So.. 9/11 Truth is dead... what next?

[iro]

Is there anyone here who thinks it is worth pursuing 9/11 truth any more?

10th anniversary coming up... infighting and silly antics have derailed any chance of this movement ever having a critical coordinated mass.. The case has been publicly made yet the case has not stuck.

so what next? Give up? Move on?

[TonyGosling]

okay so you didn't notice this summer's Richard Gage UK tour for example
and the questioning of the Bin Laden is dead story
now what was it you were going to contribute?

[iro]

[warp66]

From a personal viewpoint. I have followed this website for many years albeit not as an active member.I do say 9/11 served a purpose.To make those people who knew something was wrong with their lives but couldn't fathom what it was ,,,wake up! 911 was a catalyst ..As the really dedicated researchers on here posted all kind of allied information it made people like me realise the bigger picture .My opinion today ? 9/11 was a symptom ..not the problem to be treated .I think now the world is waking up. So from that point of view , the whole cause did what it set out to do. Maybe now it is time to go forward and keep whittling away at the establishment. It amazes me how many people today are prepared to listen to what I say and at least think about it , as compared to ,say, 5 years ago. That is progress I think Softly softly catchy monkey , as somebody once said ,
Power to the People !!

[warp66]

Forgot to add , Thank you to you all for opening my mind !

[Thermate911]

9/11 Truth is by no means dead and forgotten, much as Zion is so very desperate to make it so:-

"Arguments Regarding the Collapse of the World Trade Center Evaporate Upon Inspection


Preface: Now that Bin Laden has been confirmed to be dead, it has been established that Saddam Hussein was not behind 9/11 (one of the main reasons for the Iraq war), and Iran has been accused of having a hand in 9/11 - potentially forming the basis for a war against Iran - it is time to revisit some important, unanswered questions.

This essay does not argue that bombs brought down the Twin Towers or World Trade Building 7, even though many top structural engineers believe that is what happened, and people could easily have planted bombs in the trade centers without anyone noticing and without the conspiracy being discovered.

It simply addresses the frequent argument that fires caused the metal to sag, which brought down the 3 buildings, and that the case is closed."

Loads more good recap at:-
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/05/arguments-regarding-collapse-of -world.html

tenacity roolz, okay...

[fish5133]

Well i am still educating people about Building 7. Truth will still set people free even if we cant fight the perps directly

[TonyGosling]

Personally I see the number of people who believe the official story shrinking all the time.
The financial crisis has ironically helped, massively eroding ordinary peoples' trust in officialdom.