New book: 9/11 as Mass Ritual

[TonyGosling]

Dazed and Confused
http://themostdangerousbookintheworld.com/

“There are so many gaping holes in the official accounts of 9/11 that no plausible coherent narrative remains, and until now we have been staggering forward as if the truth about these traumatic events no longer mattered.” —Richard Falk, human rights lawyer. A Maze of Conspiracy Theories

There are so many conspiracy theories surrounding 9/11 that it’s impossible to keep track of them all, much less sort through and make any real sense of them. Which ones have possible merit? Which ones sound plausible, but have in fact been effectively debunked?

From the patently false statement that “nobody imagined that terrorists would use planes as weapons,” to suspicious insider trading in the weeks and days leading up to 9/11; from the inordinate number of military drills taking place on 9/11 (and a much-delayed response from the Air Force), to the unheeded warnings from multiple nations regarding suspiciously high levels of terrorist activity leading up to the event; from Bush family members in key positions in corporations responsible for providing security to the World Trade Center and Dulles Airport, to documented instances of the FBI failing to follow up on field agents’ warnings—there are in fact so many suspicious circumstances, unexplained anomalies, misleading statements (official and otherwise), and outright fabrications surrounding 9/11 (the detailed chronicling of which is far beyond the scope of this work) that it is easy to understand why a veritable 9/11-Conspiracy-Theory cottage industry has developed over the last ten-plus years.


http://www.trineday.com/paypal_store/product_pages/9781937584177-Most_ Dangerous_Book/index.html

“Set Up to Fail”

Millions of Americans—and concerned citizens around the globe—have serious questions about the events of 9/11, and why shouldn’t they, when even the individuals in charge of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, a.k.a. the 9/11 Commission, have no confidence in the process or its outcome, The 9/11 Commission Report.

Thomas Kean, former Republican Governor of New Jersey, was the Commission Chairman, and Lee H. Hamilton, former Democratic U.S. Representative from the 9th District of Indiana, was its Vice-Chairman.

Months after the commission issued its report and ceased functioning, Chairman Kean and other commissioners toured the country to draw attention to their recommendations, claiming that some of their findings and suggestions were being ignored. Co-chairs Kean and Hamilton subsequently co-authored a book about the constraints they faced as commissioners, entitled Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission.

Released in 2006, the book chronicles their work, and in it, they charge that the 9/11 Commission was “set up to fail,” writing that the commission became so frustrated with repeated misstatements by Pentagon and Federal Aviation Administration officials during the course of the investigation that it considered a separate investigation into possible obstruction of justice by these officials.

John Farmer, Jr., senior counsel to the Commission, stated that the Commission “discovered that...what government and military officials had told Congress, the Commission, the media, and the public about who knew what when—was almost entirely, and inexplicably, untrue.” Farmer continues: “At some level of the government, at some point in time… there was a decision not to tell the truth about what happened.... The (NORAD) tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public.” Commission head Kean concurred: “We to this day don’t know why NORAD told us what they told us, it was just so far from the truth.”
More Questions Than Answers

Former high-level officials have made serious allegations concerning the involvement of elements within U.S. intelligence agencies.

Richard Clarke, who was the White House counter-terrorism czar at the time of the attacks, has accused the CIA of deliberately suppressing information before 9/11, information that might have prevented the attacks. Clarke claimed: “There was a high-level decision in the CIA ordering people not to share information.” And who made this decision? “I would think it would have been made by the director (George Tenet).”

Similar accusations have been leveled at federal law enforcement. According to various sources, no fewer than 14 countries attempted to warn the U.S. about the impending attacks, to no avail. Then there’s Robert Wright, the top bin Laden financial tracker at the FBI’s Chicago office, who through tears of frustration and anger told a National Press Club audience, “The FBI allowed 9/11 to happen.” Come again? “FBI management intentionally and repeatedly thwarted and obstructed my investigations into Middle Eastern terrorist financing.”

And what could explain the lack of an effective response by the military, the Air Force, in particular, on 9/11? According to Webster Griffin Tarpley, the morning of September 11 saw “the greatest density of drills in US military history.” With names like ‘Vigilant Guardian’, there were reportedly up to 46 military exercises taking place—some involving scenarios uncannily similar to the actual events that would unfold that day (a happenstance that would be repeated in the London 7/7 bombings)—which diverted resources, manpower and attention away from the real threats and resulted in understandably considerable levels of confusion as the actual attacks unfolded.

A range of foreign officials have also questioned the official government version of the events of 9/11.

Andreas von Bülow, a Social Democratic Party member of the German parliament from 1969 to 1994, was on the parliamentary committee on intelligence services, a group that has access to classified information. Von Bülow was also a member of the Schalck-Golodkowski investigation committee which investigates white-collar crime. He has estimated that inside trader profits surrounding 9/11 totaled approximately $15 billion. Von Bülow told The Daily Telegraph “If what I say is right, the whole US government should end up behind bars.” Further, he said, “They have hidden behind a veil of secrecy and destroyed the evidence…they invented the story of 19 Muslims working within Osama bin Laden’s al Qaeda in order to hide the truth of their own covert operation.” He also said, “I’m convinced that the US apparatus must have played a role and my theory is backed up by the [Washington] government’s refusal to present any proof whatsoever of what happened.”

With domestic intelligence, defense, and law enforcement agencies like these, who the hell needs foreign enemies? Well, one could rightly point out that these agencies do—and one might also point to volumes of evidence that they go to great lengths to ensure the existence of aggressive, well-motivated and sufficiently-funded adversaries…all the better to justify their enormous budgets and scare the pants off the civilian population.

Is it even possible to determine if there were indeed conspirators within our own government, and, if so, their identities? Repeated calls for a new official investigation have been ignored—not that anyone should expect to have any more confidence in the results of a new investigation than the original one. Is there, then, a path on which to proceed, an explanatory framework that can help us make sense of all this?
Psych Warfare

What if the ongoing confusion surrounding 9/11, and the persistent lack of clarity ten years on, is not the residual result of the “fog of war,” but rather compelling evidence of something altogether different—psychological warfare.

The U.S. Department of Defense defines psychological warfare as “the planned use of propaganda and other psychological actions having the primary purpose of influencing the opinions, emotions, attitudes, and behavior of hostile foreign groups in such a way as to support the achievement of national objectives.” However, psychological warfare tactics can be employed by any adversary against any opponent or intended target, including a domestic population, for instance. Such as in Orwell’s dystopian novel, 1984.

In their article “9/11, Psychological Warfare & the American Narrative,” authors Elizabeth Gould and Paul Fitzgerald write that “the state’s use of psychological warfare to bend the population to war is as old, if not older than the existence of states themselves.” They continue, “But it was perhaps Nazi Reichsmarschall Hermann Goering whose statement while on trial at Nuremberg best summed up the cynical simplicity of the logic:

Of course people don’t want war. But after all, it’s the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it’s always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it’s a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders, that is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to greater danger.

Gould and Fitzgerald explain that “psychological warfare in the form of propaganda comes in all shapes and sizes as well as shades of black, grey or white.” The United States government’s coordinated use of psychological warfare on its own citizens “began in earnest during World War II and ever since has grown and expanded into public relations, advertising, cinema, radio and television, electronic video games and now social media. Its pro-war boosterism extends over sports, religion, education, news and entertainment (and of course the military) to form a seamless electronic cocoon-like web.”

Gould and Fitzgerald conclude that psych warfare “is employed on an ever growing list of those deemed as enemies of America as well as on a confused and agitated American public—whose corporate news networks frame and manage an increasingly shallow narrative while engaging in a kind of Orwellian Kabuki Theatre of fairness and balance.” Could this be an accurate assessment of what is taking place within our country, and, if so, does it help explain what happened on 9/11?



In his book, Psychological Warfare and the New World Order, Servando Gonzalez confirms this suspicion, describing “a long, protracted war against the American people. It is not a conventional war waged with tanks, battleships and planes in conventional battlefields—at least not yet.” Gonzalez continues, “It is a secret, insidious type of war whose main battleground is the people’s minds. Its main weapons are propaganda and mass brainwashing mostly by using disinformation, deception, and lies in a large scale not used against the people of a nation since the end of Nazi Germany. Though important, those elements are just part of a series of carefully planned and executed long- and short-term psychological warfare operations. In synthesis, it is a psychological war.”
A 9/11 Black Op?

9/11 is often referred to by conspiracy theorists as a “false flag” operation, which are covert operations designed to deceive a target population in such a way that it appears as though the action is being carried out by an entity other than the one actually responsible. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, but are also used in peace-time.

False flag events are a type of black operation (op, for short), a covert action typically involving activities that are highly clandestine and often outside of standard military protocol or even against the law. Black ops missions often fit into the plausible deniability category, in which there is no claim of responsibility for the action, and/or a false flag operation is used to give the appearance that another actor was responsible. Black ops frequently involve extensive arrangements so as to be able to hide the fact that the black operation ever occurred.

The methods used in black operations are also used in unconventional warfare, in which civilian populations and political parties are targeted directly. Black ops may include such things as assassination, sabotage, extortion, spying on allied countries or one’s own citizens, kidnapping, supporting resistance movements, torture, use of fraud to obtain funds, use of child soldiers, human experimentation, trafficking in contraband items, as well as false flag operations.


We instinctively reject such conclusions, even if they are supported by solid evidence. However, we must have the courage to let the evidence tell the story, because, as the reader will learn, what is at stake is not simply our view of reality. Whether or not our worldview is challenged, or shattered, by the revelations in this material, doesn’t change the truth of the matter, which is that the conspiracy that generated 9/11 is real, that it is ongoing—and that September 11, 2001, was just a prelude to what they have planned for 2012/2013.
What to Expect

As serious a topic as this is, however, don’t expect a dry, academic discourse  in the pages that follow. The script for the 9/11 MegaRitual is dripping with the dark humor of its occult authors, and even if one wanted to, there’d be no way to write about it in a serious fashion. What ensues might be compared to a combination of The DaVinci Code and an episode of South Park; unfortunately, it is neither fiction nor fantasy.

Author’s Note: Those unfamiliar with the concept of a “New World Order,” the “Illuminati,” or Freemasonry may want to refer to Appendix A on page 163.
Read 8 times
Last modified on Wednesday, 12 September 2012 02:08

http://themostdangerousbookintheworld.com/index.php/hot-articles/item/ 14-introduction


Copyright © TrineDay LLC