends, orchestrating a spectacularly successful attack on America designed to be blamed on its Arab and Muslim enemies. Hart added that the Mossad operation that became 9/11 would have been aided and abetted by certain corrupt American leaders.
Sounding a chilling note, Hart added that the U.S. is in grave danger of an Israeli-instigated false-flag nuclear attack, perhaps using an American nuclear weapon stolen from Minot Air Force Base during the "loose nukes" rogue operation of August, 2007. The motive would be to trigger a U.S. war with Iran, and perhaps to finish the ethnic cleansing of Palestine under cover of war--which Hart is convinced the Zionists are planning to do as soon as the opportunity presents itself.
When a warning this serious is delivered by a messenger with the stature of Alan Hart, the American people had better find a way around the news blackout imposed by the Zionist-dominated corporate and pseudo-alternative media. The only thing standing in the way of an Israeli false-flag nuclear attack on America, a disastrous US war on Iran, and a horrendous acceleration of the ethnic cleansing of Palestine, is the awareness of the American people. Please copy, post, and mass-email this story.
Kevin Barrett
Author, Questioning the War on Terror: A Primer for Obama Voters _________________ 'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
Hart, who got to know Yasser Arafat and Golda Meir while serving as a Security Council-briefed Mideast peace negotiator, said that he has been assured by a top-level demolitions/engineering expert who wishes to remain anonymous that the three World Trade Center skyscrapers were destroyed by controlled demolitions, not plane crashes and fires. (For the names of more than 1000 experts willing to go on the record with the same opinion, see http://www.ae911truth.org).
During the hour-long interview, Hart discussed Israel's record of engaging in outrageous attacks on friend and foe alike, and spreading even more outrageous lies to cover them up. (Around the midpoint of the show he explained the real reason Israel attacked the U.S.S. Liberty in 1967.)
Regarding 9/11, Hart suggested that while there may have been some original terrorist plot conceived by fellow-travelers of Osama Bin Laden, the Israeli Mossad, with its near-total penetration of Middle Eastern governments and terrorist groups alike, would have quickly detected and hijacked the operation to its own ends, orchestrating a spectacularly successful attack on America designed to be blamed on its Arab and Muslim enemies. Hart added that the Mossad operation that became 9/11 would have been aided and abetted by certain corrupt American leaders.........
_________________ www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org www.rethink911.org www.patriotsquestion911.com www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org www.mediafor911truth.org www.pilotsfor911truth.org www.mp911truth.org www.ae911truth.org www.rl911truth.org www.stj911.org www.v911t.org www.thisweek.org.uk www.abolishwar.org.uk www.elementary.org.uk www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149 http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Alan Hart Breaks Silence about 9/11 on Kevin Barrett Show _________________ 'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
Google says "27 May 2010 ... Hart asked the company to study the collapse of the twin towers, after which they ... Respected Middle East expert and former BBC presenter Alan Hart has broken his .... " - no cache available. Do I smell some censorship here?
I guess we ought to check in on his blog site and offer some kind words...
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 6060 Location: East London
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 8:19 am Post subject:
From Kevin Barrett's article:
'During the hour-long interview, Hart discussed Israel's record of engaging in outrageous attacks on friend and foe alike, and spreading even more outrageous lies to cover them up. (Around the midpoint of the show he explained the real reason Israel attacked the U.S.S. Liberty in 1967.)'
He should have said 'Alan Hart's belief of the real reason' rather than the real reason. His explanation could have been lifted from James Bamford's 'Body of Secrets'; I believe he actually credits him.
But they are (imo) both demonstrably wrong; anyone interested in the 'real reason' should read Peter Hounam's 'Operation Cyanide'.
I repeatedly tried to contact Bamford, by email and writing via his publisher (so it would be very odd if he didn't get my correspondence) but I got no response. I also brought up the issue of Pearl Harbour, which Bamford refers to as a 'surprise' attack, and goes on about the intelligence failure.
I also met Hart, and asked him to read Peter Hounam's book, but he said he had studied the issue and stood by his analysis.
Also, Hart's idea that Mossad would have got wind of the hijack plan and taken it over, doesn't fit with all the evidence of prior planning, scenario of Boeing being flown into Pentagon year before, PNAC, multi-simultaneous 'War Games', Zbigniew Brzezinski's 'Grand Chessboard' (1997) etc all indicate a long thought out plan, nought to do with 'Arabs in caves' but everything to do with NWO strategic plans.
That said, I of course welcome Hart's belated acceptance of the possibility of Mossad involvement (I also tried to interest Hart in 9/11 Truth, but he didn't want to know). _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 6060 Location: East London
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 4:02 pm Post subject:
Thanks, GSTT, I'm beginning to like the guy. I'll try again to get him to re-access the 'Liberty'. A reasonable explanation of his dismissal of 9/11 Truth when I spoke to him about three years ago, as well.
Anyhow, more power to his elbow; but where he got the idea of the 'Dancing Israelis' perhaps guiding the 'planes' in with their mobile phones, je ne sais pas. Even AJ did a double-take! _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Joined: 27 Mar 2006 Posts: 3187 Location: Here to help!
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 7:00 pm Post subject:
This is a very welcome development
Also, I believe in the interview with Kevin, Alan does say that he has kept his mouth shut over the issues he is now raising in the past, given an awareness of the consequences for his standing... seems the most credible explanation for his (instinctively?) veering away from 9/11 truth before
What is remarkable about the Barrett interview is the way Alan almost seems to say "sod it" to himself whilst the interview is in progress and decides to say what he really thinks... re planes guided by signals, controlled demolition and dancing Israeli's
I'm certainly grateful to him for speaking out, and hopeful more good can come of it _________________ Free your Self and Free the World
Google says "27 May 2010 ... Hart asked the company to study the collapse of the twin towers, after which they ... Respected Middle East expert and former BBC presenter Alan Hart has broken his .... " - no cache available. Do I smell some censorship here?
I guess we ought to check in on his blog site and offer some kind words...
Meet Alan Hart. He is a journalist, a former BBC presenter, and an author of several books on Israel and the Middle East. Mr. Hart is a true authoritative voice on the subject of the Palestinian-Israeli crisis. During his long career he has made friends in both the Palestinian and the Israeli leadership. He recently broke his silence on 9/11, saying that he was told by sources inside a leading civil engineering company that the two towers were destroyed from the inside, by controlled demolition.
Watch Hart’s riveting television series entitled "Hart of the Matter", available on Vimeo, and listen to what this great man has to say about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Watch especially his two-part interview with Israeli historian Ilan Pappé, who is the author of the book "The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine."
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 1959 Location: South London
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 10:52 pm Post subject:
TonyGosling wrote:
I was chatting to Alan three years ago and he was keeping an open mind about 9/11. Very respectful of Webster Tarpley's work digging out the background on George Bush senior.
A salutary warning to anyone thinking of flipantly slagging off radical types who do not publicly take the view we do here about 9/11 being some kind of Inside Job.
A very important point, Tony. Sometimes those who argue most intensely against our opinion eventually come round. Rudeness towards them does not encourage them to take us seriously. Making friends with them, even when they are deeply opposed to our line, helps towards eventual breakthroughs.
We need to use means of expressing our anger about what is going on other than targeting our anger at those who take the time to argue against us, or even refuse to look at the evidence we present.
They are not the enemy. It's those who pull the strings from the very top we have to watch out for. It's they who initiate the lies, the disinformation the psy ops, the wars, the erosion of liberties etc.
It's those who pull the strings from the very top we have to watch out for.
Haven't we watched out for long enough, now? After all, the names, addresses and phizogs of these ultimately criminal types are in the public domain and have been for some years now.
Isn't it time to stop their plans to depopulate and to lay waste our world?
Do we all want to live in Gaza? A worldwide Gaza?
Do we really want to wait for that eventuality?
Are we so collectively masochistic?
Is 'turning the other cheek' a survival mechanism in this situation?
Can you really imagine 6 billion cheeks being hit by ~150 people and their paid stooges?
Your ability to act with clear understanding is, I believe, hampered by your conditioned perceptions - perceptions inculcated from birth and beyond...
Does it take a 'celebrity' like Alan Hart (Charlie Sheen, Daniel Sunjata etc etc) asking the hard questions before we all 'follow suit' like sheep?
Are we not all sovereign beings under Common Law?
And finally, to para-quote* from Leftfield's "Poem for the 21st Century":-
"How many more homes will they burn
Before we turn...?"
And you still think some omni-wise being from off planet is going to sort it all out? You may as well call on Zaphod Beeblebrox, IMO...
Perhaps this puts it more succinctly than I ever could:-
""When bad men combine, the good must associate,
Else they will fall, one by one,
An unpitied sacrifice, in a contemptible struggle." Edmund Burke, 1729-1797."
Just lifted from an article railing at the apparent Israeli idiocy at
entitled "State Terrorism and the New World Order. "Man's Stupidity has no Bounds"" by Felicity Arbuthnot _________________ "We will lead every revolution against us!" - attrib: Theodor Herzl
"Timely Demise to All Oppressors - at their Convenience!" - 'Interesting Times', Terry Pratchett
ZIONISM NEEDS THE ISRAELI JEWS TO FEEL FRIGHTENED: ALAN HART
Quote:
... ... ...And let me add this. Last year I had a private conversation in London with a major royal from the Arab world. I said to him, “Nothing is going to change in the Arab world until your regimes are more frightened of their own masses than they are of offending Zionism and America”. He replied, “You’re right.” I also said to him, “If the Zionists do resort to a final round of ethnic cleaning to close the Palestine file, Arab leaders, behind closed doors, will give thanks and celebrate.” His reply was the same, “You’re right.” ... ... ...
and
Quote:
But most of all there is Zionism’s need for Israeli Jews to feel frightened.
A good explanation of why was provided by Ira Cherna in a Truthout post in November 2009. It was headlined Israel’s Pathology. Cherna asked – How can it be that pathological feelings of fear, weakness and victimization are “comforting” to very many Israelis? His answer was the following:
“For starters, they automatically put Jews on the side of innocence. Who can blame the weak victim for the violence? All the trouble, it seems, is started by the other side… And if all the trouble is started by the other side, then all the fault must lie with the other side. Weakness and victimization seem to prove that ‘We’re moral.’ Obviously, it’s our enemies who are immoral and thus to blame for all our problems. So Israelis have no reason even to consider changing any of their policies or behaviors.”
_________________ "We will lead every revolution against us!" - attrib: Theodor Herzl
"Timely Demise to All Oppressors - at their Convenience!" - 'Interesting Times', Terry Pratchett
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:12 am Post subject:
What’s the difference between Nazi and Zionist war criminals?
By Alan Hart
14 January 2011
Alan Hart contrasts the huge international effort to bring Nazi war criminals to justice with the lack of will on the part of the world’s major powers to prosecute Zionist war criminals.
Short answer: Great effort is made to hunt down and prosecute suspected Nazi war criminals, no effort is made to bring Zionist war criminals to justice.
On 13 January, the BBC’s News website had a lengthy story with the headline “Global Nazi investigations rise for a second year”. The writer of it was one Mario Cacciottolo who, quick research informed me, “Runs a photography website, plays poker, is a BBC journalist and grew up in Malta's red-light district.” (His other 50 listed stories for the BBC include “Brilliant” news for lesbian couples” and “What sort of man wears mantyhose?”)
“If there was an institution working to bring Zionist war criminals to justice, it would have to award failing grades to every country on Planet Earth.”
Cacciottolo’s 13 January story was based on the latest report by the Simon Wiesenthal Centre (SWC). According to it, the number of ongoing investigations into Nazi war criminals increased last year. From April 2009 to March 2010 there were 852 investigations being conducted worldwide, compared with 706 during the same period in 2008-09. The period 2009-10 was the second consecutive year that the number of investigations into suspected Nazis has risen -- there were 608 in 2007-08.
Efraim Zuroff, the head of the SWC's Jerusalem branch, was quoted as saying there were two reasons for the rise in the number of prosecutions.
It's clear that we're reaching the end of the period in which this work will be possible [because all suspects will be dead]. This has motivated countries with the political will to make an effort to prosecute former Nazis… The other reason is that Germany in particular has changed its prosecution policy, to allow more suspects -- particularly those who were not officer class and those of non-German origin -- to be prosecuted.
The increase in the number of German prosecutions was the most dramatic, up from 27 in 2008-09 to 177 in 2009-10. And that was why the SWC awarded Germany an A-grade for its efforts to prosecute ex-Nazis. Previously, only the United States had been given the SWC’s top marks.
The SWC report also gave nine countries failing grades for their investigative efforts --Norway, Sweden, Syria, Australia, Canada, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania and Ukraine. (I am surprised about Canada being on the list because its government has a well-deserved reputation for doing Zionism’s bidding.)
If there was an institution working to bring Zionist war criminals to justice, it would have to award failing grades to every country on Planet Earth.
As Efraim Zuroff said, it is a matter of political will, but President Obama’s burial of the Goldstone report is surely proof that it does not exist for calling and holding Israel’s leaders (some of them) to account for their crimes.
Footnote
At the time of writing we are waiting to see if Britain’s coalition government will introduce legislation to prevent Israeli leaders being prosecuted. It is under pressure from Zionism to do so.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
