cem Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 28 May 2008 Posts: 484
|
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 3:51 pm Post subject: A new event might surprise you the way 9/11 surprised us |
|
|
.
http://911blogger.com/news/2010-10-17/us-official-new-event-might-surp rise-you-way-911-surprised-us
US official: A new event might surprise you the way 9/11 surprised us
__________________________
http://www.america.gov/st/texttrans-english/2010/October/2010101312051 8su0.9436718.html?CP.rss=true
excerpts from: U.S. Official on Upcoming NATO Ministerial Meetings in Brussels
America.gov, 12 October 2010
Foreign Press Center briefing with Jim Townsend JR., Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for European and NATO Policy
Preview of the upcoming NATO Ministerial
The Washington Foreign Press Center, Washington, D.C., 12 October 2010
Quote: | Rossiyskaya Gazeta: […] According to the numerous reports, Article 5 of Washington Treaty (*) could be put into force if, for instance, some NATO member country is under cyber attack. Does it mean that NATO could respond to a cyber attack with a military force? […]
DASD Townsend: […] In terms of cyber in Article 5, that's a great philosophical issue. What constitutes Article 5 these days? And the great example, obviously, is 9/11. NATO invokes Article 5 for the first time in its history, and it was invoked in a way unexpected by the signers of the North Atlantic Treaty. Who would have thought Article 5 would have been invoked based on an attack on the United States by terrorists? […]
But I think the important point is that Article 5 and how the alliance reacts to an event, whether it invokes Article 5 or not, is something that isn't known until it happens, and the nations meet around the table and decide. And we'll just have to wait until that event happens before we know what might trigger it. It might surprise you the way 9/11 surprised us. […]
So whether it's cyber, whether it's WMD, whatever it might be, we have to be ready in the alliance to handle these new threats. |
________________________
(*) Article 5 of The North Atlantic Treaty (1949) states that an attack on any North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) member country is an attack on all of NATO.
________________________
from the archives:
NATO: Iran’s nuclear weapons efforts and ballistic missile stockpile could trigger a collective response from NATO countries
Dandelion Salad, 18 May 2010
http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2010/05/18/nato-iran%E2%80%99s-nuc lear-weapons-efforts-and-ballistic-missile-stockpile-could-trigger-a-c ollective-response-from-nato-countries/
"A Second 9/11": An integral part of US military doctrine
by Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, 31 October 2008
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=10767
___________________________
. |
|