View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
outsider Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 6060 Location: East London
|
Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2011 9:51 pm Post subject: Ms Clinton & Ban Ki-Moon blast Richard Falk over 911 |
|
|
US Secretary of State and UN Secretary General blast Richard Falk for comments on 9/11:
http://www.progressive.org/mc012911.html
Also link to Falk's blog and Clinton's statement in above link; you can comment on Falk's blog! _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scienceplease 2 Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 06 Apr 2009 Posts: 1702
|
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:48 am Post subject: Re: Hilary Clinton $ Ban Ki-Moon blast Richard Falk |
|
|
outsider wrote: | US Secretary of State and UN Secretary General blast Richard Falk for comments on 9/11:
http://www.progressive.org/mc012911.html
Also link to Falk's blog and Clinton's statement in above link; you can comment on Falk's blog! |
Quote: |
"While I wrote a critique of Griffin’s work many years ago and don’t put any stock in the 9/11 Truth movement, another investigation wouldn’t hurt. And what’s crucially important is this: Falk shouldn’t be punished for a thought crime." |
So writes Matthew Rothschild... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
outsider Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 6060 Location: East London
|
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:36 pm Post subject: Re: Hilary Clinton $ Ban Ki-Moon blast Richard Falk |
|
|
scienceplease 2 wrote: | outsider wrote: | US Secretary of State and UN Secretary General blast Richard Falk for comments on 9/11:
http://www.progressive.org/mc012911.html
Also link to Falk's blog and Clinton's statement in above link; you can comment on Falk's blog! |
Quote: |
"While I wrote a critique of Griffin’s work many years ago and don’t put any stock in the 9/11 Truth movement, another investigation wouldn’t hurt. And what’s crucially important is this: Falk shouldn’t be punished for a thought crime." |
So writes Matthew Rothschild... |
Yep, I got the same impression. All the same, it brought attention to something most of us would have missed. _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
U.N. chief condemns rights expert's 9/11 comments
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/01/25/us-un-rights-attacks-idUSTRE 70O05O20110125
UNITED NATIONS | Mon Jan 24, 2011 7:49pm EST
(Reuters) - U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon condemned "preposterous" comments by a U.N.-appointed expert on Palestinian rights that there was a cover-up over the September 11 attacks, Ban's chief of staff said on Monday.
The official, Vijay Nambiar, said however that it was not up to Ban to fire the expert, U.S. academic Richard Falk, as demanded by UN Watch, a Geneva-based advocacy group.
Falk wrote in a blog this month that there had been an "apparent cover-up" by U.S. authorities over the September 11, 2001 attacks, in which hijackers flew airliners into the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon near Washington.
He said mainstream media had been "unwilling to acknowledge the well-evidenced doubts about the official version of the events: an al Qaeda operation with no foreknowledge by government officials."
In a letter to Ban last Thursday, UN Watch director Hillel Neuer called on the U.N. chief to "strongly condemn Mr. Falk's offensive remarks -- and ... immediately remove him from his post."
A letter of reply from Nambiar said Ban "condemns (Falk's) remarks. He has repeatedly stated his view that any such suggestion is preposterous -- and an affront to the memory of the more than 3,000 people who died in the attack."
Nambiar said Falk and other rights experts were not appointed by Ban but by the Geneva-based Human Rights Council, a 47-nation body created by the U.N. General Assembly in 2006. "Their continuance in their jobs is thus for the Council to decide," he added.
UN Watch says on its website it is a non-governmental organization, accredited with the United Nations and affiliated with the American Jewish Committee, that aims to monitor U.N. performance against the yardstick of the U.N. Charter.
It supports U.N. goals but frequently criticizes the Human Rights Council, saying it constantly berates Israel but ignores many rights violations by developing countries. It has often targeted Falk, the council's special rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories, for anti-Israeli comments.
In a statement, Neuer welcomed Nambiar's letter but said the Human Rights Council could not be trusted to fire Falk. He said Ban and U.N. human rights chief Navi Pillay had "the power and responsibility to play an influential and decisive role." _________________ www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|