Queens Speech 2010

[Life]

so you do like Akhenaton then, who according to Ellis would be Moses

[Andrew.]

[Life]

I do indeed want to see a return to the common law constitution before the Norman Invasion....

I think there would be far to much shagging going on in the way today's tinkers are programmed to see words...

[Life]

Who are the Ashkenazi people? easy :

http://lifeinthemix2.co.uk/ISRAEL.html

but don't start I am on holiday....

[Andrew.]

[Andrew.]

[Life]

Nope... like I said I is on holiday

[Life]

Ok you twisted my arm a little....

Here is one I prepared earlier with a pair of Val's old knickers :


Great Britain Needs a New Constitution

2010 is perhaps one of the most important years for the future of Great Britain. This year according to the Chinese calendar is also a very special year, a year which comes around only every 60 years. We are about to enter the year of the Tiger with a difference, this year is the year of the Golden Tiger and of course we are all well aware of the qualities existent within the Tiger, strength, feminine prowess, absolute in its resolve and more importantly fearless to the point it will move without any thought for any dangers that may come with its actions. 2010 is indeed the year in which the future of our country will be determined, on an individual level and our place in the world.

The subversion from the Chinese Freemasonic networks will shift up a gear this year which will see the British Freemasons lose all power in the next few years unto the Crowns newly energised Triad and the Hong Kong Society lodges. Hitler did the same by killing the majority of German Masons to be replaced with the new Theosophical masons. Opus Dei will accomplish the same as did Hitler and remove the remaining true Christian Catholics from Britain.

In Great Britain we have ‘THE’ election of this century, do we continue to follow like pathetic sheep the complete fraud we have in our big four political parties, Labour, Conservative, Liberal and UKIP… do we fall for this insanity again? Do we allow their fraud to continue which is also the offering by shadow subversive movements belonging to the big four parties like the British National Party, or the British Constitution Group ? The BNP are a paid up branch of the Zionist movement, the BCG a secret wing of UKIP (although not known by many in the BCG) and also a paid up group of the British Zionist movement.

I say to my fellow countrymen let us give rise to the Ram side of our nature and demand all of the above sod off to some far off land and exist in their subversive twisted mindset among those like minded and equal in degenerate thought patterns , the type of mind limited to thinking in terms of operations which can only play into the growing police state networks under Contingency and Resilience?

Nothing in this world comes easy, I know many out there are desperately doing all they can to suggest ways of changing our current political suicide path, yet they all come up with strategy’s which play directly into the hands of the House of Windsor and their equally sick allied bloodline families.

Magna Carta…plays into their hands given the signing of this handed the English nation to the Vatican empire because it broke the King John Charter, Lawful Rebellion will bring the wrath of the EU police and NATO upon these shores and quite possibly destroy our judiciary, all current conspiratorial deals are set to operate within the Statute arena…they have all paths covered, they determined the only paths to which we the people could use based in our constitution, so we change the constitution and the Statute usurper altogether first, then all our institutions will naturally fall back into line. Not all within the Judiciary are subversive, we need to support these people so we can take back our Judiciary.

The problem we face is the fact no one seems to be able to think outside the box, everything that is being presented comes out of the minds of the psychics which seem to be controlling all in the fight against the New World Order. Justin Walker is a major player in regards to the Prince Charles camp and the psychics thereof … Walker has the ear with David Icke, Brian Gerrish and thus the whole grouping making up the British Constitution Group.

The UK Column and cpexposed are under the complete influence of Lyndon LaRouch, Yet Brian Gerrish assures me time and time again that LaRouche has no hold over him personally, yet this does not pan out in real time given his two main partners in the UK Column and indeed cpexposed are Mike Robinson and Ryan aka John Morton, both of which are LaRouchian’s to the point they attack me for exposing LaRouche as a right wing high level Theosophist.

Here is the proof cpexposed supports and links to LaRouchepac : Here
Here are three links which connect John Morton via a photo to be found in three places :

To the Schiller-Institute which is Larouche affiliated as it is run by LaRouche’s wife : Here
The John Morton photo (from the Executive Intelligence Review News Service) , again LaRouche : Here
And on the UKColumn paper itself : Here

You will note the photo is signed off John Morton on the first two links, thus presenting full evidence that LaRouche is indeed very involved with John Morton, John Morton writes for the UK Column.

The right wing high level theosophy cult which LaRouche is, has formed the LaRouch Youth which we can parallel to Hitler’s Youth, this is ongoing right under your nose ladies and gentlemen, I beseech you to grasp this reality. We face the same problem today as that faced by history, man falls for the new idea without understanding the ‘new idea’ is controlled by the old, we have to be very watchful at this time now.

Brian Gerrish is a good man taken over, this is not good enough, this will not bring to fruition that which we all demand, on that basis I have no choice but to upset Brian as the country is far more important than any individual no matter how much work has been accomplished.
So we need new ideas, ideas which will work, not because we leave it in the hands of the body politic, the police and definitely not the Crown networks, we need ideas that will work because it will be the people who make it so, as is our cultural foundation and reason we are a ‘Great’ nation, the people of Great Britain make this nation not the Crown. The destruction has been achieved because the power people follow the Crown still against all sanity…against the constitution. Treason has become the path of the powerful.

I say this to all British Freemasons :

Freemasonry, your British Freemasonry, should do what it does best, and rebuild the manufacturing structure of this nation not remove it as has been achieved over the last 70 years under command of their supreme leader Queen Elizabeth II and her forerunners, and the Crown they represent. Do it not for your own self serving accumulation, do it because you understand exactly what I say and know it to be the only balanced course for survival, not only of your own families but for the families of your fellow countrymen…Now would that not be the greatest way to disprove all the exposure of your creed thus exposed? I know you and I know the vast majority are well meaning, if not a little materialistic, your wishes are for the betterment of mankind, but as with all institutions, your elite are not.

Action speaks reality….words are fleeting.

The same sentiments I also lay at the feet of the British Catholic Institutions, you can see your Church has failed mankind, is Catholicism the Church or is it ‘you’… the people of the Universal morality? Now is the time to show the world who you are.

To look at the current situation we find panic… because no matter which political party or movement one looks into we find the Crown with its filthy hooves all over the damn place, The Alpha Lodges on behalf of the Crown control Labour, Conservative, Liberal and UKIP, and the subdivisions thereof, the bankers dictate terms via many avenues, we are in a mess we need to think….we need to act.

There is a distinct possibility that Gordon Brown will call a General Election as early as March, if this is so you all need to understand why such a pathetic excuse for a man would do such a thing given his none existent support from the sane amongst the nation. Such a move would capitalise on the confusion currently among the people given we do not like any policy any party is offering, low turnout the aim, the consequence of the mass of people now understanding they all operate for the same master, the master has been for a long time now the Hanoverian Crown.

A Hung parliament would be the result should Brown call the election in March which would satisfy the Crowns need for a one party state under the yoke of the European dictatorship, not forgetting the same Crown is the benefactor of the EU in its control of the lobby groups which dictate terms to the EU superstate.

The truth is Gordon Brown is an unelected b******, (in its true meaning) he is a Stalinist communist and the same evil intent is the root aim from his band of evil doers such as Straw and co, Mandelson of course sits atop the privy council not for the government but for the Crown, seen so if you would only look at his relationship to the Crown front the House of Rothschild. This seems to be missed by the majority who cannot grasp the fact communism of the Stalin type comes directly out of the British Crown Under the mantle of Marxism, to which many hold as the ultimate ideology, although I do not.

Through this strategy of playing one side off against the other they have demolished any idea of fair and sane social political and financial policy, because each side was busy fighting the other which enabled the total privatisation of everything British as they demolished the Unions under the Fabian network, which incidentally set up the London School of Economics within the John Adam Street complex, directly in Adelphi House, the London School of Economics has since its conception dictated all policy to the Fabian networks across the Commonwealth thus demolishing all ideas the Fabians are some sort of ‘Catholic’ army hell bent on destroying Britain. Capitalism and Communism are two sides of the same coin working to the same endgame….total control of the planet, it has always been so. The Rothschild’s sent the Trotsky revolution into Russia…and… the Rothschild’s are the front for the Crown Capitalism, they are one and the same. See it people.

Under common law this country is so named Great Britain, under Statute Law we are called the United Kingdom, the Lisbon Treaty is so signed under the title United kingdom, therefore we must rid ourselves of the Statute title because this title has been achieved via treason.
Our military is being demolished while the same Crown networks ensure China gets the best weapons systems available, Russia the same, both mere puppets of the same banking cartel which has removed our industry and commerce to China and India, India is another Crown controlled nation set to be destroyed under the might of China. This coming war if not stopped will demolish the land of all nations while the elite keep control because of the vast Navy of the United States, yet the US Navy is not around the shores of America, it belongs to NATO, NATO belongs to the Crown.

The same Chinese financial takeover is being set up in the UK
lifeinthemix has proved conclusively that the core of Hanoverian Crown power in this nation and for the global empire has its root in the John Adam Street complex, only people who have no wish to think and act as ‘real people’ would even dare to suggest otherwise after studying the above link, this is reality, this is the problem.

History proves that each time we set up an institution, it is set in such a way that infiltration commences immediately it is created, this is the Modus Operandi of the occult bloodline families, to think within the box gives power always in the future to the same.

Kings, Queens, Emperors, Popes and Chairman’s, are by nature of the beast of power, twisted by that power, they are corruptible because fear commands it, fear of losing what they have gained takes precedence over all sanity….over all life. This world has seen no leaders without fear for a long time now, therefore any idea and aim to change things for a lasting future cannot for a second be contemplated from the standpoint of allowing any existing institution to remain as it is today, all things must change, all men must change.

Here Is What I Propose

Every British citizen who is over the age of 18 stands for election at the next General Election.

This would equate to every citizen proving claim to our nation and its governance.

We all then from our respective town, city and parish put forward our own representative to sit in parliament.

There will be no fringe or minority group in this country get any say in how the British people determine the future of this nation outside the original Christian morality based common law constitution, they will know their place as guests of the British people, or they will leave, this is not a game this is reality.

Political Correctness has never had a place in this country it shall be removed, this country is Great because we have freedom of speech, we will return this doctrine and mean it.

The Criteria

Each chosen representative will have proved no secret affiliation with any secret society or religious order.
They will swear upon life imprisonment should they break the oath to uphold the British Constitution under common law, to be formed for this time now.

The Constitution

We keep the basic structure of our constitution, Monarch, House of Lords, House of Parliament

We re energise our old shire system right down to town and Parish councils, each administrating the local tax revenue for the benefit of each respective community as it was when the country worked.

All national taxes will be spent on nothing other than that for which they are collected, without compromise.

The government shall control our currency
We create a Bill of Rights

We walk away from all IMF debt given the IMF is a fraudulent and evil tier of finance

The Changes

All Parliamentary representatives operate only under the criteria of the common law constitution.

The House of Lords we make up from the wealthiest class who also will prove none affiliation to secret societies and swear oath to balance the will of the people with demonstrative fiscal policy, these Lords also swear absolute allegiance to the common law constitution under life imprisonment should they break the oath.

The Big One

Once the constitution is formed with the consent of the people as the greatest means to fair play and just criteria, we place the constitution on the throne of Great Britain, never again will we have a living being sitting on the throne in this nation. The Throne will disconnect from all global contracts to become the throne of Great Britain only… tied to nothing else, a true free nation with the option for all commonwealth countries to operate under the new British constitution if they so wish. Partnership instead of control.

Incorruptible, unwavering, none political, covet not, greed an impossibility, Treason from the monarch removed.
Battles for the throne dissolved, power games defunct.
Unchanging persevering incorruptible system unless the whole people become insane and change it to match their insanity, of course if this expressed itself ever, the whole nation would deserve all that would follow.

An end to democracy to be replaced with cooperative existence for the benefit of the whole as a Republic without any suffering in relation to the secret statute state held by the Roman Vatican.
Here is my presentation which I suggest we take very seriously and work to implement in a way which serves all man, all levels of society that we may exist in the individual vision to which each citizen would want for itself.


life…

[Andrew.]

[Life]

First we must understand what is law under the constitution of Great Britain, and what is law under the Statute corporation the United Kingdom.

Great Britain the constitution is based in common sense law giving the people 'rights', ie the right to the highways, the right to bear arms, the right to protect ones own and shackles.

The terms or language used, differ between common law and statute law, to grasp this is the basis for understanding what kind of authority is making a claim against you leading to understanding how you respond.

Example :

the term unlawful is within common law, the terms crime and illegal are statute law

Jail is common law, prison is statute law

common law is the law of the land to ensure rights of the people are protected from internal and external threats upon the constitution, under which all actions within the land system operate.

Statute Law comes under a code named the Hamurabi Code, it heralds from Babylon and has been kept as the law of trade, given until the emergence of aircraft, all trade was carried out on the seas, this system is the law of the Sea.

Ports are demarcated areas on the land at which common law and Statute Law can interact without any effect upon the common law, the law of the land. Ports have a strict boundary beyond which Statute Law ends.

With such we can see the clear distinction between the two made so by our ancestors, for very good reason.

Statute law deals with asserts, commodities, as such they are in place to protect trade not rights.

Since the Norman Invasion of 1066, the common law system been under attack, yet in the shadows. The physical expression of this move shows itself only in the castles popping up all over the country, this was to form the shadow system over the common law system without waking up the natives. What was achieved over five centuries was to keep the rights but shift the overriding authority under which these rights were given.

Our original common law was formed by King Oswald and the Irish rebel Monk, Aden, as such it was based in the Christian ethos and morality and was built around the ten Commandments, that being so all rights to which the people enjoyed came from god, not Jesus, god, the great spirit.

As the Norman (Viking) Barony was formed, these rights shifted to a more Roman system, or, these rights were now through Jesus and as such given the empire was the empire of Jesus, the rights were now held by the Knights of Jesus, the Roman empire, these rights were so under the dictate of the Barony.

The son here is nicking by deception the power of his father, so say the royal deceivers who just happen to be those Knights.

Thus the Jesus of Constantine is in reality Lucifer, history now makes absolute sense, deceptive thievery of the bloodiest kind.

The English Civil War removed the last bastion of our constitutional protection, the law on usury opening the doors for the shadow system to be implemented across Christendom and the nations conquered by the same.

The final 'Act' in this saga was to remove all humanity from the people by having them deny its reality, they must identify themselves as a statute account at which statute law could make all claims. This began with the Huguenots entrance into the Aristocracy and the entrance in Macclesfield of Sunday Schools, under the eyes of the mighty Pearson's, or that is what we know them as today, there history is clouded, purposefully.
Previous to this shift and on the back of the charter for the Bank of England, would be to force all governments to require fiat currency, the reason for this became clear in the 1930 bankruptcy decelerations by the nations involved in the First World War.

Here is what they have achieved :

Part I[/b

Introduction

All things New World Order, is an attempt to create an empire based entirely on a fraud, a deception. The fact the masses and indeed those who would not label themselves the masses, are ignorant of the deception, is the very means to the enslavement of the global community by all things Statute.
First ask yourself, do you like what is being implemented all around you?
If your answer is yes, then this information is to destroy that mindset and it’s power.
If you answered No, then this information is the key to destroying that which is a fraud.
life…

[b]Being the Creditor : The Contract

Definitions

Information : is knowledge received pertaining to a particular fact or circumstance.

Knowledge : the fact or state of knowing the perception of fact or truth clear in certain mental apprehension.

Fact : a truth known by actual experience or observation

Truth : a verified or indisputable fact, proposition, principle, or the like

The above clearly shows a circular interaction between truth and fact, and so truth could be accordance with the facts, but the question now raised would be; can you actually prove anything.
So truth is experience as observed by the individual taking the definitions from the dictionary.

This clearly shows that to present a script as absolute truth is nonsensical, be this religious or anything at all. We all observe events or situations from our own unique perspective.

Example

10 people watch the same movie, and if questioned after the movie we would get 10 differing meanings, because 10 people would take a different understanding of the experience from the information received based on their own particular knowing.

This works with all events be they physical, mental, audible or visual, we each take a different observation of that which we experience.
So truth is your own personal understanding, because individually by the nature of our experience, we will form our understanding.

This takes place on the subconscious level without exerting will.
To then take a position and claim it to be the truth, is to impose your truth onto someone else.

Websters definition for truth is : that which is true, and its definition of true : is in accordance with the facts.

As we have just described, what is fact is relative to the individual.

What Are We And What We Are Not

Though it would seem not with today’s onslaught against all things religion, we still exist with the situation whereby the majority except the archetype we call god, a being way above our complete comprehension with overall control of all things universal.

We each except the concept of soul as our real being emanating from this all encompassing spirit, that our brotherhood lies at the level of spirit were all duality and difference are gone and the place at which we are all equal.

Thus we all except that who we are is soul, spirit, that the body is but a vehicle in which our spirit-soul exists in order we can exist to experience this physical life, and as such our body is not who we are it is a vehicle or vessel our spirit utilizes.

Thus at death it is only the body which is seen to decay or die, that the soul removes itself from the physical body and lives and moves on.
In grasping the above we can then understand that even a photo ID, is not who we are, it is but an image of the vessel in which the real I uses to travel around within this physical reality.

In the same way a picture of your treasured car, though within your possession, and a vehicle in which you utilize to travel around, you never identify the vehicle as who you are.

Example

If a police constable presents the picture of your car and asks if this is you, you instinctively deny the charge, this of course is the case for all save perhaps Jeremy Clarkson….

And so, if the same police constable demands you identify yourself as your photo ID, given it is only an image of your body vehicle, then for you to accept that it is you is nonsense.

You are not a picture of your body on a piece of plastic, you are a sentient spiritual being.

Corporate Registration On Your Birth Certificate

Statute Law is the cause of demanding we each identify ourselves with the image of our body, be it static ID on bank cards, credit card or a form of license, and of course your signature, each of which are issued by the corporate statute script. This comes from the registration of your birth with the corporate country into which you are born, in my case we are speaking of the United Kingdom, but it carries forth for all nations under the control of the Bank for International Settlements, (BIS) through its World Bank and the International Monetary Fund thereof.
This comes from the bankruptcy declarations of 1930, after the insanity of the First World War, and the point at which the BIS demanded all nations for whom the credit they were offering… was to be given, would place the people of the respective nations as collateral unto the BIS to secure the credit in the form of the issuance of currencies at interest.
This presents the idea the ‘government’ already ‘Owned you’, the first deception.

So as we have identified the fact we are not our body, nor any image of the same, it stands to reason we are also not the name registered at our birth, it is a piece of paper. The name so registered is attached to the vessel we call the body and attached to the birth certificate, so it is twice removed from any identification to the real I, the spirit-soul.
Of course all things Statute depend entirely on each of us identifying ourselves as our body, and as such each respective government has so registered our body with a corporate name to their corporate system, denoted capital letters signifying ownership.

Yet still at this point, the people have not given this permission, it was taken without consent.

This is robbery by the Crown and government, and breaks common law
This reality proves itself when confronted by all things acting on behalf of the corporate system, be this the police, magistrate, or any institution that is trying to lay a claim upon your corporate registration, for law or for financial demand, they always ask you if you are your corporate name before any further action can be taken against you the spirit.

If you accept you are the corporate registered name then you have entered into contract with the statute and all facts laid out under the particular statute become binding, of course we are speaking facts…presented as truth… determined by all things statute, the Crown, and as such those mandated to enforce all things statute are activated against you the spirit, with your consent.

Or… the unlawful deception and its rules ‘Acts’ against you.
If you look at the death of a body, the point at which the spirit has left the physical vessel, then the body is buried under the name associated with the body, again proving the fact your spirit is not your body, and the name associated with the now dead body is presented for all to see on a tombstone.

The Corporate ‘Person’ is buried beneath the tombstone, still terrestrial, the soul (you) has shifted extraterrestrial

Obscure

In Britain we can see in the Mortmane Act which enabled the church to keep its property, and as such held the contracts each dead body had made in its lifetime, this passed to the Church in which the body was buried, but in 1258 this was overturned with the signing of the Provisions of Oxford as an attempt to give the Nobles and their Westminster control centre full ownership of your corporate body after death, and by definition should their be no heirs to your physical property, the duchy gained full ownership.

So the 1066 invasion was the first successful move by the Viking Normans to install the very corporate statute system upon the lands known today as Great Britain, and from this point the Barony would take control of all things corporate which meant an end to all things spiritual and the covenant broken.

This is why the Reformation was an essential play by the same Imperial bloodlines, to enable the deception the Church itself had kept the covenant, which it could not, had they not divided their power into two camps, Catholic and Protestant.
The bloodlines control all.

Commercial Debt Account

Under Statute Law, what we think of as our name, to all things corporate is in fact your very own commercial debt account, and the reason they need you to identify yourself as the corporate registration….they are trying to collect the debt, whatever that may be, and this can only be collected from the debt account, thus they need you to identify yourself, in the public sector as the surety in public, on that debt account.

If you answer that question with a yes, then you have just deposed yourself from your true identity and accepted you are in fact the corporate registered name, the fictitious ‘person’ so registered to your birth certificate, removing yourself from the surety in the private.
You have thus appeared in the public to be a surety in the public, for the public debt they are after. As such you cannot answer the question with a yes, especially so if you have sworn on oath to tell the truth, to do so would be to tell a lie, and god isn’t coming to help you, as the oath goes…
So you must reserve your rights in order you are not contractually agreeing in the public to be liable for that public debt.

common law is common sense rules on which we all agree, statute law is law that serves the corporate, which do you want for your children's future...

[Life]

See Also :

http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=154265#154265

[Caz]

The Queen's Speech 2010

‘SPORT’ = Social Engineering

'The rehabilitated' = DWP to reassess the disabled; those with mobility (prosthetic and wheelchair users) now considered mobile and so able to work and likely to become 'jobseekers'

S.P.O.R.T.

S= Skills for Thinking
P= Personal Qualities
O=Opportunities to Develop
R=Relationships
T=Teamworking

It’s also interesting to note the queen’s comments re the disabled, who are now to be re-assessed across the country. Apparently if you can use prosthetics or a wheel-chair you are mobile (able) and can be moved to job-seekers allowance and go and find a job. Trussell Trust are waiting in the wings with their processed food banks as they expect 50,000 people to be without benefits while the DWP’s wheels (John Adam St Gang) take so long to turn that the benefits transfer will leave people without money and food, possibly for some time. Interestingly the Trussell Trust are not concerned to lobby the DWP to ensure that the disabled receive what they are entitled to, when they need it.

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/ib-reassessment-customer-factsheet.pdf

[Life]

It would be wise for people to look at the comments made by Gaddafi in relation to the power of the Queen as it is known to world leaders and not as they present in their propaganda to the Blighties that they have no power and are the victims of the government....Gaddafi as a world leader knows the real power structure and one he is suffering presently after the Northern Ireland Police have been training his security forces in readiness for AFRICOM to base itself in Libya to police the African continent.

The obvious result the same require is Gaddafi out NATO in, Northern Ireland Intelligence have made sure of this as can be seen in the very small riots in only two cities of a massive country which the global media are making out to be the end times scenario for the whole of Libya. Take note of the language used by all journalist's and news presenters, it is pathetic and shows the disdain the elite hold for the masses by holding confidence the masses will believe their spin....and the masses do so the elite are correct....

In comes NATO under the fuhrer Cameron :

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8 353559/Libya-West-ready-to-use-force-against-Col-Gaddafi-amid-chemical -weapon-fears.html

WDM's are out....bring in the Mustard...we sold to him some time in the past, or perhaps Cameron and his merry arms dealers sold it last week on his warlord visit to the Middle East

[Caz]

The RSA (Royal Society for the Arts), president Prince Philip, patron the queen, and their links to Gems (Global Education Management Systems) - bringing 100 million children under their occult umbrella:

http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=20357

[Life]

Common Law

Common law is the law so named the law of the land in direct contradiction to the law of commerce. It gives rights to protect the people and systems set up within a given area and exists that should any claims or accusations be brought against a man living within the boundaries of the system, the man has the means to bring the constitutional system into play to hear and make judgement upon the claims so made.

The system ensures fair play in its choice of those who are to sit and hear the case and then make judgement, the Jurors. Under common law a man has inherent rights which govern the claims that can be made upon a man regarding goods and shackles among the other rights laid out as a whole enshrined in the constitution which every citizen enjoys.

Such a system makes it less feasible for the wealthy to steal assets from the average man, they cannot remove the inheritance of his family.

Hamurabi Code (Statute Law)

A contract is a legally enforceable agreement, one the state will enforce by placing its coercive powers at the disposal of either party if the other fails to perform. The rules that specify when the state will do so constitute our law of contracts. From this point of view all the parties themselves, the law of contracts is a valuable and important institution because it enables them to harness the state’s powers of coercion for their own private ends. The state may be thought of as a kind of machine (an enforcement machine). There is no others like it; within its own territory, the state possesses matchless powers of compulsion.

If this machine were privately owned, contracting parties would pay for its use, and the taxes the state collects to support its monopoly of violence in part represent disguised payments of exactly this sort.

In conclusion we clearly see two distinct systems coming under the title of law.
One serves the whole and preserves it, the other destroys the whole and serves only the few and monopolises power absolute unto that few.

Great Britain operated the common law system, to which Queen Elizabeth II holds the office of Monarch. Her coronation oath sets the boundaries of that office without exception.

Under the title the United Kingdom we find the Statute system overriding the common law constitutional system, yet still all offices coming within the common law system act contrary to their office in the support of the Statute System.

This can only be so under the direct command of Queen Elizabeth II, to whom the Oaths are sworn.

It is worth noting that the coronation oath has been modified without statutory authority. The present Queen swore a slightly different version of the oath to the 1689 version. It still included a promise to maintain the established Protestant religion in the Great Britain, but adds the corporate United Kingdom as of Great Britain. The text of the oath taken by Elizabeth II in 1953 is also appended to this note.


Text of the Oath as set down in the Coronation Oath Act 1688

3. Form of oath and administration thereof
Will you solemnely promise and sweare to governe the people of this kingdome of England and the dominions thereto belonging according to the statutes in Parlyament agreed on and the laws and customs of the same?

The King and Queene shall say,
I solemnly promise soe to doe.

Arch bishop or bishop,
Will you to your power cause law and justice in mercy to be executed in all your judgements.

King and Queene,
I will.

Arch bishop or bishop
Will you to the utmost of your power maintaine the laws of God the true profession of the Gospell and the Protestant reformed religion established by law? And will you preserve unto the bishops and clergy of this realme and to the churches committed to their charge all such rights and priviledges as by law doe or shall appertaine unto them or any of them.

King and Queene.
All this I promise to doe.

After this the King and Queene laying his and her hand upon the Holy Gospells, shall say,

King and Queene.
The things which I have here before promised I will performe and keepe Soe help me God.
Then the King and Queene shall kisse the booke

Text of the oath taken by Elizabeth II in 1953

The Queen having returned to her Chair, (her Majesty having already on Tuesday, the 4th day of November, 1 9 5 2, in the presence of the two Houses of Parliament, made and signed the Declaration prescribed by Act of Parliament), the Archbishop standing before her shall administer the Coronation Oath, first asking the Queen,

Madam, is your Majesty willing to take the Oath?

And the Queen answering,
I am willing.

The Archbishop shall minister these questions; and the Queen, having a book in her hands, shall answer each question severally as follows:

Archbishop. Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, Pakistan, and Ceylon, and of your Possessions and the other Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining, according to their respective laws and customs?

Queen. I solemnly promise so to do.

Archbishop. Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements?

Queen. I Will.

Archbishop. Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel? Will you to the utmost of your power maintain in the United Kingdom the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law? Will you maintain and preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of England, and the doctrine, worship, discipline, and government thereof, as by law established in England? And will you preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and to the Churches there committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges, as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of them?

Queen. All this I promise to do.

Then the Queen arising out of her Chair, supported as before, the Sword of State being carried before her, shall go to the Altar, and make her solemn Oath in the sight of all the people to observe the premises: laying her right hand upon the Holy Gospel in the great Bible (which was before carried in the procession and is now brought from the Altar by the Archbishop (The Bible to be brought) and tendered to her as she kneels upon the steps), and be brought saying these words :

The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep. So help me God.
Then the Queen shall kiss the Book and sign the Oath. And a Silver Standish
Queen having thus taken her Oath shall return again to her Chair, and the Bible shall be delivered to the Dean of Westminster.
The Act of Union 1707 requires the sovereign to make a declaration and take an oath to preserve the Church of Scotland. This is done at the first meeting of the Privy Councillors immediately following the accession.


Under this criterion, then it is the duty of the Monarch to uphold the Anglican Church, yet the parameters of the Church of England have shifted. How is this so? Is it the Monarchs shifting the boundaries or the Church shifting the Oath?

Source : http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons/lib/research/briefings/snpc -00435.pdf

[Life]

The following video outlines how the Queen has broken her coronation oath, yet what they fail to observe is in signing into the European Union the Queen has openly declared that the European union is within her realm. If this was not the case, then no judges could even consider upholding the laws which come from it :


Link



This video needs to be copied before it is lost......

11.59 is an important interview, 13.04, 23.05

The written parts of our constitution, the Bill of Rights, Declaration of Rights, Magna Carta and other documents make it very clear that all oaths of constitutional office, including MP’s, makes it very clear that allegiance is owed to the queen and her realm, and that allegiance is returned by her in the contract of the coronation oath to the people.

This is not something that can be broken; politicians do not have the right to break their oath of office.

No government with or without a popular mandate may transfer sovereignty on a temporary or permanent basis to a foreign power that holds no allegiance to the British Crown and is unaccountable to the British people.


I do however make it very clear I do not support the United Kingdom Independence Party

[Life]

Corporate Education :


Link

[Life]

And here we have the first outing of the Queens speech going live as they incorporate the children by making each one of them sign the school agreement in the place of the parents, that of course means they are incorporating the children under statute contract which means they are now bound by contract law which of course supersedes the parents authority and power of attorney over all children :

Gove the 'adopted' on the Rampage :


The 200 weakest primary schools in England will be turned into academies and placed under new management next year, the education secretary, Michael Gove, has said.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/jun/16/michael-gove-weakest-pr imary-schools-acadamies

Michael Gove and Tim Loughton overhaul "politically correct" adoption guidance to get children into "loving homes" more quickly :

http://conservativehome.blogs.com/thetorydiary/2011/02/michael-gove-an d-timloughton-overhaul-politically-correct-adoption-guidance-to-get-ch ildren-into-lov.html

Rituals and Ceremonies in Celebration of Adoption

Quote :
In adoption, rituals can provide a meaningful bridge out of secrecy and shame, which have been prevalent in traditional adoptions of the past. We know children learn more from what we feel than what we way. Rituals celebrated with openness, love, and pride send a powerful message of validation to those around us, and most importantly, to the infant or child entering our family.

http://library.adoption.com/articles/rituals-and-ceremonies-in-celebra tion-of-adoption.html

Look hard at the contract as blueprint for all Academies from 6.58 onwards :



Link



Get with it people or lose your children....

[Life]

Today is Sunday 31 July and as we approach the evening before Lammas, (1 August), in the USA they are playing a game called;

"do we kill America today or tottle on until 2013"

I am wondering are they looking to close us all down in one day as is presented in the protocols? and is the fall of the American financial empire the false flag to this affect?