O.J. Simpson: Guilty, But Not of Murder?

[James Madison]

O.J. Simpson: Guilty, But Not of Murder?

Posted by David Kramer on May 28, 2010 05:38 AM

"For those of you who have no special plans for this Memorial Day Weekend, here is a fascinating video that makes a case for someone else committing the murders of Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman (though O.J. was involved in his own way). Keep in mind that the author, like the vast majority of people, believed that O.J. Simpson was guilty—until he started looking further into the case. The video is one hour and twenty minutes long. It starts to become more interesting and compelling at about half way through, so stick with it. Feel free to send me feedback. (Please keep it civil—no tirades against me for posting this.) I will post as many LRC reader reactions to the video as I can."

WATCH VIDEO:

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/58636.html

or here:

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/58743.html

Producer Update on ‘O.J. Simpson: Guilty, But Not of Murder’
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/58695.html

or here:

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/58746.html

[James Madison]

"If a man accuses another man of murder, and the charge is not proven, then the accuser shall be put to death!"

Law # 1, Code of Hammurabi, 1792 B.C.