7/7: Crime and Prejudice - new documentary by Tom Secker

[Prole]

7/7: Crime and Prejudice

7/7: Crime and Prejudice - YouTube

A brand new investigative and analytical documentary from the maker of 7/7: Seeds of Deconstruction. It explores the 7/7 cold case via new evidence from the recent inquests and discusses the war on terror in the context of numerous miscarriages of justice and acts of violence committed by the state.

The first section of the film examines the history of the British state's use of double agents, from the Victorian Anarchists through WW2 to the war in Northern Ireland. It concludes by examining contemporary cases of injustice and violence carried out as part of the war of terror against Muslims.

The second section of the film is a multi-dimensional study of the new evidence made available at the recent inquests. It looks at the evidence of a wider conspiracy and the fundamental flaws in the official narrative and the police investigation. It also discusses why the dialogue about 'intelligence failures' itself fails to address the very real possibility of state involvement in the attacks.

The final section of the film returns to the Anarchists and the case of Martial Bourdin, Britain's first suicide bomber, in 1894. The mythology surrounding Bourdin is used as a foundation for examining the numerous films, tv shows training exercises and real life events that either predicted 7/7 or were influenced by the attacks. The question of conspiracy theories is addressed through an original analysis unique to this film.

7/7 Crime and Prejudice combines a presentation of the cutting edge of July 7th research with a deeply contextual analysis that casts light on largely unexamined aspects of the war on terror.

For further information about 7/7 please visit the website of the July 7th Truth Campaign and their dedicated 7/7 Inquests blog:

http://julyseventh.co.uk/
http://77inquests.blogspot.com/

[Vinciguerra]

Another year goes by, another film about 7/7.

The film above was referred to by Gosling during one of his recent radio shows. You can listen to or download the show here:
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2011/09/484767.html

Not only does Gosling not mention who made the film, he never asked my permission to use a clip from it in his show.

But far more importantly, the clip was used as the basis for a largely inaccurate discussion about the WTC93 bombing.

Gosling's co-host claimed that it was an FBI plot from start to finish. This isn't true - the FBI informant among the group who carried out the bombing (Emad Salem) was sacked in August 1992, six months before the bombing took place. It is possible that Ramzi Yousef and Omar Abdel Rahman (the Blind Sheikh) were involved with the CIA, but the plot had nothing to do with the FBI, except in the sense that they failed to stop it from happening.

Gosling's co-host claimed that immediately after the bombing the FBI rounded up a bunch of people and said that they did it. This also isn't true. The FBI actually got very lucky as one of the conspirators was particularly dim, and went back to the rental agency of the truck used in the bombing. Investigators had found parts from the truck in the wreckage of the bombing and traced it back to the rental agency, where they arrested Mohammed Salameh. Rahman was not arrested until months later, and his trial was a separate affair (US vs Rahman et al and US vs Salameh et al). Yousef was not arrested until nearly two years later, in 1995. Yousef then extensively confessed to the FBI.

Gosling's co-host also called John Loftus the 'former Attorney General of the United States', which isn't true. Loftus is of course the man who claimed that Haroon Aswat worked for MI6. It may be important to note that only days after Loftus' interview regarding Aswat that Loftus used his slot on Fox to give out the address of a suspected terrorist, Iyad K. Hilal. The house was vandalised and people who lived there were threatened, but Hilal had moved away THREE YEARS earlier.

'straight talking and investigative reports' - what a load of balls.

In the future, Gosling, if you must refer to my work then you are to do the following:
1) Get my permission before explicitly using my work
2) Name me as the author of that work
3) Don't use my work in the context of a load of conspiratorial hogwash of half-truths and complete untruths.

The latter is particularly important. If you are actually a journalist, and a truth activist, then accuracy should be important to you...

[TonyGosling]

mmmmmmm
you write more like a webtroll than a serious journalist - pity

1 - I don't need your permission so why would I ask?
2 - Fine - wasn't sure if it was a pseudonym.
3 - The most important aspect of the discussion was in fact the point about MI5 trying to recruit the paintballer ... and fortunately I don't control or have responsibility for what other contributers say.
Yes some of what Martin said was wrong but the point of the piece was to encourage listeners to explore your film for themselves. Which it certainly did.

If you are to take yourself seriously recognise the good and the bad, not just the bad.
You remind me of the chap who wrote Zeitgeist who attacked anyone who gave him a negative review.
I wouldn't mind betting you have a similar deeply erroneous world view too.

Thanks for the corrections - but try next time not to load up your communications with so much baggage.

[Vinciguerra]

[Andrew.]

[Andrew.]

[TonyGosling]

Journalists are not 'all knowing' and not including your name does not mean I knew it and deliberately refused to use it.
Sorry Tim but I didn't know your name until it appeared on this thread.
I have to confess I have not even watched all your films all the way through.
And now I understand what the baggage was all about.
Thanks for that.
Absolutely anybody, including you, who sends me rude or abusive communications is likely to find it permanently published on the web such as here: http://www.bilderberg.org/emails.htm#Bad
BTW I have issued an apology for the factual error you pointed out at the start of the second hour on tonight's show so a genuine thanks for flagging that up and your film got another plug - so all to the good.
You can have a listen here: http://bcfm.org.uk/2011/09/30/17/friday-drivetime-39/9749

[Andrew.]