Google & BT, Blacklist lifeinthemixtalk.com

[Life]

I have just spoken with David Ridgeway the chap dealing with this issue, in short ;

Hostopia have blocked the site lifeinthemixtalk.com they say for abusive content, when asked David replied that to his mind what he was looking at was almost the whole site.

I asked was he saying that only now after 18 months live on the net, Hostopia had determined that the entire site was abusive?...silence.

He then attempted to speak garbage, to which I gave him acting on behalf of BT formal notice that I was making a legal request thus :

I required a copy of the statutes BT are claiming have been breached and at what date they received royal ascent, I made clear that such statutes must be provided side by side with each piece of information they are claiming as abusive and under what terms, the information breeched the particular statutes.

I also required a copy of the initial and subsequent complaints made to BT in respect of each accused piece of information.

I asked under what protocol BT blocks a website, pretends it has no knowledge of such action, then caves in and admits liability?...silence..

Having experienced the protocols BT apply when a complaint is made for breech of copyright, the above is no such thing.

The word abusive was consistent in the conversation, is this an American statute or a British statute?...in fact is it a statute?

They are to send me a copy of the email received by the Scotish IT office from their American hosting operation Hostopia so I can see what reports they are speaking of, and what this is really all about.

Obama's America....the land of the Evangelical sophists

[Life]

I have received the email from BT forwarded from Hostopia in the US, it is not a legal document and is basically garbage with a capitol *.

So the issue needs to be brought into a legal framework, as they are using statutes to sanction the action, statutes that is they have failed to produce.

They are playing a game and playing for time, so this was my first response :

Legal department at British Telecom
C/O David Ridgeway
Ardroy House
2 Fyrish Way
Teaninich Industrial Estate
Alness
IU17 OPH


Hi David

Take Formal Notice

This is the initial response for information based on the conversation by telephone had by myself the account holder, and you British Telecom via David Ridgeway on December 13 2010. To further this issue in the legal format I require the following :

In regard to the issue ticket number :

You have claimed liability for the blocking of the website lifeinthemixtalk.com from view to the public at large you claim for abusive content, I therefore require the following :

Under what Statute/s do you claim information within the site lifeinthemixtalk.com is duly determined to be abusive, please provide a copy of such that I can study their legitimacy.

The email provided thus far Dec 13 2010 does not suffice in detail as to what information is deemed abusive, this would not stand in a civil court therefore this will not suffice in your response, can you please provide the exact information from throughout the site which is deemed to be in breech of the statute/s you claim are governing your action.

Please provide a copy of the initial complaints which suggest the information is in breech of the statutes you claim you are upholding, their date of receipt and contact details for the complainant/s.

The site has two clients for advertising presently, can you provide details of how you are to approach compensation for the clients given the loss of exposure since the site was blocked on 30 October 2010.

Can you provide a full log of all actions taken by British Telecom since the site was first blocked 30 October 2010 within your office, and all offices to which British Telecom subcontract services to which I am subscribed to enable lifeinthemixtalk.com to function on the internet.

Can you provide a copy of the protocols under which British Telecom operates when breech of the statute/s you suggest the information within the site has breeched, once a breech is determined.

Can you supply a copy of the action taken by British Telecom in order the suggested crime of abusive content could have been amended by the webmaster at lifeinthemixtalk.com, the times at which such attempts where made and by whom, and also copies of the response/s of the webmaster which determined the actual action you undertook.

Please provide the contract clause under which the current sanctions are being enacted to which the account holder has given signature, (please highlight the particular clause in the contract)

More to follow


PS. formal notice will also be sent to British Telecom s head office in due course.

(account holder)

What a load of proper naughty buggers

[Life]

I have noted that the browser I use, Opera, will not take me to many url's which I place into the browser, yet if I use another all is well.

Would this in your opinion suggest BT are also in my browser?

They have asked me often which systems I use, I think I know why...

[TonyGosling]

Liff, you are veering off into speculation/fact muddling here with this stuff about browsers also

www.lifeinthemixtalk.com

Is down and has been down which is probably why Google removed it. Shift service proveiders & you should be sorted.

[Life]

Google blacklisted the site before it went down the second time, though I am no IT doctor, I am told that hackers get into the browser first to find the passwords....

I was first told of the blacklisting by on 13 November 2010

[Life]

First Response From British Telecom to my Formal Notice

Having taken advise I am now able to provide you with the Terms and Conditions that deal with this situation.

The Terms and Conditions can be found at:
http://business.bt.com/asset-library/domains-and-web-hosting/web_hosti ng_BT_Terms.pdf



6.5 BT may suspend the Service or end the Contract, or both, at any time without notice if:

Conditions for BT Business Services

(a) the Customer breaches the Contract or any other contract that the Customer has with BT and, if the breach is capable of remedy, fails to put right the breach within a reasonable time of being asked by BT to do so. In this clause breach includes non-payment of any valid invoice by the due date; or

(b) BT reasonably believes that the Service is being used in a way forbidden by clauses 3.1–3.6 and 3.8 (b). This applies even if the Customer is unaware that the Service is being used in such a way; or

(c) bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings are brought against the Customer or the Customer does not make any payment under a judgement of a Court on time or the Customer makes an arrangement with its creditors or a receiver, an administrative receiver or an administrator is appointed over any of the Customer’s assets or the Customer goes into liquidation or a corresponding event under Scottish Law.

The Customer will continue to pay the charges during any period of suspension.


I hope this helps.

David Ridgeway
ITSM Supervisor
0800 500 247

So how I breeched contract, they fail to say, playing for time.....

[Life]

The Rules :

3.1 to 3.6

3.1 Any Customer Equipment must be:

(a) technically compatible with the Service and not harm BT’s network or another customer’s
equipment;

(b) connected using the applicable BT network termination point, unless the Customer has BT’s permission to connect by another means, and used in compliance with any relevant instructions, standards or laws; and Conditions for BT Business Services
Issue 3: Dated 19 March 2010 Doc Ref: BT1130
© British Telecommunications plc Page 2 of 12

(c) adequately protected by the Customer against viruses and other breaches of security.

Proper use

3.2 The Service must not be used:

(a) in any way that is unlawful or in contravention of any licence, code of practice, instructions or guidelines issued by a regulatory authority, third person’s rights or BT’s Acceptable Use Policy located at http://www2.bt.com/static/i/btretail/panretail/acceptableuse/; or

(b) to send, communicate, knowingly receive, upload, download or use any material or make any calls that are offensive, abusive, indecent, defamatory, obscene, menacing, cause annoyance, inconvenience, needless anxiety or are intended to deceive; or

(c) in any way BT considers is or is likely to be detrimental to the provision of the Service to the Customer or service to any of BT’s other customers.

3.3 The Customer will comply with BT’s reasonable instructions regarding health, security, safety or the
quality of the Service.

Security

3.4 The Customer is responsible for the proper use of User Security Details, if any, and must take all necessary steps to ensure they are kept confidential, secure and not made available to unauthorised persons.

3.5 If the Customer believes that any User Security Details are or are likely to be used in an unauthorised way, the Customer must inform BT immediately. The Customer must not change or attempt to change a user-name without BT’s prior agreement.

3.6 BT does not guarantee the security of the Service against unauthorised or unlawful access or use. If BT believes there is or is likely to be a breach of security or misuse of the Service BT may:

(a) change and/or suspend the User Security Details (and notify the Customer that it has done this); or

(b) require the Customer to change the User Security Details.

3.8 :

3.8 Where BT provides the Customer with Content, the Customer’s use of the Content is at the Customer’s own risk. The Customer understands and agrees that:-

(a) the Content may change from time to time;
(b) the Content can only be used for its own purposes and is protected by copyright, trademark, and other Intellectual Property Rights. The Customer must not copy, store, adapt, modify, transmit, distribute externally, play or show in public, broadcast or publish any part of the Content;

(c) BT does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the Content;
Conditions for BT Business Services Issue 3: Dated 19 March 2010 Doc Ref: BT1130 © British Telecommunications plc Page 3 of 12

(d) some of the Content will have its own terms and conditions. These may be displayed online or elsewhere. If the Customer accesses this Content the Customer must keep to these terms and conditions; and
(e) access to any Content provided on a subscription basis as part of the Service will cease when this Contract ends.


Strange though it is, but not only was I not informed of this action, BT attempted to show the system has been hacked from an outside source, and claimed to be dealing with the issue on that basis... and now by some miracle, they state they are enforcing the rules after a breech of the contract, explained to my good self as abusive content within the whole site, recordings of course tell a different story....

[Life]

Well British Telecom are doing very well at answering nothing, more than that they are moving to shut off all my accounts and my internet.
It is obvious we are indeed witnessing the use of the latest Bill in all things censorship.

Keep in mind the fact this action and the continued abuse by the same over my work on the internet, comes from British Telecom, the master of all things military communications, the beast in all things technocratic, and it is inside almost every home in the land....

In light of the coming switch off I wish you all a great season as we run head first into hell, a hell with absolutely no opposition that will work.

''My people are destroyed from lack of knowledge''

I would add :

''and the lack of courageous worthwhile action''

[Life]

Having left BT the time to respond in the correct manner to the fact they admit they are blocking the website lifeinthemixtalk.com, I find myself wanting to say the least.

I received an email from David Ridgeway just before Christmas :

Sean,

Please be aware that this email contains web addresses to known malware distributers. I have removed the hyperlink from these entries but BT highly recommends that you do not access these links.

The information we have back from Hostopia is that you have a hidden redirect coding. The chances are this was hacked into your website through a script on your site, such as a Forum, Feedback forms and any other widgets you have added to your site.

The violating code is: and they present the code...

So we shift from yes you are being hacked to no we are blocking you and they give the reason as abusive content, after yet another legally formatted letter from I, they decide again it is indeed being hacked, Mmmm

Today is Sunday 9th January 2011 and having spent the week learning all about website creation at the point of uploading platforms to my accounts, I have this to report :

I determined to upload a new drupal site in the account; lifeinthemix.co.uk...at first all went fine, I created a user in the database manager and then a new database, all was well until....

After I had uploaded the Drupal platform into the new database and set the files and permissions, someone had followed me through this exercise and shifted the newly created database off its proper sql host and into a secure address, thus the site would not publish. Not to be deterred I acted on the basis I had made a mistake, and set to understand what I had done wrong.

I then noted that the BT webcentre platform was not operating correctly in that the permissions of the user had been changed and as such the platform itself was operating incorrectly, or I could no longer access the permissions for the database and user just set up.

I rang BT IT Support, for which I pay lots of money to be told it was not an IT issue. I had the IT chappie Chris Hunter explain this in more detail, he was floored from the moment he opened his mouth, flubbering around trying at all points to claim it was not an IT issue and therefore not something his department dealt with, that I would have to wait until Monday.

I rang the lesser BT support desk last night to see if they could answer my questions, these guys as a general rule are BT employees and as such are very nice people, I explained the situation and was told in no uncertain terms that the issue was a job for the BT IT Support, O dear says I, why says he.....

To cut short, the supervisor at the lesser support desk was furious at the fact IT Support had claimed it was not their issue, and rang himself to demand IT Support...support.

As soon as the IT Support desk were happy their supervisor had left the conversation, they went back into their usual spiel, but happy we had brought the issue and the behaviour of IT Support to a different office within BT, I let the call go.

Not content with this explanations nor situation, I set to opening another database in the server on which lifeinthemixtalk.com was once the proud tenant. All went very well as I found an already existing user and database with an older drupal platform within it. I uploaded the most recent drupal and all was well.

The user was called lifeinthem281359 and operated the database correctly.

As I moved to change the drupal files and permissions, which took around five mins tops, I went back to the database to find the user had changed to :

lifeinthem222022 and the database to which it was connected had been emptied of all contents...in the space of five mins.

Call me old fashioned but.....by any count of the imagination this ain't right.

In conclusion at this point, it would seem as though the Scottish Industrial Estate IT Support are acting as they have while attempting to keep the real information as to what they are doing out of the BT mix, the fact I now have the actual BT office in knowledge of this play I hope the matter can be clearly presented as to what is going on in the future.

Given the fact the other five accounts held by lifeinthemix which have not been reported for abusive content, are also being blocked from usage, then the contract on which they have claimed they are acting within with the action against lifeinthemixtalk.com does not count in relation to the other accounts which are earlier than the demarcated March 2010 contract they have presented.

This unravels their web of deceit as it being the work of hackers, or the hackers are so bored they are willing to follow me about as I operate within my accounts in real time...

Free speech, don't you just miss it...

[Life]

The user lifeinthem642951 for the drupal database on lifeinthemixtalk.co.uk seems to be the conflicting user in this particular account, and the user fixed into a differing sql host address, one named sql btsecure.com, I right clicked the file and received this validation report on the file itself :

Errors found while checking this document as HTML 4.0 Transitional!Result: 29 Errors, 16 warning(s)
File:

It then lists all the problems found, to much to present here.

The validator :

http://validator.w3.org/check#

[Life]

I received the following email this afternoon from Angela Murray acting for British Telecom

From: "david.ridgeway@bt.com" <david.ridgeway@bt.com>
To: lifeinthemix22@yahoo.com
Sent: Mon, January 10, 2011 2:04:10 PM
Subject: RE: Formal Notice to British Telecom Plc
Dear Mr Young,

lifeinthemixtalk.com

Following internal investigations, BT believe that it is justified in the actions that have been taken on the hosted website lifeinthemixtalk.com

This website has been disabled due to the presence of malware/ malicious code. This action is within the terms and conditions that state:

3.2 The Service must not be used:
(c) in any way BT considers is or is likely to be detrimental to the provision of the Service to the Customer or service to any of BT’s other customers.

3.3 The Customer will comply with BT’s reasonable instructions regarding health, security, safety or the quality of the Service.

6.5 BT may suspend the Service or end the Contract, or both, at any time without notice if:
(b) BT reasonably believes that the Service is being used in a way forbidden by clauses 3.1–3.6 and 3.8 (b). This applies even if the Customer is unaware that the Service is being used in such a way.

The BT support teams have worked with yourself and provided instructions for the removal of the noted malware/ malicious code. All suspicious code is noted at: http://lifeinthemixtalk.com/disabledfiles.txt.

The website will be restored only when the disabled files are removed. In this instance if the files are not removed by 21 January 2011 then we will consider you to be in breach of contract and reserve the right to terminate your contract as of that date.

As always we will try to work through any complaint or dispute that you may have in accordance with our Code of Practice (Clause 9.2 (a)) –

(i) where appropriate, in accordance with the details set out in BT’s Code of Practice for Residential Customers and Small Businesses located at http://www.btplc.com/Thegroup/RegulatoryandPublicaffairs/Codeofpractic e/index.htm, copies of which are available on request."

Kind regards,

BT Web Hosting team

Angela Murray


I replied with the following :


To British Telecom C/O Angela Murray

Take Formal Notice

I hereby inform you that after the initial blocking of the site; October 2010 by yourselves in sync with Google's destruction of the urls to the site lifeinthemixtalk.com, I undertook multiple virus and maleware checks upon the database, there were no problems to report.

The problem was the fact permissions had been changed within the site blocking the url, I corrected this issue and made backup of the database, the site came back online.

The second instance of offline status was-at your discretion as David Ridgeway informed me for abusive content, that the permissions had once again been changed by BT as a consequence of the content on certain reports.
I requested the reports in question only to receive copious amounts of coding, this does not satisfy in order I can rectify the issue by removing any and all such abusive content, I need to first understand what is deemed abusive and by who.

So far you have failed to supply the abusive content you claim is the reason for the action you have taken, you are attempting to shift the goalposts somewhat to be frank in the matter .

The issue to this point shows the fact BT, can and have entered my accounts at server level in order to repeat what was carried out in the first instant of the offline status of the site, namely changing permissions and coding in files.

As such your office entered the site after the malware-virus possibility had been found to be negative as cause, all other reasons for failure came so after your admission to the permissions and database changes.

This is further supported in the fact when I backed up the database after the second incidence still ongoing, the changes your team had made to the permissions and other files/directories created a back up and the only one in my possession, that will not give the ability for me to use the site again from my own backup copy.

Your team changed permissions.

We are of the mind such maleware issues have been so after your team entered the site, as such we claim your team placed this code so in order you could use the clause you claim your are acting to enforce..

The current malware issue is the third reason you have given for the reason lifeinthemixtalk.com is offline, here is a reminder :

1. Your site has been hacked and permissions changed

2. British Telecom are blocking the site because of abusive content in a number of reports.

3. We have found malware in your code.

I have also found my other accounts with you, accounts it must be known which do not operate under the contract you present as of March 2010, are also being blocked, as are my attempts to upload a new site within those accounts with a new database.

The Website platform is not operating correctly as such you are not only blocking lifeinthemixtalk.com you say for a specific malware code, you are blocking the entire platform on which I use the internet, while allowing the older sites the online status, yet I can effect them not.
The sites :

lifeinthemix.co.uk
lifeinthemix2.co.uk
lifeinthemix.org.uk
lifeonchildren.com

I also give notice that this situation was known by my good self in June of last year, therefore I demand a full refund of all monies paid to you on all accounts held by me from June 2010, as you are clearly in breech of contract on the accounts other than lifeinthemixtalk.com.

I hereby give notice that I require a full and complete explanation of this reality and a full response to all questions thus far presented to you from this office.

regards

[Life]

Could people please click the following link and report what they see :

http://lifeinthemix2.co.uk/police_state_uk.html

Thanks

[Life]

The Situation

British Telecom in sync with Google determined to remove lifeinthemixtalk.com from the internet, beginning October 30 2010, the blacklisting by Google commenced from this point.

I was able to fix the blocking mechanism by presenting the correct files within Wordpress itself, BT had changed the files preventing the site from being accessible in cyberspace. They were not expecting this move and so feigned action they said in finding how it had been hacked in the first instance when all along it was they who altered the files to block the site.

They moved to block the site a second time with a shift in explanation as cause, they blocked it and stated it was due to abusive content within certain reports. I naturally asked why they had not as was protocol informed me of the abusive content, the reply from David Ridgeway...it is a lot of reports.

From that point BT basicaly stalled for time as they instituted some type of maleware coding and then presented this as cause from the get go, also claiming the reason Google had also blocked the site. What Google did was to shift the url's to take you to a totally different site without being able to access lifeinthemixtalk.com from the site to which the Google listings took you to. Then Google began to remove all the listings and removed the most important cached copies of the reports from the site.

If it was as stated by BT, then I would have been unable to fix the site as it went down in the first instant, the coding they claim they have found was not present before or immediately after I fixed the site, yet claim it was the reason Google blocked it... they are lying. I also scanned the database at this point for malware and virus's, none were present at all, the site worked and if you hit a url for lifeinthemixtalk.com, you went there.

In the most recent conversations had with Ridgeway, they are still claiming the issue is only for lifeinthemixtalk.com, yet all the sites and accounts are inaccessible for update, so to is the tradespace site for my plastering company, what this has to do with lifeinthemix, I do not know.
.
Basically the whole platform from BT as it relates to websites and hosting are blocked, this shows absolutely that BT are acting contrary to the contract they claim they are enforcing relating to lifeinthemixtalk.com, this is so because only lifeinthemixtalk.com is bound by that particular contract, the other sites and the tradespace are not within this particular contract.

BT are now demanding I give them credit for the next quarter for services they are not providing, by any stretch of the imagination to demand payment in Lou of a service while bad enough itself, to make demand for credit for a service you are not receiving is to say the least...demented.

I can only assume at this juncture that they are intent on trying to force this demand for payment in order they can suspend the broadband service claiming I have failed to pay, this I assume by BT's insanity counts as good business admin.

I have sent formal emails asking on what basis they demand payment as credit for the future quarter while preventing the services they are contracted to provide...so far absolutely no reply.

I informed Ridgeway that given the dubious manner in which he had acted in this case, I would be presenting the recorded conversations at a later date on the internet for the court of public opinion, he was very upset at this and stated he would call BT security the moment this was so, I can only presume he was speaking in terms of my presenting such through the BT accounts, of course this will not be the case given BT are blocking all access to my accounts, I am not sure how informing BT security will help his case via other options available to me.

What is clear in this case is the fact we are witnessing how American Intelligence, with BT we are speaking of the NSA, are taking it upon their selves to censor the freedom of speech in countries they have no lawful mandate to interfere, Under the corporate British Crown of course, then absolutely they can. It is clear to me that America is now controlled from the Evangelical perspective, I cite the reports on the Evangelical Crown networks headed in the John Adam Street Gang headquarters.

[Life]

Here is the email sent today Sunday 23 January 2011 to British Telecom :

Dear Angela Murray

In your email dated December 20 2010 you state the following :

Please be aware that this email contains web addresses to known malware distributers. I have removed the hyperlink from these entries but BT highly recommends that you do not access these links.

The information we have back from Hostopia is that you have a hidden redirect coding. The chances are this was hacked into your website through a script on your site, such as a Forum, Feedback forms and any other widgets you have added to your site.
End of quote

Having fixed the first instance of your blocking of lifeinthemixtalk.com October 30th 2010, there was no maleware within the site, I scanned the database for all such coding and for virus on multiple occasions. The site worked in its correct manner, people were not redirected from the site url itself, they were redirected from Google listings only. The remaining search engines outside Google did not redirect, they all operated correctly and took all who clicked the listings within each relevant search engine to the correct url for lifeinthemixtalk.com and all the relevant reports.

This clearly shows the fact the redirecting was so only within the Google search engine listings, that Google was redirecting the url's not the site itself, I am sure you can deduce from this reality the fact the redirecting issue had no relation to the site itself only from the Google listings.

The above response by you gives rise to yet more inconsistency, I therefore once again give you the opportunity to clarify the situation.

You admit your entrance into the database of the site lifeinthemixtalk.com were you claim to have found maleware coding, clearly not present after Google initiate the redirection of their search engine url listings October 30th 2010, and for the period up until the second blocking issue. You make the claim you removed the hyperlink for that malware leaving the following question :

As you are operating strictly to the contract and the protocol thereof can you supply my office with the precise protocol under which you enter the site, you find the malware, you remove the hyperlink, yet you leave the code in place. I ask this specific question because you are a service for which I pay a monthly tariff namely BT IT Support, as such it is your mandate to support me in all IT issues. This issue in particular was determined by your supervisor in the other BT IT department who rang your team and particular agent Chris Hunter to demand he sort out this issue as it was under your remit.this was made very clear to me and to Chris Hunter.

I need clarity in relation to the fact the support I pay for stopped at the removal of the code after you claim you removed the hyperlink, this clearly makes no sense outside the fact you purposefully blocked the site for reasons other than those you are claiming. This is further supported in the fact I now have proof that my other accounts have been blocked from my using them since May 2010, also the same access blocking has been formed around the tradespace hosted by you from the outset of the tradespace creation, I informed the developer of this fact the day after she developed the site.

From the telephone conversations had with David Ridgeway, three in particular, in which I informed David I was recording the conversations, though he did not like this fact he continued the conversations which is acceptance by David of my recording the conversations, he did however begin to turn down his voice volume in an attempt to prevent his words being recorded, but he did not end the conversations. It must be noted here that David used the volume control in conversations after he was aware of my recording all calls, therefore he was aware of this reality for all subsequent conversations, it works for BT and thus operates for me also. It is these particular conversations in which you can grasp the fact you BT did not expect me to fix the initial blockage of the site, he did speak of his knowledge that Google were redirecting the urls within their listings, clearly it was only google and not the site itself.

These are the recordings I will use in the future to fight this issue, they are legally usable.

You have still failed to answer the majority of my questions from the outset, these questions need to be addressed as is acceptable contractual obligations you have as my IT support, and more to the point, I need to see how you BT plan to compensate me for the loss of over 18 months hard work. We also have the issue of backpay for the inability to use my other accounts since at least May 2010, and the fact you demand payment for the tradespace which from the outset has been unavailable for update by me.

It needs to be made clear what services you BT are claiming payment in credit for the following quarter under my current bill, as clearly you are claiming credit for services I am not receiving.

I give you this opportunity as it is protocol before moving this issue into the civil courts, that I make all possible endeavours to sort out this issue by normal means before making this move. Clearly in your failure to correspond outside the telephone, which I have informed you is not the correct format for correspondence in this matter, you have left me no option but to pursue this matter through the courts.

I cannot accept the demand for credit under the current circumstances, therefore you need to address this issue forthwith that I can pay for the service I am receiving, namely internet access only.

The charge you make for IT support must also be removed until you satisfy the protocols under which you are acting in the manner you are, that we can ascertain the validity of your actions as it relates to the idea of support or not, and under the contract you present.

In short the current bill for Broadband services need to be amended that the internet access continue while the other issues are satisfied.

regards

[Life]

Contract Law is not for those who dislike reading words, the Babylon's are the greatest sophists, yet low and behold there are some bits that look after the little man :

Unfair terms

Section 6 states the implied terms of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 cannot be limited unless reasonable. If one party is a "consumer" then the SGA 1979 terms become compulsory. In other words, a business can never sell a consumer goods that do not work, even if the consumer signed a document with full knowledge of the exclusion clause.

section 13 "catches" it if liability would exist "but for" the notice excluding liability: then the exclusion is potentially unfair.


Misrepresentation

Misrepresentation in English law is an area of English contract law, which allows a person to escape a contractual obligation or claim compensation for losses. If one person can show that she entered an agreement because of another person's false assurances, then the other person will be unable to enforce the agreement against her, and may have to pay her damages.

Unconsionable agreements

Unconsionable agreements can be escaped where a person was under duress or undue influence or their vulnerability was being exploited when they ostensibly agreed to a deal.

My vulnerability was exploited in their gaining of signature to the new contract they are now enforcing for lifeinthemixtalk.com, not to mention the other naughtiness relating to the other accounts.....

[Life]

BT have decided to terminate my broadband account. What they have done is very clever and very sinister yet I will say no more for now as it would show my hand so to speak.

Under the bill to block for copyright infringement and such they have played a trap in order their stance satisfies there own action, at least this is how they are playing this game.

I suspect many more sites dealing in the alternative media will suffer such deceptive tactics as the year moves on, I hope this thread thus far helps people glimpse into the strategies they aim to employ...the more we know the better chance we have of finding a way to counter their statute games....

[Life]

I received today February 8 2011, a letter from British Telecoms Complaint review Service, from a chap named Michael Aitken.

I replied :

To Michael Aitkin British Telecom, C/O Angela Murray

Thank you for your letter dated 3 February 2011

It is not so much I expect the code to have been removed by BT yet given it was found and disabled by BT it would make common sense for BT as my IT support to have gone one step further and removed the code in the expected service for which I pay for IT support.

After the first shut down of the site October 2010 I entered the site and found no code you refer to, I also virus and maleware scanned the database on numerous occasions, basically the code to which you refer was not present at the first shut down of the site lifeinthemixtalk.com nor immediately after. I also copied the database to my pc and having looked through it the code to which you refer was and is not present at the first shutdown within the database.

I fixed the altered files and the site returned yet Google continued to blacklist the site from it's search engines. It is under this protocol that I know the code was not present after I fixed the first instance of the site shutdown, David however disagrees yet has presented no evidence to support his stance.

You say BT are not responsible for locating and removing coding errors, yet BT from the outset acted in this manner, first explaining the site had been hacked then shifting to the present stance and that of the coding maleware. Are you suggesting David Ridgeway acted contrary to your own protocol by seeking out and disabling the code?

If this is so then I need not remind you of the fact as a BT contractor Angela Murray-David Ridgeway and their agents are fully responsible for all that came to pass after I fixed the first instance of shutdown.

The code was not there before the first shutdown nor after I fixed the issue, the only people to enter the database after I fixed the problem was Hostopia and the IT support team who then informed me of the code. I took advice from IT experts and from the legal standpoint and was told in no uncertain terms not to enter the database again until this issue was resolved. I have acted under this advice and will continue to do so.

The terms and conditions to which you refer were gained by deceptive means, without fully explaining the implications of the extended contractual meanings, as such my trust of BT was abused in order you could sanction the actions which closed down the site, here are three actions I will pursue in relation to the contract :

Unfair terms

Section 6 states the implied terms of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 cannot be limited unless reasonable. If one party is a "consumer" then the SGA 1979 terms become compulsory. In other words, a business can never sell a consumer goods that do not work, even if the consumer signed a document with full knowledge of the exclusion clause.

section 13 "catches" it if liability would exist "but for" the notice excluding liability: then the exclusion is potentially unfair.


Misrepresentation

Misrepresentation in English law is an area of English contract law, which allows a person to escape a contractual obligation or claim compensation for losses. If one person can show that she entered an agreement because of another person's false assurances, then the other person will be unable to enforce the agreement against her, and may have to pay her damages.

Unconsionable agreements

Unconsionable agreements can be escaped where a person was under duress or undue influence or their vulnerability was being exploited when they ostensibly agreed to a deal.

In the above I highlight points of contention we feel are relevant in this case, but there are more we will pursue.

I have two accounts each with separate emails, I require the information to show at what point and how you have lumped both accounts into one and now under the contract you claim you are enforcing, as at no time has this position been explained to me in the time BT has hosted my websites.

We then have the issue in relation to the sites :
lifeinthemix.co.uk
lifeinthemix2.co.uk
lifeonchildren.co.uk

None of which have been available to me for use since at least May 17 2010, can you fully explain this situation as clearly we are speaking of some five months prior to the issue with lifeinthemixtalk.com, and prior to the new contractual obligations gained by you under the most deceptive of manners.

Compensation issues will be brought before the civil courts in due course, I am happy to remove this decision process out of BT and into the hands of the courts as clearly in my mind you have been lacking in the truth from the outset.

I thank you for your advice in how I should proceed with this matter, however, given my experience with supposed independent investigatory bodies such as the Information Commissioners Office, and the Parliamentary Ombudsman, we are happy after receipt of your letter that we have taken this matter as far as we can within BT's complaints procedure and will proceed to the civil courts or indeed a private prosecution in the crown courts in due course.

I need not remind you that my accounts are business accounts, as such I will move to be compensated to the maximum.

regards

[Life]

BT have terminated my broadband accounts as of today, February 16 2011....

[Life]

I found the BT mobile dongle works with extremely limited usage, here is the message I get :

Content blocked
In compliance with a new UK voluntary code of practice you are not able to access this site and have been redirected by the BT Content Administrator Service

This uses a barring and filtering mechanism to restrict access to all WAP and Internet sites that are considered to have an 'over 18' status. To date, these include sites which contain information on any of the following categories:

* Adult / sexually explicit
* Chat
* Criminal skills
* Drugs, alcohol and tobacco
* Gambling
* Hacking
* Hate
* Personal and dating
* Violence
* Weapons

If you are a Business customer and would like to have the bar lifted, please contact your BT Account Manager.

If you are a Consumer customer and would like to have the bar lifted, please contact Customer Services FREE on 150 from your BT mobile or 0800 0322111 from your landline.

More information (pdf - opens in a new window)

http://www.mobilebroadbandgroup.com/content-code.pdf

[Life]

British Telecom are now acting like gangsters and making demands of me under threat, ahh bless...they are frightened I fear and perhaps are attempting to scare me in order they can feel safe...good job I don't do fear....

[Life]

March 30 2011.

I received a letter from BT after they are now aware that my entire Telecom requirements are no longer to be held by BT, normal behaviour I presume.

I also received a phone call from the office of Angela Murray from a chap called Chris, what Chris wanted to know in his meandering speal was :

''do I have a new website"

now I ask what business is it of the clearly Intelligence office from which this call ensued as to my plans regarding websites?

lifeinthemixtalk.com was demolished by Hostopia in the USA, BT's server contractor while protected by the office of Angela Murray acting for British Telecom in Scotland. This is on top of the pathetic broadband speeds on both download and upload from British Telecom and their 'Vision', for the full period I had BT as my broadband provider,.

The concerns of the office of Angela Murray acting for British Telecom in the UK are not some after-care pleasantries, their wish is clearly to do all they can to prevent lifeinthemix from returning to cyberspace.... let us see what happens as the year progresses....

[Life]

I thought this to be very interesting indeed :

In mid April 2010, Orange UK announced that it would outsourcing the management of its broadband network to BT.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orange_%28telecommunications%29

[Life]

Most on this forum are well versed with IG Farben and it's relationship to the Third Reich; 'Hitler was IG as IG was Hitler'. A monstrous giant incorporating the entire Nazi science in engineering, aeronautics, chemicals, and military hardware making their dreams of human annihilation a physical reality.

The question in need of a birthing which I hereby deliver, relates to the mammoth that is telecommunications, microwave, radar, internet and weapons systems, is this entity, though morphed many times.... an entity so huge that the term elephant in the room was penned to paper to describe as a prophecy, this corporation, the question must be raised to ascertain, is this company a major aspect of the military industrial complex we should see as the IG Farben of today's Nazi machine :

Marconi

The Marconi Company Ltd. was founded by Guglielmo Marconi in 1897 as The Wireless Telegraph & Signal Company (sometimes presented as Wireless Telegraph Trading Signal Company). It was renamed Marconi's Wireless Telegraph Company in 1900 and The Marconi Company in 1963.
As the defence division of GEC since 1968 it was renamed GEC-Marconi in 1987, Marconi Electronic Systems (MES) in 1998, which became part of BAE Systems in 1999. The Marconi Company should not be confused with the Marconi Corporation which was created in 1999 by the renaming of The General Electric Company (GEC), minus the Marconi Electronic Systems business.



Guglielmo Marconi 25 April 1874– 20 July 1937) was an Italian inventor, known as the father of long distance radiotransmission and for his development of Marconi's law and a radio telegraph system, which served as the foundation for the establishment of numerous affiliated companies worldwide. He shared the 1909 Nobel Prize in Physics with Karl Ferdinand Braun "in recognition of their contributions to the development of wireless telegraphy" and was ennobled in 1924 as Marchese Marconi.

Titanic
The two radio operators aboard the Titanic—Jack Phillips and Harold Bride—were not employed by the White Star Line, but by the Marconi International Marine Communication Company. Following the sinking of the ocean liner, survivors were rescued by the RMS Carpathia of the Cunard Line. Also employed by the Marconi Company was David Sarnoff, the only person to receive the names of survivors immediately after the disaster via wireless technology.

In 1914 Marconi was made a Senator in the Italian Senate and appointed Honorary Knight Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order in the UK. During World War I, Italy joined the Allied side of the conflict, and Marconi was placed in charge of the Italian military's radio service. He attained the rank of lieutenant in the Italian Army and of commander in the Italian Navy. In 1924, he was made a marquess by King Victor Emmanuel III.

Marconi joined the Italian Fascist party in 1923. In 1930, Italian dictator Benito Mussolini appointed him President of the Royal Academy of Italy, which made Marconi a member of the Fascist Grand Council.
Marconi died in Rome in 1937 at age 63 following a series of heart attacks, and Italy held a state funeral for him.

Operations as English Electric subsidiary
English Electric acquired The Marconi Company in 1946 which complemented its other operations; heavy electrical engineering, aircraft and its railway traction business. In 1948 the company was reorganised into four divisions :

Communications
Broadcasting
Aeronautics
Radar

These had expanded to 13 manufacturing divisions by 1965 when a further reorganisation took place. The divisions were placed into three groups :

Telecommunications
Electronics
Components

At this time The Marconi Company had facilities at New Street Chelmsford, Baddow, Basildon, Billericay, and Writtle as well as in Wembley, Gateshead and Hackbridge. It also owned Marconi Instruments, Sanders Electronics, Eddystone Radio and Marconi Italiana (based in Genoa, Italy). In 1967 Marconi took over Stratton and Company to form Eddystone Radio.

Expansion as GEC subsidiary
In 1967 or 1968 English Electric was subject to a takeover bid by the Plessey Company but chose instead to accept an offer from GEC. The computer section of GEC, English Electric Leo Marconi (EELM), merged with Elliott Automation and International Computers and Tabulators (ICT) to form Marconi Elliott Computer Systems Limited (later renamed GEC Computers Limited) and International Computers Limited (ICL). In 1968 Marconi Space and Defence Systems and Marconi Underwater Systems were formed.

The Marconi Company continued as the primary defence subsidiary of GEC, GEC-Marconi. Marconi was renamed GEC-Marconi in 1987. During the period 1968-1999 GEC-Marconi/MES underwent massive expansion.
Acquisitions which were folded into the company and partnerships established include :

Defence operations of Associated Electrical Industries in 1968, AEI had been acquired in 1967.
Ferranti defence businesses in 1990
Ferranti Dynamics in 1992
Vickers Shipbuilding and Engineering in 1995
Alenia Marconi Systems in 1998, a defence electronics company and an equal shares joint venture between GEC-Marconi and Finmeccanica's Alenia Difesa.
Tracor in 1998.

Other acquisitions include :

Divisions of Plessey in 1989 (others acquired by its partner in the deal, Siemens AG, to meet with regulatory approval).
Plessey Avionics
Plessey Naval Systems
Plessey Cryptography
Plessey Electronic Systems (75%)
Sippican
Leigh Instruments

In a major reorganisation of the company, GEC-Marconi was renamed Marconi Electronic Systems in 1996 and was separated from other non-defence assets.

In 1999 GEC underwent a major transformation. Marconi Electronic Systems which included its wireless assets was demerged and sold to British Aerospace which then formed BAE Systems.

GEC, realigning itself as a primarily telecommunications company following the MES sale, retained the Marconi brand and renamed itself Marconi plc. BAE were granted limited rights to continue its use in existing partnerships, however by 2005 no BAE businesses use the Marconi name. Major spending and the dot-com collapse led to a major restructuring of that group, in a debt-for-equity swap shareholders were given 0.5% of the new company, Marconi Corporation plc.

In 1999 Reltec and Fore Systems were acquired at the height of the "dot-com" boom. With its subsequent collapse the Marconi Corporation got into financial difficulties.

In October 2005 the Marconi name and most of the assets were proposed to be bought by the Swedish firm Ericsson. The transaction was completed on January 23, 2006 effective as per January 1, 2006. The Marconi name will still be used as brand within Ericsson. At the time of the acquisition Ericsson announced that they would be rebranding Marconi assets Ericsson and retaining Marconi only as the name of the Italian research facility. However the company has since labeled its OMS line and its Long Haul Digital Radio system Marconi. The rest of the Marconi company was renamed as telent plc.

Telent Limited is a radio, telecommunication, and internet systems installation & services provision company. The Company was formed in 2006 from the UK and German services businesses of Marconi Corporation (formerly General Electric Company) which had not been acquired by Ericsson.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telent


Telent Acquires Telecom Services Provider, Premises Networks

Premises Networks, which employs 40 people and has offices in the North West of England (Chorley) and in the London area, has an impressive history of providing products and services to a number of medium- to large organisations. The company's capabilities include: design, supply, installation and ongoing support and management of telecommunications solutions, such as hosted, ICT and VoIP solutions, and unified communications and mobility. The company is an accredited Aastra Advanced Sales and Service Business Partner, one of only three in the UK. It also has accreditations with other complementary product suppliers such as Mitel, Microsoft and AvsT.

Premises Networks' key customers include major telecom providers such as: BT, Ericsson and Global Crossing; and public sector organisations such as Eastleigh Borough Council, Lancashire County Council, Leeds City Council, Luton Borough Council, Notting Hill Housing Trust, University of Central Lancashire (UCLAN) and West London Mental Health Authority, among others.

http://www.science20.com/newswire/telent_acquires_telecom_services_pro vider_premises_networks

London Underground's Microwave OPO : http://www.telent.com/?q=node/1799


GEC has more TV stations especially across the America's, than people realise, it would be safe to say Mr Murdoch and the empire he fronts for the same families in control of all things Marconi, is small potatoes.

I see this Murdoch fiasco as nothing other than the move for all News International has managed to acquire in assets, is now activating the shift of this asset bank into the hands of the Marconi web, it makes sense that for the Committee of 300 to move their Fourth Reich into position, then it could only be achieved by fooling the masses we have a world with the likes of Murdoch as private adventurers in control of governments.

It was and remains the committee of 300 and its Intelligence grid dictating the script to the masses...we have looked in the wrong place in our forgetfulness of the fact...we live in the now today, this is where our attention is required.

[Life]

MBDA is a missile developer and manufacturer with operations in Britain, France, Germany, and Italy. It was formed by a merger of Aérospatiale-Matra Missiles (of EADS), Finmeccanica and Matra BAe Dynamics in December 2001. In 2003 the company had 10,000 employees. In 2008, the MBDA recorded a turnover of €2.7 bn, produced over 3,000 missiles and achieved an order book of €11.9 bn. MBDA works with over 90 armed forces worldwide.

History
The consolidation of Europe's missile companies began in 1996, when parts of Matra Defense and BAe Dynamics merged to form Matra BAe Dynamics (MBD). Matra BAe Dynamics represented half of Matra Hautes Technologies' missile business, the other half was Matra Missiles which became Aérospatiale-Matra Missiles (AMM), when Matra merged with Aérospatiale in 1999. In 2000, Aérospatiale-Matra became part of EADS.

In 1998, GEC-Marconi Radar and Defence Systems and Alenia Difesa combined their missile and radar activities to form Alenia Marconi Systems (AMS). In 1999 GEC-Marconi (renamed Marconi Electronic Systems) was sold to British Aerospace and became part of the merged company, BAE Systems.

In December 2001, MBD (including AMM) and the Missile and Missile Systems activities of AMS merged, creating MBDA. In June 2005, LFK, a unit of EADS Defence and Security Systems, agreed to be merged into MBDA. On 1 March, 2006, LFK became MBDA Deutschland. Since 6 February, 2002 MBDA owns 40% of Inmize Sistemas S.L., a Spanish company which was formed to integrate the experience and technology of the major Spanish defence companies in the guided weapons sector.

Shareholders

As of March 2009 -

BAE Systems (37.5%)
EADS (37.5%)
Finmeccanica (25%)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MBDA

Gov't gets pitch from missile, rocket makers : http://www.bt.com.bn/business-national/2011/07/10/govt-gets-pitch-miss ile-rocket-makers

MBDA Coordinating Franco-British Missile Research : http://www.defencetalk.com/mbda-coordinating-franco-british-missile-re search-19890/

DATE: 17/06/09
SOURCE: Flight Daily News

PARIS AIR SHOW: MBDA advances hypersonic missile work with Russian deal
By Craig Hoyle

MBDA France has signed a deal with Russia's Rosoboronexport leading to a 2013-15 campaign of test firings with the LEA air-breathing hypersonic air vehicle, under study since 2003. Each 4.2m (13.8ft) vehicle will be released from a Tupolev Tu-22 bomber before being taken to a speed of between Mach 2 and 8 using a Raduga-supplied booster rocket, says Francois Falempin, responsible for advanced propulsion with MBDA France.

http://harpgamer.com/harpforum/index.php?showtopic=4957

[Life]

The European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company N.V. (EADS) is a global pan-European aerospace and defence corporation and a leading defence and military contractor worldwide. The group includes Airbus as the leading manufacturer of commercial aircraft, with Airbus Military covering tanker, transport and mission aircraft; Eurocopter as the world's largest helicopter supplier; Astrium, the European leader in space programmes from Ariane to Galileo; and Cassidian as a provider of comprehensive and integral systems solutions for aerial, land, naval and civilian security applications.

Through Cassidian, EADS is a major partner in the Eurofighter consortium as well as a key stakeholder in the missile systems provider MBDA. In 2009, the EADS generated revenues of €42.82 billion and employed 119,500 personnel. EADS was formed on 10 July 2000 by the merger of Aérospatiale-Matra of France, DaimlerChrysler Aerospace AG (DASA) of Germany, and Construcciones Aeronáuticas SA (CASA) of Spain. Overall, the company develops and markets civil and military aircraft, as well as communications systems, missiles, space rockets, satellites, and related systems. The company is headquartered in Leiden, the Netherlands, and operates under Dutch law.

History

The 1997 merger of American corporations Boeing and McDonnell Douglas, which followed the forming of Lockheed Martin, [Carrying out the recent UK census 2011] the world's largest defence contractor in 1995, increased the pressure on European defence companies to consolidate. In June 1997, British Aerospace Defence Managing Director John Weston commented "Europe... is supporting three times the number of contractors on less than half the budget of the U.S.".

European governments wished to see the merger of their defence manufacturers into a single entity, a European Aerospace and Defence Company.

As early as 1995 the German aerospace and defence company DaimlerChrysler Aerospace (DASA) and its British counterpart British Aerospace were said to be eager to create a transnational aerospace and defence company. The two companies envisaged including Aérospatiale, the other major European aerospace company, but only after its privatisation.

The first stage of this integration was seen as the transformation of Airbus from a consortium of British Aerospace, DASA, Aérospatiale and Construcciones Aeronáuticas SA into an integrated company; in this aim BAe and DASA were united against the various objections of Aérospatiale. As well as Airbus, British Aerospace and DASA were partners in the Panavia Tornado and Eurofighter Typhoon aircraft projects. Merger discussions began between British Aerospace and DASA in July 1998, just as French participation became more likely with the announcement that Aérospatiale was to merge with Matra and emerge with a diluted French government shareholding.

A merger was agreed between British Aerospace Chairman Richard Evans and DASA CEO Jürgen Schrempp in December 1998. However when the British General Electric Company put its defence electronics business Marconi Electronic Systems (MES) up for sale on 22 December 1998, British Aerospace abandoned the DASA merger in favour of purchasing its British rival. The merger of British Aerospace and MES to form BAE Systems was announced on 19 January 1999 and completed on 30 November. Evans stated that in 2004 that his fear was that an American defence contractor would acquire MES and challenge both British Aerospace and DASA.


DASA and the Spanish aircraft company Construcciones Aeronáuticas SA agreed to merge with the signature of a memorandum of understanding on 11 June 1999. On 14 October 1999 DASA agreed to merge with Aérospatiale-Matra to create the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company. 10 July 2000 was "Day One" for the new company which became the world's second largest aerospace company after Boeing and the second-largest European arms manufacturer after BAE Systems.

In January 2001 Airbus Industrie was transformed from an inherently inefficient consortium structure to a formal joint stock company, with legal and tax procedures being finalised on 11 July. Both EADS and BAE transferred ownership of their Airbus factories to the new Airbus SAS in return for 80% and 20% shares in the new company respectively. In April 2001 EADS agreed to merge its missile businesses with those of BAE Systems and Alenia Marconi Systems (BAE/Finmeccanica) to form MBDA. EADS took a 37.5% share of the new company which was formally established in December 2001 and which thus became the world's second largest missile manufacturer.

On 16 June 2003 EADS acquired BAE's 25% share in Astrium, the satellite and space system manufacturer, to become the sole owner. EADS paid £84 million, however due to the lossmaking status of the company BAE invested an equal amount for "restructuring". It was subsequently renamed EADS Astrium. In November 2003, EADS announced that it was considering working with Japanese companies, and the Japanese METI, to develop a hypersonic airliner intended to be a larger, faster, and quieter, replacement for the Concorde, which was retired in October the same year.

Despite repeated suggestions as early as 2000 that BAE Systems wished to sell its 20% share of Airbus, the possibility was consistently denied by the company. However on 6 April 2006 BBC News reported that it was indeed to sell its stake, then "conservatively valued" at £2.4 billion. Due to the slow pace of informal negotiations, BAE exercised its put option which saw investment bank Rothschild appointed to give an independent valuation.

Six days after this process began, Airbus announced delays to the A380 with significant effects on the value of Airbus shares. On 2 June 2006 Rothschild valued BAE's share at £1.87 billion, well below BAE's, analysts' and even EADS' expectations. The BAE board recommended that the company proceed with the sale and on 4 October 2006 shareholders voted in favour; the sale was completed on 13 October making EADS the sole shareholder of Airbus.

In March 2007 EADS Defence and Security Systems division was awarded an eight year, £200m contract to provide the IT infrastructure for the FiReControl project in the UK.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EADS

[Life]

Core BT services
BT Germany is providing AXIO-NET with the following services in a
co-operative agreement that will stretch over several years :

• Implementation of an MPLS-based data WAN to link more than 200
reference stations, the ascos control centre in Hanover, and the data
centre in Frankfurt

• Management of the entire data centre infrastructure with internet
firewalls and associated GSM and GPRS connectivity

AXIO-NET
Behind AXIO-NET GmbH (AXIO-NET) are two of the most experienced and successful companies in the development, operation, and provision of satellite services – EADS Astrium Services GmbH (a subsidiary of European Aeronautics Defence and Space Company) and Allsat GmbH network+services. In early 2008, the two companies jointly founded AXIO-NET with the aim of further developing and marketing ascos – a satellite positioning system.

Dr. Christof Schäfer, Head of Value Added Services Navigation at EADS Astrium Services GmbH, explains :

“The most important aspect of our business is data; we simply cannot afford network failure or security lapses.” The company invited offers from suppliers with not only the required technological expertise and the willingness to handle special requirements, but also with a Europe-wide or – better still – global presence. BT emerged as the ideal partner.

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&sqi=2&ved=0CCMQFjAA&u rl=http%3A%2F%2Fglobalservices.bt.com%2Fstatic%2Fassets%2Fpdf%2Fcase_s tudies%2FEN_NEW%2Faxionet_case_study.pdf&rct=j&q=EADS%20and%20british% 20telecom&ei=I-cxTtPfHM2ZOtXL4ZIF&usg=AFQjCNEvhs8KizzBZi3jAyTPEQ3DFb3P Ow&cad=rja

Silent bandwidth battles at BT : http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/13/bandwidth_bt/

BT to drag T-Mobile onto 21st Century : http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/07/18/tmobile_bt_deal/

[Life]

BAE demos DSL-esque military radio protocol : http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/20/bae_dsl_via_link_16/

BAE bulging with cash and wardroids, worried about future : http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/22/bae_results_n_droids_future_wo rries/

BAE lands US Army minidroid horde contract : http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/04/29/bae_us_minidroids/

BAE in South Coast mouse-click drone spy plan : http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/08/bae_mouse_click_robot_spy_dove r_over/

Robot aircraft 'sense and avoid' gear in flight tests : http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/02/northrop_sense_and_avoid_tests  /

MoD proposes Salisbury Plain spy-plane droid playground : http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/06/17/salisbury_plain_spy/

EU defence agency wants open skies for flying robots : http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/05/29/eda_friendly_skies_for_flying_ robots/


And so it was in 2010, it was announced the Police are playing with drones in the skies above Blighty, and of course the drones are BAE the communication systems are BT, Marconi (in its chameleon form), we have strange white masts popping up everywhere... "it's for the superfabtastic supersonic broadband", or so they say....

We have the 2012 Olympics in one years time which just happens to be the 30th Olympiad, and, in London, the corporate Atlantis. We had the closing ceremony of the Chinese Olympics scripting all things alien, I see bloody aliens aright, but only through the telecommunications division called Hollywood.

If they can pass off the drones as alien lizards from the moon, while frying our asses off with the microwave and scalar technologies, again the fault of those aliens, then control of this globe comes down to play station-Xbox skills of the younger generations playing cod 4 in real time with real live bleeding fleebags (formerly known as humans).

I mean if Russia are a part of this technocratic madness...then explain to my rather exacerbated self, what the hell is the missile system planned for eastern Europe really all about?

I think we are beginning to see our new enemy, its all gone a bit robot and terminator, with data collection and scans of all descriptions forming the database for the robot army as it hunts down the plagued humans after they launch their biological chemistry over the populations.

http://www.lifeinthemix2.co.uk/galactic_alignment.html


In 1997 Siemens agreed to sell the defence arm of Siemens Plessey to British Aerospace (BAe) and a UK government agency, the Defence Analytical Services Agency (DASA). BAe and DASA acquired the British and German divisions of the operation respectively

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siemens

[Life]

More evidence this network is to subdue the populations globally, or if it is to be all out war, then we glimpse the fact those in control of the Military Industrial, are supplying all sides giving absolute control of all sides but more importantly, the outcome :

Weaponry

All weapon systems are designed to be compatible with both Western systems (ie. supporting MIL-STD-1760 data bus), Chinese systems and Pakistani systems as well. A total of 3,629 kg (8,000 lb) of ordnance can be loaded on the JF-17 Thunder. [Pakistan Aeronautical Complex.... Pakistan Aeronautical Complex ]

Cannon

One internal GSh-23-2 twin-barrel 23-mm [ [MILAVIA Aircraft - Chengdu FC-1/JF-17 Thunder Specifications MILAVIA Aircraft - Chengdu FC-1/JF-17 Thunder Specifications ] cannon has been installed on JF-17, which can be replaced with a 30-mm single-barrel cannon. [ [http://www.sinodefence.com/airforce/.../fc1_specs.asp FC-1/JF-17 Specifications - SinoDefence.com ]

Air-to-air weaponry

The JF-17 is primarily an export-oriented fighter, thus it can be built according a customer's specifications and use a variety of Chinese and Western weapon systems.

These include air-to-air Beyond Visual Range missiles (BVRs).

Non-Chinese weapons :

*R-Darter BVR-AAM (proposed at IDEAS 2006, Karachi, Pakistan)
*A-Darter WVR-AAM (also proposed at IDEAS 2006)
*T-Darter BVR-AAM (also proposed at IDEAS 2006)
*IRIS-T WVR-AAM (also proposed at IDEAS 2006)
*AIM-9L/P Sidewinder WVR-AAM
*AIM-7F Sparrow BVR-AAM
*AIM-120C-5 BVR-AAM
*Magic-II - R550 Magic [ [Matra Magic-II Matra Magic-II ] ]
*MBDA MICA
*Aspide
*BLU-107 Durandal

Chinese weapons :

*PL-5/PL-5C
*PL-9 Chinese copy of Python-3 for within visual range combat
*SD-10 BVRAAM, a Beyond Visual Range missile

Air-to-ground weaponry

In addition to unguided bombs and rockets, the aircraft is adopted to deploy a wide range of precision guided munitions, including:

Non-Chinese weapons :

*GBU-10 Paveway II
*GBU-12 Paveway II
*Mark 82 bomb
*Mark 84 bomb
*DPGM (Precision Guided Bomb) - Denel (South Africa)
*Raptor-I precision-guided long-range glide bomb (60 km) - Denel (South Africa)
*Raptor-II precision-guided long-range glide bomb (120 km) - Denel (South Africa)
*Rockeye - CBU-100 Cluster Bomb
*Anti-ship missile such as Exocet and Harpoon missile.
*Russian KAB series laser guided bombs; these Russian bombs cannot be directly mounted on weapon pylons like Western or Chinese munitions, instead, added special adapter rails are needed for JF-17s when using them

Indigenous Pakistani weapons :

*H-2 Air to Ground Munition(60 km)
*H-4 Air to Ground Munition(120 km)
*Ra'ad Stand-off cruise mssile (350 km)
*HAFR-2 Anti-Runway bomb

Chinese weapons :

*FT (Fei Teng) series of GPS guided bombs
*LT (Lei Ting) of laser guided bombs
*LS (Lei Shi) series of GPS glide bombs
*C-101 Supersonic Anti-ship missile
*FL-7 Supersonic Anti-ship missile
*C-701 Air-to-surface missile
*TL-10 Anti-ship missile for boats with displacement up to 500 tons
*TL-6 Anti-ship missile for boats/ships with displacement up to 1,000 tons
*C-704 Anti-ship missile for ships with displacement up to 3,000-4,000 tons
*C-801/802 Anti-ship missile for ships with displacement greater than 4,000 tons

All precision guided munitions listed above are either GPS or radar guided, and when the television or laser guided munitions are deployed, addition electro-optical targeting pods such as the Chinese-built Blue Sky pod must be carried externally in order to provide guidance and targeting information.

JF-17 Thunder : http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/27455-thunder-vs-tejas-2.ht ml

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/27455-thunder-vs-tejas-2.ht ml

Tip for National Military

After the German Lufthansa fleet found all their Boeing planes to have back-doors in the planes computer systems in order the US can take full control of the cockpit loop, to the point they grounded and reinstalled their own systems..... why O why do you purchase military hardware from US companies?

[Life]

Comverse Infosys Signs Agreement With Ericsson to Cooperate in the Distribution of CALEA Electronic Surveillance Products for Telecommunications Carriers and Switch Manufacturers

Comverse Infosys Inc., a subsidiary of Comverse Technology Inc. (Nasdaq:CMVT) and a global leader in digital recording technology, announced today that Ericsson has entered into a License and Distribution Agreement for Star-Gate(TM), Comverse Infosys' line of products designed for telecommunications carriers and switch manufacturers to comply with the electronic surveillance requirements of the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) of 1994. Ericsson plans to utilize STAR-GATE with the Ericsson CALEA delivery solution for switching platforms they have deployed in the U.S. including TDMA/AMPS (including the Home Location Register -- HLR), GSM and wireline.

Comverse likes to control telecommunications billing and issues the invoice for communication providers :

http://www.comverse.com/Data/Uploads/PR/PLDT_SMARTv8.pdf

Also big in Value Added Services (the BT mantra) :

http://www.comverse.com/partners





They think very highly of Elements :

http://uxelements.com/?page_id=190




Comverse has morphed into Verint Systems UK Limited which is a name change from the following :

Comverse Technology (Europe Limited)
Comverse Infosys Limited
Worldclass Technology Limited

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Comverse+Infosys+Signs+Agreement+With+Er icsson+to+Cooperate+in+the...-a063556064

Verint and the 77 London and Madrid Bombings :

VERINT...security...The same company Verint, whose camera systems inconveniently for us malfunctioned on 7/7/05 during the London Bombings, are the same company whose cameras are being set up around the area to provide security. Also worthy of noting is that during a large terrorist attack, as the DOW goes down, stocks at Verint have always shown to have gone up. They also apparently had part in the security of the airports involved during 9/11 and were found to be connected to the bombings in Madrid on 3/11 as well. ...AND GUESS WHO IS HANDLING SECURITY AT 2012...VERINT

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread674877/pg1

Comverse Website : http://www.comverse.com/mobile_internet_news_and_events

Voice recognition capability :

Verint Systems keeps a close eye on all sorts of data. Formerly Comverse Infosys, the company provides analytic software for communications interception, video surveillance, and business intelligence. Its software allows communications service providers to capture voice, fax, video, and e-mail transmissions for customer service operations, while other products (sold to law enforcement and government agencies) are used for intercepting, processing, and analyzing data. Verint offers business intelligence software to improve call centre efficiency by recording and analysing the actions of call centre agents, as well as video surveillance systems. Comverse Technology owns a majority stake in the company.

Perfect also to further the drone database recognition capabilities.

http://www.answers.com/topic/verint-systems-inc#ixzz1TcpBvE1d

Verint and British Telecom

Quote

Find out what your customers want

Your contact centre agents' voice and screen interactions provide a rich source of data. They tell you what customers want and need – and how well your company is serving those needs.

BT Contact Recording – Verint captures, stores and indexes your contact centre interactions to help you provide a better service to customers, comply with industry regulations and reduce liability.

http://globalservices.bt.com/LeafAction.do?Record=Contact_Recording_Ve rint_products_uk_en-gb&fromPage=Furl&chapterKey=1





An interesting development last year :

If a deal is closed, it will probably be in two parts: first the acquisition of Comverse Technology, immediately followed by the sale of Comverse Inc., probably to Oracle Corporation, Comverse’s main competitor in the billing-solutions market.

http://www.jpost.com/Business/Globes/Article.aspx?id=197159

Oracle partners with Intelligent Addressing :

http://www.scribd.com/doc/36513770/050-John-Adam-St-Gang-Intelligent-A ddressing-Ezine-Dec-2009

[Life]

The manipulation by corporate interests into the lives of the British public advanced with the privatisation of the British Telecom infrastructure. It has opened the whole show to Intelligence through utilising the software offered by high end shell companies to the Isp giants :

Quote

The Crown Prosecution Service’s decision not to prosecute BT and Phorm over their secret interception of internet traffic closes a chapter of Britain’s biggest online privacy scandal.

Phorm first hit headlines in February 2008, when it announced it had signed deals with BT, TalkTalk and Virgin Media – the country’s three largest ISPs – to install its advertising system. Its share price immediately soared as investors bought into suggestions it would become a major competitor to Google.

Although based on some advanced interception technology called Deep Packet Inspection, the principle of what Phorm aimed to do was simple: it would intercept all of the web pages BT, TalkTalk and Virgin Media customers visited and the scan virtually all of them for keywords. It would even scan what they searched for on Google.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/8438461/BT-and-Phorm-how-an -online-privacy-scandal-unfolded.html




Phorm

Phorm, formerly known as 121Media, is a Delaware, United States-based digital technology company known for its advertising software. Founded in 2002, the company originally distributed programs that were considered spyware, from which they made millions of dollars in revenue. It has since stopped distributing those programs after complaints from groups in the United States and Canada, and announced it was talking with several United Kingdom Internet service providers (ISPs) to deliver targeted advertising based on the websites that users visit.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phorm


Deep Packet Inspection

Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) (also called complete packet inspection and Information eXtraction - IX -) is a form of computer network packet filtering that examines the data part (and possibly also the header) of a packet as it passes an inspection point, searching for protocol non-compliance, viruses, spam, intrusions or predefined criteria to decide if the packet can pass or if it needs to be routed to a different destination, or for the purpose of collecting statistical information. There are multiple headers for IP packets, network equipment only needs to use the first of these (the IP header) for normal operation, but use of the second header (TCP, UDP etc.) is normally considered to be shallow packet inspection (usually called Stateful Packet Inspection) despite this definition.

Deep Packet Inspection (and filtering) enables advanced network management, user service, and security functions as well as internet data mining, eavesdropping, and censorship. Although DPI technology has been used for Internet management for many years, some advocates of net neutrality fear that the technology can be used anticompetitively or to reduce the openness of the Internet.

DPI is currently being used by the enterprise, service providers and governments in a wide range of applications.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_packet_inspection

How it Works (image)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/45/Phorm_diagram.svg