Orchestrated terror at London 2012 olympics?

[notilluminati]

I've put together some important new information which to me indicates that another false flag event is being planned for the London Olympics and also possibly on the London Underground.

The information is based on symbolism and 'hidden messages' which I know is not good enough for many of you.

But as I point out in my video, before 9 / 11 and 7 / 7 there were similar references in various media, to the events that would later take place.

I believe the information is good enough and so I am trying to distribute this information to as many people as possible.

THIS IS NOT ABOUT SELF-PROMOTION BUT PROMOTION OF THE INFORMATION SO THAT THE FUTURE MIGHT BE CHANGED.

For those of you who do think I have some sort of case, please help me distribute this information to other people. If you are interested in helping me do this, please send me a message or say so in reply to this message.


Link

[fish5133]

Interesting vid. Wheres are numerologist with some dates?

[Andrew.]

[Disco_Destroyer]

[TonyGosling]

Here's an interesting one - via email


4 October 2011
China Warns Russia Of Coming American “Great Event”

"A shocking new Federal Security Services (FSB <http://www.fsb.ru/>) report on Prime Minister Putin’s meeting

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2011-09/24/c_131156694.htm

this past week with one of China’s top military leaders is warning that the
United States and its Western allies are in “active preparation” for the
unleashing of a series of catastrophic events over the coming year designed to throw the world into chaos from which they hope global economic and social order can be restored.

According to this FSB report, China’s Ministry of State Security were given the outlines of this massive plot by a former Blackwater
mercenary named Bryan Underwood

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2043096/US-consulate-guard-Bry an-Underwood-accused-trying-pass-secrets-China.html

who was a contract security guard at a US consulate in China who believed his actions in getting this information to China and Russia would help avert an “apocalypse.”

Underwood has subsequently been arrested by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI <http://www.fbi.gov/>) who stated in their arrest report
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2043096/US-consulate-guard-Bry an-Underwood-accused-trying-pass-secrets-China.html

of him that:
*“According to the superseding indictment, from about March 1, 2011, to
about Aug. 5, 2011, Underwood knowingly and unlawfully attempted to
communicate photographs and other information relating to the national
defense to representatives of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), with the intent and reason to believe that these materials would be used to the
injury of the United States and to the advantage of a foreign nation.”*

Chinese intelligence sources quoted in this report appear to verify
Underwood’s fears by noting that the over 1,000 top-secret US documents and photographs obtained by them show an American government “under siege” from multiple threats they fear will spread causing the unleashing of
“unprecedented chaos” from which “normal order” will never be able to be
reestablished again."

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1524.htm

[TonyGosling]

A torch the Nazis lit
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/may/16/torch-nazis-lit-ol ympic-flame
The Olympic flame that reaches Britain on Friday was initially a way of glorifying Hitler's regime
Guy Walters - guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 16 May 2012 21.30 BST
Seventy-eight years ago this month, two elderly Germans found themselves on a train to Athens. As they watched the scenery chuff past, they discussed arrangements for what would be the biggest sporting festival the world had seen – the 1936 Berlin Olympics. The older man, Theodor Lewald, was president of the organising committee for the Games; his companion was Carl Diem, the committee's secretary-general, who had captained the German Olympic team at Stockholm in 1912.
While the two men headed south, Diem had a brainwave. Wouldn't it be a great idea, he suggested, if the Olympic flame were carried by a torch relay from Olympia all the way to Berlin? There could be no more vivid a way of linking the capital of the new German Reich with the original games of classical Greece, whose culture Hitler so admired. Lewald agreed, as did the International Olympic Committee members they were to meet in Athens.
What the men could not appreciate was that the torch would become emblematic of the uneasy links between politics and sport. It took the Nazis to realise the full propaganda potential of the Olympics, and thanks to them the torch quickly became a symbol more of political willpower than harmless sporting pageantry.
However, the road from Greece to Germany was paved with good intentions. Before the first torch relay took place, the event was "blessed" by Baron Pierre de Coubertin, the founder of the modern Olympics. He declared that through the event "there will be established the vigorous and well-considered peace appropriate to a sporting epoch of high ambition and strong will".
Ironically, the partly Jewish Lewald described the relay in terms of the cod Nazi history of which Himmler would have been proud. The torch created, he claimed, "a real and spiritual bond between our German fatherland and the sacred places of Greece founded nearly 4,000 years ago by Nordic immigrants".
The relay was a triumph of organisation, 3,331 runners carrying the flame all 3,187 kilometres to Berlin. But it did attract controversy. As the torch – forged from the same Krupp steel that would be used to build Hitler's panzers – made its way north, it became a magnet for Nazis and their sympathisers.
In Vienna, 10,000 Austrian Nazis greeted it with shouts of "Heil Hitler!" and, predictably, the Horst Wessel song. When Jewish members of the Austrian Olympic team gathered to see the torch, they were abused by Nazis, and 500 arrests were made. So much for De Coubertin's fine words.
Despite these disturbances, the Germans were so proud of the relay that Lewald upbraided De Coubertin for not giving the host nation more credit. "I cannot hide from you my extreme surprise," wrote Lewald, "that you have not given a single mention of the fact that the idea for the torch relay is a purely German idea."
To add further irony, it was Carl Diem who addressed thousands of Hitler Youth in the Olympic stadium in March 1945, calling on them to show "Olympic spirit" by refusing to surrender to the Russians. As an extra incentive, execution stakes had been erected around the stadium to inspire any boys who did not feel "Olympic" enough. Two thousand of those he addressed that day were killed before the end of the war.
Nevertheless, the Germans eventually honoured Diem by putting his face on a postage stamp in 1968. That's the great thing about Olympism – it's not just about being faster, higher, stronger, but also about forgetting.
We ourselves might do well to remember the somewhat sordid past of the torch relay when the flame reaches British shores on Friday Just as with 1936, the torch can be seen more as a political symbol than a sporting one, just as we witnessed four years ago when it made its controversial way around the globe for the Games in Beijing. Then the flame was surrounded by a mob of police heavies, which perfectly represented the controlling nature of the Chinese regime.
In truth, the torch has become more a symbol of the desires of the host country than of the Olympic movement. As the flame passes through our towns and villages, will we see it as a flaming beacon of a Cameroonian "big society", or something a little less confident – a flickering tealight caught in a mighty global wind?

[TonyGosling]

Lou talks to ian R Crane about why he is staying out of London, Rik Clay and the similarities in the events leading up to 9/11, 7/7 and the forthcoming Olympics.
http://www.mixcloud.com/shylou73/lou-collins-radio-show-250612-ian-r-c rane-olympic-special/

[notilluminati]

Since putting together my original Youtube video on a possible false flag attack at the Olympics, I have produced a further five short videos providing further examples of hidden messages in various media.

My latest video shows a scene from the last episode of Spooks in which a terrorist attack on London is discussed and in the background you can clearly see the masonic square and compass. Is that not a good indication of what has been planned ?

I'm hoping this will inspire some of you to start researching and prepare youselves for the possibility of a large-scale false flag at the Olympics, so that we can better expose them, if such an event were to occur.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_x16d-gLxro

[notilluminati]

The BBC have decided to pursue a copyright claim on the link I included in my previous post.

I have disputed the claim, but will also probably reproduce another video that doesn't contain the disputed material in a few days.

So if you are interested in seeing the material, please keep checking my Youtube channel, which you can find by searching 'Notilluminati'.

[TonyGosling]

It seems Frank Lowry of Westfields fame actually OWNS the Olympics site.
If so that's a serious RED FLAG.

The lease of the Twin Towers was purchased just weeks before 9/11 by Larry Silverstein (Rothschild Zionist) and Frank Lowry (Rothschild Zionist).

[TonyGosling]

Monday, 16 July 2012
The Perfect G4Storm
http://berkshire911truth.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/perfect-g4storm.html

NOTE: This newsletter contains some important and urgent information which is being suppressed by the mainstream media. Please feel free to distribute it to anyone you feel may be interested.

The head of Britain's internal security service MI5, Jonathan Evans, talking about the possibility of a terrorist event during the London Olympic Games, has stated that the national threat level is assessed to be SUBSTANTIAL - meaning that an attack is a "strong possibility". He also stated: "The fact that there have been no successful al Qaida related terrorist attacks in Britain since 2005 is the result of a great deal of hard and creative work by the security, intelligence and Police services". Yet what did happen on 7 July 2005? What we do know is that much of what we, the public, were told turned out to be untrue http://terroronthetube.co.uk I wonder what "creative work" means.

Jonathan Evans was giving the Lord Mayor's Annual Defence and Security Lecture in the City of London on 25 June 2012, titled 'The Olympics and Beyond'. The last time he had given a public lecture was on 16 September 2010, when he told the Worshipful Company of Security Professionals: "There will be a major security operation to support the Games, but we should not underestimate the challenge of mounting the Games securely in an environment with a high terrorist threat, the first time this has been attempted". The first time this has been attempted, he says!

A resident of Newham, where much of the Olympic Park is situated, writes on the Games Monitor website that "a sense of foreboding has descended on many of the people who, like me, live and work in Newham in east London". He points out that 24% of the residents are Muslim, and that during Ramadan the streets of Newham are likely to be very busy late into the evening. Against this background there will be "the largest peacetime military and security operation since 1945". But his main concern is the massive policing operation and its impact on local people. Police officers will have the power to instruct groups of two or more people who live outside the area to leave for up to 24 hours. They will have curfew powers for unaccompanied people under the age of 16. "Coupled with a range of stop and search powers under criminal, anti-social behaviour and anti-terrorist legislation, NMP's [Newham MonitoringProject's] fear is that young people in particular and ethnic minorities in general will be subjected to a level of intrusive policing that is likely to lead [to] arrests and criminalisation", he explains.

Why would anyone want to stage the Olympic Games under such conditions if their aim was not to create a police state?

Temporary measures in politics usually turn out not to be so temporary after all. Indeed, Jonathan Evans said in his recent lecture, "We are also anticipating an Olympic security legacy after the Games". I suggested in my last newsletter that there could be a security crack-down at the time ofthe Olympics whether or not there was a terrorist event. The Government has created enough fear in the minds of the public as to be able to take all sorts of measures to limit our freedoms. To see what the latest security restrictions are, see the Big Brother Watch website.

If we have not yet been told the truth on the London bombings of 7/7, how can we trust the Government, or MI5, in statements on some forthcoming terror event in London? Is MI5 telling the truth about Al Qaeda and Islamic terrorism? My previous reports on the two main government think tanks, Policy Exchange and Demos, suggest that there is gross deception on the terrorist threat supposedly posed by Muslims in the UK. Indeed, I have reported on the sacking of South Yorkshire Police's Principal Intelligence Officer, Tony Farrell, for concluding that the threat of terrorism from UK Muslims is negligible compared to that coming from our own government.

The issue of 7/7 needs to be investigated, just as 9/11 needs to be investigated. According to an article appearing on the Muslim Brotherhood's website, IkhwanWeb , on 15 September 2007, the now newly elected Presidentof Egypt, Dr. Mohamed Morsi, stated on the sixth anniversary of 9/11:

"The US administration has never presented any evidences on the identity of those who committed that incident. The Muslim Brotherhood and others demanded a transparent trial with clear evidence and to have court rulings. We confirm that this isn't a defense to those who committed these actions but we only seek the truth".

The article also makes clear that immediately after the 9/11 attacks happened, the Muslim Brotherhood condemned them, seeing them as "totally divorced from any religion or creed, actions which are totally rejected by Islam".

According to an article in the Washington Times on 31 May this year, Dr Morsi in 2008 called on the US to provide "scientific" proof for its account of events.

"We have officially demanded a fair trial for 9/11 suspects and the issuance of a detailed scientific report about the attacks, but the U.S. administration did not respond till now", Mr. Morsi told Ikhwanweb, the Washington Times reports. "This requires a huge scientific conference that is devoted to analyzing what caused the attack against a massive structure like the two WTC towers," he said, referring to the World Trade Center. "Should this happen, we will stand firmly against whoever committed this horrific crime against innocent civilians". However,the Washington Times reports negatively about the personality of Dr Morsi,and adds that Osama bin Laden admitted his terror group's involvement in the Sept. 11 attacks in a videotaped message in October 2004. The website Muslims for 9/11 Truth reproduces this article but refutes the statement on Bin Laden, stating: "False! Bin Laden repeatedly denied responsibility for 9/11, deplored the attacks, called them un-Islamic, and blamed 'some people with their own agenda' and 'American Jews' for the attacks in repeated statements before his death in December, 2001". The same website states: "Add Mohamed Morsi to the lists of heads of state who openly support 9/11truth. Presidents Ahmadinejad of Iran, Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, former PMMahathir Mohamad of Malaysia, and Fidel Castro of Cuba preceded him".

Many other issues involving the UK security services need to be investigated, too. Just from the issues reported in my news letters one could begin to wonder whether the people in the United Kingdom may be more secure, and democracy may be better safeguarded, if MI5, MI6 and ACPO (The Association of Chief Police Officers) ceased to exist.

Recently, Brighton's Green Party MP, Caroline Lucas, made a sensational revelation in Parliament, concerning undercover police officer Bob Lambert,who had infiltrated the Animal Liberation Movement, and who had been unmasked, as reported in my earlier newsletters. On Wednesday, 13 June, she told parliament: "In July 1987, three branches of Debenhams, in Luton,Romford and Harrow, were targeted by the ALF in co-ordinated, simultaneous incendiary attacks because the shops were selling fur products. Sheppard and Clarke were tried and found guilty, but the culprit who planted the incendiary device in the Harrow store was never caught. Bob Lambert's exposure as an undercover police officer has prompted Geoff Sheppard to speak out about that Harrow attack. Sheppard alleges that Lambert was the one who planted the third device and was involved in the ALF's co-ordinatedcampaign"

She went on to quote a statement by Sheppard, in which he said: "There's absolutely no doubt in my mind whatsoever that Bob Lambert placed the incendiary device at the Debenhams store in Harrow. I specifically remember him giving an explanation to me about how he had been able to place one of the devices in that store, but how he had not been able to place the second device." Sheppard also alleged that the intelligence for the raid was so precise that it was now obvious that it "came from Bob Lambert", who knew that the pair were going to be there making another set of incendiary devices.

Caroline Lucas talked of police obstructionism in investigating the issues of undercover officers, including the holding of investigations in secret, and concluded that she hoped that the Government would "agree to set up a far reaching public inquiry into undercover police infiltrators and informers, looking back over past practices as well as looking forward".

In a Guardian blog, Rob Evans writes (Monday 25 June 2012 15.25 BST): "By any measure, the allegation is startling and serious, and the public should know whether it is true or not. So who is investigating?" - "The answer to that question is typically opaque".

A similar case has now arisen in Germany concerning the 1972 Olympic Games in Munich, in which Palestinian militants with a Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) terrorist group called 'Black September' took nine Israeli athletes hostage and demanded the release of several hundred Palestinians from Israeli prisons. When the police attempted to free the Israelis at the Fürstenfeldbruck military airport, where they were being held in two helicopters, the terrorists murdered all of their hostages. A police officer also died in the firefight. Three of the Palestinians survived. That was the official account, but the German magazine Spiegel has now come up with new evidence.

"Though it was never proved, left-wing extremists were suspected of working with the Palestinian terrorists behind the operation. But previously unreleased files seen by SPIEGEL prove that neo-Nazis were involved instead -- and officials knew about it", wrote theSpiegel on 17 June

The previously classified documents were provided by the German domestic intelligence service (BfV) in response to a request by SPIEGEL. "This evidence practically proved that the suspicion that German neo-Nazi Pohland Abramowski were collaborating with the Palestinian terrorists was in fact true", says Spiegel. According to the article, Pohl claims to have had no knowledge of the planned attack in Munich at the time. He claims that there was talk of hostage-taking in Germany in which the Palestinians planned to exchange 20 Israelis for some 200 fellow Palestinian militants in Israeli prisons. "The Palestinians insisted that it would be a bloodless incident, and they asked the two Germans what they thought the Germanpublic would think about it", Spiegel reports. "The German courts treated Pohl and Abramowski with astonishing leniency. ... . Only four days after sentencing, Pohl was released and fled to Beirut", Spiegel reported.

Assuming that Pohl is inverting the truth, the pattern emerging here is consistent with that of Operation Gladio, in which protest groups intending perhaps to create minor diversions find themselves involved in something much bigger and more sinister than they had ever imagined, having been infiltrated and manipulated by undercover agents of the security forces. So if it has taken 40 years for an investigation of the Munich Olympics attackto be announced, how long will it take to get a proper investigation into the London terror attacks of 7 July 2005?

I attended the Employment Appeal Tribunal hearing in London for the case of Tony Farrell, in which he is appealing against unfair dismissal from South Yorkshire Police when, in 2010 he reached the conclusion that the risk to the public of terrorism from Islamic extremists was negligible compared with that from our own government. In September 2011 an employment tribunal in Sheffield dismissed his case, and on Friday 15 June his appeal to that was heard in London. The essence of his appeal was that it should have been plainly obvious to the Employment Tribunal judge that he was being poorly represented by his legal team; they had advised him to appeal on the grounds that he had been dismissed because of his religious beliefs rather than for making protected disclosures in the process of refusing to carry out a management instruction which would have been unlawful. Indeed, when Tony Farrell broke the news of his story at a meeting of our Keep Talking group in London some of us expressed concern about the religious discrimination angle. Part way through his Sheffield hearing, truth campaigner Ian Crane, who was not legally qualified, tookover Tony's representation with more credible argumentation.

Tony's case was dismissed by the judge in London, in a ruling that took ten minutes to prepare and twenty minutes to read out. Essentially, the reason was that the appeal hearing could only consider new points of law,and that there was a precedent which contradicted Tony's case. Clearly, something has gone very wrong with this case.

One point that caught my attention in particular was made by the judge after Tony Farrell's barrister had acknowledged that it was not the job of the tribunal to reach conclusions of fact, meaning that it could only consider points of law, but that the official version of events does not stack up. The judge responded by saying that he was quite right in saying that it was no business of his to judge that issue, adding that Lady Justice Hallett had dealt with that. Lady Justice Hallett had run the inquest into 52 victims of the London bombings, specifically excluding the four Muslim lads widely alleged to have committed the atrocities. It was outside her remit to determine the guilt or innocence of those four. In fact, she stated their guilt right at the beginning of the proceedings,with no examination of the facts. I was surprised that the Employment Appeal Tribunal judge could have made such a comment, just as I had been surprised that Lady Justice Hallett could have made the allegation of guilt before her inquest proceedings had begun. Clearly, something has gone verywrong with this case, too.

I was, however, impressed at the 23-page skeletal argument document ,which Tony had produced. It may or may not have had legal validity, but it does retell the story in a formal way, with the emphasis which it should perhaps have had right from the beginning. The important point for me is that Tony had already been making representation to his employers expressing concern at the statistical method being imposed nationally by the Home Office in producing a Risk Assessment Matrix. He made it known that in his opinion these matrices were flawed, and when applied too generically were nonsensical. An 'Orwellian speak' was creeping in. "And so it was that a new simplified language emerged. Principals were horrified but seemed powerless to stop the madness", the document states. "Blind acceptance of the Government's rhetoric on threat levels would invariably point towards imminent threats from Al Qaeda / Islamic Extremism. Such values fed into the matrix would in turn be used by ACPO to make the case for extra resource allocation to enhance counter terrorism activity under CONTEST II", the document states.

"Trusting what they tell us is a leap of faith. That faith was destroyed once it dawned on the Claimant that the retrospective official narratives of 9/11 and 7/7 were full of very serious distortions and omissions", the document explained. I think this document is an important document in the history of the truth movement, because it describes how the Government was manipulating statistics in order to advance their own version of events, at the same time claiming that the evidence was coming from the professionals. I look forward to seeing this document on some website somewhere. It is of direct relevance to current claims of risks of terrorist attacks coming from Muslim extremists during the Olympic Games, as being put forward by the Government, and MI5.

Journalist Adrian Salbuchi, who is based in Buenos Aires and is a regular contributor to Russia Today, has been trying to draw attention to a 'scenario analysis' published by the Rockefeller Foundation in May 2010. The Rockefeller Foundation is right at the heart of the Establishment in the US, and what they produce has to be taken seriously. He wrote to journalist Tony Gosling, who posted his request on his 9/11 Forum. It read: "Please find below an article that I consider to be very important. Surprisingly (?), it was rejected by those who'normally' publish my works... May I ask you kindly help us to spread this information as far and wide as possible". His article is headed 'Are the London Olympics a target for a False-Flag Attack?'.

He explains that false-flag attacks carry their tell-tale signs, because, when planned, they must include some sort of communication so that those in the know can make sure that neither they nor their associates or loved ones should happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time (ED: like Silverstein just happened to be at a doctor's appointment on 9/11 and his son and daughter were late for a meeting at the "Windows on the World" restaurant). "Is somethingalong these lines on Global Power Master drawing boards for the up-coming London O lympics?", he asks. "The question would surely sound ludicrous, were it not for a May 2010 Report issued by The Rockefeller Foundation (RF)and Global Business Network (GBN) that 'predicts' exactly that", he explains. The text of his article reveals that in one of their scenarios they talk of a bombing that kills 13,000 people at the London Olympics.

"Called 'Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development', it carries introductions by RF president Judith Rodin and GBN chairman Peter Schwartz, both members of the powerful New York-based Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) think-tank, a key geo political planning node of the Global Power structure embedded deep inside the US", writes Adrian Salbuchi. So I looked up the report to see what I could make of it.

I found it was written in the same sort of pseudo-scientific sociological clap-trap that the deceptive reports that I had previously studied by the British think tanks Demos and Policy Exchange had been written in. In his introductory letter, Peter Schwartz writes: "Perhaps most importantly, scenarios give us a new, shared language that deepens our conversations about the future and how we can help to shape it". Indeed, once we can understand the language they are written in, we can understand their purpose and their warnings. The report does the usual thing of starting off in what Adrian Salbuchi calls "rather nondescript terms". In fact, the first eight pages are carefully preparing the reader for a set of false alternatives, the alternatives which the authors wish to guide us into, but ignoring any other alternatives that any normal person might think of, such as ending the current wars by bringing about more openness and transparency, or doing a deal between the US and Russia in which they will call off all proxy wars. What they do instead is to direct the reader to just four possible scenarios, which they call 'Lock Step', 'Clever Together', 'Hack Attack' and 'Smart Scramble', all of which are doomsdays cenarios.

The 'Hack Attack' scenario includes the following paragraph: "Devastating shocks like September 11, the Southeast Asian tsunami of 2004, and the 2010 Haiti earthquake had certainly primed the world for sudden disasters. But no one was prepared for a world in which large-scale catastrophes would occur with such breathtaking frequency. The years 2010 to 2020 were dubbed the 'doom decade' for good reason: the 2012 Olympic bombing, which killed 13,000, was followed closely by an earthquake in Indonesia killing 40,000, a tsunami that almost wiped out Nicaragua, and the onset of the West China famine, caused by a once-in-a-millennium drought linked to climate change". I wonder if, when translated, they could mean: "the 2012 Olympic bombing, which killed 13 August, 1000". The thirteenth of August is the day the crowds will disperse from the Olympics (ED: also a masonic number).

All four of these scenarios are presented as 'plausible'. Indeed, they write: "The scenarios that follow are not meant to be exhaustive - rather,they are designed to be both plausible and provocative, to engage your imagination while also raising new questions for you about what that future might look and feel like". They also state: "Together, a set of scenarios captures a range of future possibilities, good and bad, expected and surprising - but always plausible". So the Rockefeller Foundation is actually stating that it is plausible that thirteen thousand people will die in a bombing during the London Olympic Games.

Indeed, in his introductory letter, Peter Schwartz states: "Through interviews and the scenario workshops, they have engaged a diverse set of people - from different geographies, disciplines, and sectors - to identify the key forces driving change, to explore the most critical uncertainties,and to develop challenging yet plausible scenarios and implications". So what have all these people been doing in their analysis, and why is that not explained in the report? Is this based on some serious analysis of publicly available material - in which case one would expect an account of their thinking - or is it based on information known only to the Global Elite? All they need to have done was to ask a class of first year sociology students to come up with four scenarios of doom, and they would have produced just as good a result, unless there's something they're nottelling us.

So how likely is a terrorist attack in London during the Olympics of 2012? What better way could there be of assessing this than to listen to an investigative journalist who is training undercover as a security guard for the London Olympics with private security firm G4S? Lee Hazledean is a filmmaker and investigative TV journalist, who has also been involved in major stories such as how the British Army infiltrated the IRA and carried out false flag operations. Unusually, he broke his story whilst still operating undercover, hoping nevertheless to continue his undercover work until the Olympics. Presumably he is using an assumed name.

In a deeply worrying interview on Tony Gosling's Friday Drivetime slot on BCfm Radio in Bristol on Friday 22 June he reported that security training is so appalling that the safety and security of the London 2012 Olympics are in jeopardy. The 'Rapiscan' walk-through metal detectors don't work properly and aren't sensitive enough to pick up large knives, ammunition and other metallic threats. He was told that they would be set to go off only after 50 people have walked through to limit queuing time and to get spectators into the venue. G4S are recruiting long-term unemployed people as security officers, regardless of how suitable they are for the role. In training classes, there is drug dealing, some people can't speak any English whatsoever, and others are constantly making jokes about disabled people. People who haven't even completed their training are being picked to be Team Leaders over highly trained security officers, ex-soldiers and ex-police. Uniforms are going missing, and people are taking photos on their mobile phones in the training facility.

Also, there are plans for the evacuation of London; G4S are going to be at the forefront, as well as 100,000 troops coming in via Woolwich barracks, made up of regular British Forces, American regular army and European troops. Lee was not told why there would be any need for an evacuation of the whole of London, they just said it was to be a "defining moment in the history of London". The troops are being held across London in various barracks once they've been through Woolwich. Lee also had this information confirmed by an army doctor who was shocked at all the foreign troops coming into London. There is also a shipment of what are being described as'casket linings'; each casket can hold four or five people, and 200,000 casket linings have been delivered, he believes, from America. Also, they were shown videos of drones attacking targets in Afghanistan, and were told that drones would be patrolling the skies over London during the Olympics, carrying out surveillance and search and destroy missions if necessary. Lee believes there is something fundamentally wrong with how the security for the Olympics is being implemented by G4S.

Lee also discovered that there is a media black-out on all major news outlets to do with the Olympics. Tony Gosling suggested to him that he raise this with Channel 4's Andy Davies, but he said that Andy Davies didn't want to know. I would be interested to know how such news blackouts occur, because I've suspected them before. There is a system of 'D-notices', by which the Government makes it known that a certain issue may be voluntarily avoided by the press, but that there may be consequences if they ignore it. Is there a D-notice on the Olympics arrangements, or is there some other censureship process at work? Is the D-notice system being abused? If so, how should journalists fight back? If Tony Farrell of the South Yorkshire Police can stand up to authority in defending his obligation to report things to his bosses that they don't want to hear,then could there be some journalists who would be prepared to take a similar stance in the mainstream media? Do Russia Today and Aljazeera come under the D-notice system, or would they get banned, as Iran's Press TV did?

A week earlier, a Darlington data entry clerk turned whistleblower was sacked by G4S after having told ITV's North-East Tonight programme of the shambles at the G4S offices in Thornaby, near Stockton. She told the programme that staff were cutting corners while screening security workers applying for jobs at the London Olympics. Sarah Hubble told viewers: "It was an absolute shambles - you had people vetting potential employees who had not been vetted themselves". She said that her experiences had prompted her to pursue a career in journalism. "I got a taste of what journalism could be like and I loved every single second of it, so much so that I want more," she said. This was reported in the Northern Echo on 2nd June 2012 and reached the Daily Mail. This story ties up with Lee Hazledean's story. It seems, though, that since then, some sort of notice, perhaps a D-notice - would have been issued to the press, enforcing censureship on such stories in the future. Best of luck with Sarah Hubble in her journalistic career.

An excellent commentary with links on these two stories is provided on Tony Gosling's 9/11 forum.

"Unless this story is broken in a newspaper or foreign news agency it's unlikely to see the light of day", says the write-up on the Friday Drivetime website. Let's try to help that along. Send your friends the links. Possibly copy the interview on to an audio CD and pass it on. I sense that the army of talkers is growing. We all know that there is something fundamentally wrong. I can now walk into any pub and quickly find people who agree. Five years ago people thought that truthers were 'conspiracy theorists'; I had to be very guarded in talking about 9/11 and 7/7 and the impending economic gloom. But now the idea that we're being governed by a hidden government with its own agenda is becoming generally accepted. But there's still a long way to go.

We must encourage potential whistleblowers to speak out. Find out and speak out, and do keep Talking.

[acrobat74]

[acrobat74]

The World Trade Centre Mall appears to have been leased to the Westfield Group in May 2001.

Frank Lowy (Westfield boss) appears to be a business partner of Larry Silverstein:

http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/september-eleven/insuran ce-scam.htm


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mall_at_the_World_Trade_Center

[Hopper]

Please note that a section of the London Underground was closed off for 24 hours, between 6 and 7 June due to a burst pipe. For details see the following articles:

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/06/07/central-line-flooded-two-mi llion-litres-water-london-olympis_n_1576821.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012/jun/07/olympics-2012-tube-flood-l ondon

What is extremely disturbing about this event, as one particular video points out (see link below) is that the section of the underground that was closed off during this period just happens to be that which runs right under the Olympics complex!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1mUDLoJ5Ink

It is very possible that 'they' will have access to nuclear bombs, given that it is known that up to nine nuclear bombs over the last few years have gone missing! For details on this please check David Chase Taylor’s site, The Nuclear Bible: nuclearbible.com.

I’ve also stumbled across reports of a 500 kiloton nuclear bomb that went missing in May of this year:

http://www.disclose.tv/news/500_Kiloton_German_Hydrogen_Bomb_Goes_Miss ing/84932

[scienceplease 2]

Before mentioning missing German nuclear weapons, you'd have to convince me that Germany has nuclear weapons... its not like you can start manufacturing at the back of our Volkswagon factory.

This is the story of UK's AWE: http://www.awe.co.uk/aboutus/our_history_f77a4.html

Development in Germany is unlikely to have been kept secret. This is the official position: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germany_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction

[TonyGosling]

Anarchist Group Allied to CIA’s Red Brigades Plan London Olympics Terror
http://counterpsyops.com/2012/05/28/anarchist-group-allied-to-cias-red -brigades-plan-london-olympics-terror/
By Kurt Nimmo, Infowars.com
An anarchist group is threatening to disrupt the London Olympics with terrorist attacks. The Informal Anarchist Federation (or FAI, Federazione Anarchica Informale) warns it will engage in “guerrilla activity to hurt the national image and paralyze the economy however we can,” according to a post on the anarchist website 325.nostate.
The group claims it will target the Ministry of Defense, defense firms, and banks in Britain. “Finance, judicial, communications, military and transport infrastructure will continue to be targets of the new generation of urban low-intensity warfare.”
As we have reported numerous times, so-called anarchist groups are the preferred tool of the state when it plans to launch false flag attacks or unleash agents provocateurs to discredit demonstrations against the globalists and their “free trade” organizations.
The Informal Anarchist Federation is a classic Gladio cut-out organization. It was established in Italy and is allied with the New Red Brigades and the Communist Combatant Party. The original Red Brigades was a terrorist organization founded by Italian intelligence and the CIA. It was closely associated with the Hyperion Language School in Paris, a CIA outfit. See Andrew Gavin Marshall, Operation Gladio: CIA Network of “Stay Behind” Secret Armies.
Since 2003, the Gladio FAI has targeted European Union institutions. It has mailed threatening letters to politicians, including Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi, and parcel bombs that exploded at the Swiss and Chilean embassies in Rome.
In 2011, the FAI claimed responsibility for a bomb that exploded at a Swiss nuclear industry association, injuring two people. In December of that year, a mail bomb was sent to the CEO of Deutsche Bank in Frankfurt.
Earlier this year, the FAI claimed responsibility for the shooting of an Italian executive at a nuclear company. In May, an FAI “affinity group” in Britain sabotaged railway signaling equipment, an incident that may be viewed as a precursor to violence planned for the Olympics.
The primary objective of Operation Gladio was to create a “strategy of tension” in Europe through terrorist bombings and assassinations which were then blamed on the so-called left. Gladio was run by the CIA’s P-2 lodge (short for Propaganda Due, a Masonic lodge). CIA director Allen Dulles was key in instituting Operation Gladio, and most of Gladio’s operations were financed by the CIA.
In Gladio, NATO’s Dagger at the Heart of Europe: The Pentagon-Nazi-Mafia Terror Axis, author Richard Cottrell documents how Gladio incorporated Nazis, fascists (including fascist elements of Italian intelligence), the Mob, and the military-industrial complex in its concerted effort to overthrow governments and sabotage political organizations in Europe.
Former Italian prime minister Giulio Andreotti insists Gladio was discontinued after the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc, but as any astute student of intelligence understands, covert operations that successfully neutralize enemies of the global elite are never retired.

Unleashing “anarchist” terrorists during the Olympics in London this summer will provide a sensationalistic pretext to further militarize police, put soldiers on the street, roll out a high-tech surveillance apparatus and promote and domesticate a war on terror that is designed to last indefinitely, or at least until the global elite have put the finishing touches on their police state and control grid.

[TonyGosling]

Okay - five minutes to go before the opening ceremony now.

Time to remind ourselves of this little event that happened during the Beijing opening ceremony& remind you to keep an eye on the news ticker in the corner.

South Ossetia, Georgia war provoked by NATO?
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=15451

[TonyGosling]

The London Organizing Committee of the Olympic Games, in preparation for cyber threats, has allocated an estimated $3.1 billion to spend on technology securitization alone.

Terrorists using blended attacks, which is the application of simultaneous destruction of physical targets, could be carried out as an attack on the Games and London. The security agents and military forces may be pulled in opposite directions to mitigate damage.

MI5, British internal counter-intelligence and security agency, will collaborate with the Secret Intelligence Service to focus on minimizing foreign threats.

Mainstream media is claiming that MI5 may have to worry about:

Organized plots hatched by al-Qaeda or affiliated jihadist groups.
An individual with an Islamist background intent on carrying out a “lone wolf” attack.
An attempt by a rogue Irish Republican group to do something attention-getting on the mainland.
Dissident groups from other countries who see an opportunity to strike at the head of a hated government while he is in London.
The “lone wolf” is being touted as the biggest threat to the Games. Islamic extremist, plants of al-Qaeda or other Irish dissidents could, according to Will Hartley, defense specialist at HIS Jane’s, who warns that the lone wolf “by definition, they are unpredictable and could be potentially motivated by any number of causes.” Hartley refers to “chatter” that specifies a target at the Games that militant Islamic online forums have revealed points to anarchists who represent a clear and obvious threat to the Games.
__
Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism. Our alternative news site is dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporately funded mainstream media. You can find us on our Facebook page.

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=40350

[Sabrewolf]

Mossad helps UK secure Olympics

Israeli secret service participates in drill that simulates 1972 terrorist attack on Jewish athletes in Munich

Yaniv Halili Published: 05.12.11, 10:27 / Israel News

Mossad officials participated in a security drill at London's Olympic Park last weekend.

A source at the British Cabinet told Yedioth Ahronoth that the drill simulated a terrorist attack on athletes, similar to the one that occurred in the Munich Olympics in 1972, when Palestinian terrorists took over the building where the Israeli delegation was staying, and killed 11 of them.

The UK's entire defense establishment, including the emergency services, participated in the massive drill, which was held secretly by the British Defense Ministry.

But British intelligence officials were not satisfied, and invited their Mossad counterparts to share their experience.

The drill simulated a scenario where athletes are held hostage by terrorists. A large part of the exercise took place inside the park's residential buildings, under live fire. The village was surrounded by guards who kept out onlookers.

A source at the British Olympic Association said that "certain Israeli elements are advising us on securing the Olympic games." Israel is considered an authority on urban warfare.

The UK has allocated nearly a billion dollars for the security of the athletic event – more than 10% of the event's budget.

Last weekend's drill is the first in a series exercises that are expected to take place in the coming month. The British defense establishment is also preparing to deal with attacks on other Olympic facilities and on the streets of London, which will be flooded with tourists come next July.


The Israeli Mossad helping out with the security matters at the 2012 London Olympics, cannot be a good sign.

[TonyGosling]

Hmmmmm strange convoy on Sunday

Link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFrXb1r88VQ

[scienceplease 2]

[Sabrewolf]

Since there was no false flag attack at the 2012 London Olympics, then that tells me that the London Olympics was nothing more than a diversionary tactic orchestrated by the Illuminati puppet-masters.

[Disco_Destroyer]

There was a bomb though, Batman and Robin appeared which I thought was odd, and Michael Cain said you're only supposed to blow the bloody doors off.
Oh yes Queen couldn't be bothered with the closing ceremony could she

[Sabrewolf]

I think that it is very possible that the Illuminati puppet-masters used the time during the London Olympics to not only distract but to possibly set up "something" for later this year for their puppet Barack Obama.

"Something" perhaps like a fake assassination attempt on Obama, or another 9/11 type of event in maybe in Chicago, or "?"

[timo]

Well, I have to say, I am glad nothing happened during the Olympic Games in London - of course the danger will always be there, and the people have to watch out - not only in London. But I am happy nothing happened - after all behind all the politics and strategies - it is all about people, young and old, boy and girl.

[Disco_Destroyer]

Don't forget we still have the Paralympics event ahead http://www.standard.co.uk/olympics/olympic-news/london-2012-paralympic s-transport-the-next-big-challenge-for-games-8068943.html

[fish5133]

[Disco_Destroyer]

Maybe the missiles are there to intercept Russian Missiles?
and they have nothing to do with the games