Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 9:36 pm Post subject: On the Edge TV programme on Diana assassination
Did anyone catch the TV interview by Theo Chalmers of Jon King, author of new updated paperback Diana investigation - "Princess Diana The Evidence"
The programme was essential and unmissable - well I missed the first half hour.
I looked on the EdgeMedia schedule and can't find a repeat showing, but someone somewhere will have recorded it and will put it on YouTube or Google over the next day or so
Keep an eye out
http://consciousape.com/news/princess-diana-a-peoples-inquiry/ _________________ http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 2:42 pm Post subject: Diana's death: proof that white Fiat Uno driver was murdered
I have discovered a passage in one of the archives of the French investigative website Groupe de Presse Nicolas
http://www.investigateur.info/
that blows the official story of Princess Diana's death sky high, changing it from a car accident to an assassination, as many have suspected. In the dossier entitled "France" at
http://www.investigateur.info/affaires/
there is a detailed account of the death of James Andanson, the notorious paparazzi photographer, whom many students of Princess Diana's death suspect was the driver of the white Fiat Uno that was seen coming out of the Pont de l'Alma tunnel in Paris seconds after Dodi Fayed's car crashed. It is now known that this high society photographer spent several hours on board Dodi's yacht a few days before the crash, being invited to take photos of Diana and Dodi for newspapers and magazines. See:
He was found dead less than three years after the tragedy in 1997 in a burnt-out car in woodlands near Montpellier in France, his body so badly charred that it took the police nearly a month to establish his identity, using DNA and dental records. A fireman, Mr Pelat,
http://www.whale.to/b/pap1.html
who arrived on the scene of the burning car, said that he saw two bullet holes in Andanson's head
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/12839/Diana:-Fiat-driver-%27shot-i n-the-head%27
The police, however, concluded that Andanson had committed suicide when he discovered his wife was having an affair with a local farmer. His wife, as well as friends, adamantly rejected this. She said: "My husband was not more depressed two days before his death than six months or three years ago." She also said that he often bragged about being at the scene of the crash that fateful night (see the video above). Someone took this last photo of Diana alive in the car in the tunnel just before it crashed:
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/home/blog_data/13/13/images/diana1.jp g
(Well, perhaps not the very last. Photos have been released of Diana still alive after the crash). The point is: did Andanson take it? He owned a white Fiat Uno, paint from which matched exactly that found on Dodi's Mercedes. He repainted the car and sold it in October, 1997, a few months after Diana's death. Former senior detective John Macnamara, who worked for Mohammed Al Faed, found Andanson's car with his team of detectives and were arrested. Macnamara was warned that he would be charged with a criminal offence if he interfered again with the police ‘investigation’. Red-and-white optical debris found in the tunnel entrance in the right-hand lane came from the rear light of a Fiat Uno built in Italy between May 1983 and September 1989. This matched the paint deposits on the front right wing mirror and body panels of a white Fiat Uno made in Italy between 1983 and 1989. Andanson’s white fiat Uno was made during the same period. Macnamara noticed that the front right of Andanson's car had been repaired.......
What is odd about Andanson's death is that his badly charred body was found inside his locked car but no car keys were found either inside or outside it on the ground. How was that possible? What person intent on shooting himself inside his car would bother, anyway, to set fire to it first just before pulling the trigger? And how could he manage to shoot himself twice in the head?! If he was murdered because he drove the car that (intentionally or accidently) bumped into Dodi's car, causing it to swerve and crash, the assassin made the blunder of holding onto the keys after shooting Andanson and locking the car in which his burnt body was found. The absence of the car keys proves that he was shot by someone else, therefore indicating a conspiracy to silence him.
"Selon le rapport confidentiel d¹une sorte de ³groupe d¹études², constitué, après la mort d¹Andanson, par des amis que le photographe avait su se faire dans une société anglo-saxonne d¹investigation et de sécurité proche des services britanniques, le photographe a été assassiné par un homme de main d¹origine yougoslave, T...,évoluant habituellement sous le pseudonyme d¹une grande famille de la noblesse française, connu aussi de la chanteuse Amanda Lear."
http://www.investigateur.info/affaires/france/andanson.html
(my emphasis in boldface).
Its English translation, somewhat garbled by an internet translator, is:
"According to the confidential report, a kind of studies group, made up, after Andanson death, by friends whom the photographer had known to be made in a Anglo-Saxon company investigation and of safety close to the British services, the photographer was assassinated by a henchman origin Yugoslav, T…, usually evolving/moving under the pseudonym of a great family of the French nobility, also known of the singer Amanda Lear."
(Notice the reference to "Anglo-Saxon" and "British services". Intelligence services.)
Now, Amanda Lear is a famous French transexual singer and TV show hostess who was a close friend of Salvador Dali.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amanda_Lear
In 1979, she married the bisexual French aristocrat Alain-Philippe Malagnac d'Argens:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alain-Philippe_Malagnac_d%27Argens_de_Vil l%C3%A8le
It is suspected that this man killed himself in a fire at his home in 2000 in a suicide pact with his former close male friend, who had died shortly before. So what this explosive passage in "Le Investigateur" is saying is that a Yugoslav code-named "T", who operated under a deleted (d) pseudonym that is in this aristocrat's name, murdered the very man whom many suspect was involved in the assassination of Princess Diana!
That this man "T" was connected to intelligence agencies is strongly suggested in the following translated passage (garbled somewhat) from the same article in "L'investigateur":
"But information of the British from now on came to a service French information, attached to the Ministry for Defense. They could have unexpected developments. (Old) connections of T… with Amanda Lear feed from the interrogations on death by fire - a mania - D ¹ Alain-Philippe Malagnac, the husband of the singer, on December 28, 2000. T. would have worked a little, also, a front year, on the Safra file - name of the owner of national Républic bank of New York, asphyxiated in a fire with L ¹ interior of its building-fortress of Monaco, on December 6, 1999. According to L ¹ official investigation, fire had been lit in a dustbin by an old green beret (commando of the special forces) American, Ted Maher. It came D ¹ to be recruited as male nurse, and lived a love disappointed with one of his colleagues… "
Notice the reference to working on the "Safra file". This refers to the murder of Edmond Safra, the founder of the Republic National Bank in New York, in 1999 (two years after Diana's death), for which an ex-Green Beret, Ted Maher, was convicted.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Maher
Safra employed security guards trained by the Israeli Mossad and had contacts with the FBI. So his murder was of great interest to intelligence agencies because he had made enemies with the Russian mafia. The man codenamed "T", named by the French investigative website as Andanson's killer, was therefore very likely either an intelligence agent or a free-lance hitman who carried out 'wet jobs' for intelligence agencies.
Here, therefore, is indisputable evidence from a French investigative website specializing in digging the dirt on French politicians and famous people (therefore very likely having sources within the French intelligence agencies) that confirms that James Andanson did not kill himself, as the French police concluded, but was assassinated by a Yugoslav involved in some way with international murder cases (he worked on the "Safra file"). The question now is: why was Andanson killed? He had started to brag about his presence at the crash scene and about slipping away from the French police (he left that night for Corsica - a mafia haven and 'safe house'). Could it be that, because of his intelligence agency conections and his bragging, he had become a dangerous liability to those who had used him to cause the crash that killed Diana? If so, he had to be silenced before his freelance work for French and British intelligence agencies became revealed. And - more serious still - before he exposed his collusion in their involvement in Diana's death ......
Last edited by Micpsi on Sun Oct 25, 2009 8:17 pm; edited 3 times in total
Andanson sitting with his wife in front of his white Fiat Uno:
Video frames of a white Fiat Uno parked outside the Ritz Hotel in Paris, captured on video taken by two Australian tourists.
http://www.wethepeople.la/diana16.htm
Andanson's wife, Elizabeth, said he was home in bed on the night of Diana's death
Well, you can take that with a pinch of salt. She would say that, wouldn't she? What wife would admit that her husband had been involved in murder? No doubt for a while Elizabeth honestly believed that he was not involved. That is, until he started bragging to her about being in the tunnel on the night of Diana's death. And until men from the French intelligence service came and told her to stop speaking to the media about her disbelief in the official police story that her husband had killed himself because he was depressed about her affair with a local farmer.
The view in the intelligence community is that Andanson had been talking too much and someone decided to silence him ad infinitum before he revealed seriously damaging information in the murders of Princess Diana, Dodi Fayed and Henri Paul. There is also clear evidence, from his colleagues that he threatened to come clean about what happened that night and was prepared to release the photographs and that was quite simply a 'bridge too far' for his handlers.
Andanson's friend François Dard said, "He told us that he was there. He was behind them. He was following behind. He saw the accident and all but he wasn't stopped by the police. He left. It is impossible that he committed suicide. We are convinced of it. To be burned alive in a car - we don't believe it at all." In fact, no one with half brain cell believes that Andanson committed suicide in the circumstances ascribed. And a week after his death, the SIPA photo agency in Paris, which he co-founded, was raided by three armed men, wearing balaclavas. They shot a security guard in the foot and held dozens of employees hostage for several hours. Staff phoned the police but they did not turn up. A member of staff said: "They seemed to know exactly what they were looking for and were confident enough to remain in a busy building for several hours, though they stole nothing of real value."
Indeed, the 'raiders' disabled the CCTV cameras in the offices and did not seem stressed about the police turning up. For armed 'robbers' they were incredibly relaxed about the whole thing. And yet again, they took computer hard drives, laptops, cameras and the storage media for photographs. They knew exactly what they were looking for. SIPA staff are convinced that the 'raid' had something to do with Andanson and believe French spooks carried out the seizure of property at gunpoint.
There is also talk that the 'raiders' many have been British SAS troopers, from the MI6's disposal team The Increment, who are alleged to have been involved in the crash at the tunnel. Contacts we have spoken to in Paris, however, are adamant that the French DST were behind the armed 'robbery' and they were intent on removing the last damaging traces linking the DST and MI6 to the murders of Princess Diana, Dodi Fayed and Henri Paul.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.princess-diana/msg/e9d93 192769bb1f0?
Well, the suspicions and speculations are now proved. We have archived intelligence material naming Andanson's assassin, identifying his nationality and asserting that he worked as an "agent".
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 9:21 pm Post subject:
Front page lead in today's Daily Express.
I'm reminded that Diana was negotiating with the Express (under previous management) to publish material proving the House of Windsor (Saxe-Coburg-Gotha) had obtained the title to the British Throne fraudulently. That would have been one of the biggest scoops of all time so Express researchers and lawyers (masons?) were double checking all the facts ... when she was murdered.
PRINCESS DIANA: THE 500 HIDDEN CLUES
Saturday August 7,2010
By Frank Thorpe and John Chapman
FRESH concerns were raised over the Princess Diana inquest last night after it was claimed 500 pieces of crucial evidence were withheld from the jury.
The documents, many containing information from medical experts, were not made available to the 2008 hearing in London, we can reveal.
As the 13th anniversary of Diana’s death in a car crash in Paris approaches, a new book has been published containing the original official statements of witnesses who failed to attend the inquest, including the French pathologist and toxicologist who dealt with the bodies. Mystery has surrounded the crash ever since it happened on August 31, 1997.
The inquest blamed drunk driver Henri Paul, but it is claimed blood samples used to verify the amount of alcohol he had consumed were taken from another corpse.
Writer John Morgan believes his book, Diana Inquest: The Documents The Jury Never Saw, provides a compelling reason why a new inquest should be held in France.
He has always insisted the London hearing was tainted by errors, omissions and suppressions following a French cover-up of evidence.
He told the Daily Express last night: “My book reproduces more than 100 of the most critical documents and lists a further 400 documents that the jury should have had access to if they were ever going to be able to reach an informed verdict.
“Lawyers say justice is blind but in this case I have proved that it was the jury who were blindfolded. The official inquest was a travesty.”
The 700-page book is the fourth in a series probing every aspect of the death of the Princess and her partner Dodi Fayed.
Australian Morgan, who lives in Brisbane, says evidence in the new book casts serious doubt on claims that the inquest examined the complex case in “the minutest detail”.
The Documents The Jury Never Saw reveals judicial censorship of key evidence that was so substantial that the inquest was more significant for the documents that were not shown than for those the jury actually saw.
The book includes the original official police statements of French experts Professor Dominique Lecomte and Dr Gilbert Pepin.
Lecomte was the pathologist who conducted the controversial post mortem examination on Mr Paul’s body and Pepin was the toxicologist who carried out tests on samples.
The confusion over whether the correct samples were taken continued at the London inquest, where both these crucial witnesses refused to appear.
Both Lecomte and Pepin deny any abuse of the legal process or any errors in their work but the information would have been highly relevant to the inquest process.
Mr Morgan said last night: “At the time, the public expected the Diana inquest jury to reach an informed verdict, but no one could have possibly understood that such a huge volume of critical evidence was withheld from the jury. Through this massive censorship the inquest jury had no hope of reaching a fair, impartial and, more importantly, informed verdict. They were kept in the dark.
“Justice can only be achieved through an independent inquest held on French soil. The crash occurred in France and the witnesses are therefore French.
“An inquest that is capable of forcing the French witnesses to appear is the only way forward to establish the truth.” Mr Morgan said he believes a new inquest should be conducted under the auspices of the International Court of Justice.
His investigative efforts have been praised by Dodi’s father, former Harrods owner Mohamed Al Fayed.
“John Morgan has done more to expose the facts of this case than police in France and Britain,” he said. “He has shown how the so-called investigators were more interested in covering up what really happened than honestly delving for the truth.”
http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/191724 _________________ www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org www.rethink911.org www.patriotsquestion911.com www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org www.mediafor911truth.org www.pilotsfor911truth.org www.mp911truth.org www.ae911truth.org www.rl911truth.org www.stj911.org www.v911t.org www.thisweek.org.uk www.abolishwar.org.uk www.elementary.org.uk www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149 http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
So there's Diana, Camilia, Tiggy (see above), Kanga...
Quote:
When Kanga Tryon - once a household name and a central figure in the life of the Prince of Wales - died almost three months after Princess Diana, in 1997, she was quickly forgotten.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:55 pm Post subject:
all extremely weird this
and Charles' beautful Cedar tree out the front of Highgrove has died.
Charles axes his Harley-riding florist... just weeks after her husband is found dead
By Nick Constable - Daily Mail - 26th September 2009
Prince Charles is at the centre of a row for axeing his personal florist just weeks after her husband died in an apparent suicide. Sarah Champier-Lowe has been made redundant from her post at Highgrove following what Royal sources have described as a ‘staffing review’. Friends say she has been left shocked by the decision, which comes ahead of next month’s inquest into husband David Lowe’s death.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1216364/Sarah-Champier-Lowe-ax ed-Prince-Charles-florist-florist--just-weeks-husband-dead.html
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:43 am Post subject:
Gay claim: Prince Charles "has three male lovers"
MSN Celebrity Fix - July 2008
Poor ol' Prince Charles has apparently been in the closet for 30 years, hiding his sexuality from the world via Princess Diana, Camilla and having kids. According to UK trash paper The Globe, that is!
According to the rag, Camilla spilled the beans herself - yep, that's believable! The prospect of a gay king heading up our monarchy someday is pretty rad though. Take that, marriage laws! Etc.
http://celebrities.ninemsn.com.au/blog.aspx?showcomments=true&blogentr yid=714786
A U.K. millionaire lawyer claims the princess may have been killed before she could “expose landmine dealers.”
The late Princess of Wales’ legacy was traduced at this year’s annual Hay Festival of Literature in a most unwelcome way for those who cherish her memory:
One of the U.K.’s leading Queen's Counsels, 69-year-old Michael Mansfield, claimed that Diana might have been killed as she was preparing to “expose landmine dealers.”
-
What's behind all of ths:-
The worlds largest dealer in Landmines at that time was John Arnold Bredenkamp ,
-
Bredenkamp is the Rhodesian-Afrikaner dealer in Tobacco, Minerals out of Africa, and the lost nuclear WMD. that had been made by Armscor at Pelindaba .
In fact after he had been paid for those 3 in no. atomic bombs, just before the first Gulf War, Bredenkamp was able to steal them back.
-
Three of those atomic bombs had been bought by the UK Government after delivery to Oman and just before the first Gulf War.
-
The UOR had been signed for them under the bogus title of 'Cylinders' by Thatcher just as she was quitting being PM on 28th Nov 1990.
-
The UOR was implemented by Peter Lilley as head of the DTI immediately thereafter.
The contract to buy three 'Cylinders for Peter Lilley as head of the DTI had to sign had been drawn up for the DTI by MoD Contracts-Branch at Sloane Sq, London.
The only other signatory was Stephan Kock of Astra.
-
Payout from the Bank of England via Astra to Bredenkamp's company Casalee happened after Dr David Kelly had signed-off on Astra Invoices
Thereafter £17.8 millions from that payout was laundered into Tory Party 1992 elections campaign coffers.
see.....Hansard for 22nd June 1993, starting Col.197.
-
North Korea exploded one of those rogue Tory atomic bombs on 25th May 2009.
Gordon Brown called for an Iraq Inquiry,......
.... that because of protests from Tony Blair, a compromise was reached where it was agreed it be run under Warwick Rules.
-
Warwick Rules had been invented late July 2003 for use at the Hutton Inquiry, and repeated in 2004 at the Butler Intelligence Review.
They are only applied in cases of National Security.
-
During the Iraq Inquiry debate on 24th June 2009 Sir Menzies Campbell QC MP asked:-
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 4:21 pm Post subject:
Actor and film-maker Keith Allen will screen his controversial documentary about the death of Princess Diana in Cannes on 13 May.
Unlawful Killing, a labour of love developed over three years following extensive interviews with people who knew his subject, alleges that "dark forces" within the British establishment worked to cover up the true details of Diana's death in 1997. It is described by Allen as "the inquest of the inquest" and has drawn controversy because it will show a photograph of the dying princess taken by paparazzi moments after her car crashed in a Paris tunnel....
"By going 'undercover' at the inquest, I hoped to reconcile some of my own suspicions too – but what I experienced was horrifying. This film is, in short, the inquest of the inquest."
Unlawful Killing will combine a recreation of the inquest and interviews with the late Tony Curtis, Howard Stern, Kitty Kelley, Mohamed Al Fayed, Piers Morgan and Michael Mansfield QC. Dave Stewart provides the original score.
Writing in the Guardian, Allen said: "Unlawful Killing is not about a conspiracy before the crash, but a provable conspiracy after the crash. A conspiracy organised not by a single scheming arch-fiend, but collectively by the British establishment – judges, lawyers, politicians, police chiefs, secret services, even newspaper editors – all of whom have been appointed to their positions because they are 'a safe pair of hands'.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/may/10/princess-diana-documentary- cannes
meanwhile
http://www.thedianaplot.com
Express story today says tissue samples were swapped
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/245718/Diana-inquest-samples-switc hed
PRINCESS Diana’s post-mortem samples were switched with those from another woman, an explosive new book claims.
Adding weight to “cover-up” theories, it says samples were swapped prior to toxicological testing.
According to documents uncovered for the book, published this week, the toxicologist at London’s Charing Cross Hospital received the samples of another female and tested them in the belief that they were from Princess Diana.
In his latest volume in a series about the Diana inquest, author John Morgan believes he has discovered the truth of what occurred in the 24 hours following the deaths of the Princess and Dodi Al Fayed in a Paris car crash on August 31, 1997.
“There is a lot of evidence which points to the toxicology testing being carried out on samples that did not come from the body of Princess Diana,” he said last night, pointing out that the documents were, along with others, withheld from the inquest jury.
Mr Morgan said he had uncovered a litany of conflicting evidence, inconsistencies, mis-labelling of body samples, cover-ups, evidence and witnesses who were never called to give evidence at the inquest.
He is now calling for independent DNA tests to be carried out on the body samples. “The samples at Charing Cross Hospital have never been subjected to DNA testing. With so much conflicting evidence, how can we be sure?” he said.
“The evidence I have studied indicates that there are two lots of samples. One belongs to Diana, which is held by the Metropolitan Police’s Operation Paget, and the other lot are samples from another body and held by Charing Cross Hospital.
“Diana’s UK post-mortem samples were switched ahead of the toxicology testing.”
He added: “The jury were not given the post mortem and toxicology reports on Diana. If they had, they should have been able to work out that the toxicology testing was conducted on samples that weren’t Diana’s.
“For example, Diana’s body was embalmed in France, but there was no embalming fluid in the toxicology tested samples.”
He went on: “Diana had consumed alcohol that night in Dodi’s apartment and later at the Ritz Hotel.
It is recorded by the Hammersmith and Fulham mortuary manager that her stomach smelled strongly of alcohol, but there was no alcohol in the samples tested in London.”
Mr Morgan said that within 24 hours of her death, Diana’s body had been subjected to embalming in France and the UK, along with two post mortems.
“I am asking why?” said the Australian-based writer who lives in Brisbane and insisted that documentation shows interference from senior aides on behalf of the Queen.
“Having removed Princess Diana as a member of the Royal Family in 1996, suddenly, Diana became royal again. Only the Queen could have ordered this.
“The Queen took control of events from Balmoral, very early following Diana’s death,” Mr Morgan said, adding that he believed the UK coroner should not have taken possession of Diana’s body after it arrived back in England.
“By law, jurisdiction over the body should have gone to the coroner in Northamptonshire, which covers Diana’s family home, Althorp, where it was known Diana’s body would be buried.”
Another stark example of a switch Mr Morgan claims to have discovered was that there was no vitreous humour (eyeball gel) sample taken during the UK post-mortem, yet a sample was tested by the London toxicologist.
Also, sample labels received by the toxicologist, Susan Paterson, for both blood and liver tests, read differently to the descriptions in the post-mortem documentation. Mr Morgan has spent more than five years investigating the evidence relating to the 1997 Paris crash in the city’s Alma Tunnel.
His series of books is based on the testimony heard during the inquest and evidence in official documents from within the British police investigation that were withheld from the inquest jury.
Leading QC Michael Mansfield, who served throughout the six months of the London inquest, stated last year: “I have no doubt that the volumes written by him will come to be regarded as the Magnum Opus on the death crash.
Dodi’s father, Mohamed Al Fayed, has praised Mr Morgan’s work, calling it “heroic” and “impressive works of forensic enquiry and immensely helpful to the cause of truth.”
Mr Al Fayed said: “I believe that John Morgan has done more to expose the facts of this case than the police in France and Britain.”
Diana Inquest: Part 4: The British Cover-Up by John Morgan, published by Lightning Source UK Ltd, available on Amazon UK, (www.amazon.co.uk)priced £17.89. _________________ www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org www.rethink911.org www.patriotsquestion911.com www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org www.mediafor911truth.org www.pilotsfor911truth.org www.mp911truth.org www.ae911truth.org www.rl911truth.org www.stj911.org www.v911t.org www.thisweek.org.uk www.abolishwar.org.uk www.elementary.org.uk www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149 http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Another excerpt from Actor and film-maker Keith Allen, who will be screening his controversial documentary about the death of Princess Diana in Cannes on 13 May
Quote:
"Screening this film in Cannes for the world's media will be both exhilarating and terrifying for me," said the star of Shallow Grave and Trainspotting. "As far back as 2004, I had been intrigued by Mohamed Al Fayed's unrelenting determination to seek answers to the questions surrounding the death of his son, Dodi and Princess Diana.
"By going 'undercover' at the inquest, I hoped to reconcile some of my own suspicions too – but what I experienced was horrifying. This film is, in short, the inquest of the inquest."
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 8:52 pm Post subject:
This interview which I posted up on UK Indymdia has UNBELIEVABLY been hidden by the new 'mayday' group which is now moderating the site.
Totally unjustified according to their own 'rules' which are now being ignored by the new collective.
In the past it was usualy possible to get UK Indymedia posts un-hidden after flagging them up on their open moderation email list but even that has now become a farce.
The UK/US/Israeli control grid is tightening down massively.
Somebody is putting everything they've got into supressing this information. Even infiltrationg Indymedia UK to do so.
Explosive interview with John Morgan, author of 'Diana, The British Cover Up'
Tony Gosling | 14.05.2011 10:45 | Anti-militarism | Repression | Terror War | World
plus all the usual Friday Drivetime discussions about policing, the 7/7 inquests and state terrorism.
Exclusive and comprehensive interview with John Morgan, Australian author of new book out this week Diana, The British Cover Up. He looks at a death threat to her beforehand from Conservative Armed Forces minister Nichlas Soames and discusses motives for murder as well as describing the mysterious halting and ‘rocking’ of the ambulance which was taking Diana to hospital. Did Princess Diana survive the crash only to be murdered in the ambulance? Also a look at the new film on the same subject by Keith Allen premiering at Cannes this week ‘Unlawful Killing’. Inadequate emergency planners’ provision of potassium iodide tablets which should be used as a preventative measure against radiation poisoning.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 8:58 pm Post subject:
Press TV review the film which cannot be shown in the UK due to legal threats from the royals to filmmaker Keith Allen. These threats cite the 'distress' which 'will' be caused if the a still picture of Diana looking uninjured after the crash which appears in the film and which has previously appeared in various countries is shown to the British public.
Contrast this with the Zabruder film shots of assassinated US President John F. Kennedy having his head blown off which was not shown on US TV until 1977.
Joined: 11 Nov 2008 Posts: 558 Location: Lancashire
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 11:07 am Post subject:
In Profile : Princess Diana, the Whole Story
The Murder of a Princess
Introduction
The following information comes from many sources, it is the information which came to the fore in the aftermath of the murder, un censord.
I present this today after 10 years of media de-construction of all things Diana, which has helped people forget the real facts as they came forth in the times after the tragic event in 1997.
The Complete Chronology of an Evil Event
PART I
With the major attempt by the elite to destroy your connection to the Queen of Hearts Diana, I feel compelled to offer you not just the conspiracy facts you have heard and seen on the TV, but give you the full occult symbolism. Of course this will make better sense to those of you who are involved in the seeking of secret knowledge, but for any intelligent mind one can see the relevance and connection of such symbolic facts. I shall also offer you background information to the bloodline she was born into. Is it not a bit strange they give us a memorial service in which Camilla at the request of the two Princes was asked to attend, first accepting then declining for very good reason, call me a cynic but is this an attempt to have us warm to Camilla? I think yes… with the TV premier of the sordid and complete fabrication docu/film “the Queen” two days after the commemorative service, and their not desperate for you to believe their lies? Either way I leave it to you to make your own choice.
life…
Diana Frances Spencer was born at Park House on the Queens Sandringham estate in Norfolk on July 1st 1961, the third and youngest daughter of Viscount Althorp, later the 8th Earl Spencer, and his first wife Frances Roche, below. Her parents separated when she was six which is relevant to the trauma these families instil to a child up to the age of six as the heart chakra begins to activate in the natural growth of the human form. They eventually divorced in 1969. Diana’s mother then married the wallpaper tycoon Peter Shand-Kidd.
Diana had a younger brother, Charles, the present Earl Spencer, and two sisters, Jane and Sarah. There was a son born before Diana, but he died which by the rules of the elite could well have been the sacrifice as he was the first born son which for Diana’s father would be the necessary ritual to enter the utmost levels. Diana had always believed that her parents wished she had been a boy to give them a son and heir.
This is classic installation of underdog, unwanted feelings pushed into the mind of a chosen child which creates the lowered vibration for access by the negative energies into the being of the child. Diana had always maintained her childhood was very unhappy; this leads to a craving for love and warm affection she continued to crave until the end of her short life. Living at Sandringham she knew the Queen from being a small child, and played with the Royal children.
She always remembered with less than affection, being shunted over to the Queens residence during the holidays year after year to watch the film ‘Chitty Chitty Bang Bang’. This in itself would seem not really relevant yet from a small age the fear created by such a satanic film, of which it is, would form the patterns of her subconscious fears that would be manipulated as she grew older. This film was written by the intelligence agent Ian Flemming, friend to Aleister Crowley and author of the James Bond films. The story is satanic symbolism for what really happens, a King and Queen who hate children and employ a child catcher to lure children, abduct them, and put them in a cage, take them to the castle and place them in a dungeon; of course they exclude the end for these children which of course is ritual sacrifice. I remember when I first learnt of this ritual sacrifice, I was constantly in fear that it could happen to my children, believe me it keeps you in terror and extremely controllable.
Why would the Windsor’s keep playing this film constantly to a child who was a guest in their home? She told Andrew Morton for his book, Diana Her True Story,
“the atmosphere was always very strange when we went there and I used to kick and fight anyone who tried to make us go”.
When Diana was age 13, she moved from Norfolk to live at Althorp in Northamptonshire, the Spencer family’s ancestral home, after her father married Raine, the daughter of the novelist Barbara Cartland. Diana had a deep loathing for her. Diana said again in the book Diana Her True Story that in September 1989 she had unleashed her years of frustration on Raine : “I told her what I thought about her, and I’ve never known such anger in me. I remember really going for her gullet”.
I said “If you only knew how much we all hated you for what you have done, you’ve ruined the house (Althorp), you spend all daddies money, and for what?” if you remember the information in a previous phase from the close confidant of Diana, Christine Fitzgerald, how she explained the deep empathy Diana had for others who were emotionally distressed, this is a consequence of emotional distress in herself from her childhood.
The Spencer’s are an elite bloodline family. They are cousins of the Spencer Churchills and related to the Marlborough family at Blenheim Palace in Oxfordshire, the birthplace of Winston Churchill. Other forebears included the Duke of Marlborough, Sir Robert Walpole, and the Spencer family inherited a considerable fortune from Sarah, Duchess of Marlborough. They also married into the Cavendish family, the Dukes of Devonshire at Chatsworth House, that offshoot became known as Spencer – Cavendish. Diana shared common ancestors with Prince Charles in the third Duke of Devonshire and, most significantly, King James I, the first Stuart King of England and Scotland and sponsor of Francis Bacon, but the truth is James was at the emotional mercy of Buckingham, but that is a story in itself and has direct connections to the John Adam Street Gang around Adelphi House. It was King James who played a highly influential role in the expansion of the Statute Empire, the formation of the Virginia Company through which still today, controls the United States of America, he also began the removal of Britain’s psychic’s, seer’s and mystics with the King James version of the Bible which was translated with over 36.000 translation errors, he also created the rules on how to seek, determine and murder those he called witch’s. Diana was also descended through several lines from the Stuart Kings, Charles II and James II, which connected her bloodline as it did with James I, to the Carolingian bloodline in France, which parades itself as the Merovingians.
Charles II had so many children out of wedlock who knows how many offshoots exist today; one thing is for sure the elite know all of them. As elite bloodlines go, the Spencer’s line is important; Diana’s blood was related to countless aristocratic lines, including the Earls of Lucan. Further afield the Spencer’s have blood ties with many leading American families and are distantly related to the Rockefellers. The bloodline has a long history of serving the monarch and the tradition continued with Diana’s father. He was equerry to King George VI (the one married to the Queen Mother) and to Queen Elizabeth. Diana’s sister, Jane, is married to Sir Robert Fellowes; the Queens private secretary at the time of Diana’s death (makes perfect sense for extra cover). Both Diana’s grandmothers, the Countess Spencer and Ruth Lady Fermoy, right, were inner circle members of the Queen Mothers Court, as were four of her great aunts.
The Spencer’s and the Queen Mother were extremely close and it was the Queen Mother and Lady Fermoy who manipulated Diana into her marriage with Prince Charles. The countdown to marriage began when Diana met Charles at Althorp while he was having a relationship with her sister Sarah, in 1977. Diana was 16; it was three years later that the Windsor’s really made their move on her. It was Lady Fermoy and the Queen Mother who were manipulating behind the scenes, Diana was invited to a dance at Buckingham Palace to celebrate the 30th Birthday of Charles. Then in July 1980, a friend of Charles, Philip de Pass, asked Diana to stay with them while the Prince was there, in Diana’s own words, Charles was all over me and, “he leapt on me practically”. He asked her to accompany him to Buckingham Palace the next day and an invitation followed to join the Windsor’s in the September at Balmoral, their residence in Scotland. Eventually Charles asked her to marry him, she accepted. “I love you so much” Diana said to him, “whatever love is” replied Charles. If nothing else this reply speaks volumes about the state of the man who is to be king or probably not, but speaks even more about the current Queen and her consort as the parents of the cold, cold Charles.
The elite bloodlines have no idea what love is, none of them ever received it and thus can not express it, sad really, but this is the ancient reality for the elite born children, we need to demolish the ruling of the world by beings that have no understanding of what love is, for their own sakes as much as the rest of us. During some of the interviews after the break up of the marriage, Diana had stated that in looking back she could see that Charles had never been genuine in his affection towards her, and even before the wedding she had realised she would be having a relationship with his true love and consort Camilla Parker Bowles, which of course became more apparent as the marriage continued. One should not be too judging on why Diana stayed with Charles as long as she did, for many ladies they feel they can change their chosen partner, in fact that is the basis of many females when they chose their husbands, as it is for many males also. During the marriage Charles and Camilla communicated with the code ‘Gladys and Fred’. Camilla like the Windsor’s, is close to the Rothschilds and on the first anniversary of Diana’s death, she was on the Ionian island of Corfu enjoying the hospitality of Lord Jacob Rothschild, who just happens to have spent £16 million leasing and restoring the Spencer’s 18th century mansion overlooking Green Park in London close to Buckingham Palace. It’s funny in that once you have played ball with the elite they give you everything, the Rothschilds are about money, the Imperial Empires money as they act as the front for the 13 elect families, they give nothing not a penny to anyone who has not served them well. At the core of this whole saga is the fact the Windsor’s, required heirs from the Spencer genes to continue the ‘acceptable’ monarchy.
A week after her engagement to Charles , Diana’s bulimia began, this is an eating disorder in which you make yourself sick every time you eat food, Diana was throwing up three or four times a day and became desperately thin. This condition is a direct result from the satanic upbringing of children and in this case was triggered when Charles put his hand on her waist and said, “Oh a bit chubby here, aren’t we?” she stated. What we have here is the start of another character assassination of the Queen of Hearts to ensure you all by the time of her murder, saw her as a nutcase; of course this did not work, good on you. Bulimia is a dis-ease of the emotions, as most diseases are, and Diana had been an emotional wreck since the break up of her father and mother’s marriage and the standard upbringing of bloodline offspring.
She described the attitude of Charles thus :
“He found the virgin, the sacrificial lamb, and in a way he was obsessed with me. But it was hot and cold, hot and cold. You never knew what mood it was going to be, up and down, up and down… He was in awe of his mama, intimidated by his father, and I was always the third person in the room.”
She met her sisters and told them she couldn’t go through with the marriage, especially with Camilla still on the scene, but they said she had no choice (classic form of control) because “your face is on the tea towels and you’re too late to chicken out”.
Before the wedding Diana stayed at Clarence House, the London residence of the Queen Mother. When she arrived no-one was there to welcome her, she said, it was like going to a hotel. Are these the type of people we wish to have representing the pinnacle of what it means to be British? Because I for one do not wish the world to feel this is how the average Brit functions!
Diana and Charles were married in St Paul’s Cathedral on July 29th 1981, the numbers here are very significant, but more importantly this just precedes the sacrificial ritual and feast of Lammas. That morning at Clarence House she said she felt calm, deathly calm: “I felt I was a lamb to the slaughter, I knew it, I couldn’t do anything about it”.
How prophetic would these feeling turn out to be?
They spent their first night of their honeymoon at the Mountbatten (Battenberg) family estate at Broadlands in Hampshire, before sailing around the Greek Islands in the Royal Yacht Britannia. The Bulimia got worse and she considered suicide, such was the scale of her unhappiness, this within the first year of the marriage. “My husband made me feel to inadequate in every possible way, each time I came up for air he pushed me down again. I hated myself so much”. One of Diana’s royal duties in 1982 was to represent the Queen at the funeral of Princess Grace of Monaco, herself a victim of murder by the elite when the brakes on her car failed.
Princess Grace, formerly the actress Grace Kelly, ran the Monaco branch of the Order of the Solar Temple with Jean Louis Marsan, the close friend of her husband, Prince Rainier. The Windsor’s got what they wanted when Prince William was conceived. Diana was told that the birth had to be induced to fit in with Charles’ polo playing programme, and William was born on June 21st 1982 which just happens to be the summer solstice. Again what kind of people, held as the pinnacle of Britishness, would induce a child’s birth to fit in with the fathers polo programme, what kind of people have we got here? Well of course the inducement was to ensure the birth concluded on the solstice, this is the occult showing itself here, to which the elite are so obsessed. The summer solstice esoterically represents the height of the suns power in that in the northern hemisphere it is at its highest point in the solar year. One can even predict what colour cloths the Queen will wear each day such is their obsession with esoteric principles.
He was christened William, after the bloodline William the Conqueror, Arthur, after the sun god symbol, King Arthur, Philip, after the Duke of Edinburgh, Louis, after Louis Mountbatten. William’s first serious girlfriend, according to the British press, was Emma Parker Bowles, the niece of his then father’s lover, Camilla. Prince Harry was born in 1984 and thus Diana’s role was over.
“Then suddenly as Harry was born it just went bang, our marriage, the whole thing went down the drain”, she told Andrew Morton. Diana and Charles separated in 1992 and divorced on August 28th 1996, almost one year later, she was dead.
Diana lived in apartments in Kensington Palace or KP as she called it. Prince Michael of Kent, the Grand Master of English Freemasonry, also has his home there. From this time the elite manipulated character assassination towards Diana took off in earnest, believe me this is easily accomplished while you are a slave to your emotions and DNA in that the elite know exactly the programming of all their targets, I have learnt this in recent years, which is why especially for those of you under the control via secret societies and the Evangelical Nonconformist religions, need to understand how only by the overriding of your DNA programming through ascension, can you hope to counter attack the operations against you by the elite.
A tape of an intimate telephone conversation between Diana and the car dealer, James Gilbey, was released through the media in 1992. On the tape Diana said that Charles was a real torture. She told Gilbey :
“I’ll go out and conquer the world, do my bit in the way I know how and leave him behind”.
The great thing about the character assassination by the Windsor’s against her was that it worked in her favour, her popularity grew. Of course this shows that the elite have no idea what love is, as Charles himself has stated, and could never combat what they do not understand, for how could they war against an enemy unseen to them, Love. With Diana’s combination of enormous heart, her global public profile, and her intense desire to prove the Windsor’s to be the cold heartless minds they surely are, threatened the very survival of royalty in all its forms.
With the information I have thus given throughout this work you can further see that the royal families are but the public face of something much worse and far bigger than could have been imagined, it is to this now exposed bunch of criminals and there ancient deceitful pacts and agreements we must focus, and take apart, if this world is to cease to be the cold heartless imagination or rather nightmare it has been all the while the same bloodlines have reigned supreme.
Her natural compassion and empathy on a one to one basis with people exposed the Windsor’s and all those like unto them as irrelevant in the eyes of the people, yet while they hold the reigns of power we have to see them as relevant in order we can remove such loveless people from their current position as dictators to the true humanity, the people. The shy and gullible child, whom the Windsor’s calculatingly and coldly enticed into their world of pain, became a woman who realised her true power and was not afraid to use it, what a girl! She brought the issue of landmines from obscurity full on into the minds of the masses, what a danger to evil this lady became. She also knew many intimate secrets within the establishment and was prepared to expose them.
She had called a chap in March 1997, a few months before she died, he was amazed when she told him she was the Princess of Wales, astounded at first he did not believe her, especially when she told him she was calling from a ‘supermarket phone in England. Diana and this man had a mutual friend. A close friend of Diana has stated that she often rang people from public phones, particularly from a department store in Kensington, when she wanted to be certain the conversation would not be tapped.
Diana admired the man she had rang for his wisdom and knowledge, she told him she had something to reveal that would shake the world and she wanted his advise on how best to do it. He will not reveal what she told him, yet one researcher rang this man and asked him if it was her awareness of the Windsor’s connection to drug trafficking, his reply was “Oh no, it was much worse than that”. So to lower initiates or outer circle operatives, the fact she was to reveal something would be the understanding they have of why she was killed, but there is another level of this event which would have been planned long before. Diana because of the quality of her soul, and to which bloodline she chose to be born, was the reason she was chosen as the incubator and breeding partner for the House of Windsor to create a more acceptable genetic cloak, the cold old bloodline with this scenario could continue to hide behind the more acceptable genetic, thus keeping the monarchy alive and well into the new cycle, and thus continuing to hide the real power brokers of the world yet again.
To the higher initiates or fully illuminated operatives this ritual was the killing of the moon Goddess in the middle earth, Diana in her highest form, the same with Kennedy, to lower initiates it was because of the policies he was pursuing, to the highest initiates it was a ritual known as the killing of a King, and a Catholic King at that.
The final sequence of events which led to her ritual murder involves at almost every turn, the man called Mohamed Al Fayed, the Egyptian former owner of Harrods, which just happens to be the shop for the top of the social strata, he is also do not forget, the father of one of the other victims of this ritual killing. It makes sense that Fayed’s role in this aftermath is as it is. What I mean by this is that many people high in British society see Al Fayed as an enemy of the establishment, proved with his long battle with Lonrho tycoon and mass murderer in Africa, Tiny Roland. This works into the psyche of people who would believe it is him and only him who is trying to keep the conspiracy alive, and of course those who also believed it to be murder, would, they hope, join with him, which would give the elite a line in yo the many who believe the same. Fayed would ensure the conspiracy stays within the boundaries of the hu ha already released through the TV and media, and no other information would come out via the elite controlled leader in all things conspiracy…. Mr Al Fayed.
It’s the Nick Brown tactic used in the top up fees debate only this time while you the people hold on to the truth of Diana’s death, Al Fayed will continue to weep for them and claim conspiracy, yet as the feelings of this event wane, he will be seen to be defeated (now accomplished) which in the minds of the sick creatures should finally bring into form the symbolism of the four black swans; sealed never to return.
During the takeover of Harrods there was a Department of Trade and Industry inquiry, but the lies so easily spewed from Al Fayed and the elites ability to gag the press, that as far as the press is concerned, “lies are the truth and the truth is a lie.
The report also added he had lied about his background, claiming to be from a wealthy family, when he was not. This man wouldn’t know the truth if it smacked him in the mouth. Al Fayed’s main media mouthpiece is the Daily Mirror, and when he was editor, Piers Morgan was the man who would interview Al Fayed every time.
This for me explains how important it is for the establishment to have all believe Fayed is against them, even Morgan was used perhaps without his knowledge to add to this deceit, in that when he was fired those at higher level of society would believe it to be because of his ties with Fayed.
In presenting himself as an anti establishment figure, the elite control both truth and the lie as they are presented through the TV and media, suggesting the role as given to an initiate having sacrificed his son as the Old Testament demands.
Al Fayed is well known as a sexual deviant, and has escaped prosecution for a growing number of sexual assaults on female staff working at Harrods. One girl Samantha Jane Ramsey, said, when she complained to her supervisor that she had been groped by Al Fayed, the supervisor sighed, “another one”. She was sacked for making the complaint which he does to all those who speak out about his molestation and style of business management. John Monks the general secretary of the Trades Union Congress, stated, “There was a regime of fear and terror”.
When Samantha Jane took her complaint to the local Marylebone Police Station, she said that the officer told her : “you are not the first to come to us. We have files inch’s high on Mr Al Fayed, but no proof, it would be your word against his”. What garbage, if this was you or I, we would be on the sex register pronto especially given the fact ‘he is supposed to be against the establishment, they would have him quick smart. This shows beyond reasonable doubt that Fayed operates for an agenda of the establishment.
With this in mind what I would ask you to consider is that this man was in total control of all security on the day and night of the 31st August 1997…
Al Fayed become close to the Spencer family through Diana’s father, Earl ‘Johnny’ Spencer, and stepmother Raine. He helped Johnny through financial difficulties and said he considered the Earl to be a brother. He had given Raine whom Diana could not stand, a place on the Harrods board. Al Fayed sponsored prestigious royal events like the Royal Windsor Horse Show and polo competitions, but he especially made sure he supported the charities and causes of the Princess.
Bob Loftus, the head of security at Harrods between 1987 and 1996, told Channel 4 programme, ‘dispatches, in June 1998 that he was ordered to tell Al Fayed immediately if Diana came into the store. Al Fayed would then go to the department where she was shopping and ‘accidentally meet her. Every Christmas a green Harrods van would call at Diana’s home, Kensington Palace, with gifts for her and the boys from ‘uncle Mohamed’.
When you look at all the evidence, he made it his business to court the friendship of the Princess of Wales in every way possible. On June 3rd 1997, he invited her to join him for a summer holiday at his beach-side villa in San Tropez in the South of France. On June 11th he got the breakthrough he had worked so hard for, she accepted. The following day he completed the purchase of a £15 million yacht, the Jonikal, through his (or rather the Sultan of Brunei’s) Bermudan company Mohafa Shipping. This was the boat on which Diana and Dodi’s relationship would blossom. On July 11th Diana arrived in San Tropez with her sons, William and Harry, to stay in the eight-bedroomed luxury apartment on the ten acre Al Fayed estate on the exclusive Le Parc development. At this time Dodi was still at his apartment in Paris with his fiancée Kelly Fisher, the American model.
The 41 year old Dodi was a ‘gofer’ for his father and lived on his father’s wealth, although he had enjoyed some success in the movie industry at one time as the hands off producer of the British film Chariots of Fire, again thanks to his father’s money. He had a playboy reputation and was a very big spender, famously running up a $100.000 bill in two months on his Amex card. He was dominated by his father and even in his film operation every decision had to be approved by his father. Dodi did whatever his father told him to do. He had been engaged to Kelly Fisher for eight months and she was expecting to spend her holiday on the Jonikal, but on the evening of July 14th, Dodi took a phone call from his father who ordered him to go immediately to San Tropez to be with Diana. Kelly Fisher describes what happened next in an interview with the Dispatches programme:
“Dodi said he was going to London and he’d be back and then we were going to San Tropez. That evening he didn’t call me and I finally got him on his portable phone. I said Dodi where are you? And he said he was in London. I said ‘Ok’, I’ll call you right back at your apartment. He said No, no, don’t call me back. So I said ‘Dodi where are you?’ and he admitted he was in the South of France. His father had asked him to come down and not bring me, I know now.”
Two days later Dodi sent a private plane to fly Kelly to San Tropez. But while he stayed with Diana, Kelly was kept aboard another Al Fayed boat. “I’m sitting here stuck” she said. “So he had me in my little boat cage and he was, I know now, seducing Diana.” On July 31st, Diana returned to San Tropez for a second holiday with Dodi, this time alone. Kelly Fisher was back in Los Angeles preparing for her marriage to Dodi which she said was due to take place on August 9th. But two days before that, the story broke in the worlds media of the romance between Diana and Dodi. Kelly heard from a friend who saw a picture in the paper, she recalls :
“I started calling him in London because at this time I was expecting his arrival in a day. I called his private line, but there was no answer, so then I called the secretary and asked to speak to him and she wouldn’t put me on. So Mohamed got on and in so many horrible words told me never to call back again. I said ‘he’s my fiancé, what are you talking about? He hung up on me and I called back and the secretary said don’t ever call here again, your calls are no longer to be put through. It was so horrible.”
At this stage Diana had Kensington Palace swept constantly for bugging devices set by the intelligence operations, this on the advice of her body guards, and for the irony, she now placed herself in the hands of a man obsessed with bugging and video recording of all people around him. The Al Fayed villa in San Tropez was bugged, as were all properties and vehicles within the clutches of Fayed and his personal army of security. Everything Diana said while in the hands of this man was heard. Bob Loftus, the former head of security at Harrods said the bugging at Harrods was ‘a very extensive operation’ and was always under the direction of Al Fayed.
Henry Porter, the London editor of the magazine Vanity Fair, had spent two years investigating Al Fayed and he said they came across his obsessive use of eavesdropping devices to tape telephone calls, bug rooms, and film people. Through mutual friends, Porter warned Diana about Al Fayed’s background and activities “Because we thought this was quite dangerous for her for obvious reasons”. But Diana apparently felt she could handle it and although she knew Al Fayed could “sometimes be a rogue”, he was no threat to her, she thought. She apparently told friends, “I know he’s naughty, but that’s all.” The Dispatches programme said they had written evidence that Al Fayed bugged the Ritz hotel and given his background and the deals that are hatched at the Ritz, it would be staggering if he did not. Kelly Fisher said that the whole time she was in Fayed property; she just assumed everything was bugged. It was known, she said, and Dodi had told her everywhere was bugged. She went on, “as a matter of fact, when I confronted him about Diana, he said, “I can’t talk to you on the phone.” He said, “I’ll talk to you in LA”. I knew what that meant”. Diana was under the protection of the Al Fayed security machine and even her most private conversations were being monitored. Diana went with Dodi to Al Fayed’s Elizabethan-style mansion called Barrow Green Court at Oxted in Surry, formerly owned by fellow Satanist Lord McAlpine. Throughout the house Al Fayed had placed statues of semi naked Greek Goddesses. One can see the symbolism with this ritual beginning.
On August 21st, despite Henry Porter’s warning, Diana returned once again to San Tropez for another holiday with Dodi. Al Fayed was milking the situation, briefing journalists and photographers, also enlisting the advice of the publicist Max Clifford.
After the announcement by ex Metropolitan police commissioner Lord Stevens, on Thursday 14th December 06, that the death of Diana was an accident, we had once again Max Clifford dragged out on the TV to operate for Al Fayed, see the game people, don’t let Al Fayed and his merry bunch hijack the conspiracy or allow Fayed to become ‘Nick Brown’, they will lead ultimately down a path of even more confusion than is already existent, that is the plan. The Al Fayed machine was leaking the couple’s whereabouts to ensure maximum publicity. Al Fayed complained after the crash that photographers and journalists would not leave Diana alone, that statement given the circumstances, beggars belief, yet as always the elite make use of every possible outcome of all events they manipulate, and this was an attempt to instil the anti stalking laws to prevent journalists and investigators from tracking the movements of elite operatives, they use most proficiently ‘celebrities’ to instil this agenda. The Diana Dodi romance by this time was in full swing, with Al Fayed forcing Dodi to intensify the relationship. What Al Fayed said, Dodi did. Nothing was left to chance. Diana’s favourite music, the theme from the English Patient, was played over and over as the couple cruised on the Jonikal. Diana and Dodi had much In common, both had been born into wealthy families and there fathers were distant figures. Both had experienced the breakdown of their parents marriages as their mothers left home. They even attended finishing schools in close proximity to each other in Switzerland. But we should not rule out the possibility of mind manipulation being used on both parties. My own experience of such manipulation would conclude outright, this to be the case. One of the main abilities created via mind control techniques is to make two people fall madly in love with each other, just look at the world of celebrity for the proof. Magic spells and black arts of all kinds are used in this way.
They tried this technique on me using a satanic female operative who out of no where gave me a kiss in a place well known to me as a satanic centre, of course me being me played along to see where it was to go, yet at no point did this spell work, which has been the case most often during my time around these black magicians, when they did, there was always another female to break the spell, thank goodness. Scientist Brian Desborough, states the feeling of being in love is dependant upon the brain producing Phenylethylamine.
This is a chemical which also diminishes the ability to discriminate effectively, hence the term ‘love is blind’. Production of this chemical is sustained by the release of endorphins, a naturally occurring chemical linked to memory, learning, pain suppression, sex drive and hormone regulation. If these chemicals can be stimulated in both parties they would instantly fall in love.
The talk of engagement I feel was rubbish, this whole escapade was to create the idea that something had to be done in that to have a Muslim as step father to the future King, was abhorrent. I suppose for some people this manipulation worked, but as stated the heart connection most had with Diana overwhelmed any backward thinking relating to any possible reasoning this had to be done. All who accepted this need to kill, would benefit to look hard at themselves, you are ill.
Diana and Dodi left the South of France from Olbia airport at 1.30pm on August 30th bound for Paris on Al Fayed’s gulfstream jet. They apparently intended to stay one night at Dodi’s apartment, which looks out on the Arc de Triomphe, before going on to London where Diana was due to meet her sons. The plane touched down at Le Bourget airport in Paris at 3.20 pm and they were met by 20 or so celebrity photographers known as the paparazzi (from the Italian word meaning buzzing insects). A Mercedes was waiting for the party and a green Range Rover was to follow on behind. This is normal security procedure and the very minimum you would expect to protect a Princess. With Diana and Dodi in the Mercedes was Dodi’s bodyguard, Trevor Reece Jones, the former 29 year old member of the Paras. Along with the SAS the Paras are the most highly trained regiment in the British forces. In the Range Rover was the driver Henry Paul, Al Fayed’s acting head of security at the Ritz, and another bodyguard, Kes Wingfield. They drove from the airport to the villa Windsor on the Bois de Boulogne, the former home of the Duke and Duchess of Windsor (formerly King Edward VIII who abdicated). Al Fayed stated he was to give this villa to the couple as a wedding gift, and that they were at the Villa discussing décor, but the bodyguard Kes Wingfield stated they were at the Villa Windsor no more than ten minutes. The whole idea of engagement and wedding was the fabrication of Al Fayed. From here they were driven to the Ritz hotel where they arrived at 4.20pm.
The Ritz (right) is in the Place Vendome and all around that square at the first floor level are the symbols of the Sun and the cross, very like the symbols used by the ancients to symbolise the ‘journey’ of the sun through the year.
This is very symbolic and is important within the full ritual that would end in their death. The same kind of symbolism was all around the final journey of JFK. These symbols relate to King Louis XIV, who was known as the Sun King. At his palace at Versailles in the 17th century he decorated rooms in honour of Apollo, the sun god, and Diana, the goddess of the moon. There was also a statue of the goddess Diana at Versailles.
In the centre of the Vendome Square is an immense pillar with the statue of Napoleon on the top mirroring the famous Nelson’s column in Trafalgar Square in London. Pillars of this type represent masculine energy, phallic symbolism.
Unusually Diana at this stage still had the same level of security she’d had since the airport. Usually security for VIP’s is increased beyond the airports with a request to the French High Protection Police Security Service (SPHP), but it was not requested. This meant that the whole security operation around Diana in Paris was under the control of Al Fayed and his people from start to finish. Had they requested the SPHP, they would both still be alive. The SPHP operate a car in front and behind, together with two motorcycle police on each side of the vehicle the VIP occupies. The cars are driven by professional drivers carrying armed security men.
According to reports immediately after the crash, which always give a truer account of both eye witnesses and footage, as was seen directly after 911, the SPHP made three possibly four, offers to protect Diana, each one refused by Dodi. Bet I know who told him to refuse? An officer of the SPHP told Dodi, “if you will not use our car, we recommend that two police cars accompany you on your excursions around the city.” This advice too was ignored. Diana and Dodi went straight to the $6000 a night 18th century Imperial Suite at the Ritz. The couple booked a table at the Chez Benoit restaurant for 8.45pm and they intended to spend the night at Dodi’s apartment. At 6.30pm Dodi went across the Place Vendome to a jeweller, Repossi, to buy a diamond ring for Diana which was later delivered to the Ritz. A little after 7pm, the couple were driven in the Mercedes along the Champs Elysees to Dodi’s apartment on Rue Arsene-Houssaye close to the Arc de Triomphe. Here they unpacked and prepared for dinner. Again the back up Range Rover was there and so was another car carrying bodyguards for added protection. Why was this level of security thought necessary in the evening, but not in the early hours of the morning at the time of the crash? Dodi’s apartment is known as the Etoile flat, after the Place de L’Etoile, the Sun or the Star circle road around the Arc de Triomphe. The route they took to the apartment was out of the Place Vendome onto the Rue de Rivoli, and half way round the Place de la Concorde they turned right into the Champs Elysees and drove straight up that famous avenue to Dodi’s apartment. See below:
The journey taken to Dodi’s apartment during the early evening of August 30th is marked by the white line. It is a straightforward journey; why then in the early hours of August 31st did they take the ludicrous detour to the Pont de L’Alma tunnel? If it was to avoid the paparazzi, one would think you would still go the shortest journey and not a journey whereby the paparazzi had plenty of time to find and follow.
Remember that route, it is critically important. As they arrived at the apartment at 7.15 pm, bodyguards were seen to rush from their car to hold back six paparazzi. Diana and Dodi became concerned about eating at the unprotected Chez Benoit restaurant and decided to head back to the Ritz to eat. They took the same route back, down the Champs Elysees and around the Place de La Concorde. There is much more traffic in the early evening than in the early hours, there would have been better reason to avoid the same route at this point than in the early hours. The couple with bodyguards Wingfield and Rees-Jones, walked into the Ritz captured by the now famous video pictures, at 9.47pm, also at this time the paparazzi gather in numbers outside amid rumours of an engagement announcement.
The fact we know Al Fayed himself was manipulating the press all that day and evening, it is obvious to me the build up of the press was what he wanted. Why? To create the tale of marriage to enable the elite to change the route in the early hours because of the discomfort for Diana Al Fayed had created in his press leaks and manipulation, and because the Windsor’s foolishly believed this nation loved them, hoping it would seem reasonable to kill her save having a Muslim at the heart of the establishment, and no big deal. This of course before they realised in the heart connected outpouring of the world for Diana after the event. How out of touch they realised they are in that time. This more than anything else terrified the Windsor’s and the elite in general. The Crown is the enemy of humankind do not lose sight of this fact as they force upon the world the New World Order which serves not the human race but the Crown.
The Ritz security video also identified a number of people who had been outside among the onlookers for most of the day and were still there on the edge of the crowd.
Now the plot seriously thickens. After speaking on the phone with his father who was at his estate in Oxted, Surry, Dodi Fayed announced a quite ludicrous plan. To avoid the paparazzi, the Mercedes that had been transporting them all that day together with the back up Range Rover were to be taken around the front of the hotel and used as a decoy for the paparazzi. At the same time another Mercedes would be brought around the back entrance of the hotel to whisk the couple away to the apartment on the Champs Elysees. Henry Paul, the 41 year old acting head of security at the Ritz, was called on his mobile phone by Dodi and told to report back to the hotel. He went off duty at 7pm and by the time he returned it was 10pm. No one has established were Paul was in those three hours. Dodi said that his father, Mohamed Al Fayed, had personally authorised that Henri Paul should drive the Mercedes. What we are seeing here is that the whole of the changed plan was given to Dodi as full and complete orders from his father, those who know Al Fayed would be astonished if this was not the case, Dodi did not think or act for himself ever. Henry Paul was not a qualified chauffeur and had no hire car permit.
L. Fletcher Prouty
L. Fletcher Prouty, a former Colonel in the US Air force who worked closely with the intelligence agencies, once said :
“No one has to direct an assassination – it happens. The active role is played secretly by permitting it to happen. This is the greatest single clue. Who has the power to call off or reduce the usual security precautions?”
If we apply Prouty’s rule to the ritual killing of Diana, and asked who had the power. and used that power… to reduce the usual security precautions for Diana that night, we have a rather interesting answer: Mohamed Al Fayed. Given these circumstances he must answer the obvious question :
why was this security reduced?
When JFK was assassinated, there were no bodyguards standing on his car which is the usual protocol, they were instead on the car immediately behind. When Martin Luther King was assassinated the black police officer In charge of security for King was sent home against his will before the shooting.
When Bobby Kennedy was assassinated, again the security arrangements were tampered with in that he was to walk of the stage and exit through the crowd, but his aids told him to exit via the kitchen, and was met by Sirhan Sirhan, who had been on a Rosicrucian mind expansion course in the weeks before the murder (mind control course more like in which he was the victim). Frank Mankiewics, the aid who guided Bobby into the kitchen was a former public relations man for the Mossad front in America, the Anti Defamation League. Interestingly this same chap turned up as head of publicity for the Oliver Stone movie JFK, which was supposed to be an exposé the assassination of Jack Kennedy. So to apply Prouty’s rule to all assassinations, you get the picture without necessarily requiring the long winded details.
With Diana we have last minute changes to the security arrangements, change of cars and removal of the Range Rover with no back up support whatever, then a change to the route, all on the orders of Mohamed Al Fayed, a man obsessed with security at least for himself! Bob Loftus, the former head of security at Harrods, said :
“Compared with the protection that Al Fayed affords himself, which is very professional, of a very high standard; that which is afforded to the mother of the future King of England was a Mickey Mouse operation.”
He added that “Al Fayed was absolutely paranoid about his personal protection.” Just for him to walk around his own store, there would be three or four plain clothes members of his personal protection team who travelled with him all the time, plus another four uniformed security who would act as ‘outriders’ to create two rings of security around him, that’s in his own store! One could ask is it paranoia which I see as another form of awareness, the worse it is the denser the energies are around you, or is it the knowledge of the seedy cesspit world of arms dealing and being part of the elite in general, to which Al fayed, is involved. Of course his fantasies of grandeur must also play a part in this!
Al Fayed in the main, recruits former members of the SAS and the Parachute Regiment for his close security, which makes good sense apart from the fact that their loyalties belong to the Crown, always. He uses the elite operation, Control Risks, to make recommendations. Tom Bower tells in his book about AL Fayed of how armed guards at the Oxted estate hide behind bushes wearing full combat uniform and blacked out faces.
Whenever Al Fayed travelled in his Mercedes there was always a back up Range Rover carrying emergency medical equipment and security staff, yet he withdrew that protection from Diana and his son. More than that a new car was introduced for her, another Mercedes which was sent to the rear entrance to the Ritz, supplied by a car hire company called Etoile Limousines, the same name as Dodi’s flat. Etoile Limousines is based at the Ritz and depends for its entire income on contracts with the hotel and its guests. In other words, it is controlled entirely by Mohamed Al Fayed or rather the Sultan of Brunei, that great friend to the House of Windsor and the Bush’s.
The new Mercedes was an S-280 lighter in weight than the 600 series they had used all day and without the dark tinted windows. Other cars where available, but this one was chosen instead. A director at Etoile, Niels Siegel, told the inquiry into Diana’s death that he delivered the car to the rear entrance of the Ritz, but the dispatches programme shows that this is a lie. It was delivered by a driver called Frederic Lucard and he can be seen doing so on the security video. Lucard said he found it was very strange that Etoile would allow Henry Paul, a man not qualified as a chauffeur, to drive one of their cars. So why did they do it? Because Mohamed Al Fayed told them to, obviously. Brian Dodd, the former Head of Security for Al Fayed in the 1980’s, gave his assessment of the situation to dispatches :
“It’s a new car that has come into the system. They wouldn’t have had time to check that car out. It should have been checked out. There could have been a bomb on that car, for instance. It was a most stupid plan. It shouldn’t have even been considered. The back up vehicle is there, not just to avert the paparazzi, but for instance, a motor cyclist with a pillion rider to pull up and shoot, or put a magnetised bomb on top of the car. God only knows. (I think we all know why)
“I had probably six or eight men I would consider professional bodyguards who I would have had on that job and Trevor Rees-Jones and Kes Wingfield, after what I have seen happened, would not have been in Paris that night.”
The Mercedes with Henry Paul (below) at the wheel sped off from the rear entrance of the Ritz at 12.20 am with Paul telling the paparazzi not to bother following because they would never catch him. Diana and Dodi were in the back seat and in the front was Trevor Rees-Jones, the former Para, with the reputation for being fearless. Rees-Jones says he disagreed with the change of plan. He was not wearing a seat belt which is normal practice in built up areas because body guards need to be free to react quickly. The car was driven at speed down the Rue Cambon and turned right down the Rue de Rivoli into the Place de la Concorde where it stopped briefly at the lights.
The paparazzi photographer, Romuald Rat, on the back of the motorcycle drew up alongside them here, but he says that Henry Paul jumped the lights on red and headed onto the dual carriageway along side the river Seine called the Cours la Reine. The car went down one tunnel, came back to the surface, and almost immediately went down into the short tunnel at the Pont de L’Alma. Here it went out of control and struck the 13th pillar in the centre of the tunnel which is lined with concrete pillars unprotected by crash barriers. Henry Paul and Dodi Fayed died immediately.
According to the autopsy report Diana was clinically dead within 20 minutes and this was long before she arrived at the hospital. Trevor Rees-Jones survived the crash because he was wearing his seat belt and Diana and Dodi were not. This could be highly significant. Rees-Jones was not wearing his seat belt when they left the Ritz in accordance with normal practice for body guards, and when Romuald Rat took a photograph at the lights at the Place de la Concorde, Rees-Jones still did not have a seat belt on. But a little more than a minute later when the car struck the pillar, he was wearing a seat belt. Why? If he donned the seat belt because for some reason he sensed danger, why did he not scream at Diana and Dodi to put their seat belts on? After all it only takes a second and this was his sole reason for being in the car, to protect the two in the back. Rees-Jones has some serious questions to answer here and he is giving none and continues to give none. Rees-Jones stated he didn’t know why he strapped himself in. all he says is they were followed by two cars one of them white and a motor cycle, these answers fit within the smokescreen. I watched the news reports just after the crash for the whole day too, I definitely saw two people, a man and a woman who were together, state that the white car was parked in the tunnel, and that from this car came a massive flash. These two people were shown stating this quite a few times, then never again. This for me is the only reason they incorporated the white car in the official version, yet slowly changed in relation to its position to further the idea it was the paparazzi to blame. After the crash neither a single TV nor tabloid report showed the detour from the route they had taken twice that day from the Ritz to Dodi’s flat and back again. This detour was not at all in the first reports; it was only after researchers brought this to our attention that they incorporated it into the ‘Official’ version of what happened. As already stated, why did they take this detour when to travel to Dodi’s flat you travel to the Place de la Concorde and, half way round, you turn right into the Champs Elysees and drive straight up to Dodi’s flat? To go a longer way gives the paparazzi even more time to hound you and more time for them to arrive outside Dodi’s flat?
The one thing this alternative route ensures is that they went through the Pont de L’ Alma tunnel the relevance of which will become apparent via occult knowledge later.
In the same way as with Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan, and James Earl Ray, Henry Paul is the scapegoat. Once the paparazzi card had been played and focused media and public attention to the story in the days after the crash, they stick to it like a mantra, the same with the 911 story, the Russian building bombing, they tell us what happened and keep on telling the same fairy story over and over again. It was announced that Henry Paul was three to four times over the limit, and that his blood contained traces of anti-depressant drugs, including Fluoxetine, the active ingredient of Prozac. “The cause of the crash was simple” so we are told again and again, “the driver was drunk”. Tampering with blood samples or incorporating alcohol in the blood is child’s play especially when everything is being carried out in the strictest secrecy, the insertion of tiny balloons which release alcohol into the blood stream in stages. There was certainly no sign of inebriation as he drove away from the Ritz, and it has been exposed that there was a chap died that day who did have all the symptoms in his blood they attribute to Henry Paul, this man committed suicide by sticking a hose from the exhaust into the car.. According to his blood tests, he drank the equivalent of eight scotches on an empty stomach. A behavioural psychologist on the ITV documentary, Diana – Secrets of the Crash, could find no evidence that he was drunk after studying the Ritz videos of him that night, but there could be an explanation to this we shall look at later. Only two days earlier, Paul had undergone a rigorous medical for the renewal of his pilot’s licence and there was no sign of the alcohol abuse the post crash propaganda claimed, one of his close friends has also stated he was no big drinker. There was another strange anomaly revealed by the ITV documentary in 1998. The Haemoglobin in Henry Paul’s blood was found to contain 20.7% carbon monoxide and this would have been at a much higher level earlier because the carbon monoxide content halves every four to five hours once exposure to it has stopped. Haemoglobin carries the oxygen. Debbie Davis of the carbon Monoxide Support Group said that with these levels in his blood, Henry Paul would not have known his left hand from his right, because of the reduced oxygen reaching the brain. Dr Alistair Hay, an expert in carbon monoxide poisoning, agreed and could not explain why Paul showed no signs of the considerable symptoms that should have been evident:
“I find it difficult to rationalise everything. A blood carbon monoxide level of 20% and a high blood alcohol level suggests this would be someone with a much slower reaction time, certainly be someone who would be slowed up in the way he did things, would probably also be somebody who was in some pain, but none of those things appear to be evident from the pictures that we see of him. It’s a bit of an enigma.”
There is a lot more to know about Henry Paul. His best friend, Claude Garrec, told the ITV documentary that Paul had contacts with the French and foreign intelligence services and maintained them throughout his time at the Ritz. This is no surprise because the intelligence agencies recruit the security men for the top hotels, and the Ritz, with its VIP clientele and reputation for espionage and arms dealing would have been a prime target. Paul certainly had unexplained sources of income. He earned around £20-25.000 a year at the Ritz and yet he was a keen pilot with 605 hours of flying time at about £300 per hour. He had a string of bank accounts; there were two in a bank outside Paris and three accounts, plus a safe deposit box, at the Banque Nationale de Paris near the Ritz. He had three accounts at the nearby branch of Barclays and one current and four deposit accounts at the Caisse D’Epargne de Paris. In the eight months before the crash, sums of £4000 were paid into an account here on five separate occasions. In total he had £122.000 (1.2 million Francs) and no one knows where it came from. Then there is the question of where Paul was in the three hours between 7pm when he went off duty and 10pm when Dodi called him on his mobile and told him to return to the Ritz. His whereabouts in this period are a mystery, a very significant mystery at that.
To understand how the Illuminati operates requires detailed research over a vast array of interconnecting subjects. Everything from ancient history, but especially relating to satanic symbolism and ritual, the Earth’s magnetic grid, the power of the sun, the banking system, and mind control, all these subjects I have breached with you in this operation. Hopefully you will be able to grasp the occult knowledge thus given in order you can better understand the ritual sacrifice of the Queen of Hearts. When you consider all the journalists that have produced articles and documentaries about the crash are operating without the knowledge of the occult, it makes the whole reality of conspiracy a mystery because of course they are dealing with only half of the picture and thus mystery surrounds the event, they only operate with information within the five sense reality. This is the same with all major events throughout history, only to initiates is the true picture of man clear and true. When you deal within the five sense reality you are unable to see that there are organisations within organisations which give the ability for one force to operate through apparently unconnected agencies like British and French intelligence, the Paris Police and medical services, and most importantly of all, the inquiry investigating the cause of the crash.
In Britain we had an investigation into the crash by John Stalker, the former deputy chief constable of Greater Manchester police in which he dismissed all idea that Diana was murdered. Ironically, Stalker claimed, quite rightly, that he was the victim of a conspiracy to remove him from the police force after he identified a policy by the Northern Ireland police, the RUC, to shoot people they believed to be terrorists and ask questions later. This was the so-called shoot to kill policy. In the late 1990’s the chosen property of the local elite to inflict their arts against me was in Manchester road Baxenden. It was a cottage situated over an underground river, the property number added to 13, (the point at which consciousness determines the physical reality). With the rushing water and the house number made this property a major point of energy and was chosen by the Freemasons to act as a vortex to ensure I became ritually plugged into the Illuminati vibration. Just a few houses up from this cottage, was a large detached property in which lived a scapegoat from this Stalker affair. This man lived in absolute fear of his former colleagues, and died not to long ago.
They then tried to re-manoeuvre the situation to another property this time a flat in the centre of Accrington town centre. In this flat they tried there best to have me sorted, but again they were unsuccessful. It was during these periods they used Bradford also to attempt their machinations against me.
Pushing aside every suggestion of conspiracy to kill Diana, Stalker asked; “Why would the French want to cover up the murder of an English woman?” well I think I answered that in an earlier phase in showing how the British and French elite operate together using the takeover of the USA as the example. You can see that operatives at Stalkers level understand nothing save the illusory outer circle knowledge within Freemasonry, nor do they understand the true nature of the Crown. At the same time Stalker did ask some very pertinent questions about the crash and its aftermath; “why was the Fayed security around the princess reduced to one wholly inadequate man with no back up? Why did the police not appeal for help from the public? Why was there no post mortem-autopsy on Dodi Fayed’s body?” I would offer this answer to Mr Stalker, “because it is one hall of a conspiracy, one that dwarfs your knowledge of the conspiracy against yourself when you where removed.”
I have already breached the subject of mind control throughout this work, because it is essential to understand the occult knowledge and potential of it to be used in such operations, I will offer some examples to better help you realise its operational use.
In the 1980’s the best part of 30 scientists working on top secret projects, mostly computer programmers, died in very strange and unexplained circumstances. Marconi was the major company involved, but there were others like Plessey and British Aerospace. In 1986, Vimal Dajibhai, who was working for Marconi Underwater Systems, drove from London to Bristol, a city with which he had no connection, and threw himself off the famous suspension bridge there. A few months before, Arshad Sharif, a computer programmer with Marconi Defence Systems, also drove from London to Bristol and hanged himself. Why Bristol? Bristol is a former Knights Templar port and before that a Phoenician port. Its name has evolved from Barati; the Phoenician goddess. It just so happens that an elite unit of British intelligence called the Committee of 26 is based there and they use the runway of the British Aerospace complex to fly British and foreign agents in and out of the country. In that period of the 1980’s there were strange deaths galore of people at the cutting edge of development in the defence industries.
What possesses a man to get into his car, drive more than two hours to the Bristol suspension bridge, and jump off?
A CIA scientist told a researcher he was put through forms of mind control to stop him recalling his knowledge once a project was completed. To give another example, one which is similar to the situation in Paris: David Sands was a highly skilled scientist working on a very sensitive area of defence, but at 37 he was talking about leaving the industry and changing his lifestyle. (Never tell anyone what you propose to do, just do it). He was happily married with two small children, a son aged six and a three year old daughter. Sands and his wife had just returned from an enjoyable holiday in Venice when he died in mysterious circumstances, although they are not so mysterious when you understand mind control. He worked for Easams who in turn, were operating contracts for the Ministry of Defence. It appears that while Sands and his wife were in Venice, the company was visited by members of the elite British police unit, the Special Branch.
Then, on Saturday March 28th 1987, David Sands told his wife he was going out to refuel the car, but he didn’t return for six hours. No one has any idea where he was. His wife Anna called the police and Constable John Hiscock was at the house when Sands returned at 10.20pm. Asked the obvious question; “where have you been?” he said he had been driving and thinking. His wife said it was out of character for him to be away for so long and she didn’t think he realised how long he had been out. He seemed confused, but happy, she said. Two days later, on Monday, March 30th, he climbed into his excellently maintained Austin Maestro and began his regular journey from his home in Itchen Abbas, near Winchester, to Easams at Camberley in Surrey. His wife said there was nothing unusual about his demeanour or behaviour and driving conditions were good. But about 30 minutes into his journey when David Sands was driving along the A33 at Popham, near Basingstoke, he suddenly did a U-turn across the dual carriageway and headed at high speed in the opposite direction to his destination. Turning onto a slip road at about 80 miles an hour, sands then drove his car straight into a disused café building killing himself in an explosion of flame. There were no skid marks; he had not even tried to stop. When you understand the methods of mind programming, an initiate would know that in the time he was missing, he had his mind re-programmed to act in a certain way with some kind of trigger, which could be a word via mobile phone, a particular sign or symbol on the road, a particular sound, a light or some kind of action outside of his vehicle. Whatever was programmed into his mind would be activated via one of these methods. At that point he would have switched from his normal self to a man focused only to driving into the café building being unaware of the consequences. In effect the subconscious programming overpowers the conscious mind and the programme takes over to replace the human. This can also be achieved via attachment to your electromagnetic field (Aura) of an entity which forces a play into your subconscious which you then carry out against your conscious intention…casting a spell. This is operated within the Special Forces, to turn humans into killing machines.
In the three hours Henry Paul went missing, this programming or possession, is what any initiate would know to have happened to him in Paris. This is the occult or hidden reason and not a coincidence, that Henry Paul drove into the 13th pillar in the Pont de L’Alma tunnel in Paris. The elite networks of which Al Fayed played a major role were operating through many agencies to ensure Diana was in Paris that night, because at its foundation, the plan was to perform a specific satanic ritual of the utmost calibre under which the timing and circumstances and the place of death had to be arranged in intricate detail. Diana was under Fayed’s security web for much of the time leading up to the crash and all of the time during the last few days.
_________________ KEEP IT REAL
Last edited by Life on Sun Jun 05, 2011 11:15 am; edited 1 time in total
Joined: 11 Nov 2008 Posts: 558 Location: Lancashire
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 11:15 am Post subject:
Continued
All her conversations were heard and monitored throughout the Al Fayed bugging system, so if Al fayed was, as he claims a victim of the elite, why does he not publish them? During those missing hours, Henry Paul, the asset of British and French intelligence would have had the final aspect of his programming set into place on top of the full programming already placed in there. Diana’s ritual death was arranged from the very top of the Illuminati, the Queen Mother being the chieferoony, Prince Philip at the time was subordinate to her, Al Fayed for all his wealth is nothing other than a puppet of the Black Magicians carrying out his role as dictated by the Illuminati, himself probably never aware of the full consequences of his role save through hindsight.
The Mercedes brought to the back of the Ritz had itself been stolen some weeks earlier – before the Diana Dodi relationship began, stolen from Etoile Limousines, and when it was recovered from the theft it underwent extensive repairs. It had been standing outside the exclusive Taillevent restaurant when the driver’s door was flung open and the chauffeur pulled out by three Arabic-speaking men with handguns. The vehicle was missing for two weeks and when it was found the wheels were missing, the door ripped off, and the electronic system and equipment controlling the braking system, had gone. This car would have been written off by any insurance company, but of course this was the cover for the extensive Illuminati repairs which would install remote control and much other electronic wizardry. Al Fayed controls the Etoile Limousine company which supplied the vehicle, is it any wonder the French authorities refused the offer by experts at Mercedes to examine the car after the crash?
When Henry Paul came back on duty that night he seemed his normal self to most observers.
The programming lies deep within the psyche until the arranged trigger which would have activated his fast driving and route change. We have already seen the technology relating to remote control with its use by the American Airliners for the event 911; it would make more sense that this was the real cause of precision 13th pillar direct hit with the loss of brakes too. It does come back to the white car which in the first reports was clearly stated to have been parked in the tunnel and not as they now claim, travelling in the tunnel in the same direction. From this car came a white flash and I would strongly suggest those within this car where operating the remote control, it could even have been a computer controlled precision operation from this white vehicle. Then the cover for the white flash is simple, the paparazzi did it. The reason I have written the number 13 in bold, is to show how often in the occult numerology it enters this ritual, because it has massive significance to the elite and it would be essential to the ritual for the car to hit the 13th pillar because this marks the centre of the ancient spot of worship to the dark aspect of the goddess, Hecate. The tunnel itself would have been constructed in this way. Diana had an aversion to the number 13; she would not allow a thirteenth lot in her dress auction at Christies in the June before she died.
A chap named Mark Phillips helped to de-programme a mind controlled victim named Cathy O’ Brien, who was a mind controlled slave operating for the CIA. This woman has detailed many incidents involving father George Bush, Bill Clinton Gerald Ford, Dick Cheney and many others, who systematically sexually brutalised her and her daughter for many years.
Mark Phillips has worked in these fields for many years, in fact most of his adult life; he states it is absolutely possible to have programmed Henry Paul to have actually hit the 13th pillar with precision without the need for remote control.
Personally having studied the remote control technology available to Intelligence, I am compelled to see it as the Modus Operandi for the crash, but I keep an open mind. To further re-enforce the remote aspect I will offer this:
Randulph Fiennes, famous for his Polar Expeditions, was an officer in the Royal Scots Greys and attached to the elite SAS. He wrote a book about a secret group of assassins called the clinic and how they murdered people while making it look like an accident. The death of Major Michael Marman is particularly relevant to what I would suggest happened in Paris. He was driving a Citroen “CV along the A303 near Stonehenge in November 1986 when a BMW coming the other way careered across the carriageway and killed him instantly. Fiennes says that the BMW had been tampered with and the braking system was operated by remote control which could override the normal system via compressed air from a tiny scuba diving cylinder hidden in the engine compartment. (This is why in the main they use Mercedes and BMW’s for death on the road; there is a lot of space within the engine compartment to add such things as cylinders and such). The remote control equipment was operated from a Volvo which followed the BMW, Fiennes reported. The BMW was driven by Sir Peter Horsley, a retired Air Marshall, who survived the crash. Fiennes says that the Clinic knew that Horsley would be travelling along that road at the same time as their target. In his Autobiography, Sounds From Another Room, Horsley says that he was accelerating to about 60 miles an hour when the car began to react strangely. He saw a grey Volvo closing up quickly behind him and he was about to wave it past, his BMW spun sharply to the left, the brakes screeching, and then sharply to the right and back again. You will note this is remarkably similar to what happened to the Mercedes before it hit the 13th pillar, Horsley was desperately trying to maintain control, he went on:
“Out of the corner of my eye I saw the grey Volvo accelerating past me at high speed. My car had now developed a mind of its own as it swung broadside and skidded down the road. With a lurch it hit the central reservation mounted the grass verge separating the two lanes of the highway and crossed over into the opposite carriageway. I had just time to see a small car approaching from the opposite direction. I hit it sideways on with tremendous force. In a split second the drivers horror stricken face was visible and I heard his hoarse scream.”
So we can see in this event, the brakes, acceleration and steering where acting under remote control.
Whenever an assassination occurs in a public place, two things happen. The first thing is to name the ‘scapegoat’ or ‘patsy’. Then there are diversions galore created incorporating eye witness testimonies obviously because they have seen the light of day, but most importantly the tale they have pre-invented and made to seem reasonable in the planning. Once the initial reports have aired they have time then to either remove initial testimonies from the airwaves for good, or miss-use true testimonies to create false leads for investigators removing them from the line of truth.
In the first act of the play, they make an immediate arrest, or expose the person to blame, which cancels out further need for investigation, because we all know who is responsible?
The second act, diversion, ensures that in those critical hours and days after the event are wasted as people chase a mass of false leads and stories.
The next stage is, wait for the ‘Official investigation’. They have had the time to incorporate all that was picked up on, in the initial moments after the event, and to add them to the pre-planned version of events, and thus they give out the ‘Official version. This ‘Official version’ is then played like a mantra for months and months as they produce the evidence to fit with the ‘Official story. They then prevent via complete control at editor level anything other than the ‘Official version from seeing the light of day within the media and hey presto the event heads down in history as one of those mysteries.
After the murder of Diana it was made more difficult for the elite in the sense that they did not fully control ITV, and we had alternative points of view put out on the TV and then the media. They now stand in the position whereby they almost control all media and TV outlets in this nation, as they have accomplished in the USA completely.
With the most recent investigation carried out by former chief constable, Stevens, released in December 06, what baffles me is it claims to have interviewed 400 people!
What the hell were 400 people doing hanging around the Pont de L’Alma tunnel at 12.25 in the morning? There is nothing there save a maze of roads and tunnels and a couple of nearby restaurants. It is also strange that in the first couple of years after the event, there was never a mention of 400 witnesses, in fact to the contrary; there was a lack of credible witnesses. Although there did seem to be more than a believable amount of American so called witnesses. In the same way as 911 was cleared away so quickly, this scene of a major accident involving the most famous lady in the world was treated in less time than they clear up minor accidents in the UK! Of course this makes perfect sense when you consider as with 911, they were clearing up quick smart to prevent actual investigation into the incident. Everything relating to this murder stinks to high heaven.
Not only that, with the CCTV cameras being everywhere one would better accept this monumentus lie as possible had we witnessed the whole journey via the footage taken from these cameras. But of course when you are intelligence, controlling all personnel in all these organisations involved in the event, whichever city you may be in, you can get away with anything.
There are 17 cameras on the route between the Ritz and the Pont de L’Alma tunnel, including those inside the tunnel itself. What kind of idiots do they take us for in having us believe that on that particular night in only that particular part of Paris, the cameras were switched off!! On that alone anyone who involves themselves with the findings of all the inquiries had so far, and agrees with the findings, is either in, or so dementedly stupid, it beggars belief.
The cameras are controlled by the police and are powered by an independent power supply, yet they will not explain why the cameras were off in that particular place and time on that particular night. Never before has this happened in Paris. A letter to the Daily Mail said the cameras in the tunnel were pointing towards the wall in the morning after the crash. Without a doubt the police would have noticed this interrupted view to their own cameras?
Worse than that, at the same time as the journey and crash, all the police communication frequencies in central Paris went off! Simon Reagan in his book, Who Killed Diana, quotes a contact called Andre, who like many people enjoys listening to police radio messages. Andre was sitting on a bench near the Eiffel Tower, a few minutes walk from the tunnel, on the night Diana died. He was as is usual for him, using a receiver to monitor the police communications. But suddenly at 12.20am, all the lines went down. There was a radio blackout. It lasted for 20 minutes and then, Andre said, the signal came back and there was a mass of radio traffic as people all wanted to talk at once.
When the lines went down at 12.20am Diana was leaving the Ritz!
By the time they came back on Diana was lying in the tunnel under the complete control of the Emergency team and according to the autopsy report within a few minutes of clinical death. So at this point in the expose, according to the Stevens report, there is not a shred of evidence that there is a conspiracy surrounding the death of Diana, the true Queen of the peoples hearts, *.
Now we enter another vital point. According to a source from within British intelligence, causing the crash is easy for the powers involved, but of course you cannot be sure you will kill your target. Therefore you have your people controlling the medical team, because although your target hasn’t yet died, there is now a credible reason for them to do so. This I can vouch for. The first time this was attempted was against my wife, and involved the traveller I spoke about in an earlier phase. My wife was enticed to go to the girlfriend of this chap’s brother’s house.. They tried to poison my wife in order they could call an ambulance, which was manned by local satanic operatives. This failed. This was to be attempted again while we lived in my current area of Spring Hill. This time they had set one of the local operatives to petrol bomb my house, this was with all my children present in the house, again they would finish the job with the ambulance operatives. Remember also certain members of the police were involved in this.
I hope this helps you to understand that what I write about in this work relevant to the operations and methods of intelligence via their underworld networks, I have gained through extreme experience.
So the medical team’s job is to ensure the target does not survive, no matter what condition they are in after the incident. Even those who dismiss the idea Diana was murdered, question the astonishing delay in getting her to hospital, when according to the ‘Official’ medical reports, she was suffering from an injury that required urgent surgery. The Doctors say that the pulmonary vein had been ruptured near the heart and that this was filling her lungs with blood. So what they are saying here is that Diana was lying in the tunnel bleeding to death, if that is correct, the only way to save her life would be with immediate surgery. So why was it more than an hour and a half before she arrived at hospital?
Doctor Frederic Mailliez with an American ‘friend’ Mark Butt drove into the tunnel from the opposite direction. A private investigator has and is making extensive inquiries into Mailliez and Butt, so far his findings strongly suggest there is more to this pair than the elite would want you to know. The crash happened at 12.25am and by 12.26, Doctor Mailliez said he had seen the crushed Mercedes, stopped his car, turned on warning lights, run across to the Mercedes to establish there were two people dead and two alive, and had also rang the emergency services. This chap must be as fast as superman! He is one of 160 Parisian doctors who are on constant call for emergencies in hospitals and private homes as part of a French insurance system, SOS Medecins. He had treated accident victims many times when he was a member of SAMU the French emergency ambulance service. And yet a doctor on constant call for emergencies says all he had in his car to help Diana was an oxygen cylinder and mask! Mailliez was in control of Diana and her condition for the crucial 15 to 20 minutes before his former employers, the SAMU emergency team arrived to take over. He claims that Diana did not say anything to him, but this contradicts his comments to the London Times when he said she kept saying how much “she hurt” as he put a resuscitation mask over her mouth. Trevor Rees-Jones, the bodyguard, also says he has flashbacks of hearing a female voice calling out in the back of the car: “first it’s a groan, then Dodi’s name was called…And that can only be Princess Diana’s voice”, he told the Daily Mirror.
What does seem to be clear is that Diana was conscious when Mailliez arrived. He told the CNN chat show host, Larry King, that, “she looked pretty fine. But inside you know, the internal injury was already starting… its really funny. That’s the only part, where she was sitting, that’s the only part, which was still intact.” eh?
Mailliez on the one hand told a French medical magazine that; “I thought her life could be saved”, and yet said another time that “it was hopeless there was nothing we could do to save her.” He also told King that although Diana is the most photographed lady in the world, and, that the paparazzi were taking shots of her while he was with her in the tunnel, he had no idea that she was the Princess Diana until he saw the news reports the following morning. What kind of an idiot is this man, more to the point how stupid does he think you are? When the emergency team arrived, Mailliez says he left the scene because there was nothing more he could do. Confused, me too…
The official explanation for the incredible delay in taking Diana to hospital is that she was trapped in the wreckage. This is complete and utter bs. One of the ambulance crew told the French newspaper, La Parisien, that when he arrived Diana was lying with most of her body out of the car with her legs resting on the rear seat. “She was agitated, semi knocked out, but conscious… she was groaning and struggling feebly. She murmured “Oh my God” several times.” The Scotsman newspaper, in an investigation published on September 11th 1997, established that Diana was removed from the car shortly after the fire brigade arrived and the excuse of her being ‘trapped’ does not stand up. Another excuse for the delay is that the emergency doctors had to give her a blood transfusion. This again is a lie. SAMU teams do not carry blood transfusion equipment because they would not know the victims blood type. When the ambulance did leave the tunnel, the driver was ordered to go no faster than 25 miles an hour and some reports say it took as long as 40 minutes to cover the 3.7 miles to the La Pitie-Salpetriere. Four other hospitals quite capable of treating Diana were closer to the scene and the ambulance stopped twice on the way for ‘delicate interventions’, one of them within sight of the hospital.
Diana arrived at La Pitie-Salpetriere about 2.10am, an hour and 45 minutes after the crash happened. By any medical criteria whatsoever this delay is completely ludicrous, of course ludicrous unless it was supposed to be this way because they were performing horrendous occult practices. It doesn’t take a genius to see why, despite such apparent incompetence, there has been NO inquiry into the medical response that night, the answer in Stevens report stating they could not go at speed because of her injury, is absolute nonsense, 1 hour and 45 minutes?
Waiting at the hospital was a surgical team headed by Professor Brumo Riou, the duty surgeon who, we are told, first heard about the crash while doing his rounds, is that not a strange enough sentence, a renowned surgeon doing his rounds in the early hours of the morning? Never! Waiting with him when Diana arrived was professor Pierre Coriat, the head of anaesthetics, professor Alain Pavie, a chest and heart specialist, and professor Pierre Benazet, another experienced surgeon. They had been in telephone communication with the emergency team in the tunnel throughout. We are told they opened Diana’s chest cavity, repaired the vein, and battled to save her for an hour and a half before admitting defeat. This is remarkable because the autopsy report shows Diana was clinically dead at 12.45am while still lying in the tunnel. She was therefore clinically dead for an hour and 25 minutes before she even arrived at the hospital and for three hours before the professors walked out of the operating theatre to announce that she had died. Having the body examined at a location you control is vital in such assassinations. This similar game was played with JFK
So who was behind Diana’s assassination? Well of course those who gave the order and those who carried out the deed would be rather different. We are looking at the Illuminati here, a spider’s web, and while the order will have come from the spider or spiders in the centre, it in the main would have been carried out by flies. It is highly unlikely it would have been carried out by British intelligence directly, because of course that would be too obvious. Intelligence agencies subcontract the assassinations of their own citizens to put them at arms length from the incident and allow them to plausibly deny that they were responsible. Not only that, the nationality of the victim’s intelligence agency can be seen to be acting to find out who was responsible.
For instance, there is considerable evidence to show JFK was shot by members of an elite rifle team within the French intelligence called OAS, along with Israeli Mossad. Olof Palme, the Bilderberger Prime Minister of Sweden, was murdered in Stockholm in 1986 on the orders of among others, Father George Bush. The killing itself was carried out by members of BOSS, the South African intelligence agency.
I had members of BOSS around me late 1990’s, I wonder why? They continued to try and keep contact with me up to 2005. The British Foreign Office has its own assassination squad called Group 13, more than that British intelligence has a very long history of political and economic assassinations. British intelligence consists of MI5 – Military Intelligence Five, which is responsible officially for domestic intelligence security and MI6 which deals with overseas matters.
MI5 announced in 1998 that they do not assassinate people. No they hire other branches of the intelligence family to do it. This rather weak denial was prompted by the revelations of the former MI5 agent, David Shayler, who stated MI6 had organised a plot to assassinate Libya’s Colonel Gaddafi. The attempt had failed because the bomb had been put under the wrong car. Shayler was head of the ‘Libyan Desk’ at MI5 and was in the perfect position to know. Robin Cook, the then Foreign Secretary, stated, he had been assured that no such event took place. The Attorney General banned David Shayler from appearing on the ITV programme, Diana – Secrets of the crash.
We can look at the most likely organisation to have been involved in the Death of Diana at operational level. A secret group called the ‘Pinay Circle or Le Cercle’ which has among its ranks a number of British establishment figures. Le Cercle is an offshoot of the even more elite ‘Safari Club’, which was set up by Count Alexander de Maranches, the director during the 1970’s of the French Service for External Documentation and Espionage. It was the Safari Club that arranged for the alliance between a French intelligence front-company called ‘Group Bull’ and the computer giant Honeywell which is, you will be surprised to know, the worlds biggest manufacturer of landmines.
This alliance supplied landmines to both sides in the Bosnian conflict. The Safari Club began as a consortium of the secret police of the Shah of Iran called SAVAK, Saddam Hussein in Iraq, Anwar Sadat of Egypt and Saudi Arabian Intelligence. It has been involved in countless coups in Africa to further its goals and is heavily involved in the arms trade and supply. Out of the Safari Club came the Pinay Circle or Le Cercle, named after the French Prime Minister, Antoine Pinay, who attended the first Bilderberg meeting in Oosterbeek, Holland, in May 1954. Others involved with Le Cercle included the Habsburg family. To give you an idea of its make up and range of influence, the Le Cercle membership has included Nicholas Elliot, a department head at MI6; William Colby, a former director of the CIA; Colonel Botta of Swiss Military Intelligence; Stefano Della Chiaie, leading member of the Italian Secret Service; Giullo Andreotti, the former Italian Prime Minister from the notorious P2 Freemasonry Lodge and the man who gave the Mafia ‘Official Protection’; Silva Munoz, a former Minister for the fascist, Franco, in Spain and a member of the elite secret society, Opus Dei; Franz Josef Strauss, the German Defence Minister; and Monsignor Brunello, and agent to the Vatican. In America, one of the Le Cercle fronts is the CIA – backed Heritage Foundation in Washington. Just look at the potential for such an organisation to be the co-ordinating force between countless different agencies and countries, all aiming to a common operation. The Safari Club – Le Cercle network provides the Arab-British-French connection necessary to arrange for Diana to be in Paris at the right time, the security for her to be withdrawn, the assassination to be carried out, and most importantly, those involved to get away with it. So when you look again at the statement of outer initiate John Stalker, and his comment “why would the French want to cover up the murder of an English woman?” the answer is quite simple, because of Illuminated elite level interconnection via organisations such as the Safari Club and Le Cercle! Simon Regan in his book, who killed Diana?, says that it was Le Cercle that destabalised the Gough Whitlam government in Australia in 1975, and as already stated the Queen of England was involved in this too, via her control of her Governor of Australia, Philip Kerr, who removed Whitlam. If the Crown through the Windsor’s and Le Cercle worked together to bring down an elected Australian government, it’s a fact they would work together to eliminate Diana the peoples Princess?
When you study the history of assassination, Paris comes up as one of the major cities for assassination going back centuries. Amschel Rothschild from the English branch of the family was murdered there in 1996 in what many claim to have been part of an inter-Illuminati war which litters the history of the Illuminati. For an organisation like Le Cercle, or its many mirrors in London, it would have been very easy to place its people in the right places. Mohamed Al Fayed’s security operation is full of ex British elite military and police units, who know the consequences of saying NO. Remember all these operatives belong to the crown and certainly not to whichever individual company or organisation that would be foolish enough to hire them. To do so places a spy of the Crown directly into your company in which ever position you hire them. There will always be the exception, but for those who join the Field Lodges, the Oath continues into Civy Street.
If we look at Al Fayed’s personal investigation into Diana and Dodi’s death we find it was headed by Pierre Ottavoili, a former chief of the Criminal Brigade, the criminal investigation department of French police. This is the same organisation that is also responsible for the ‘Official Investigation’. Al Fayed’s chief lawyer in Paris is a former French Justice Minister, and in overall charge in London at the time was John Macnamara, his head of security and former Chief-Superintendent at the headquarters of London’s Metropolitan police, Scotland Yard. In the spring of 1998, Macnamara was part of a sting operation involving the FBI, CIA and possibly the Israeli (Rothschild) intelligence Agency Mossad, to arrest a former CIA agent Oswald Le Winter, a 67 year old American born in Austria. Le Winter contacted Al Fayed claiming to have documents for sale proving the involvement of MI6 and the CIA in the murder of Diana. He was asking $10 million and after meeting with Macnamara he was given an advance of $15.000. A further meeting was arranged in Vienna, Austria, for the key documents and the rest of the money to be handed over. In the meantime however, Al Fayed called a friend in the FBI, who contacted the CIA. Le Winter was followed, spied on, and lured to the Ambassador Hotel in Vienna on Wednesday April 22nd, where with support from the Austrian police a combination of FBI, CIA and Mossad agents pounced on him.
If Al Fayed was the grieving father, why would he ensure the man who would give him the proof he required, was offered up to his enemies?
If Le Winter was offering a hoax, why would so many agencies spend so much money, time and effort, to prevent him leaking information that was as they put it, a lie? When this would prove that MI6 was not involved to many people?
This story would have remained a secret, but for Peter Grolig, an Austrian journalist on the ‘Kurier’ newspaper. He reported what happened and established that when Le Winters hotel room was searched, four documents two of them in code were found and appeared to be genuine CIA documents. The CIA has since admitted tapping Diana’s phone calls in, and to America and passing the contents to British Intelligence. Le Winter was arrested and held in custody. Grolig’s story forced Al Fayed to admit that it was true. Another intelligence insider also insists the crash was not an accident. Richard Tomlinson, a former agent of Britain’s MI6, gave evidence to the French enquiry into Diana’s death. In 1997 Tomlinson served a six month jail sentence under the official secrets act for trying to sell his memoirs. In 1998 he was arrested again, at gun point, in Paris at the request of the British government who were concerned at his association in that city with MI5 whistleblower, David Shayler, (now a fruitcake) who was also arrested and jailed in Paris. Tomlinson apparently told Herve Stephan, the judge in charge of the ‘inquiry’, that Diana was murdered. According to a report on the BBC’s news service, Ceefax, on August 29th 1998, he told the judge that Henry Paul was an asset of British Intelligence and so was one of the bodyguards, which one was not named. So with all this information given to the inquiry Here, Stephan an Illuminati placeman concluded, ‘it was an accident.
In the words of the Roman writer Seneca :
“He who most benefits from the crime is the one most likely to have committed it”.
For sure the Windsor’s as a family benefited the most. No longer is there an inside threat to their secrets and actions.
No longer is Diana there to continue her inevitable destruction of the Monarchy as a credible force able to own and influence the path of this nation.
No longer is she there to influence in the upbringing of her sons William and Harry. The Windsor’s have full and total control in the moulding of these two Princes, giving total ability to form them into their own sick image.
It paved the way for Charles to marry Camilla
Of course the House of Windsor is just a public face of a much larger power structure, ‘The Crown Temple.’ Which no longer has Diana demolishing there secret holocaust against the populations of the world with landmines, as she certainly would not have stopped there.
Joined: 11 Nov 2008 Posts: 558 Location: Lancashire
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 10:24 am Post subject:
this one comes from Christine Fitzgerald in an interview with Icky :
Christine Fitzgerald, a brilliant and gifted healer, was a close friend and confidant of Diana for nine years. Because of Christine’s understanding of the esoteric, Diana was able to talk to her about matters she would not dare to share with anyone else for fear of being dubbed crazy. It is clear Diana knew about the true nature of the Royal family’s genetic history and the reptilian control. Her nicknames for the Windsor’s were “the lizards” and the “reptiles” and she used to say in all seriousness: “they’re not human. There is a very good reason for Diana using this description of the Windsor’s. (This brings us back to the lady Arizona Wilder, the lady with the title Mother Goddess who I brought to your attention in Phase VII.) The Mother Goddess clearly remembered a ritual she attended at Clarence House, the Queen Mother’s home near to Buckingham Palace, in which Diana was shown who the Windsor’s really are. It took place in the first seven days of July 1981, she said, just before Diana and Charles were married on the 29th. This period is the last seven days of the cycle of the Oak Tree, (or the Druidic month of the Oak) according to esoteric law, and for numerological significance week 27, the ritual was called The Awakening of the Bride. This is a ritual for all females of the 13 bloodlines (and others) who are going to be in publicly high positions and marry the hybrid Nefilim to produce the new generation of rulers. Arizona says that the Queen Mother, the Queen, Prince Phillip, Lady Fermoy, Diana’s father Earl Spencer, Prince Charles and Camilla Parker- Bowles were all present when Diana was brought into the room. [Incidentally the pop Queens Celine Dion and Madonna are blood related to Camilla Parker-Bowles]. [My emphasis] She was wearing a white gown and Lady Fermoy had administered a drug. Diana was told that she should consider her union with Prince Charles as only a means to produce heirs and nothing else, she said. Camilla Parker-Bowles was his consort, not her. (In the legends of the Goddess Diana, she had an ‘attendant’ called Camilla, and she was also connected to a character called Alphaide, pronounced Al-fye-eeda!). Arizona said that Prince Phillip and the Queen Mother then shape-shifted into their fourth dimensional aspects to show Diana who they really were. [To fully grasp the science of frequency manipulation, this shape shifting or the ability to increase your vibrational field or in the case of Satanism, to lower your frequency speed to connect with the Nephilim, is not only possible, it is a fully understandable science, and, with the hybrid bloodlines having been infused with the blood of the Gods they have the ability to affect their DNA thus altering their vibrational frequency which is the reason for the blood drinking and other nonsense] [My Emphasis] Diana was terrified, but quite, she said. Diana was told that if she ever revealed the truth about them, she would be killed. (In the March before Diana was murdered she had called a gentleman asking for his advice on how best to reveal information about the Royals that would shake the world?) The Queen Mother told Diana at the ritual that “all ears” would be listening to everything she said and “all eyes” would forever be watching her. This is the classic “nowhere to run” bind imposed on mind controlled slaves. Does anyone believe, therefore, that they would allow Diana into the clutches of Mohammed Al Fayed if he were not under their control? The ritual also included the use of a golden penis (Osiris symbolism), which was used on Diana to signify the ‘opening of the womb’. Arizona says it was of reptilian shape and size and had needle like protrusions designed to superficially puncture the walls of the vagina and cause bleeding. Diana was told that after this ritual, she would never be “honoured” again by attending their rituals and she was not to ask questions about them. Now do people understand why Diana suffered from bulimia and serious emotional problems from the time she married Charles?
Just to break here, I would offer insight into genetic science:
Scientists and researchers in the United States have shown that the emotion of fear resonates a low vibrational pattern, a long wavelength, while the emotion we call love resonates a high vibrational pattern, a short wavelength. This is extremely significant for this reason, as the author, researcher and archaeologist Gregg Braden shows in his video, awakening to zero point, the genetic material of the human body is a highly sophisticated transmitter and receiver of frequencies. Experiments have shown that when you place a piece of DNA, the body’s genetic blueprint, in a tube of electrons, the electrons form themselves together in the pattern of the DNA. When you remove the DNA, the electrons still hold the same pattern. In other words the DNA is constantly affecting the energy around us. Our state of being affects the world second by second. When you change your attitudes and state of being you change the whole because we are part of the whole, indeed you are the whole. We have within us a series of micro antenna called amino acids, which interact with the DNA, and, according to Braden there are 64 potential human genetic codes or antenna to transmit and receive frequencies. In short, we have a potential of 64 antennas to connect us with higher frequencies and higher dimensions of ourselves. But, he says; only 20 are activated while 44 remain ‘switched off. This is the reason Hecate holds as important the number 44. This means that our ability to connect with our full power and wisdom is massively undermined. No doubt the fact that we use only a fraction of our brains potential is a consequence of this also. Research by the Institute of Heart Math and others in the United States has further shown that these antennas on the DNA are activated or closed down by the wavelengths of emotion, which constantly pass through the DNA.
Diana told Christine Fitzgerald that the Queen Mother was the power behind the Windsor’s, along with Prince Phillip. But Philip was subordinate in the hierarchy to the Queen Mother, Diana said. The Queen Mother is connected to a long list of Brotherhood groups and societies and she is the head of the Inner Temple, the elite and highly secret society for the upper levels of the legal profession on the former Knights Templar land at Temple Bar in London.
It was the Queen Mother and her close friend, Diana’s grandmother, Lady Ruth Fermoy, who manipulated Diana into the marriage with Prince Charles. This is why Diana was given quarters at the Queen Mothers home, Clarence House, in the weeks before the wedding from where she left to marry Charles at St Paul’s Cathedral. “Diana used to tell me that the Queen Mother was evil” Christine Fitzgerald said, “She actually used that word, evil. She said she hated the Queen Mother and the Queen Mother hated her.” Most people in Britain will be astonished to read this because the Queen Mothers propaganda has turned her into the nation’s favourite grandmother when she was alive. “so the Queen Mum, such a lovely, kind old lady.” But at this position operatives are not what they are claimed to be, I can’t emphasise that enough. During her time at Clarence House before the wedding, Diana says herself that she was being given drugs, like the anti-depressant, Valium, to treat her bulimia. What else were they giving her?
“They drugged her”, Christine said, “I’m sure of it, they had her doped from the start.” Christine had many conversations with Diana as she opened her heart about her nightmare life with the Windsor’s. But Christine’s contacts through her work have given her access to other sources with inside knowledge of the British Royal Family, too. This was the first time she had talked publicly about her experiences with Diana and what she knows of the reptile/Nephilim agenda. She told me:
“The Queen Mother… now that’s a serious piece of wizardry. The Queen Mother is a lot older than people think. To be honest, the Royal Family hasn’t died for a very long time, they have just metamorphosised. It’s a sort of cloning, but in a different way. They take pieces of flesh and rebuild the body from one little bit. Because it is lizard, because it’s cold blooded, its much easier for them to do Frankenstein * than it is for us. The different bodies are just different vibrations, they have got that secret, they’ve got the secret of the micro currents, it’s so micro, so specific, these radio waves that actually create the bodies. These are the energies I work with when I am healing. They know the vibration of life and because they are cold blooded, they are reptiles; they have no wish to make the Earth the perfect harmony it could be, or to heal the Earth from the damage that has been done. The Earth’s been attacked for zeons by different extraterrestrials, it’s been like a football for so long. This place was a bus stop for many different aliens. All these aliens, they could cope with everything, including the noxious gases. They’re landing all the time and coming up from the bowels of the Earth. They looked like reptiles originally, but they look like us when they get out now through the electrical vibration, that life key I talked about. They can manifest how they want to. All the real knowledge has been taken out and shredded and put back in another way. The Queen Mother was “Chief Toad” of this part of Europe and they have people like her in each continent. Most people, the hangers on, don’t know, about the reptiles. They are just in awe of these people because they are so powerful.
“Balmoral is a very very nasty place. That’s somewhere they want to dig underground. They will find reptile fossils it goes back that far. Don’t think of people like the Queen Mother and Queen Victoria, as different people. Think of them as the same person, which after a while has had to replace their coat. [The Mother Goddess Arizona Wilder states that Catherine de Medici was also the same creature as Victoria and the Queen Mother]. [My emphasis]. When the flesh dies, that energy, while it is dying, will be immediately up someone else’s jacksy (backside). It is very vampire, worse than vampire. They are not going to come to you with hooked teeth and suck your blood.”
[With this last knowledge no matter how bizarre it would appear, in the world of the Occult this is not as bizarre as you would quite understandably conclude. Of course you will have noticed this information speaks of the Queen Mother as still alive, and of course when this was written she was, yet with the knowledge that one should not consider Catherine de Medici, Victoria and the Queen Mother as different entities. Then with the knowledge that a recent child was induced to be born under a lunar eclipse then removed from its mother for god knows how long, it makes one think, perhaps she still is?] [My emphasis].
“Fear is their food; they can actually take fear and manifest it into a tangible thing. The key is the vibrational current. At that vibrational current, they can manifest anything from anything. It’s like a holographic image. We are all minerals and water vibrating. This is an illusion we are living in. that’s the secret. You know when the monarchy’s fallen; it’s not the end of it. They will manifest in another form. The reptiles have never been defeated and this is the closest they have come to it. The reason they are so threatened today is because the Earth is in such trouble and the mental power of the people is returning. This is their most frightening time, but it is not going to kill them. There are long centuries before it is over yet. The difference this time is that it will be more difficult for them and they are going to have to settle for less and the Earth people are going to get more. But even though these reptilian ones are *, they are sad pathetic beasts really, while humanity is galloping towards the light. They are just pathetic lumps of nastiness who aren’t going to win. I can’t talk about this everywhere because they would just go ‘Christine, get a white coat, put it on backwards, get out’. But I want to end the bs.”
Christine also knew about the reptile satanic rituals, the sexual rites and the widespread sacrifice of children. She said it is the pure essence of the pre-pubescent the reptiles want. She goes on:
“If you looked at were all the castles are built and were there are a lot of street children in the Third World, they’re galloping it at the moment. They’re pulling the kids in en masse now.” she said the reptiles want the children’s life essence because they can’t continue to manifest without that pure energy... “The contaminated essence of us adults is not worth anything to them”, she said. “All the rituals, the knives, the goblets, the sodomy, it’s that easy for these people to snatch a piece of your energy.” Christine also spoke about the sex rituals and orgies involving the Windsor’s. The very word orgy comes from the Greek, orgia, meaning ‘secret worship’ and relates to the sexual rites of the ancient mystery religions. Christine said:
“There used to be an elect circle who took part in ritual orgies at Buckingham Palace. This was told to me by one of the participants. They were all couples. The lights used to go out at a certain time and they all swapped round and did their things. You know about the butler ringing the bell at six o’clock in the morning so that everyone goes back to their bed? These people are nasty pieces of work, sweetheart, these people are nasty. Nothing you can ever think of can ever be as nasty as they really are. Diana used to say that if the world knew what they were really like, they wouldn’t want them, but I knew that. My chin was on the couch now, hearing about all these orgies at the Palace. Just the laugh that these serious people who are going on like butter wouldn’t melt in up their jacksy and they are carrying on like that. But the sex thing is a big part of their rituals because it’s Kundalini energy; see which is the core, our generator. The orgies stopped because one of the couples died and they had an odd number and they did not want to bring in anyone else. So even that was ritual. Everything about them is ritual… all that heraldry, all that pomp and ceremony. Negative energy gets drawn to negative energy.”
Diana told Christine Fitzgerald in 1989 that they were going to kill her: “it sounded outlandish at the time”, Christine said, “because she had the boys and they were little and I thought, no, they need her to bring the boys up.” but there were to be many indications that Diana was indeed in danger from the Windsor’s and the Brotherhood in general. In the late 1980s with her marriage nothing more than a public show, Diana was having a relationship with Captain James Hewitt. One day about this time, she went rushing into Christine’s healing centre in London in a terrible state, Christine remembers:
“She was crying hysterically and I said ‘what’s the matter?’ you know it was dog’s died stuff, bottom lip out, full sob. She came galloping through the door. I gave her rescue remedy, clutched her, hugged her, calmed her down, and said now tell me what’s going on. ‘I can’t believe it, I can’t believe it, they killed him, they killed him she sobbed. I said: ‘who did they kill?’ She told me about her affair with the detective (Barry Mannakee) and how he was decapitated on a motorbike and how she thought it was a terrible accident. But now she knows the Royal family killed him because Prince Charles’ senior detective had just told her that if she didn’t cool it with Hewitt, the same would happen to him. He told her she should not think she was indispensable, either.”
Officially, Barry Mannakee died in a ‘road crash’. The roads seem to be rather dangerous if the Royals don’t like you. Christine said that Diana was very much in love with Mannakee and she had visited his grave regularly. Diana had, apparently, been unaware of his death at the time until she was being driven with Prince Charles to the airport to fly to Cannes Film Festival. He waited until she was about to get out of the car in front of waiting photographers and he said: “Oh, by the way, I got word from protection unit yesterday that poor Barry Mannakee was killed. Some sort of motorcycle accident. Terrible shame, isn’t it?” Diana burst into tears, but Charles said sarcastically: “Let’s go darling, your press awaits you.” I would emphasise again that the confirmation that Mannakee was murdered, and the personal threat to Diana, came from Prince Charles’ senior detective, according to the Princess. Would he be making statements and threats to her like that without the approval of Prince Charles? Of course not. In 1998 in the Independent Television documentary, Diana--Secrets of the Crash, James Hewitt said that he too had been warned to stop seeing Diana or the consequences would not be pleasant. He said:
“The telephone calls were anonymous, but left me in no doubt that they knew what the situation was. They were threatening. They said it was not conducive to my health to continue the relationship.”
He said that other warnings came from Diana’s personal police protection officers, the Royal Household, and a member of the Royal Family, whom he would not name:
“The (member of the Royal Family) said your relationship is known about. It is not supported, we cannot be responsible for your safety and security, and suggest that you curtail it forthwith.”
[Although this threat is given in the most quaint of English, what is it about you people whom despise what you see as the threat to your social ideal, namely ’organised crime’, that would lead you to accept this threat as fine. Yet if the threat went thus “I know you are seeing Diana if you don’t stop we will Fu@*ing kill you, you would be straight to the police and the police action would be of the most severe against those whom had made threats to kill? Drugs, the arms trade, terrorism, murder, genocide, protection racketeering (insurance), blood drinking, child sacrifice, sodomy of children, kidnapping of children, creating mind controlled slaves, suppressing the knowledge of free energy, cutting down all the teak forests of the world, you try buying teak it’s nigh impossible, destroying the Planet on a scale one would not really understand, creating massive benefit dependency with the full intention of removing the social security completely, creator’s of and protector’s of all organised crime as they created and control the social ideal. These are the charges brought against the Royal houses of this world.
James Hewitt was further quoted in the London Times about these threats and his comments supported completely the story Diana had told Christine Fitzgerald. Hewitt said that his clearest warning came when he was told he would suffer the same fate as Barry Mannakee. Does anyone still believe that the Windsor’s and their networks were not involved in the murder of Princess Diana? Or that they had prior knowledge and played an active role in the decision to assassinate the mother of William and Harry? According to reports in the United States, Susan Barrantes, the mother of Sarah ‘Fergie’ Ferguson, had been telling friends that she thought Diana had been murdered in the weeks before she was decapitated in a mysterious car crash in Argentina on September 19th 1998. Confidential mail for Diana was delivered to Christine Fitzgerald and this included packages from a former member of the elite SAS who was concerned for Diana’s safety. He was warning her of what was going on behind her back “Half of MI6 were on Diana’s side too you know”, Christine said. One day a client, who had involvement with the security agencies, saw some of these packages being delivered. Christine described what followed:
“She said I’m really worried for you, you don’t know what you’re getting involved in here. Diana’s basically mad, she’ll drop you in it, she will hang you out to dry, you’ll end up dead, your kids will end up dead, your cats, and your business will be ruined. I couldn’t believe how she was carrying on. She was so full of hate. Diana came in the next day and I gave her the mail. I said not everyone who bows to you has your best interests at heart. I told her what had happened and she went purple with rage. When she died, everybody came in and said ’they bumped her off didn’t they? But that client was the only one who was outraged at the suggestion. I was checked out by MI6, my phones were tapped, my house was burgled, the royal family kept a big check on me while I was dealing with Diana.”
Christine and her contacts have no doubt about what happened in Paris: “She was bumped off; she was left to die at the roadside. Those responsible were above the elite of the army”, she said. “It was not the secret squirrels (British intelligence)” she understands, “It was above that. She said “Mohammed Al Fayed ‘in his tortured little sense’ wants to be part of the reptilian power because ‘he likes all that’. Christine believes that Diana’s romance with Dodi was engineered. She said:
“Diana fell in love quite easily and he’s a master of the smile. She was unfortunate in her love affairs because she rescued others in her own distress. So the men she went for were all emotional cripples because she was a healer, too. Most people who went with Diana used her and I think Dodi did also. He would have used her for his ego, the contacts, and his dad. The Royal Family killed her for her light energy, especially when she was pregnant. I don’t believe she was as badly injured as they say. If they checked her body they would see that the scar the surgeons made starts at her pubis and goes right up to her throat. They’ve even taken her thymus gland, the way we make interstellar communication. I know from the best sources that she was pregnant and they took the baby. Pieces of that foetus will have been delivered everywhere. They can make babies from the cells. Parts of her body will have been used in their rituals as well. (Just to give insight, hope you are not eating! When children are sacrificed with their throat cut from left to right, the blood is drained and drank from their goblets, and specific body parts are eaten. The fat is scraped from the intestines and they rub it on their skin or scales. This is the mesa fat, or the anointing oil, this also is within the Jesus story the anointing of their Messiah. Sick aren’t they). Diana was always having Kensington Palace swept for bugs, but they had Dodi bugged and they knew exactly what was going on. This was not the first time she thought she was pregnant and this nearly happened before, but she was not pregnant. That was with Hewitt.”
Christine Fitzgerald shared the most intimate details of Diana’s life and knew her in ways, and at levels, that very few others did. The incredible revelations of the Windsor’s treatment of Diana over many years, the threats made to her by Prince Charles’ personal detective, the ritual sacrifices and the confirmation that they were responsible for the murder of Barry Mannakee, cannot be allowed to pass by. There must be a campaign to press the Windsor’s to face these matters and for Al Fayed, Trevor Reece Jones, Earl Spencer, and the others I have named, to answer the questions that have to be addressed. Power must be stripped from the Windsor’s, their Royal Dynasty dismantled, and their crimes against humanity publicly exposed. More than that, however, those in the Political, security, and medical professions, who are also involved, must be equally exposed. The Royal Family, Earl Spencer, and the Satanic British Prime minister, Tony Blair, have all dismissed claims that Diana was murdered and called for such suggestions to cease ‘for the sake of the boys’. The questions must not be allowed to be ignored or another Brotherhood assassination will have been achieved while those responsible go free. Earl Spencer went to the extent of issuing a statement on behalf of the Spencer family in February 1998 in which he asked: “Is there any good in all this speculation? I ask that because there is clearly a lot of harm in it. All we, her family, ask is that Diana’s memory be respected, and the sensational speculation be left out of the public arena, where it undermines are aims to come to terms with her loss”. When you see the evidence in this supplement while people like Earl Spencer and Tony Blair say there is no evidence of a conspiracy, what does that make you think? If Diana had been your sister would you not be determined to find out what happened? If you were Prime Minister when such a famous and loved Princess had been killed, would you not insist that the truth be established? So why don’t they?
Diana’s relationship with her brother was less than harmonious to say the least. When you know the background, Earl Spencer’s famous speech at her funeral can be seen as a diatribe of hypocrisy. So was his bitter condemnation of the media, in a statement after her death outside his home in Cape Town, a statement, which like Al Fayed’s, fuelled the belief that the paparazzi were to blame for the crash. Christine Fitzgerald said of him:
“Charles Spencer is a *, major *. He’s quite a spiteful little *, too. When Diana was going through the trauma and really needed a new home, he said to her: ‘you’re not bringing your * down to me and mine. ‘He wouldn’t even give her one of the houses. He’s not a powerful man at all. He knows he’s sniffing around something dangerous and powerful and so he is attracted to it. Satanism goes on the Spencer estate. Diana knew about it.”
Diana had a profound affect on millions of people as we saw after her death and they did not know the half of what she had to suffer after the Windsor’s sank their fangs. In many ways Diana was a mirror of Marilyn Monroe, used by the establishment and then cast aside and murdered. Marilyn had affairs with President Kennedy and, it seems, his brother, Bobby, and when she became dangerous and surplus to requirements she was killed because of what she knew. In another of those remarkable examples of synchronicity there are many ‘coincidences’ that connect her life and that of Diana’s. They were both born on the first of the month and died at the age of 36 in August. They both married on the 29th of the month to men twelve years older. Marilyn called herself the Queen of Diamonds and Diana the Queen of Hearts. And both were subjects of the Elton John song, Candle in the Wind, which he sang at Diana’s funeral. Since Christine Fitzgerald first spoke this the threat to destroy her business has been implemented. Suddenly the phone stopped ringing and when I met her again she was seeing as many clients in a week as she had been in a day. This is unexplainable when you consider she is one of Britain’s most gifted and effective healers working in the centre of London.
Unexplainable, that is, unless you know the story. But she told me she is determined the truth shall be known, whatever the authorities seek to do to her: “I don’t want a war, I just want to end the bs”, as she puts it. Looking back on Diana’s life and their conversations together she says:
“Poor cow, she was in a house where no one gives a damn and it’s a terrible state of affairs. She was all alone in a nest of vipers. I used to just patch her up. She just found me and came to me. I made her wait a fortnight until I checked it out. They used to say that I was giving her anger therapy. I didn’t. I used to just listen to her, take it all in, and think Jesus Christ! But I didn’t think they would kill her. I can’t believe that this information is so close to home and yet they are still managing to keep it at bay. My room is the truth room and it’s a real place of safety and I don’t judge anyone on their *, and that’s why I haven’t spoken about any of this in the past. She was as screwed up as anyone, you know, and if you’re going to tell the truth, you have to tell the whole truth. She wasn’t crazy, she was mentally and physically abused, I feel, from a little girl. Her father was a nasty piece of work and her stepmother (Raine), too.
The Royal Family was very afraid. She would have taken the public away from them; she would have taken the world from them gradually. They recognised her worth and fed off her in a psychic vampire way for a long time. All she wanted was to get married and have children you know bless her little heart. She wanted to live out what she had never had. The world would have come to rights with Diana because as F@*ed up as she was, she was a light being and wherever she went she manifested love. It was amazing. The sad thing was that she didn’t know she was doing that and she needed proof of her worth and she was looking in the wrong quarters for that. But when she tried to break away, we went out and did normal things. She did Kung Fu with my husband for five years. She wanted to be normal, to link arms and walk down the street. She knew where her heart lay. She really and truly did amazing things.
Diana said she could not believe how cold the Windsor’s were and the public had a graphic example of this in the days after her death. They stayed out of sight in Balmoral in Scotland while the people mourned Diana in there tens of millions with an unprecedented explosion of grief. Only pressure from the public through the media forced the Queen kicking and screaming, to make a cold, emotionless and pathetic ‘tribute’ to Diana on TV the night before the funeral. Cold is a word constantly used about the Queen, Phillip and Charles, and that’s the mental and emotional profile of the Brotherhood and its networks. Bill Cooper said that the Initiates that he met in his work for US Naval Intelligence had “No conscience, no morals, no regrets, no feelings, and no emotion”. This is precisely the same character profile as the Windsor’s and, according to all the people I have met who have encountered them, the character profile of the reptilians of the lower fourth dimension. There is a reason for that of course.
The people have been hoodwinked for thousands of years. Hoodwinked about their history, hoodwinked about whom they really are and the true nature of life. Hoodwinked about the true background and agenda of those they have allowed to rule them. How apt, therefore, that this word should also derive from Freemasonry. Dr. Albert MacKey, the 33rd degree Freemason and foremost Freemason historian of the 19th century, defined the term hoodwinked in his Encyclopedia of Freemasonry as: A symbol of secrecy, silence and darkness, in which the mysteries of our art should be preserved from the unhallowed gaze of the profane.
Friday July 22,2011
By Cyril Dixon, Padraic Flanagan and Mark Reynolds
PRINCESS DIANA POLICE FACE ARREST
Quote:
TWO of Britain’s leading former police officers are wanted for questioning over allegations that they withheld crucial evidence about the car crash which killed Princess Diana.
A French judge wants to ask ex-Yard chief Lord Condon and Sir David Veness why they failed to disclose the existence of a note in which she predicted her assassination.
They could face international arrest warrants as suspects should they refuse to attend interviews in Paris, sources close to the investigation indicated last night.
The note, taken by Diana’s lawyer Lord Mishcon, was handed to the officers a few months after the 1997 Paris tunnel crash which also claimed the lives of Diana’s boyfriend Dodi Fayed, son of tycoon Mohamed Al Fayed, and the pair’s chauffeur Henri Paul.
The highly-respected lawyer’s document records the line: “Efforts would be made if not to get rid of her (be it by some accident in her car, such as a pre-prepared brake failure or whatever)...at least to see that she was so injured or damaged as to be declared unbalanced.”
_________________ 'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
Friday July 22,2011
By Cyril Dixon, Padraic Flanagan and Mark Reynolds
PRINCESS DIANA POLICE FACE ARREST
Quote:
TWO of Britain’s leading former police officers are wanted for questioning over allegations that they withheld crucial evidence about the car crash which killed Princess Diana.
A French judge wants to ask ex-Yard chief Lord Condon and Sir David Veness why they failed to disclose the existence of a note in which she predicted her assassination.
They could face international arrest warrants as suspects should they refuse to attend interviews in Paris, sources close to the investigation indicated last night.
The note, taken by Diana’s lawyer Lord Mishcon, was handed to the officers a few months after the 1997 Paris tunnel crash which also claimed the lives of Diana’s boyfriend Dodi Fayed, son of tycoon Mohamed Al Fayed, and the pair’s chauffeur Henri Paul.
The highly-respected lawyer’s document records the line: “Efforts would be made if not to get rid of her (be it by some accident in her car, such as a pre-prepared brake failure or whatever)...at least to see that she was so injured or damaged as to be declared unbalanced.”
The "Squidgygate" tape showed clear signs of having been doctored and rebroadcast on 4 January 1990; four days after its initial interception on New Year's Eve, 1989. However, there is overwhelming evidence to suggest that it could not have been recorded off-air in the manner claimed by Reenan and Norgrove.
And a second sqidgygate tape was about to surface at the time of her death...
Quote:
...The second "Squidgygate" tape disappeared from the media without trace, before it had even had a chance to appear, with no further information on its contents, origins, or on its sudden surfacing in private hands after a gap of some seven years.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 3:27 pm Post subject:
PRINCESS DIANA'S SECRET ENGAGEMENT
Wednesday August 17,2011 - By Mark Reynolds
PRINCESS Diana and Dodi Fayed were already secretly engaged when she was killed, according to explosive new evidence.
A German journalist has come forward to tell of a visit to Monte Carlo by Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed – just seven days before the fatal Paris car crash in August 1997.
Trixi Chall, who wrote for Germany’s popular Bild newspaper for two decades, claims she saw Diana pointing at and picking out a diamond-encrusted ring from an exclusive jeweller as they strolled through the resort.
Dodi later arranged for the £11,500 ring – from Repossi the jeweller’s Tell Me Yes range – to be sent to the shop’s sister outlet in Paris. It was then delivered to his suite at the Paris Ritz hotel just hours before the couple died.
The remarkable evidence adds weight to the claims made by former Harrods owner Mohamed Al Fayed that Diana and Dodi were murdered in an Establishment plot to stop the Princess marrying a Muslim.
Ms Chall has now come forward to speak for the first time about the dramatic event she witnessed during an ordinary morning shopping excursion in the swish casino resort of Monte Carlo on Saturday August 23 1997.
Ms Chall had retired and was living in Monte Carlo at the time. On that morning she went to an electrical store by the port. She said that on leaving she glanced across the road and was surprised to see Diana hand-in-hand with a man she had never seen before.
She said: “It was amazing because there were no bodyguards. I was stunned as they looked like a very normal young couple in love, rather like naughty teenagers. I just remained on the other side of the road and they walked on a bit ahead of me.
“She was so beautiful and so happy and at one point he put his arm around her shoulder and I felt I could cry. I thought to myself, ‘Thank God she’s found a man.’
“They were dressed very casually and no one paid any attention to them. I was fascinated and he looked kind, which was nice to see. I felt that love was in the air.”
Ms Chall followed them. She said: “Nobody else was aware of them and they were aware of nobody, as if they were the only ones in the world. They were not in any hurry, were chatting happily and strolling casually.”
Ms Chall, who has detailed her account in a signed statutory declaration, added: “They went to the shop on the left of the Hermitage hotel. They looked in the window and Diana was pointing with her finger at something. I saw them entering the shop.”
There has been much speculation that Diana had an engagement ring when she died after secretly becoming engaged to Mr Fayed.
During the 2007 inquest into the couple’s death, evidence was heard from the shop owner Albert Repossi that Diana had tried the ring on.
And Ritz hotel executive Claude Roulet said he brought Dodi the love token to give to Diana, hours before the crash on August 30 1997.
When she arrived back home, Ms Chall called her friends and relatives.
Her niece, Janet Sayers, speaking last week from her home in Croydon, south London, recalled the phone call. She said: “It was no ‘Hello darling’ as usual, but ‘Guess who I have seen in Monaco today’. She told me they looked so much in love. She also said she saw them looking in a jewellery shop at rings.”
Ms Chall said she has never given her account to the various investigations because she felt strongly from very early on there was a huge “cover-up of the truth coming from the top”. She said: “I did write an article for Bild but they rejected it and told me it was ‘too hot to handle’.”
She added: “Going to the police would have been a waste of time and I didn’t want any problems. They would probably say I was inventing it.”
But John Morgan, an investigative author who has written several books about Diana’s death, said Ms Chall has provided a very credible account that fits with the evidence of other witnesses at the London inquests.
He said that Dodi’s holistic healer Myriah Daniels, who was there, had told how Diana and Dodi had taken off at one point without the bodyguards in Monte Carlo.
In an inquest statement, Claude Roulet, vice-president of the Paris Ritz Hotel, said how Dodi had told him Diana liked a ring she had seen. Mr Roulet was asked to ensure the ring was available for them in Paris.
A week later in Paris, Dodi bought the engagement ring from Repossi’s Dis-Moi-Oui – Tell Me Yes – range.
In his summing up to the inquest jury Lord Justice Scott Baker stated “there is no evidence Diana participated in choosing” the ring.
But Mr Morgan said: “The truth may be quite different. This new account from Trixi Chall should be viewed in the light of the inquest evidence of both Myriah Daniels and Claude Roulet.”
He added: “In a bizarre twist to this story, the staff inside the Monte Carlo Repossi store on August 23 1997 were not heard from during Scott Baker’s “thorough” inquest and have never been interviewed by police.”
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/265480/Princess-Diana-s-secret-eng agement _________________ www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org www.rethink911.org www.patriotsquestion911.com www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org www.mediafor911truth.org www.pilotsfor911truth.org www.mp911truth.org www.ae911truth.org www.rl911truth.org www.stj911.org www.v911t.org www.thisweek.org.uk www.abolishwar.org.uk www.elementary.org.uk www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149 http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 6:09 pm Post subject:
here's the story sp,
I know Tony had an article here about the strange suicide of Prince Charles' Florist's Husband.
I can't find the article. Perhaps Tony can find and link.
Here's another strange story...
I watched last night a TV program on Channel 4 (On Demand) about the life and death of Prince Charles' other Mistress, Dael Harper aka "Kanga" or Kanga Tyron (all the same person).
In the newspapers there is this article.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1076026/The-lonely-death-Cha rless-mistress.html
First of all the shocking revelation that Diana knew of BOTH of Charle's mistresses before her marriage!
Story of sordid going-ons and finally Kanga's multiple near death and fatal events...
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=18152
TonyGosling wrote:
all extremely weird this
and Charles' beautful Cedar tree out the front of Highgrove has died.
Charles axes his Harley-riding florist... just weeks after her husband is found dead
By Nick Constable - Daily Mail - 26th September 2009
Prince Charles is at the centre of a row for axeing his personal florist just weeks after her husband died in an apparent suicide. Sarah Champier-Lowe has been made redundant from her post at Highgrove following what Royal sources have described as a ‘staffing review’. Friends say she has been left shocked by the decision, which comes ahead of next month’s inquest into husband David Lowe’s death.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1216364/Sarah-Champier-Lowe-ax ed-Prince-Charles-florist-florist--just-weeks-husband-dead.html
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
