FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Blair sister-in-law Lauren Booth converts to Islam

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Stratehy Of Tension, Fake Terror, 9/11 & 7/7 Truth News
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 18335
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 4:21 pm    Post subject: Blair sister-in-law Lauren Booth converts to Islam Reply with quote

Lauren Booth
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/148203.html

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Wakeymedia
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 12 Nov 2008
Posts: 222

PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 5:42 pm    Post subject: H&R Reply with quote

It's often better that people turn to Religion rather than Heroin.

In most cases it is anyway.

Lauren converted to Islam (that well known bastion of female emancipation) in Iran (that well known bastion of female emancipation and the rights of gays to be hung from cranes in the High Street).

Your sisters around the world must be proud of you Lauren. I wonder where she stands on the rights of 50 year old (holy) men to marry and have sex with 9 year old girls? I bet you never mention that on Press TV hmmmm? Bet you won't be mentioning any of that on "V-Day" will you Lauren?

. . . erm . . . y'know Lauren, if you can get clean Heroin or pure Morphine you can be on it for years and no-one will notice.

Just a thought.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 18335
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 5:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As ever Wakey puts his atheist Dawkins view.
As if every Catholic is a paedophile.
Of course there is infiltrated and fundamental Islam.
Wakey's assumption that Lauren has joined a media POV infiltrated Islam is as wide of the mark as can be.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Wakeymedia
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 12 Nov 2008
Posts: 222

PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 10:57 am    Post subject: Media POV? Oh no. Reply with quote

Here you go Lauren: I think this bit is probably after page sixty in "Crazy Mo's book of facts", (otherwise known as the holy Qur'an) Surah 4:34:

"Men have authority over women because God has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because God has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and forsake them in beds apart, and beat them. Then if they obey you, take no further action against them. Surely God is high, supreme."


Well Lauren, if you can swallow that and keep a straight face and even a solitary shred of integrity then good luck to you (you'll need it). Unfortunately for almost all of your sisters in Islam they were indoctrinated in it from birth and had planted deep in their collective psyche that apostasy equals death - and hey; you don't get more "peaceful & tolerant" than that!

The Prophet Mohammed - crazy name, crazy guy!!!


Link


.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Andrew.
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Posts: 1518

PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 11:33 am    Post subject: Re: Media POV? Oh no. Reply with quote

Wakeymedia wrote:
Here you go Lauren: I think this bit is probably after page sixty in "Crazy Mo's book of facts", (otherwise known as the holy Qur'an) Surah 4:34:

"Men have authority over women because God has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because God has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and forsake them in beds apart, and beat them. Then if they obey you, take no further action against them. Surely God is high, supreme."


Well Lauren, if you can swallow that and keep a straight face and even a solitary shred of integrity then good luck to you (you'll need it). Unfortunately for almost all of your sisters in Islam they were indoctrinated in it from birth and had planted deep in their collective psyche that apostasy equals death - and hey; you don't get more "peaceful & tolerant" than that!

The Prophet Mohammed - crazy name, crazy guy!!!

.





4:34. Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because God has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence what God would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (next), refuse to share their beds, (and last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them means (of annoyance): for God is Most High, great (above you all).
4:35. If ye fear a breach between them twain, appoint (two) arbiters, one from his family, and the other from hers; if they wish for peace, God will cause their reconciliation: for God hath full knowledge, and is acquainted with all things.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
killuminati
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 12:26 am    Post subject: Re: Media POV? Oh no. Reply with quote

Wakeymedia wrote:
that apostasy equals death


apostasy does not equal death in Islam. Stop spouting Islamophobic nonsense. "There is no compulsion in religion" (2:256). historically, it was actually treason, when comitted under an islamic state (which does not exist currently anywhere in the world) did the caliph (ruler) reserve the right to the death penalty.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
killuminati
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 12:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

On Women:

The Qur'an and the Traditions of the Prophet (Hadith or Sunnah) are the sources from which every Muslim woman derives her rights and duties

Today people think that women are liberated in the West and that the women's liberation movement began in the 20th century. Actually, the women's liberation movement was not begun by women but was revealed by God to a man in the seventh century by the name of Muhammad (peace be upon him), who is known as the last Prophet of Islam. The Qur'an and the Traditions of the Prophet (Hadith or Sunnah) are the sources from which every Muslim woman derives her rights and duties.

I. HUMAN RIGHTS

Islam, fourteen centuries ago, made women equally accountable to God in glorifying and worshipping Him - setting no limits on her moral progress. Also, Islam established a woman's equality in her humanity with men.
In the Qur'an, in the first verse of the chapter entitled "Women," God says, "O mankind! Be careful of your duty to your Lord Who created you from a single soul and from it its mate and from them both have spread abroad a multitude of men and women. Be careful of your duty toward Allah in Whom you claim (your rights) of one another, and towards the wombs (that bore you). Lo! Allah has been a Watcher over you." (4:1)
Since men and women both came from the same essence, they are equal in their humanity. Women cannot be by nature evil (as some religious believe) or then men would be evil also. Similarly, neither gender can be superior because it would be a contradiction of equality.

II. CIVIL RIGHTS

In Islam, a woman has the basic freedom of choice and expression based on recognition of her individual personality. First, she is free to choose her religion. The Qur'an states: "There is no compulsion in religion. Right has been made distinct from error." (2:256)
Women are encouraged in Islam to contribute their opinions and ideas. There are many traditions of the Prophet (pbuh) which indicate women would pose questions directly to him and offer their opinions concerning religion, economics and social matters.
A Muslim woman chooses her husband and keeps her name after marriage. A Muslim woman's testimony is valid in legal disputes. In fact, in areas in which women are more familiar, their evidence is conclusive.

III. SOCIAL RIGHTS

The Prophet (pbuh) said: "Seeking knowledge is a mandate for every Muslim (male and female)." This includes knowledge of the Qur'an and the Hadith as well as other knowledge. Men and women both have the capacity for learning and understanding. Since it is also their obligation to promote good behavior and condemn bad behavior in all spheres of life, Muslim women must acquire the appropriate education to perform this duty in accordance with their own natural talents and interests.
While maintenance of a home, providing support to her husband, and bearing, raising and teaching of children are among the first and very highly regarded roles for a woman, if she has the skills to work outside the home for the good of the community, she may do so as long as her family obligations are met.
Islam recognizes and fosters the natural differences between men and women despite their equality. Some types of work are more suitable for men and other types for women. This in no way diminishes either's effort nor its benefit. God will reward both sexes equally for the value of their work, though it may not necessarily be the same activity.
Concerning motherhood, the Prophet (pbuh) said: "Heaven lies under the feet of mothers." This implies that the success of a society can be traced to the mothers that raised it. The first and greatest influence on a person comes from the sense of security, affection, and training received from the mother. Therefore, a woman having children must be educated and conscientious in order to be a skillful parent.

IV. POLITICAL RIGHTS

A right given to Muslim women by God 1400 years ago is the right to vote. On any public matter, a woman may voice her opinion and participate in politics. One example, narrated in the Qur'an (60:12), is that Muhammad (pbuh) is told that when the believing women come to him and swear their allegiance to Islam, he must accept their oath. This established the right of women to select their leader and publicly declare so. Finally, Islam does not forbid a woman from holding important positions in government. Abdur-Rahman Ibn Auf consulted many women before he recommended Uthman Ibn Affan to be the Caliph.

V. ECONOMIC RIGHTS

The Qur'an states: "By the creation of the male and female; Verily, (the ends) ye strive for are diverse." (92:3-4)
In these verses, God declares that He created men and women to be different, with unique roles, functions and skills. As in society, where there is a division of labor, so too in a family; each member has different responsibilities. Generally, Islam upholds that women are entrusted with the nurturing role, and men, with the guardian role. Therefore, women are given the right of financial support.
The Qur'an states: "Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend of their wealth (for the support of women)." (4:34)
This guardianship and greater financial responsibility is given to men, requires that they provide women with not only monetary support but also physical protection and kind and respectful treatment.
The Muslim woman has the privilege to earn money, the right to own property, to enter into legal contracts and to manage all of her assets in any way she pleases. She can run her own business and no one has any claim on her earnings including her husband. The Qur'an states:
"And in no wise covet those things in which Allah hath bestowed His gifts more freely on some of you than on others; to men is allotted what they earn, and to women, what they earn; but ask Allah of His bounty, for Allah hath full knowledge of all things." (4:32)
A woman inherits from her relatives. The Qur'an states: "For men there is a share in what parents and relatives leave, and for women there is a share of what parents and relatives leave, whether it be little or much - an ordained share." (4:7)

VI. RIGHTS OF A WIFE

The Qur'an states: "And among His signs is that He created for you mates from among yourselves that you may live in tranquility with them, and He has put love and mercy between you; Verily, in that are signs for people who reflect." (30:21)
Marriage is therefore not just a physical or emotional necessity, but in fact, a sign from God! It is a relationship of mutual rights and obligations based on divine guidance. God created men and women with complimentary natures, and in the Qur'an, He laid out a system of laws to support harmonious interaction between the sexes.
"...They are your garments and you are their garments." (2:187)
Clothing provides physical protection and covers the beauty and faults of the body. Likewise, a spouse is viewed this way. Each protects the other and hides the faults and compliments the characteristics of the spouse.
To foster the love and security that comes with marriage, Muslim wives have various rights. The first of the wife's rights is to receive mahr, a gift from the husband which is part of the marriage contract and required for the legality of the marriage.
The second right of a wife is maintenance. Despite any wealth she may have, her husband is obligated to provide her with food, shelter and clothing. He is not forced, however, to spend beyond his capability and his wife is not entitled to make unreasonable demands. The Qur'an states: "Let the man of means spend according to his means, and the man whose resources are restricted, let him spend according to what Allah has given him. Allah puts no burden on any person beyond what He has given him." (65:7)
God tells us men are guardians over women and are afforded the leadership in the family. His responsibility for obeying God extends to guiding his family to obey God at all times.
A wife's rights also extend beyond material needs. She has the right to kind treatment. The Prophet (pbuh) said: "The most perfect believers are the best in conduct. And the best of you are those who are best to their wives." God tells us He created mates and put love, mercy, and tranquility between them.
Both men and women have a need for companionship and sexual needs, and marriage is designed to fulfill those needs. For one spouse to deny this satisfaction to the other, temptation exists to seek it elsewhere.

VII. DUTIES OF A WIFE

With rights come responsibilities. Therefore, wives have certain obligations to their husbands. The Qur'an states: "The good women in the absence of their husbands guard their rights as Allah has enjoined upon them to be guarded." (4:34)
A wife is to keep her husband's secrets and protect their marital privacy. Issues of intimacy or faults of his that would dishonor him, are not to be shared by the wife, just as he is expected to guard her honor.
A wife must also guard her husband's property. She must safeguard his home and possessions, to the best of her ability, from theft or damage. She should manage the household affairs wisely so as to prevent loss or waste. She should not allow anyone to enter the house whom her husband dislikes nor incur any expenses of which her husband disapproves.
A Muslim woman must cooperate and coordinate with her husband. There cannot, however, be cooperation with a man who is disobedient to God. She should not fulfill his requests if he wants her to do something unlawful. A husband also should not take advantage of his wife, but be considerate of her needs and happiness.

VIII. CONCLUSION

The Qur'an states: "And it becomes not a believing man or a believing women, when Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad) have decided on an affair (for them), that they should (after that) claim any say in their affair; and whoso is rebellious to Allah and His Messenger, he verily goes astray in error manifest." (33:36)
The Muslim woman was given a role, duties and rights 1400 years ago that most women do not enjoy today, even in the West. These are from God and are designed to keep balance in society; what may seem unjust or missing in one place is compensated for or explained in another place. Islam is a complete way of life.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wakeymedia
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 12 Nov 2008
Posts: 222

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 9:00 am    Post subject: Crazy Mo's Book Of Facts Reply with quote

killuminati - you didn't watch the video did you. Have a look, Dr. Mohammed Mukadam says that "the Sharia is very clear" about apostasy carrying the death penalty.

That's the reality on the ground in the vast majority of the Muslim world - you want out of Islam then you die. It's a bit like the Mafia in that respect. You should know that all later verses in "Crazy Mo's Book Of Facts" abrogate the earlier ones.

So, your brainwashing and silly fairy stories and imaginary friends are exactly as they seem. And wholly unnecessary too.

"ONE BOOK!!!". Don't you ever get embarrassed by all that?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
killuminati
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:06 pm    Post subject: Re: Crazy Mo's Book Of Facts Reply with quote

Wakeymedia wrote:
killuminati - you didn't watch the video did you. Have a look, Dr. Mohammed Mukadam says that "the Sharia is very clear" about apostasy carrying the death penalty.


Yes I did watch your 'heavily edited' videos. There are scholars who will tell you Sunni Islam is the correct Islam and others who will tell you its Shia Islam. There has always been a difference of opinion. His views are not gospel. You even have puppet scholars backed by the west who justify the collateral murder sustained in wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, should we also take their words as evidence too?

Quote:
That's the reality on the ground in the vast majority of the Muslim world - you want out of Islam then you die. It's a bit like the Mafia in that respect. You should know that all later verses in "Crazy Mo's Book Of Facts" abrogate the earlier ones.


Really? I dont think we need Militant Atheists like yourself schooling people on Islam. No wonder there is such ignorance and ill concieved notions about Islam today.

Let me break it down for you again. There is no proscribed punishment for apostasy. The majority opinion is commiting treason against the state (islamic state) is liable for punishment by death, not for choosing one's religion.

The Qur`an refers to apostasy several times (2:217, 3:86-90, 4:137, 9:66, 9:74, 16:106-109, 4:88-91, 47:25-27) and yet does not prescribe any punishment for it.

To help you out, look at this verse in particular :

Translation of Chapter 4 Verse 137 = Those who believe, then reject faith, then believe (again) and (again) reject faith, and go on increasing in unbelief,- Allah will not forgive them nor guide them nor guide them on the way.

Here it talks about those who believe in Islam, then leave the religion (become apostates), but then come back to Islam, but then leave again and dont come back. Do you not see the inherent flaw in those who claim apostasy equals death? If that was true, how could someone leave the religion but then come back again? Surely this would not be possible as according to the those who believe apostasy=death the person would be killed and hence not have a chance to come back again!

Here is another in case you are not yet convinced:

Chapter 16:

106. Any one who, after accepting faith in Allah, utters Unbelief,- except under compulsion, his heart remaining firm in Faith - but such as open their breast to Unbelief, on them is Wrath from Allah, and theirs will be a dreadful Penalty.

107. This because they love the life of this world better than the Hereafter: and Allah will not guide those who reject Faith.

108. Those are they whose hearts, ears, and eyes Allah has sealed up, and they take no heed.

109. Without doubt, in the Hereafter they will perish.

Now clearly, if the death penalty was proscribed, verse 109 would say something along the lines of 'o muslims, kill them wherever you find them', but it does not. It simply says 'in the hereafter they will perish' i.e. God will deal with them.

Quote:
So, your brainwashing and silly fairy stories and imaginary friends are exactly as they seem. And wholly unnecessary too.


I think its quite clear to me, you and anybody else reading this thread, that it is you that has been brainwashed. In light of this, I am more than happy to help you if you need further clarification.

Kind Regards,
K
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
item8
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 24 Nov 2009
Posts: 974

PostPosted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 6:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

killuminati wrote:
I think its quite clear to me, you and anybody else reading this thread, that it is you that has been brainwashed. In light of this, I am more than happy to help you if you need further clarification.


Nice to know that Islam has its very own "Dogsmilk". Unfortunately it isn't clear to me at all that anyone other than yourself has been brainwashed. Could you explain in what way Wakeymedia is a "Militant Atheist"? Has he been calling for deaths or bombings? Has he been involved in terrorism? Its a nice phrase that projects "Militant Islam" back on to its victims but utter bs in reality.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
killuminati
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 1:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

item8 wrote:
Nice to know that Islam has its very own "Dogsmilk". Unfortunately it isn't clear to me at all that anyone other than yourself has been brainwashed.


Well that was a great effort in backing up your buddys Islamophobic tirade on Islams treatment of Women and Apostates. Well done.

Quote:
Could you explain in what way Wakeymedia is a "Militant Atheist"? Has he been calling for deaths or bombings? Has he been involved in terrorism? Its a nice phrase that projects "Militant Islam" back on to its victims but utter bs in reality.


So by using your logic, its ok to use "Militant Islam" because Islam calls for deaths, bombings and involvment in terrorism? Do you want to provide evidence for this? And by that, I dont mean a copy and paste of some random BS most likely originated and lifted from some robert spencer/pam geller backed zionist website. Although saying that, anyone with half a brain would easily dismantle their garbage. I think your agenda is pretty clear for everyone to see.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
item8
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 24 Nov 2009
Posts: 974

PostPosted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 1:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I think your agenda is pretty clear for everyone to see.

There you go again. Why do you speak for "everyone"? I do not have an "agenda". I believe Islam has been framed for the bombings and terror, but some idiots DO commit murder in the name of Islam including Islamic republics. Do you intend to respond to any questions or just post the usual "Islam is about love and tolerance" garbage. ALL religions are about control, and institutionalised violence is a part of the package. So called "Atheists" ie people who are not under any system's domination, do not have any movement except some individuals who protest againsts religion's constant attempt to force compliance with its rules. "Militant" athesism is about as big an oxymoron as "Tolerant" Islam.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Whitehall_Bin_Men
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 3205
Location: Westminster, LONDON, SW1A 2HB.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 7:50 pm    Post subject: Re: Crazy Mo's Book Of Facts Reply with quote

Oh wakey... what posesses you to pump such bilge.
Maybe you should follow the advice in your own name?
Only in the far rightest atheist circles would such a bigoted lie go unchallenged.
If only you could have an open mind to things of faith.
You're record is stuck ... on a lie.

Wakeymedia wrote:
That's the reality on the ground in the vast majority of the Muslim world - you want out of Islam then you die.

_________________
--
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com
http://aanirfan.blogspot.com
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
killuminati
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

item8 wrote:
Quote:
I think your agenda is pretty clear for everyone to see.

There you go again. Why do you speak for "everyone"?


I dont speak for everyone. I said it was clear for everyone to see. A bit like NIST saying it was fires that caused the demise of WTC7 yet everyone could clearly see the evidence of a controlled demolition.

Quote:
...but some idiots DO commit murder in the name of Islam including Islamic republics.


I'm sure they do; just like how some govts murder in the name of freedom, so whats your point?

Quote:
Do you intend to respond to any questions or just post the usual "Islam is about love and tolerance" garbage.


I think you'll find its you that is not answering any questions. You claim a lot, but do not back it up with anything.

Quote:
ALL religions are about control, and institutionalised violence is a part of the package.


More hogwash, blanket statements. No evidence. Same 'ol.

Quote:
So called "Atheists" ie people who are not under any system's domination, do not have any movement except some individuals who protest againsts religion's constant attempt to force compliance with its rules.


I really dont have a problem with atheists per se. Why should anybody. What I have a problem with is when an atheist does not like the fact that someone chooses to adopt a particular religion for themselves, out of their own free will and choice. What pains you so much that you have to come onto a thread about a Lauren converting to Islam and immediately start spouting your uncorroborated drivel.

Quote:
"Militant" athesism is about as big an oxymoron as "Tolerant" Islam.


I dont want to go into semantics here but I've just demonstrated to you above why people may use that term. Be an Atheist if you so wish, ignore the Creator if you so wish, no one can stop you. But when you go out of your way to mock, insult and ridicule people for choosing their own path in life, thats when you know there is something seriously wrong with you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Disco_Destroyer
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 6342

PostPosted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are you a spokesperson for all Killuminati's?
_________________
'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'


“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”


www.myspace.com/disco_destroyer
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Wakeymedia
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 12 Nov 2008
Posts: 222

PostPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 1:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whitehall_Bin_Men wrote
Quote:
"Oh wakey... what posesses you to pump such bilge"


Please point out what is bilge about the statement - "That's the reality on the ground in the vast majority of the Muslim world - you want out of Islam then you die." That is the reality in the ground. It is commonly understood that an apostate in the Islamic world had better run for his/her life as the risk of being murdered, even by immediate family, is very high. What part of that don't you understand?

1. Do you support freedom of speech?

2. Do you support freedom of thought, freedom of religion or indeed freedom from religion?

3. Do you support equal rights and emancipation for Women and minorities?

If you answered yes to all of those questions then you should know that in each and every case you in diametric opposition to Islam which supports none of those.

Islam is a totalitarian and supremacist ideology and if you were to place Islam on the political spectrum you would find it in that part of the political spectrum occupied by Fascism and Nazism. In fact it is more akin to National Socialism than traditional Corporate Fascism. Ein Prophet! Ein Umma! Ein Allah! It has tracts of rabid Jew-Hatred in "Crazy Mo's Book of Facts" and hey, it even indulged in mass book burnings during the Satanic Verses affair . . . not to mention a popular will to murder that nice Mr. Rushdie for writing his book, even our fluffy moderate Muslim friend Cat Stevens joined in on that one.

It is expressed quite clearly in "Crazy Mo's Book of Facts" and the Hadith that Islam is, and must be considered, supreme by all with at least the implementation of Jizya and Dhimmitude upon infidels. Please don't try to present it as some female-friendly fluffy freedom movement: that's just silly.

The brave people in this video are making a stand. And you know very well that if they did the same in the Islamic world they would last about ten minutes. Listen to the great and courageous Maryam Namazie and learn.


Link



And finally: here is a classic example of "The Religion Of Peace & Tolerance" getting a bit upset about cartoons. Yes ladies and gentlemen you read that correctly "cartoons" - I kid ye not. How pathetic can it get?


Link



.


Last edited by Wakeymedia on Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:31 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blackbear
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 08 Aug 2006
Posts: 656
Location: up north

PostPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello Wakeymedia..

Do you ever rant against Judaism.?

Ever thought of joining the English/Zionist Defence League.?

Thanks..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wakeymedia
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 12 Nov 2008
Posts: 222

PostPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello blackbear, I notice you have not even one solitary syllable to say about what I actually wrote in answer to the previous points.
Surely you are capable of more than irrelevant and cop-out questions? Surely?

PS - The EDL is a disastrous and stupid response to nascent Islamisation. It is tragic that the braincell deficient right wing thug element is trying to counter Islam. You can not attack Islam from the right. Islam is already on the extreme right. The EDL and Islam have more in common than they realise Wink
The left should be the natural place for resistance to misogyny and totalitarianism but so far the left has maintained the ludicrous blind-spot it has when it comes to Islam.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fish5133
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 2568
Location: One breath from Glory

PostPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was in Oxford this weekend and in the centre there was a small group campaigning against Islamaphobia as well as another couple of unrelated issues A bit further down the street I was talking to a man who was having to give protection to a muslim who has recently converted to Christ. Rather ironical I thought.
_________________
JO911B.
"for we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, against powers, against rulers of the darkness of this world, against wicked spirits in high places " Eph.6 v 12
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
blackbear
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 08 Aug 2006
Posts: 656
Location: up north

PostPosted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 3:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gilad Atzmon: Julie Sabbath Goy Burchill


In her desperate attempt to smear Lauren Booth, Independent writer Julie Burchill, a devout Zionist, proves how deceiving British multiculturalism is.

Indeed the Zionification of this Kingdom has left this country in a disastrous ethical limbo............

It is pretty astonishing to witness the amount of poison that pours out of Burchill against Booth, a fellow journalist who recently converted into Islam: it is even more astonishing to find such a level of islamophobia and personal attack on the pages of a respected British paper. In the past, I certainly saw this kind of vile personal slander on Jews only blogs.

But I have never seen anything similar on paper, let alone in a British paper.

I guess that the Zionification of Britain is beginning to take a heavy toll on our cultural and public life.

Would Booth have to go through such a slanderous campaign if she had converted into Judaism? I don’t think so. Would anyone in the British press dare remind us, for instance, that it is actually Judaism that calls on its followers to “pour their wrath on the Goyim?” No one would remind us that the crimes that are committed on a daily basis by the Jewish state, are actually implied by certain interpretation of the Old Testament, namely the Zionist interpretation.

British multiculturalism is indeed a funny concept, it basically means tolerance towards everyone except Muslims......

... I will review some of her argument, because it is apparent that the logic she employs is symptomatic of both Neocons and Zionists in Britain and in America.

“There is one religion which proscribes its followers under threat of death from rejecting it, and that is Islam” says Burchill : Yet if there was any truth in such a statement, our streets would be soaking with the blood of ex-Muslims. This is obviously not the case.

Whilst we are on the subject of proscription, restriction, revenge and forgiveness in religious precept and religious tradition, I am sure that Burchill learned in school about Jesus : whilst the man didn’t actually reject Judaism, he did suggest to his fellow Jews to love their neighbours.

That was enough to nail him to the cross. I guess that Burchill doesn’t know that the word Yeshu- Jesus in Hebrew-is the abbreviation for the Hebrew phrase "may his name and memory be blotted out". Seemingly, Rabbinical Jews are yet to forgive Jesus.

But maybe we should leave Jesus’ crucifixion aside. Many contemporary Jews rightly argue that they have nothing to do with this crime. Yet, I do wonder whether Burchill has heard about Israeli PM Yitzchak Rabin, and the Talmudic Rabbinical ruling that led to his assassination. Igal Amir, the young student who took Rabin’s life, had come to believe that Rabin was a ‘din rodef’, meaning Talmudically, a ‘pursuer’ who endangered Jewish lives. Under din rodef, Amir would be justified in ‘removing’ Rabin from being a threat to Jews.

As far as Rabbinical Judaism is concerned, one doesn’t even have to reject Judaism in order to be murdered. It is enough that a Rabbi or a great Cohen tags a Jew as a ‘din rodef’ in order for another Jew to complete the job.

But let us return to Burchill’s ad hominem argument against Lauren Booth – next, she turns her attention to Booth’s work for Press T.V.

“It's hard to know where to start when describing the sheer ickiness of Booth,” says condescending Burchill. “That she works as a paid stooge for the murderous Iranian regime's television channel has to come pretty near the top.”

As tragic as it may be, it is actually Britain and the British (rather than Iran and Iranians) who are directly complicit in a colossal criminal war that has lead up to date to 1,421,933 fatalities in Iraq alone. It is pretty fascinating that ‘nearly converted’ Burchill would denounce the Iranian regime as murderous while it is evident that Britain was taken to the Iraq war by a government that was funded by the Zionist lobby, led by no other than fund raiser, Lord Cashpoint Levy.

In fact, more than ever, we need Press TV in the UK, for the Iranian TV channel is the only broadcast in Britain to deliver a full coverage of Israel’s colossal crimes. In case Burchill has managed to forget, at the eve of Operation Cast Lead, when the BBC was quick to follow IDF ‘instructions’ and evacuated its reporters from Gaza, it was Press TV that stayed behind and delivered live footage of the Israeli massacre. It was Press TV rather than BBC, SKY or ITN that broadcasted in real time UNRA shelter shelled with white phosphorous.

We need Press TV, and we need many more Lauren Booths to practise real journalism instead of Zionised comedy. We need Press TV and Lauren Booth exactly because the British press and people like Julie Burchill have so evidently failed.

Burchill is not just a devout Zionist and a Neocon, she is also a sincere feminist. She doesn’t like Islam, and she doesn’t hide it either. She doesn’t approve of regimes that “uphold the punishment of death by stoning for adulteresses”. For those who fail to remember, it was also so called ‘feminists’ who were the first to campaign against the Taliban in the mid 1990’s, just to prepare the ground for the American invasion. I am almost taken in by Burchill’s caring for Muslim women; yet, I wonder how come the ‘women’s right campaigner’ fails to show the same care for Palestinian women who are often enough bleeding to death in Israeli roadblocks.

When it seems as if Burchill runs out of Necoon slogans, she then takes the gloves off and pulls the chicken out of the boiling soup : Booth ,according to Burchill, is so “jaded that she can only get a kick from self-denial.” But may I point out to Burchill here, that conversion is actually the exact opposite of ‘self-denial’. It is actually all about the ‘self’ being ‘spiritually awakened’ out of a state of denial, an experience that may be foreign to ‘nearly converted’ Burchill.

However, Burchill’s feeble accusation of ‘self denial’ does ring a bell here; it does sound familiar: It is after all, common amongst Jews and within the Zionist fold to label their dissident voices as being ‘self haters’.

As I mentioned earlier on, Burchill didn’t have to convert: the Jewish philosophy and manners are apparently deeply engraved within her soul. It spills out in each of her sentences -- and it is far from being attractive.

But I guess that at a certain stage Burchill just couldn’t hold it together anymore. She wanted Lauren Booth to simply shut up. She suggested that Booth treats herself “to a full-face and – most essentially – mouth-covering burka”. All of a sudden, Burchill, the liberal impostor, the one who just a few lines before was rallying for freedom of Muslims, gays and women, has revealed her true face: in Burchill’s world, women and homosexuals should be free -- but Muslim converts better shut up.

Can anyone explain this discrepancy? It is no wonder that Neo-conservatism and moral interventionism are such a disaster. There is not a single shred of truth, coherence or consistency in them. They are, in fact, simply a pretext for Zionist expansionism.

This is unfortunately the true meaning of the current western brutality. It obviously didn’t take me by complete surprise then, when I found out that Julie Burchill was also a supporter of the war in Iraq.

But, as one would expect, Burchill's poisonous outbursts are followed by some tender ‘light waves’ of self-love: Israel was named recently as “the eighth happiest country in the world – coming in above Britain and the US”, says the proud Zionist enthusiast.

And I am now more concerned than ever : If Israelis can be so pleased with themselves at a time when their army locks millions of Palestinians in concentration camps with no food or medical supplies, it really says a lot about the Jewish State, the Israelis -- and it says a lot about Sabbath Goys like Julie Burchill.

I am afraid that we are dealing here with a morbid psychotic ideological collective. I wish I knew how to help them -- or at least how to save the rest of us.

http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/gilad-atzmon-julie-sabbath-goy-burchil l.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Stratehy Of Tension, Fake Terror, 9/11 & 7/7 Truth News All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group