Dear
All,
Following
some thought and reflection I have now unlocked the locked threads. I have the
following ideas for all posters to consider:
1)
If people want to waste their time posting pointless replies to someone
who isn’t interested in the truth – merely in stating that “he/she/it is
the only person who knows what it is” and that we are the opposite of what
we know we are – they are free to do just that.
2)
Johnny Pixels is either a software entity or person who is paid to do
what he does.
3)
His strategy of wasting our time has been quite successful.
4)
It is possible the JP is working in tandem with someone else who is
apparently “on our side”. This is simple technique will fuel the time
wasting process and be much more effective at sucking genuine people into the
fake debate.
So,
can we learn any lessons from this? Yes! As one of my good friends put it
“DON’T FEED THE TROLLS!”
I
will try to keep moving posts of people of Johnny’s ilk to the critics
corner, but this could take time as whomever is doing it may intensify their
efforts to derail our campaign, so I’m not going to attempt to fight it that
much – there is too much else to be done.
To
JP, and their type, what you have done has certainly not been a complete waste
of my own time. In my effort to determine whether you are a machine or not, I
decided to contact someone I haven’t spoken to for over 14 years and I used
the e-mail below to advise him of the current “state of play” with our
campaign. He is a professor now. So hopefully he will learn the truth too.
Whoever
or whatever you are, it is your efforts that will ultimately fail – because
of those genuine people who post against you – collectively we stand against
you and your agenda.
I
will do my best not to be drawn in to any debates on “critics corner” for
all the reasons outlined above. I will post this message to threads where JP
has posted.
Thank
you.
Dear Dave,
I wonder if you
remember me. The last time I spoke to you was probably over 14 years ago when
we both worked above the Canteen at Technology Drive, Beeston, for the (now
dismembered) GPT. I used to work with Nick Thompson and Dave Mason for Dave
Wright's (redundant) squad - at the same time you worked for Douggie Laws.
Sorry to
"interrupt" your busy schedule. Don't feel the need to reply to this
message. I will get to why I thought of you later on. I would warn you that,
if you want to try and answer this question honestly, it may turn your world
upside down (no, it's not religious - it is, essentially, a technical
question).
I was just
browsing your cv - man, what a cv! I'm a bit flummoxed by it actually, and
rather ambivalent about asking you what I wanted to ask you, because it's kind
of trivial, but behind the question is an issue of global importance.
Like many people,
I experienced "The Broadband Revolution" - in about May 2003 (when
it became available in our area on NTL). Since then, well, let's say I have
had "a 30+ hours per week unpaid research job". To cut a long
story short, this has lead me to join, following invitation, a loose
association of Scholars called "Scholar's
for 9/11 Truth". This group formed in about December last year and
it's most prominent member is probably Professor (Emeritus) Morgan Reynolds,
who served in George
W Bush's 1st Administration for 16 months in the Department of Labour .
You can find out about other members of the group on the web link, and also
here are audios (done by other people) of several of them being interviewed
etc (stored on my own website).
I have also
become involved in The British 9/11
Truth Campaign, with "these hats on", I have corresponded with
people like Michael Meacher and BBC News Director Helen Boaden. Some of this
correspondence (and other stuff) can be found on the Campaign Forum Website (link).
This brings me to
my question, which, from your considerable knowledge and experience, you
may be able to give me some thoughts on - or ask someone you might know for
theirs, as it may be a little outside your field. I have no idea why your name
suddenly came into my mind, except that I remember you as a jolly, affable and
extremely intelligent person (honest!)
QUESTION:
In the past couple of months, we have experienced increasing
"attacks" on our forum, and I wondered if you thought it would be
feasible that a "forum posting Bot" exists somewhere in the world.
My reason for
asking has been brought on by a sequence of posts I have made on this thread.
Scan through my
posts which respond to "Johnny Pixels". Is Johnny Pixels a real
person, or is he, perhaps what I suggest (jokingly) he might be (on the
thread)? I wonder if something could pass the Turing test. Looking at the
latest competition, http://loebner.net/Prizef/2005_Contest/Transcripts.html it
would seem not. However, on our forum, the topics are fairly narrow and you
don't post questions in a random or "gobbledegook" fashion. Also,
the communication is not real time. Added to that, the "black
technology" is at least 30 to 40 years in advance of anything publicly
disclosed, so my current guess would be around 80% probability that
"Johnny Pixels" and his ilk are software entities. Do you know any
AI experts, or linguists or psychologists who would profile the thread?
In reality, the
answer to this particular question is perhaps not that important, if you care
to consider the information posted on the forum and, why the forum even exists
in the 1st place. (My answers below).
For myself, I can
say for sure that the scenario portrayed in Orwell's 1984 (Orwell's real
name was Eric Blair, don't you know) is pretty much what we are very near to
now - and I am now personally engaged in a vigorous information war, and a
battle for our freedom.The US and UK are either supporting Israel or being
lead by them in planned genocide in the Middle East. I wish I could convince
myself otherwise. BBC News has now become a propaganda organisation where, for
regular news bulletins, no one is willing to do real investigative
journalism and ask any hard questions of those that should be questioned. This
is proved by the BBC's point blank refusal to cover the formation of our
highly-credentialed Scholars Group (see
our forum for
proof). They fake impartiality. The ignore or distort important stories,
but are happy to report inconsequential trivialities as part of
"editorial policy" - and we pay for it. The proof of this is in the
fact that you know nothing about the Worldwide 9/11 Truth campaign (if it is
true that you currently know nothing about it).
I am sorry if
this has spoiled your day. Take a look at the Scholars group and see what you
make of it. More info and free
DVDs available on request. Other comments and feedback greatly welcomed. I
hope you'll come and join the party. We need all the "rockers" we
can get.
Cheers for
reading this, dude - from way back, to right now....
Andrew (Johnson)
Still the same
really, if you remember me....
P.S. This
is about as far as I've pushed out my boat on this issue so far.
[/html]
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
