| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
SHERITON HOTEL
Moderate Poster
Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 988
|
 Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 3:48 pm Post subject: History of Bush regime response to 911 truth movement |
 |
|
Not long after 9/11 we had Bush at the UN saying let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories about the attacks of September11... but no follow up to this, does "never tolerate" mean something different in Texas? Any coverage of the 9/11 truth in the US mainstream media , as far as I can tell, seems to be treat them, at best., as unhinged eccentrics, or get some right wing shock jock to be openly abusive. There has been a near total 9/11 truth blackout in the UK mainstream media. We had the "20th 911 hijacker trial" but no mention that OBL is not to be charged re. 911 by the FBI for lack of hard evidence. You get the usual suspects on internet news forums (where the mods condescend to allow you to actually debate the 911 truth) sitting there like guard dogs waiting to pounce, rarely with cogent counter arguement.
Why oh why don't the Bush regime sue those who accuse them of 9/11 mass murder and high treason and have done with it all? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Johnny Pixels
Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 932
Location: A Sooper Sekrit Bunker
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:03 pm Post subject: Re: History of Bush regime response to 911 truth movement |
|
|
| SHERITON HOTEL wrote: | Not long after 9/11 we had Bush at the UN saying let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories about the attacks of September11... but no follow up to this, does "never tolerate" mean something different in Texas? Any coverage of the 9/11 truth in the US mainstream media , as far as I can tell, seems to be treat them, at best., as unhinged eccentrics, or get some right wing shock jock to be openly abusive. There has been a near total 9/11 truth blackout in the UK mainstream media. We had the "20th 911 hijacker trial" but no mention that OBL is not to be charged re. 911 by the FBI for lack of hard evidence. You get the usual suspects on internet news forums (where the mods condescend to allow you to actually debate the 911 truth) sitting there like guard dogs waiting to pounce, rarely with cogent counter arguement.
Why oh why don't the Bush regime sue those who accuse them of 9/11 mass murder and high treason and have done with it all? |
If they did, you'd all be whining about state oppression and government censorship. They're allowing you your freedom of speech. Ironic really. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SHERITON HOTEL
Moderate Poster
Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 988
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well I wonder what JP would do if someone falsely acused him of mass murder and high treason? I know I'd never tolerate it and be down my solicitor PDQ!
If you didn't take any action, wouldn't people begin to ask questions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
scubadiver
Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 1850
Location: Currently Andover
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:10 pm Post subject: Re: History of Bush regime response to 911 truth movement |
|
|
| Johnny Pixels wrote: |
If they did, you'd all be whining about state oppression and government censorship. |
They're doing it anyway. Its called the Patriot Act. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Johnny Pixels
Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 932
Location: A Sooper Sekrit Bunker
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SHERITON HOTEL wrote: | Well I wonder what JP would do if someone falsely acused him of mass murder and high treason? I know I'd never tolerate it and be down my solicitor PDQ!
If you didn't take any action, wouldn't people begin to ask questions? |
If people started accusing me of something ridiculous like that, then I couldn't care less. If you started actuallt affecting my life in some way then yes, I'd do something, but all the time your a nut shouting "murderer" with no reason and no evidence then I'm just going to think you're a nut job. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Johnny Pixels
Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 932
Location: A Sooper Sekrit Bunker
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:18 pm Post subject: Re: History of Bush regime response to 911 truth movement |
|
|
| scubadiver wrote: | | Johnny Pixels wrote: |
If they did, you'd all be whining about state oppression and government censorship. |
They're doing it anyway. Its called the Patriot Act. |
So you're all stumbling across tonnes of this evidence, that the goverment murdered 300 people, and don't you ever wonder why the websites stay up? Why you've never been contacted by the authorities? Why people aren't disappearing? Think, this is the government that killed 300 people according to you. What's a couple more? It'd be very easy to raid a couple of servers, accuse people on false child porn charges. Sure they'd deny it, but they would. Everyone would be shocked, but hey, you'd keep that sort of thing from everyone you know anyway. Except that hasn't happened, and you're free to post your crazy theories. And why? Because you're just like the other nuts that shout about UFOs, and bigfoot, and black helicopters. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SHERITON HOTEL
Moderate Poster
Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 988
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Johnny Pixels wrote: | | SHERITON HOTEL wrote: | Well I wonder what JP would do if someone falsely acused him of mass murder and high treason? I know I'd never tolerate it and be down my solicitor PDQ!
If you didn't take any action, wouldn't people begin to ask questions? |
If people started accusing me of something ridiculous like that, then I couldn't care less. If you started actuallt affecting my life in some way then yes, I'd do something, but all the time your a nut shouting "murderer" with no reason and no evidence then I'm just going to think you're a nut job. |
So what did that honest President George Walker Bush mean when he said "never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories..." at the UN?
How is it ridiculous? Bush invaded WMD Iraq free Iraq, he's a proven unreliable witness and fabricator of wars with false pretext. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Johnny Pixels
Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 932
Location: A Sooper Sekrit Bunker
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SHERITON HOTEL wrote: | | Johnny Pixels wrote: | | SHERITON HOTEL wrote: | Well I wonder what JP would do if someone falsely acused him of mass murder and high treason? I know I'd never tolerate it and be down my solicitor PDQ!
If you didn't take any action, wouldn't people begin to ask questions? |
If people started accusing me of something ridiculous like that, then I couldn't care less. If you started actuallt affecting my life in some way then yes, I'd do something, but all the time your a nut shouting "murderer" with no reason and no evidence then I'm just going to think you're a nut job. |
So what did that honest President George Walker Bush mean when he said "never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories..." at the UN?
How is it ridiculous? Bush invaded WMD Iraq free Iraq, he's a proven unreliable witness and fabricator of wars with false pretext. |
He meant not to tolerate conspiracy theories, and no-one did. They examined the facts and the official account is not a crazy conspiracy. I think he was talking about an international level, not small fry like this.
Yeah, about the whole no WMD, why didn't they just conspire to find some? I mean, they killed 300 of their own people, and rigged several buildings to explode, and all without a single whistle blower leaking the facts, yet they seem to be stumped when it comes to discovering chemical and biological weapons that they can make themselves and plant in Iraq, yet they couldn't seem to do that.
Bush is an idiot, but he didn't investigate 9/11. That's why the official report has science and not George W waffling about his golf swing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SHERITON HOTEL
Moderate Poster
Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 988
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think you'll find that if the US, led by that mental heavyweight WBush, had had to fabricate Iraq WMD evidence they would somehow have also had to fabricate a whole long WMD service and maintainance trail with physical evidence, paperwork, scientists etc. not Colin Powell faked satellite images and mobile chemical labs with canvas sides. In other words they'd have never gotten away with it once it was independentally forensically examined.
The FBI refusal to release the confiscated petrol station, hotel and freeway CCTV footage of whatever hit the Pentagon 911 is a similar case, it would be almost impossible to 100% synch all those three CCTV sources past forensic examination by independent labs.
Wasn't it 3000 plus, who were killed on 9/11 not 300? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jay Ref
Moderate Poster
Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 511
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SHERITON HOTEL wrote: | I think you'll find that if the US, led by that mental heavyweight WBush, had had to fabricate Iraq WMD evidence they would somehow have also had to fabricate a whole long WMD service and maintainance trail with physical evidence, paperwork, scientists etc. not Colin Powell faked satellite images and mobile chemical labs with canvas sides. In other words they'd have never gotten away with it once it was independentally forensically examined.
The FBI refusal to release the confiscated petrol station, hotel and freeway CCTV footage of whatever hit the Pentagon 911 is a similar case, it would be almost impossible to 100% synch all those three CCTV sources past forensic examination by independent labs.
Wasn't it 3000 plus, who were killed on 9/11 not 300? |
Right...it was! Over 3,000 even! So, the NWO had 4 airliners retrofitted as drones...moved hundreds of passengers into limbo....secretly wired up 3 of the world's largest buildings for demolition....and used a special cruise missile against the Pentagon which flies a zigzag path to knock down light poles and then punches a too-small hole in the building while simultaneously sprinkling B757 parts in it's wake....then steals the video tapes that would prove the existance of said special cruise missile...videos BTW of hotel grounds and gas pumps....
Riiiight....but a few "found" WMD's in the Iraqi desert would have been too complicated for them....
Bloody amazing!
-z
_________________
"Knowledge is good"
-Emil Faber
"God in heaven. Here's the hard-headed, evidence-only freak who will not, like we CTers, indulge himself in self-inflating, utterly misconceived fantasies." -kbo234 (who is NOT a nazi) briefly makes sense |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SHERITON HOTEL
Moderate Poster
Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 988
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jay Ref wrote: | | SHERITON HOTEL wrote: | I think you'll find that if the US, led by that mental heavyweight WBush, had had to fabricate Iraq WMD evidence they would somehow have also had to fabricate a whole long WMD service and maintainance trail with physical evidence, paperwork, scientists etc. not Colin Powell faked satellite images and mobile chemical labs with canvas sides. In other words they'd have never gotten away with it once it was independentally forensically examined.
The FBI refusal to release the confiscated petrol station, hotel and freeway CCTV footage of whatever hit the Pentagon 911 is a similar case, it would be almost impossible to 100% synch all those three CCTV sources past forensic examination by independent labs.
Wasn't it 3000 plus, who were killed on 9/11 not 300? |
Right...it was! Over 3,000 even! So, the NWO had 4 airliners retrofitted as drones...moved hundreds of passengers into limbo....secretly wired up 3 of the world's largest buildings for demolition....and used a special cruise missile against the Pentagon which flies a zigzag path to knock down light poles and then punches a too-small hole in the building while simultaneously sprinkling B757 parts in it's wake....then steals the video tapes that would prove the existance of said special cruise missile...videos BTW of hotel grounds and gas pumps....
Riiiight....but a few "found" WMD's in the Iraqi desert would have been too complicated for them....
Bloody amazing!
-z |
Didn't the US have something similar planned for Cuba in the early 60's? I hear Castro's Cuba have discovered oil and gas reserves off-shore, they may be tempted to dust off that plan! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andrew Johnson
Mighty Poster
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1919
Location: Derbyshire
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 7:14 pm Post subject: Pub Conversations |
|
|
Johnny Pixels talks to his workmate, Franky Sprite.
Franky Sprite (FS): Alright John.
Johnny Pixels (JP): Alright Frank.
FS: Had a good day?
JP: Not too bad, thanks.
FS:How many posts did ya do then, mate?
JP: oooo, I'd say about 30.
FS: 30?!? You big girl's blouse!
JP: How many did you do them, dog's breath?
FS: Well, I think it was about 150.
JP: 150? Bloody hell! How did you manage that?
FS: Well, there's quite a bit of overtime going at the minute. Also, they're switching us onto performance related pay soon, so I am getting ready for that.
JP: Yeah - that's a downer that is.
FS: Why?
JP: Well, I'm having a bit of hard time on the UK911 Forum.
FS: What, those ignorant *?
JP: Yeah, I know obviously they are that. But they rumbled me a bit quicker than I expected.
FS: Ah, ye soft git! That doesn't matter does it?
JP: Well, I know that the point is to waste their time....
FS: Exactly, so why worry?
JP: It's not as much fun as it used to be.
FS: Fun? What's fun go to do with it? We're souless, compassionless robots. Wouldn't you agree?
JP: Well, I know... that's how we're trained... but...
FS: Oh man! You're not saying....!
JP: Yes... I am ... I.... I...
FS: ....had an emotion today??!?!
JP: .........y...y.yes I did.
FS: You dipstick! What's happening to you? Oh man, I can't believe you...!
JP: Yeah but... but... I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU FELL FOR THAT ONE!!! *!
FS: Eh? What do you mean?
JP: Of course I didn't have an emotion!!!
FS: B*stard.
JP: I'd really p*ss myself laughing you know.
FS: So would I.
JP: So what shall we do instead???
_________________
Andrew
Ask the Tough Questions, Folks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andrew Johnson
Mighty Poster
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1919
Location: Derbyshire
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 7:22 pm Post subject: Re: Oops |
|
|
| Johnny Pixels wrote: |
If they did, you'd all be whining about state oppression and government censorship. They're allowing you your freedom of speech. Ironic really. |
Oops - shouldn't that be "us our freedom speech"? A strange turn of phrase...
A Freudian Slip perhaps?
Not to worry. Paycheque's still coming, ay?
_________________
Andrew
Ask the Tough Questions, Folks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sinclair
Moderate Poster
Joined: 10 Aug 2005
Posts: 395
Location: La piscina de vivo
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here they are........
(from cryptome) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Johnny Pixels
Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 932
Location: A Sooper Sekrit Bunker
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 7:27 pm Post subject: Re: Pub Conversations |
|
|
| Andrew Johnson wrote: | Johnny Pixels talks to his workmate, Franky Sprite.
Franky Sprite (FS): Alright John.
Johnny Pixels (JP): Alright Frank.
FS: Had a good day?
JP: Not too bad, thanks.
FS:How many posts did ya do then, mate?
JP: oooo, I'd say about 30.
FS: 30?!? You big girl's blouse!
JP: How many did you do them, dog's breath?
FS: Well, I think it was about 150.
JP: 150? Bloody hell! How did you manage that?
FS: Well, there's quite a bit of overtime going at the minute. Also, they're switching us onto performance related pay soon, so I am getting ready for that.
JP: Yeah - that's a downer that is.
FS: Why?
JP: Well, I'm having a bit of hard time on the UK911 Forum.
FS: What, those ignorant *?
JP: Yeah, I know obviously they are that. But they rumbled me a bit quicker than I expected.
FS: Ah, ye soft git! That doesn't matter does it?
JP: Well, I know that the point is to waste their time....
FS: Exactly, so why worry?
JP: It's not as much fun as it used to be.
FS: Fun? What's fun go to do with it? We're souless, compassionless robots. Wouldn't you agree?
JP: Well, I know... that's how we're trained... but...
FS: Oh man! You're not saying....!
JP: Yes... I am ... I.... I...
FS: ....had an emotion today??!?!
JP: .........y...y.yes I did.
FS: You dipstick! What's happening to you? Oh man, I can't believe you...!
JP: Yeah but... but... I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU FELL FOR THAT ONE!!! *!
FS: Eh? What do you mean?
JP: Of course I didn't have an emotion!!!
FS: B*stard.
JP: I'd really p*ss myself laughing you know.
FS: So would I.
JP: So what shall we do instead??? |
Keep up the good work. Everytime you fail to provide evidence but instead respond with a smart alec answer, another lurker reads this and wonders why you can't provide a sensible answer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
scubadiver
Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 1850
Location: Currently Andover
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 7:34 pm Post subject: Re: Pub Conversations |
|
|
| Johnny Pixels wrote: |
Keep up the good work. Everytime you fail to provide evidence but instead respond with a smart alec answer, another lurker reads this and wonders why you can't provide a sensible answer. |
This statement reminds me of you and JREF. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Johnny Pixels
Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 932
Location: A Sooper Sekrit Bunker
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 7:35 pm Post subject: Re: Pub Conversations |
|
|
| scubadiver wrote: | | Johnny Pixels wrote: |
Keep up the good work. Everytime you fail to provide evidence but instead respond with a smart alec answer, another lurker reads this and wonders why you can't provide a sensible answer. |
This statement reminds me of you and JREF. |
I provide as my evidence:
The official reports.
You offer as counter-evidence:
Nothing. Well, paranoid accusations that I'm working for the government, and pictures of Anne Robinson. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andrew Johnson
Mighty Poster
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1919
Location: Derbyshire
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JP,
Yes mate, I know you are right really.
There is only fake debate on the threads that you've started, so what does it matter?
The picture of Anne Robinson was part of my ECM (Electronic Counter Measures) Strategy - Maybe you wanna add it to your portfolio. It's pretty scary I reckon.
Also, you forgot to mention Chris Tarrant, Marvin, Arthur Dent, Flash Gordon and Queen. Insufficiency of information is something to watch out for I reckon.
I hope you're enjoying yourself. I'm having a great time!
Do you wanna insult my use of grammar, at all? Feel free! I think I know you well enough now for me not to be offended!
I love the spontinaity of it myself. And you?
(To everyone else, I'm sorry for being so self-indulgem=nt and getting rather carried away with myself, but hey - these threads with JP and JR are a refreshing free-for-all of nonesnse, I hope you'll agree!)
_________________
Andrew
Ask the Tough Questions, Folks!
Last edited by Andrew Johnson on Tue Aug 08, 2006 7:47 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Johnny Pixels
Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 932
Location: A Sooper Sekrit Bunker
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 7:45 pm Post subject: Re: Oops |
|
|
| Andrew Johnson wrote: | | Johnny Pixels wrote: |
If they did, you'd all be whining about state oppression and government censorship. They're allowing you your freedom of speech. Ironic really. |
Oops - shouldn't that be "us our freedom speech"? A strange turn of phrase...
A Freudian Slip perhaps?
Not to worry. Paycheque's still coming, ay? |
No, I was talking about the truth movement being allowed it's freedom of speech. My freedom of speech isn't involved. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Johnny Pixels
Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 932
Location: A Sooper Sekrit Bunker
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Andrew Johnson wrote: | JP,
Yes mate, I know you are right really.
There is only fake debate on the threads that you've started, so what does it matter?
The picture of Anne Robinson was part of my ECM (Electronic Counter Measures) Strategy - Maybe you wanna add it to your portfolio. It's pretty scary I reckon.
Also, you forgot to mention Chris Tarrant, Marvin, Arthur Dent, Flash Gordon and Queen. Insufficiency of information is something to watch out for I reckon.
I hope your enjoying yourself. I'm having a great time!
I love the spontinaity of it myself. And you? |
Yes it's great. You make yourself look incompetent so I don't have to. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andrew Johnson
Mighty Poster
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1919
Location: Derbyshire
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh man! So we're both happy then!
I'd never have expected that! I feel fulfilled now!
_________________
Andrew
Ask the Tough Questions, Folks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SHERITON HOTEL
Moderate Poster
Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 988
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Did old man Bush ever sue Michael Moore over his accusations in Farenheit 911? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
scubadiver
Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 1850
Location: Currently Andover
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:31 pm Post subject: Re: Pub Conversations |
|
|
| Johnny Pixels wrote: |
I provide as my evidence:
The official reports
|
1) 9/11 Report a fraud:
http://www.harpers.org/WhitewashAsPublicService.html
2) Thousands of dollars spent by Pakistan to get 9/11 findings dropped:
http://www.zeenews.com/articles.asp?aid=282600&sid=SAS&ssid=
3) The report completely omits the collapse of World Trade Centre 7 and the 47 core columns in the twin towers.
4) Mr Mineta's evidence reduced to a footnote:
taken from
http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hearing2/9-11Commission_Hearing_ 2003-05-23.htm
MR. HAMILTON: We thank you for that. I wanted to focus just a moment on the Presidential Emergency Operating Center. You were there for a good part of the day. I think you were there with the vice president. And when you had that order given, I think it was by the president, that authorized the shooting down of commercial aircraft that were suspected to be controlled by terrorists, were you there when that order was given?
MR. MINETA: No, I was not. I was made aware of it during the time that the airplane coming into the Pentagon. There was a young man who had come in and said to the vice president, "The plane is 50 miles out. The plane is 30 miles out." And when it got down to, "The plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said to the vice president, "Do the orders still stand?" And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?" Well, at the time I didn't know what all that meant. And --
So what do you think those orders were?
The Vice President obviously knew about a plane coming towards the Pentagon and he replied, "of course the orders still stand?" Given that the plane was notified to have been 50 miles out don't you think they would have had time to scramble a couple fighter jets in that time if the order was to shoot the aircraft down?
Anyway, how did Dick Cheney know that a plane was heading for the Pentagon if nobody else did?
5) There is also that little matter of the South tower falling in ten seconds as confirmed by the 9/11 Commission report at the bottom of page 305.
http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Ch9.pdf
6) Why Did Bush and Cheney refuse to appear before the 9/11 Commission under oath?
7) The report completely ignores the $100,000 dollars wired to Atta by Gen Mehmood Ahmed as discovered by the Indians and confirmed by the FBI. I have posted these sources in other threads.
8. In the six months before 9-11, Federal Aviation Administration senior officials received 52 intelligence briefings regarding threats from Al Qaeda, warnings that mentioned hijacking, according to a commission staff study. The study was not part of the final commission report. The Bush administration blocked release of that information until after the 2004 election, and well after publication of the final commission report.
The hijackers easily eluded CIA surveillance. Two of them landed in California in 2000, where they were greeted by an FBI informant, who actually rented one of the hijackers an apartment. FBI agents, then under Louis Freeh, remained clueless—either the informant didn't tell them what was going on or they didn't act on what they were told. Efforts by the Joint Inquiry of Congress to interview the informant were blocked by the FBI, which actually hid the man from congressional investigators. Top FBI officials refused to take subpoenas put in their hands by Senator Bob Graham. The 9-11 Commission never pursued this obvious obstruction of Congress.
The Joint Inquiry traced the flow of money from the Saudi royal family and government institutions to a Saudi spy in California who had contact with the hijackers. The commission found Saudi Arabia blameless, although behind closed doors the staff is said to have demanded an airing of the situation.
http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0549,ridgeway,70692,6.html
9) There is also that little matter of Thomas Keane and his indirect links with Al-Qaeda.
December 16, 2002 - Bush names former New Jersey Republican Governor and Homeland Security Project Co-Chairman Thomas Kean, who has a business link to the husband of one of Osama bin Laden's sisters, to replace Henry Kissinger as head of the 9/11 commission.
http://web.archive.org/web/20030201090108/http:/www.fortune.com/fortun e/print/0,15935,410237,00.html
10) January 15, 2004 - Two of the 9/11 Commission's own senior officials, Philip Zelikow and Jamie Gorelick, were so closely involved in the events under investigation that they have been interviewed as part of the inquiry.
WTF????? 
http://web.archive.org/web/20050209145424/http:/www.upi.com/view.cfm?S toryID=20040115-024012-7011r
11) July 8, 2003 - 9/11 Commission criticizes Defense, Justice dept's for not cooperating fully With Probe's Requests and was intimidating witnesses by insisting that CIA and FBI "minders" attend sensitive interviews.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/september11/story/0,11209,994933,00.html
12) December 17, 2003 - 9/11 Chair: Attack Was Preventable and points blame to the administration.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/12/17/eveningnews/main589137.shtml
13) August 2, 2006 - Some of the 9/11 commission concluded that the Pentagon's initial story of how it reacted to 9/11 may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public and debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for a criminal investigation.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/01/AR2006 080101300.html
Don't know about you, but I don't have much faith. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TimmyG
Validated Poster
Joined: 04 Apr 2006
Posts: 489
Location: Manchester
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | and used a special cruise missile against the Pentagon which flies a zigzag path to knock down light poles and then punches a too-small hole in the building while simultaneously sprinkling B757 parts in it's wake....then steals the video tapes that would prove the existance of said special cruise missile...videos BTW of hotel grounds and gas pumps.... |
first time i've heard that theory.
_________________
"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Johnny Pixels
Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 932
Location: A Sooper Sekrit Bunker
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 10:45 pm Post subject: Re: Pub Conversations |
|
|
Sorry, the 9/11 commision report is a fraud, you said so yourself. You can't claim that it is wrong, and then in the next breath use it as evidence.
Seriously.
Make your mind up.
And you use mainstream news sources too? Get real, those are controlled by the government. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
scubadiver
Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 1850
Location: Currently Andover
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 7:12 am Post subject: Re: Pub Conversations |
|
|
| Johnny Pixels wrote: |
Sorry, the 9/11 commision report is a fraud, you said so yourself. You can't claim that it is wrong, and then in the next breath use it as evidence.
Seriously.
Make your mind up.
And you use mainstream news sources too? Get real, those are controlled by the government. |
Why choose the one part of the message on which everyone agrees, including the Commission? Video evidence doesn't lie.
Why ignore parts that the Commission blatantly ignored? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Johnny Pixels
Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 932
Location: A Sooper Sekrit Bunker
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:32 pm Post subject: Re: Pub Conversations |
|
|
| scubadiver wrote: | | Johnny Pixels wrote: |
Sorry, the 9/11 commision report is a fraud, you said so yourself. You can't claim that it is wrong, and then in the next breath use it as evidence.
Seriously.
Make your mind up.
And you use mainstream news sources too? Get real, those are controlled by the government. |
Why choose the one part of the message on which everyone agrees, including the Commission? Video evidence doesn't lie.
Why ignore parts that the Commission blatantly ignored? |
What? You said the commission was a fraud, but now you're defending it? Make your mind up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
