Any UK Construction Professionals into 911 truth

[fish5133]

After watching 9/11 Blueprint for Truth with Richard Gage, American Architect it dawned on me that perhaps their may be an avenue of campaigning under the banner of a UK architects and engineers for 911 truth or something similar.
I have emailed the Royal Institution of British Architects. The Institution of Civil Engineers and the Institute of Struct Engineers for some leads if any.
Wondering if anyone else on this forum may have some Construction clout
cheers
fish5133
ex ARICS

[scubadiver]

I have sent letters to the

Institute of Mechanical Engineers
Institute of Civil Engineers
Institution of Chemical Engineers
Royal Institute of British Architects
Institute of Demolition Engineers
Institute of Physics

as well as Sir Norman Foster.

[ian neal]

I have contacts in the UK engineering world. Back 2006 DVD's and a letter were sent to all the UK fire engineers we could find and all the participants at an ICE conference on the implications of WTC collapses on fire engineering/safety. They may or may not have watched the DVD but none of them contacted me.

Here are some contacts

http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=1934&highlight=engine ers#1934

[fish5133]

Nice one guys i am obviously a couple of years behind the times
Might try a local showing of Richard Gage dvd targeted at local Architects and Engineers practices. DVd doesnt appear to have copyright so may get the burner out and drop copies off.

[scienceplease]

[scubadiver]

[scienceplease]

[Snowygrouch]

Engineering professionals are called "professionals" because they graduate with sufficient credit (or take some extra exams) to get "Chartered Engineer" status. Usually they will be members of the IMECHE (institute of mechanical engineers).

The IMECHE is heavily integrated into the corporate "system" and as such is immessurably unlikely to be interested as they are probably ultra conservative and super paranoid about their "reputation".

Individuals may be interested but these 'governing bodies' do a pretty good job of keeping the good old status quo in place.

However you never know, and trying is always much better than saying "it wont work". So ignore my post and try anyway!

Calum

[scubadiver]

Institute of Mechanical Engineers

http://www.imeche.org/

Office of the President and the Chief Executive
Institution of Mechanical Engineers
1 Birdcage Walk
Westminster
London
SW1H 9JJ

Institution of Chemical Engineers

http://www.icheme.org/

Institution of Chemical Engineers
One Portland Place
London
W1B 1PN


Institute of Civil Engineers

http://www.ice.org.uk/

One Great George Street
Westminster
London
SW1P 3AA.


RIBA Council

Link

Royal Institute of British Architects
Portland Place
London
W1B 1AD



Institute of Demolition Engineers

http://www.ide.org.uk/

Institute of Demolition Engineers
69 Poplicans Road
Rochester
Kent
ME2 1EJ


Institute of Physics

http://www.iop.org/

Institute of Physics
76 Portland Place
London W1B 1NT
UK


Foster + Partners

press@fosterandpartners.com

Riverside
22 Hester Road
London
SW11 4AN
United Kingdom

[magnus alexander rawstron]

ive worked in construction and demolition and i know steel cutters dont cut from A to B via the longest route, but in 9/11 conspiracy videos i like many other people saw the lower floor upright supports of the towers inner core cut by something that went from A to B via the longest diagonal route possible, and that route also being the same route demolition practice takes. Diagonal cuts in upright supports to make the upper building shift/jump sideways off its own supporting lower floor supports.
sceptics to the conspiracies have their say on the net by saying steel workers cut them stanchions after the towers fell, but that cant be correct because steel/metal cutters dont cut the longest, slowest route and work even faster on a job like wtc.
There had to be a complete failure of the inner core of each tower to make them both fall but there was no evidence to suggest the planes caused that damage.
and osama bin laden was a construction expert, thats where he made his millions, if he was responsible why didnt he target the load bearing lower floor sections? A construction expert wanting to cause as much death and destruction as possible would have done his homework on the building and then targeted the bottom floors so to guarantee immediate tower collapse and no survivors, possibly even pulling the building down on a pivot to fall into other buildings.
Whoever did WTC they knew they wouldnt fail and knew they didnt have to try hard.

[fish5133]

Thanks magnus for that contribution. The photo of the steel column with a shaped cutter charge cut is IMO a huge piece of evidence. So huge that my natural skepticism wonders why the first responders seem to not have commented about it. This has led me to wonder if the photo is faked or that the steel column was cut during the rescue or clearance operations to perhaps remove high level steel that was dangerous to rescue workers.
Yet to come across much info about the clearance operation.Just working my way through Frank Gayles NIST metallurgist findings .

[Pikey]

Missed this thread. I had a bash at this; check out:-

http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=629&highlight=denise+ chevin

The latest letter was never published. They did send me a free " Building" pen and PC memory stick though

Also Tom Broughton's name was removed from the editorial team listed in the mag. . No doubt he got a bollocking for printing a letter on the subject and allowing his conscience to get the better of him and failing to apply the usual gatekeeping/censorship practiced by the MSM.

[fish5133]

Thanks for your link Pikey to earlier posts 2005/2006. I dont think i was a born again 911 truther then.
Used to read Building magazine avidly (usually the Jobs pages)
Will drop them a line with Richard Gages Architects and Engineers website details

www.ae911truth.org

[Pikey]

[Blace_01]

Nice post !