Charlie Veitch Arrested In Pre-Crime Raid Prior to Royal Wedding
Hi guys,
My apologies for sending this to multiple emails – this news is
important and needs to get out quick, and these are the only Infowars
addresses I have.
My boyfriend, Charlie Veitch of the Love Police (UK) was arrested
today from our own home on suspicion of a ‘conspiracy to cause a
public nuisance’ tomorrow at the Royal Wedding. By nuisance, they mean
speaking freely in a public space, which is what Charlie does. He went
to the police recently, on his own accord, to discuss how he is
entirely non-aggressive and not a threat to them but a friend to them.
If you were wondering if the UK is still a democracy – the answer is
evidently no. I have never known so many democratic activists be
arrested, not only on suspicion of thought-crime, speech-crime, or
political assembly crimes – but now actually these ‘offenses’ as
PRE-crime?!
My name is Silkie – I am Charlie’s partner and a student of politics
and psychology at The University of Cambridge. I would very much like
to get the word out to your listeners/readers.
I’d particularly ask anyone who is similarly outraged by this to call
(+44) 845 456 456 4 and ask for the custody block, who will be quite
aggresive and rude (as they have been to me), in order to maintain the
pressure and demand his release.
- Show quoted text -
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 2568 Location: One breath from Glory
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:43 pm Post subject:
according to MSM reports the police have made preemptive arrests on a number of squatts. The only thing they could come up with is "stealing electricity"
I believe Bin Laden is marrying the happy couple. _________________ JO911B.
"for we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, against powers, against rulers of the darkness of this world, against wicked spirits in high places " Eph.6 v 12
28 April 2011 Last updated at 17:46 Help
A radio phone-in caller to BBC Three Counties radio, Melvin from Milton Keynes, expresses his anger at the coverage devoted to the royal wedding.
Angry radio caller complaining about the royal wedding.
Link _________________ 'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
Vietch is an attention seeker, who having worked as a banker and now wants to "fight the system". His merchant banking brother and his father in big oil must be proud of him. He can push the mantra of the Royal family being head of the, so called, New World Order and at the same time divert attention away from the corporate and banking financial elites, who hide in the shadows and have real power.
I wonder if anyone has worked out how he and Silki manage to fund themselves?
Vietch is an attention seeker, who having worked as a banker and now wants to "fight the system". His merchant banking brother and his father in big oil must be proud of him. He can push the mantra of the Royal family being head of the, so called, New World Order and at the same time divert attention away from the corporate and banking financial elites, who hide in the shadows and have real power.
I wonder if anyone has worked out how he and Silki manage to fund themselves?
??? when has he ever said the Royals are top???
It is something I don't even claim but I do see how far their tentacles reach!
is this post a personal vendetta? _________________ 'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
??? when has he ever said the Royals are top???
It is something I don't even claim but I do see how far their tentacles reach!
is this post a personal vendetta?
Not a personal vendetta. I'm just fed up of hearing - mainly American's and Alex Jones and his followers - claim the Royal family are at the head of a pyramid representing the New World Order. People claim these people have power, exactly how much power do you need in order to affect news coverage? Because they can't seem to quite manage it! What a distraction!!!
If it was so easy to change our constitutional framework, we wouldn't have a monarchy but we do. They are as much trapped by the system as the rest of us. We fought a civil war to check their power and devolve it to parliament. It would take something similar to change what is left. And as much as what we have is far from perfect, it is built on hundreds of years of fighting for rights and freedoms. I'd be worried if we threw it out over night what would replace it, here and in parts of the Commonwealth. Someones agenda? Of course, we all know that globalisation is in the hands of big business and big banks. They want a "one world order" to project their power and inflence, less checked by national boundaries, cultural norms, taxes and other restrictions.
As for Charlie Veitch, well whatever you make of him, he seems confused, one minuet he's pissing everyone off with his new age rants about Christians and the next he's saying he's a Satanist.
I'm not a Royalist but I am a patriot, this country has almost been destroyed by globalists. The union has been divided and it's ready for the chop. No one identifies themselves as British, everyone seems to think it's cool to knock the idea of being British. It's so easy to destroy everything that took centuries to create, to be replaced by what? And exactly how? If we're not careful, we're doing the work of the globalists, for them.
The Queen as head of the NWO is about as insane as it gets!!! But where did that idea spring from? Lyndon LaRouche a US nutbag... he makes VERY interesting reading and you have to ask what kind of agenda was he serving and who was pulling the strings...
quote - "Members all over the world would send information to NCLC headquarters, which would distribute it via briefings and other publications. It would include political developments about supposed behind-the-scenes processes, though Alexander wrote that they were more often flights of fancy than inside information. Douglas Foster wrote in Mother Jones in 1982 that the briefings consisted of disinformation, "hate-filled" material about enemies, phony letters, intimidation, fake newspaper articles, and dirty tricks campaigns. Opponents were accused of being gay or Nazis, or were linked to murders, which the movement called "psywar techniques."
The Queen as head of the NWO is about as insane as it gets!!! But where did that idea spring from? Lyndon LaRouche a US nutbag... he makes VERY interesting reading and you have to ask what kind of agenda was he serving and who was pulling the strings...
Then you need to read the work of "Dr. John Coleman" about the seed of David and thier entourage (Nothing to do with Lyndon LaRouche, as many know here that he Lyndon LaRouche was working with the NWO via the CPUSA in the seventies and for example explained by Bill Still of "The Money Masters fame" although he Lyndon LaRouche may have changed some of his views in the time since then.
Then you need to read the work of "Dr. John Coleman" about the seed of David and thier entourage (Nothing to do with Lyndon LaRouche, as many know here that he Lyndon LaRouche was working with the NWO via the CPUSA in the seventies and for example explained by Bill Still of "The Money Masters fame" although he Lyndon LaRouche may have changed some of his views in the time since then.
Dr John Colman - where did he earn his phd? I can't find any reference, anywhere, as to where he earned his phd or what it was in. Only questions as to whether he has one. Likewise, he claims to have been in MI6, although there is no proof for this, he hasn't been arrested, or charged, under the Official Secrets Act, and MI6 claim he never served for them!
I wonder if his books are academically referenced? Because, it seems to me that most books on these topics lack ANY references. And anyone can claim virtually anything, like the Queen is a reptilian, etc. It only falls down, when you have to provide evidence!!!
This is what I mean about the truth movement. It seemed to start off great, questioning the pretext for the wars of the 21st century and the geopolitical agendas behind them. Now it's shot off in all directions, with people jumping to conclusions about everything from there being a giant Zionist conspiracy to take over the planet, to it being led by the Queen, who is really a reptilian and has an army of aliens living amongst her, by her side! I exaggerate... but only slightly. Do you see where I am going?
The Queen as head of the NWO is about as insane as it gets!!! But where did that idea spring from? Lyndon LaRouche a US nutbag... he makes VERY interesting reading and you have to ask what kind of agenda was he serving and who was pulling the strings...
Then you need to read the work of "Dr. John Coleman" about the seed of David and thier entourage (Nothing to do with Lyndon LaRouche, as many know here that he Lyndon LaRouche was working with the NWO via the CPUSA in the seventies and for example explained by Bill Still of "The Money Masters fame" although he Lyndon LaRouche may have changed some of his views in the time since then.
Charlie Veitch's political arrest in Cambridge. Freedom of Speech in the UK is dead. This must be resisted.
Jazds, you are not a very intelligent person. Why do you want to attack someone who gets out there and does something? You carry on. Just sit in front of your computer being negative and doing nothing. How sad.
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" - Edmund Burke
Jazds, you are not a very intelligent person. Why do you want to attack someone who gets out there and does something? You carry on. Just sit in front of your computer being negative and doing nothing. How sad.
Because I don't believe Charlie Veitch is doing anything, other than pissing people off and causing a distraction - for whatever reason.
Rather than calling me stupid, perhaps you could address some of the points I raised above, David.
Jazds: The Queen and the British Royal family play a central role in perpetuating an international political order that supports elite rule over "the people".
Its role is both real and symbolic and therefore anyone resisting the present political order has to be against the continued power and privilege enjoyed by the British Royal family. It follows that anyone who is against Charlie Veitch protesting against the Royal Wedding (ie: you Jazds) is in fact perpetuating the present political order of huge inequalities, where 25,000 children die each day of conditions caused by preventable poverty.
Jazds, what are you doing to stop 25,000 children dying everyday of preventable poverty when the elites (symbolised and normalised by the British Royal Family) continue to own and control the vast majority of the earth's human and non-human resources and therefore are responsible for the deaths of these innocent children?
Please support this important work by purchasing the book from the link below
Andrew, rather than post a link for Colman's book, perhaps you'd like to address the points I raised above.
As it happens, I have a PDF copy of Colman's book above, there seems to be a lot of these free PDF copies on the internet!
There are NO - that is ZERO - references to anything he has written or claimed in that book. It hasn't been proof read very adequately, either as I spotted numerous errors on the pages I read. Without knowing who Dr Colman is, what his background is and where his sources material came from, it just as well may be thrown in the bin as read. Because, it could be 10% fact and 90% garbage for all we know.
If this is the kind of material "truthers" are claiming as their source material for "the truth" we're in trouble!
The kind of books I would read are John Pilger, Naomi Kline, Nafeez Ahmed, Dr David Ray Griffin, Dr Peter Dale Scott, Daniele Ganser, Noam Chomsky - well researched, extensively referenced. There is a long list of authors and books well worth reading but so many "truthers" tend to want to read pulp faction from suspect authors.
The material I would NOT rely on would be Jim Marrs, David Icke, Webster Tarpley, Alex Jones - because some of what I've read from them is complete garbage, all of them have agendas and some of them are just plain angry or cranky. Take Jim Marrs claims about the Report from Iron Mountain - which has since 1973 been known to have been authored by Leonard Lewin - not only did he successfully win copyright but the publishers knew him as the author, yet Marrs didn't even mention the case, let alone attempt to debunk it in his book Secret Rulers of the World (another unreferenced book).
That's more like it. But please refer to my previous comments as to what I am objecting to. I'm as against elite rule over the people as anyone else but the problem is just getting rid of the Royal family isn't going to solve the problem. The US is a far more wealth and class ridden country than the UK. In the US it's isn't just money that talks (it gets you into places - politics, business - and out of trouble far more eaisly than probably anywhere else on Earth), it is your colour, race, class and family. Yet the US hasn't had a monarchy for 235 years! How about Kenya, Kenya hasn't had a monarchy for over 50 years and yet we see another country ridden by a few families who own most of the land and most of the wealth. The destruction of the constitutional framework of post independence nations throughout Africa is a testament to throwing the baby out with the bathwater. I agree with everything you say below but they are a distraction - trapped in the current system as much as we are. The problem is neo-libralism, global financial elites and the power they exert through their banking interests and their control of the media and money supply. The Royal family are a nice side show for them, to have you argue over... call it divide and rule!
David Rose wrote:
Jazds: The Queen and the British Royal family play a central role in perpetuating an international political order that supports elite rule over "the people".
Its role is both real and symbolic and therefore anyone resisting the present political order has to be against the continued power and privilege enjoyed by the British Royal family. It follows that anyone who is against Charlie Veitch protesting against the Royal Wedding (ie: you Jazds) is in fact perpetuating the present political order of huge inequalities, where 25,000 children die each day of conditions caused by preventable poverty.
Jazds, what are you doing to stop 25,000 children dying everyday of preventable poverty when the elites (symbolised and normalised by the British Royal Family) continue to own and control the vast majority of the earth's human and non-human resources and therefore are responsible for the deaths of these innocent children?
@Jazds: So you are in favour of Charlie Veitch protesting the Royal Wedding because the British Royal Family symbolically and materially supports
elite rule on a trans-national, Imperial level.
The Royal family are a nice side show for them, to have you argue over... call it divide and rule!
The so called Royal family have been married into the banking families since the time of William Shakespeare and have their own nepotistic interests at heart, at everyone else’s expense.
For example “Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg” swore to uphold the Royal Laws of Liberty (where everyone is equal in that Law with Law’s for every department of life and order)
Pilger on Diego Garcia must give a nod to the Royals true power and nature _________________ 'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 12:21 pm Post subject:
What an interesting discussion on the constitutional positiopn of the royals in Britain in relation to the New World Order.
In discussions like this it's always helpful to see who is actually answering the points of the other side rather than just slagging off people's alleged motives. On that count alone jazds comes out on top.
Having said all that nobody can blame somebody because of the family they come from. Quite often wealthy families produce well-resourced progeny that decide they want to make a positive difference in the world like all posters on this forum do and make a dent in the evil empire of the dark forces.
Bear in mind though that since the English Civil War in the 1640's the monarchy has been straitjacketed by the 26 member Order of the Garter. This is why nobody half decent such as Princess Diana is allowed to survive as part of the royal family. Remember too that they play a big role in the armed forces and appointment of magistrates etc etc so their constitutional role is actually quite hidden.
European Royalty also play a big role in Bilderberg where almost all of the money in the NATO countries and Western world generally is controlled.
This murderous BS in Afghanistan, Iraq and now Libya too, picking up where the Nazis left off in destroying monotheistic religions, could never happen without royal approval, however tacit.
IMO The Windsors/Saxe-Coburg Gotha/Dracula family play an important role in the New World Order elitist corporate eugenics system.
And their most trusted 'knights' - the two covens that make up the Order of the Garter, ensure the royal family don't think about ordinary people. Just take a look at Diana to see what happens to any royal who has a heart.
I'm sure running around in Afghanistan calling a brother in arms Paki will have helped _________________ 'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
Having said all that nobody can blame somebody because of the family they come from.
Which is why I gave the specific example of one so called Royal who swore to uphold the Royal Law's of Liberty i.e.
"For example “Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg” swore to uphold the Royal Laws of Liberty (where everyone is equal in that Law with Law’s for every department of life and order)"
And she like everyone, is not above the Law.
She “Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg” has given Royal-Assent (so called) to 3,401 Acts of Parliament (as of 24/03/2011) and thus broken The Law against legislating 3,401 times.
If it has been against her will, then that should be determined in a court of Law.
PS. Thankyou for the example of "Diana to see what happens to any royal who has a heart."
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
