| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
eogz
Validated Poster
Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 262
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jesussdad
Banned
Joined: 26 Jan 2010
Posts: 49
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fish5133
Site Admin
Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 2568
Location: One breath from Glory
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 11:19 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
we each have our own "doorway" into the rabbit hole and must keep testing it against other explanations. Have a look at some of the debunking sites to see their points of view sometimes sincere sometimes nonsense., until you find the evidence that you will remain unshaken on. For me after accepting the collapse of the towers and WTC7 were not the result of just a plane and fire then all things become possible for Pentagon and Shanksville.
Even amongst 9/11 truthers of differing positions e.g. No Planes, Dustification, Thermite the concensus is that the Towers did not collapse just because of plane and ensuing fire.
_________________
JO911B.
"for we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, against powers, against rulers of the darkness of this world, against wicked spirits in high places " Eph.6 v 12 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jesussdad
Banned
Joined: 26 Jan 2010
Posts: 49
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bill withers
Banned
Joined: 06 Oct 2010
Posts: 7
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 10:40 pm Post subject: Re: Documentary |
|
|
Yup watched it all, went to their website, find it a bit silly.
I think it's a money spinner attempt, far too much cherry picking and distortion of facts, given that 103 people witness the plane actually hit the Pentagon, and that they quote the guy Shane in the tower who witnessed the flight and use that as fact, but basically claim he is lying about seeing the plane hit the Pentagon.... pure bunkum.
The charactor assasination, and confusion of the Taxi driver- now a old man, and the placing of the camera starting a conversation about something (possibly his interest in david ike), and proving it as him being in on it. Nope, don't buy it. Anyone that cherry picks, basically has a therory that they then go on to "prove" discount any evidence which contradicts their assertations like with this guy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISwWfCGyjzQ&feature=related
They charge $1000 for 500 dvd's on their website, and they are cashing in on the loose $hange phenonemon, and it's just as bad in it's deception.
That said, it's a well made, very engaging piece of woo, that to anyone who stumbles across it, without researching it's claims, will seem very convincing - which is a shame.
To the poster above who charactor assainates brokenstyx who made the vid showing how CIT is bunk by saying "he is shady" well that's in tradition of CIT. at least come up with a rebuttal of what he has said, I thought it was good.
I mean come on guys! they fly planes into wtc 1 and 2, but decide that they are gonna do a flyover of the pentagon, and missile it, or bomb it, with all the risks involved of a camcorder or photo of it? Just hit the pentagon with the plane already!
They provide 1 flyover thoery witness, who is taken well out of context, and dismiss loads of stuff that contradicts their theory.
nope. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
