View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kbo234 Validated Poster
Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 2017 Location: Croydon, Surrey
|
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 11:41 am Post subject: Kevin McDonald: The “Right to Migrate” Trumps All |
|
|
The “Right to Migrate” Trumps All
Kevin MacDonald on November 24, 2010
The Center for Immigration Studies has issued a report, Fewer Jobs, More Immigrants, maintaining that despite the loss of 1 million jobs, 13.1 Million immigrants arrived in the last decade. The level of immigration remained the same despite a huge worsening of job creation.
Most tellingly, in 2008-2009, in the midst of the greatest economic downturn since the Great Depression, 2.4 million new immigrants (legal and illegal) settled in the United States, even though 8.2 million jobs were lost over the same period. And the forecast is miserable, the LA Times print edition headline screaming “Fed forecasts hears of pain on job front.” The article did not quote anyone who thought that cutting back immigration would be a good idea.
Which tells us one thing: It’s not about economics. As the CIS notes, “the level of new immigration can remain high even in the face of massive job losses.”
I was reminded of this as I read my daily email from the American Third Position, titled “U.N. Calls for More Legal Immigration, as U.S. Jobs are Increasingly Shipped Overseas.” (Click here for the article; instructions for getting A3P emails are on the same page.)
Navi Pillay, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, stated that “Although states have legitimate interests in securing their borders and exercising immigration controls, such concerns do not trump the obligations of the state to respect the internationally guaranteed rights of all persons.” Among those rights is the right to migrate wherever they want–effectively saying that in fact states have no right to control their borders.
[img]http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/posting.php?mode=newtopic&f=29[/ img]
She implies that the developed world should be willing to take in 214 million (!!) international migrants. America is clearly not doing its share. (And there will be plenty more prospective migrants as soon as these 214 million are settled in.) Indeed, as A3P notes, she essentially threatened Americans as being outside compliance with international law, stating that “The principle of non-discrimination is fundamental in international human rights law.” Everyone has a right to come to the US and the US has no right to discriminate among among prospective immigrants.
In the hands of Third World ideologues, what started out as the powerful, uniquely Western idea that people have rights against the state is in effect turned into the right to displace the people who created these societies. Western societies have rejected an identity based on their traditional people and culture in favor of an ideology that they are nothing more than “proposition nations”–a major theme of The Culture of Critique. Such proposition nations are ill-equipped to establish a principled intellectual defense against such egregious expansions of rights. Viewed from the perspective of, say, an African native of Kenya, any policy that discriminates in favor of people of European descent involves impermissible discrimination.
Clearly, there will be unrelenting pressure on the West to admit ever more immigrants–regardless of the economic conditions in those countries and regardless of the consequences to the founding populations and their culture. The Camp of the Saints nightmare in slow motion. But since the elites of all Western societies are resolutely committed to the dispossession of the people who built them, one never hears anything from political leadership or from the mainstream media about the astounding fact that legal immigration has continued more or less as it has been despite millions of unemployed Americans.[/img] _________________ --
http://kevboyle.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
insidejob Validated Poster
Joined: 14 Dec 2005 Posts: 475 Location: North London
|
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 5:17 pm Post subject: Be honest about racism |
|
|
Quote: | Western societies have rejected an identity based on their traditional people and culture in favor of an ideology that they are nothing more than “proposition nations”–a major theme of The Culture of Critique. Such proposition nations are ill-equipped to establish a principled intellectual defense against such egregious expansions of rights. Viewed from the perspective of, say, an African native of Kenya, any policy that discriminates in favor of people of European descent involves impermissible discrimination | .
Let's be clear. The US isn't going to get millions of Kenyans or Africans despite the supposed lineage of its President. The likelihood is that Obama has no connection with Kenya or direct connection with any part of Africa. His father is more likely to have been Frank Marshall Davis.
What you are arguing is that a US that interferes in the internal and external affairs of non-white nations should close their doors on those nations. It is a white supremacist credo. Why not just say it?
If there is uncontrolled immigration into the UK, it is because the immigration authorities know that the people want it. And it's not because of cheap labour, or silly conspiracy theories about undermining British culture. It is because of racial solidarity among white people.
Long-stay immigrants into the UK from Poland, India and China are outnumbered by Germans, South Africans, North Americans, people from the white Commonwealth and returning Britons.
Official figures show that of the top ten migrant countries in 2008, 137,000 were from the first group and 152,000 from the second group.
There is no debate in the media, among politicians and among the public about immigration, North America and the white Commonwealth.
The fact that they 'take jobs' in the UK does not feature as an issue among those who are most concerned about immigration.
The anti-immigration campaign group Migration Watch and UKIP create fear about immigration numbers and fail to point out that immigrants include people from Australia, US, New Zealand and others.
The figures are contained in the Office for National Statistics latest (2009) annual report on migration, Migration Statistics 2008, http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm71/7197/7197.pdf
Of those intending to stay for a long period, the report states:
British, 77,000 (i.e. UK citizens returning to the UK)
Poland, 54,000
India, 48,000
China, 18,000
Germany, 18,000
Pakistan, 17,000
USA, 15,000
South Africa, Australia, Italy, 14,000
The report suggests that many of the Indian, Chinese and perhaps Pakistani long-stay migrants are students. It states: 'More than half of all migrants arriving in the UK for formal study were citizens of an Asian country. Of the 91,000 Asian migrants arriving in the UK in 2008 to study, 22 per cent were Indian citizens and 17 per cent were Chinese citizens.'
The number of asylum seekers have been falling. Official figures excluding dependants, states that asylum applications received in 2006 was 23,610, 8 per cent less than in 2005.
In terms of all visitors and migrants into the UK, the report states: 'Citizens of the United States of America (USA) comprised 32 per cent of total non-EEA admissions, the nationality with by far the most admissions, representing an increase of 6 per cent to 4.1 million in 2006. The next three nationalities with the highest numbers of admissions were Australia (up 8 per cent to 1.1 million), Canada (up 11 per cent to 1.0 million) and India (up 23 per cent to 0.8 million).'
It is likely that most illegal immigrants are from North America and white Commonwealth countries.
According to the Institute for Public Policy Research, few people sneak into the country undetected so most illegal immigrants are overstayers, or people who stay in the UK beyond their entitlement.
There are few figures concerning overstayers by country. When Australia checked their overstayers in 2005, they found the top countries were the US and Britain.[/i] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kbo234 Validated Poster
Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 2017 Location: Croydon, Surrey
|
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 5:48 pm Post subject: Re: Be honest about racism |
|
|
insidejob wrote: |
If there is uncontrolled immigration into the UK, it is because the immigration authorities know that the people want it. And it's not because of cheap labour, or silly conspiracy theories about undermining British culture. It is because of racial solidarity among white people.
|
Could you explain what this means please because it sounds like utter nonsense to me? _________________ --
http://kevboyle.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andrew. Validated Poster
Joined: 27 Nov 2007 Posts: 1518
|
Posted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 6:12 pm Post subject: Re: Be honest about racism |
|
|
kbo234 wrote: | insidejob wrote: |
If there is uncontrolled immigration into the UK, it is because the immigration authorities know that the people want it. And it's not because of cheap labour, or silly conspiracy theories about undermining British culture. It is because of racial solidarity among white people.
|
Could you explain what this means please because it sounds like utter nonsense to me? |
I'll second that Kevin, although I don't agree with all of the subject and the way it's portrayed, but do see like many do how Brits are being trained to hate, lets say the Muslims as one example. I also don’t like the meme about jobs for Baalim (Bosor)(the Boss)(my boss at work) that from the cradle to grave and generation after generation are minds are saturated with and slaves to as another example. And there shouldn’t be supremacism anywhere by now, but we’re all failing and it's getting worse.
But also, do you insidejob live in Britain, these’s some strange assertions in your post from my travels and other people I meet. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andrew. Validated Poster
Joined: 27 Nov 2007 Posts: 1518
|
Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2010 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | how Brits are being trained to hate, lets say the Muslims as one example. |
"UAF v BNP & EDL. Mass Immigration: A Frankfurt School Technique"
http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=2702
Quote: |
http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/features/Businessman-bankrolls-street-ar my.php
A middle-age, respectable looking man has emerged as a key figure behind the English Defence League. Alan Lake, a 45-year-old businessman from Highgate, North London, sees the EDL as a potential “street army” willing to be deployed against what they claim is rising Islamisation of modern Britain.Lake, who claims to have made money through computers, runs a series of intranet services for far-right groups across the world. Addressing an anti-Islam conference in Sweden last month, organised by the far-right Swedish Democrats, he told delegates it was necessary to build an anti-Jihad movement. He spoke of the need for “people that are ready to go out in the street” and boasted that he and his friends had already begun to build alliances with “football supporters”.
“We are catching a baby at the start of a gestation,” Lake later told The Guardian. “We have a problem with numbers. We have an army of bloggers [on the far right] but that’s not going to get things done.
“Football fans are a potential source of support. They are a hoi polloi that gets off their backsides and travels to a city and they are available before and after matches.” |
There’s hardly a straight word the guy says in these videos. Absolutely shocking. Same video-s from the link on the ukcolumn forum above, but specific to Alan Lake.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMzFFm2V4QE&feature=player_embedded |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|